Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
OF
BANGALORE UNIVERSITY
By
RAJANI
CH
the
Guidence of
Mr.PRAKASH
BORAH
Date-25th February
Mr. Prasanna
Place- Bangalore
H.R. Executive
Affiliated to
CERTIFICATE
INTERNAL GUIDE
PRINCIPAL
HOD
Affiliated to
Bangalore University (Managed by
M.G.Charitable Trust)
(NO.147, Bidrehalli, Virgonagar (po), Bangalore -560049 PH: 08028473777)
CERTIFICATE
BY THE GUIDE
PLACE: BANGALORE
THE GUIDE
NAME SIGNATURE OF
Affiliated to
Bangalore University (Managed by
M.G.Charitable Trust)
(NO.147,Bidrehalli, Virgonagar (po),Bangalore -560049 PH:08028473777)
DECLARATION
I do Here by Declare that the Study
Entitled working conditions of the employees
At IFB Industries in Bangalore. Submitted to
Bangalore University in partial fulfillment of the
Requirements for the award of the Degree of
Bachelor of Business Management is a record
of confide and independent project work
carried out by myself under the guidance and
Affiliated to
Bangalore University (Managed by
M.G.Charitable Trust)
( NO.147,Bidrehalli, Virgonagar (po),Bangalore -560049 PH:08028473777)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I utilize the opportunity to express my heartfelt thanks to sri.
S. m.venkatpathi ,chairman, East Point Group of Institutions,
Bangalore, for providing me an opportunity to study in this
esteemed organization.
My special words of thanks to Dr.Roopa T. N,Principal of East
Point College of Higher Education , Prof.S. Gopalakrishanan,
Vice principal , Department of Management Sciences and
Prof.Chaya Devi H.B HOD Of Management Science who
PLACE: Bangalore
DATE:
12XCC24059
NAME: RAJANI C H
REGISTER NUMBER:
LIST OF CONTENTS
CHAPTE
R
Chapter :
1
INTRODUCTION
overview
PARTICULARS
PAG
E
NO:
@
*
@
*
*
Chapter :
2
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter :
3
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter :
4
Chapter :
5
Chapter :
6
Chapter :
7
Chapter :
8
ABOUT INDUSTRY
Brief History
ABOUT SUBJECT
Definition of the terms Used
Importence & otheraspects of the subject or study
RESEARCH STUDY
Title of the study
Statement of the Problem
Objectives Of the study
Scope of the study
Semping
Methodologuy
Plan of Analysis;
Limitations of the study
COMPANY PROPFILE
Inception
Type
Nature
Board of Directors
Organisation Charts
DATA ANALTSIS AND INTERPRETATION
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
CONCLUSION:
APPENDICES AND ANNEXURE :
BIBLOGRAPHY:
THE
HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION;
As we enter a new millennium one could be forgiven for
thinking that with all the attendant media type and the
BRIEF HISTORY
2002 IFB Industries ltd has informed that the Board of Directors
of the company at meeting held on June 20, 2002 have approved
the Scheme of reduction in the share Capital of the Company
subject to the Shareholders At the ensuing Annual General
Meeting and Confirmation by the Honble High Court at Kolkata
and sanctions of any other authority if necessary.
2008 IFB Industries it has informed that Board of Directors of the
company at its meeting held on October 31, 2008 has inducted
Mr. Bikranjit Nag in the Board and appointed him as Joint.
Executive Chairman and Managing Director of the company.
Data show that health and social services play an important role
in employment growth, according to the Second Biennial Report
on SSGI, employment in the health and social services sector
grew much faster than in other sectors of the economy, 21.4
million people who were employed in health and social services in
2009 and the health and social services sector generates around
5% of the total economic output in the EU-27.
From 2000 to 2009 total employment in in the health and social
service sector in the EU registered a 4.2 million increase.
Also, in terms of employment, among Services of General
Interest, health and social services are the largest sector,
representing 33% of SGI and employing 20,5 million employees.
Due to demographic reasons and change in family patterns
increasing numbers of people will need health care or social care
for increasing amounts of time: this is a key driver of the growing
Salary/Benefits
Job Security/Advancement
Working conditions
If you own a company in the Netherlands you must ensure a
healthy and safe work place for all your personnel, including
temporary personnel. If you outsource work, for example to a
subcontractor, you must also ensure a healthy and safe work
place for the subcontractor's workers. A healthy and safe work
place includes:
Work place and equipment
Physical and psychological stress
Substances, radiation and contagion
You are obliged to record details of the occupational hazards
and corresponding countermeasures in a risk inventory and
evaluation
health facility
general welfare programmes
economic welfare
labour welfare programmes
medical care
pention
drinking water
canteen facility
rest rooms
lighting facility
PLAN OF ANALYSIS;
The data collected with the help of the questionnaire is
tabulated and
Analyzed. Statistical tools like percentages, mean scores, pie
charts and graphs
Will be used for easy understanding of the data collected.
Inference will be
Made based on the analysis.
The analysis of the results of the questionnaire helps us to gain an
understanding
About the perceptions, of employees views and satisfaction level
of the
Employees of the organization towards the system, it also helps in
identifying
Whether the organization promotes a good culture for effective
performance
Inception
IFB Industries Limited originally known as Indian Fine Blanks
Limited started their operations in India during 1974 in
collaboration with Hienrich Schmid AG of Switzerland. The
product range includes Fine Blanked components, tools and
related machine tools like Straighteners, Decoilers, Strip
loaders and others.
The Engineering divisions are located at Kolkata & Bangalore.
The Bangalore unit, apart from Fine Blanked components,
manufactures motors for White goods as well as Automotive
applications.
TYPE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
millions of Indian households use IFB products, making us one of the most
trusted home appliances brands in the country. Our service network of 250
franchises and 2,200 service engineers ensures we deliver exceptional service
across the country.
NATURE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Name/Title
Managing Director
Executive Director
Radharaman
Bhattacharya, 80Independent Director
Tridibesh Dinesh
Mukherjee, 73Independent Director
All Executives
Dipak MitraPresident-Legal
ORGANIZATION CHART
TABEL - 1
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
No
Comments
1
4
13
33
17
Percentag
e
1
6
19
47
24
Interpretation:
From the above table and chart it is clear that, 24 percent of the employees
are extremely satisfied with there sBU as a place to work, 47 percent of the
employees are satisfied, 19 percent say that they are neither satisfied nor
dissatisfied, the rest 7 percent are not satisfied.
Inference:
It is inferred that the majority of the respondents are satisfied with there sBU
as a place to work and the rest respondents are not satisfied.
GRAPH : 1
4 = satisfied; 47%
TABEL - 2
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
No
Comments
1
5
6
22
33
Percentag
e
1
7
9
31
48
4
Interpretation:
From the above table and chart it is clear that, 48 percent of the employees
Strongly agree that they know what is expected of them at work and the
rest 31 percent of the employee agree, 9 percent say that they neither
agree nor disagree, 7 percent say they dis agree and the rest say no
comments.
Inference:
It is inferred that the majority of the respondents know what is expected
from them in their work place and some of the respondents doesnt know
what is expected from them.
GRAPH : 2
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
4% 1% 7%
9%
48%
31%
Q3. I have the materials and equipments that I need to do my work right ?
TABEL - 3
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
No
Comments
3
4
16
26
20
Percentag
e
4
6
23
37
29
1
Interpretation:
From the above table and chart it is clear that, 29 percent of the employees
say they have the materials and equipments that they need for doing work,
37% say they agree that they have the materials and equipments, 23
percent say they nether agree nor disagree, 6 percent of te employees say
they disagree and strongly disagree and the rest say no comments.
Inference:
It is inferred that the majority of the respondents have the materials and the
equipments needed for doing the work right and some of the respondents
say they dont have the materials and the equipments to do the work right.
GRAPH : 3
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
1% 4% 6%
29%
23%
37%
TABEL - 4
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
No
Comments
2
3
16
21
24
Percentag
e
3
4
23
30
34
6
Interpretation:
From the above table and chart it is clear that, 34 percent of the employees
strongly agree that they have the opportunity to do what they do best every
day and 30 percent agree to the same,23 percent say they neither agree nor
disagree, 4 percent and 3 percent of the employees say the they disagree
and strongly disagree.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it is inferred that the majority of the
respondents have the opportunity to do what they do best every day and
some of them say they dont have the opportunity to do what they do best
every day.
GRAPH : 4
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
6%
3% 4%
23%
34%
30%
Q5. In the last seven days, I have received recognition or praise for doing
good work.
TABEL 5
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
4
8
20
16
12
No
Comments
Interpretation:
From the above chart and table 27% and 23% of the employees say that
strongly agree and just agree that they get recognition or praise for doing
good work and 29% of them say they neither agree and the 6% and 14% say
they disagree and strongly disagree and the rest say no comments.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it is said 50% of the employees get recognition
or praise for doing the good work and some say they dont get the
recognition or praise for doing good work.
GRAPH : 5
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
14%
6%
11%
17%
29%
23%
TABEL 6
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
3
1
18
21
26
No
Comments
Interpretation:
From the above data it is said 38% of the employees feel that some one at
work seems to care them as a person 30% of the employees agree, 1% say
they disagree,4% say they strongly disagree and the 26% say they neither
agree disagree.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it is inferred that the majority of the m fell that
some one at work seems to care about them as a person and some say no
one care for them as a person
GRAPH : 6
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
1% 4%
1%
38%
30%
26%
TABEL 7
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
4
7
18
22
19
No
Comments
Interpretation:
From the above chart it is interpreted that 27% of the respondents feel that
someone at work encourages their development and 31% of them agree to
the same. And 26% disagree and 10% strongly disagree because they dont
feel so and 26% neither agree nor disagree.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it is inferred that 58% of the them feel that
they are encouraged for their development and say they are not encouraged.
GRAPH : 7
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
6%
27%
10%
26%
31%
TABEL 8
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
1
4
16
29
19
No
Comments
Interpretation:
Form the above chart is can be interpreted that 27% of the respondents
strongly agree that their opinion seem to count and 42% agree to it and 1%
of the employees disagree and strongly disagree that at work, their opinion
seems to count and 23% say they neither agree nor disagree.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it can inferred that majority of the m feel that
at work, their opinion seems to count and say some say their opinion doesnt
count.
GRAPH : 8
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
1%1% 6%
27%
23%
42%
TABEL 9
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
0
10
13
24
22
No
Comments
Interpretation:
It can be interpreted that31% of the employee they strongly agree that the
mission purpose of akzonobel make them feel them that their job is
important, 35% of them agree, 14% say they disagree, 19% they neither
agree nor disagree.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it can be inferred that the majority of the
employees feel that the mission purpose of akzonobel make them feel that
their job is important andsome say they disagree to it
GRAPH : 9
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
1%
14%
31%
19%
35%
TABEL 10
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
2
7
16
30
14
No
Comments
Interpretation:
From the chart it can be interpreted that 20% of the employees strongly
agree that their associates are committed to doing quality work, and 43% of
the employees agree, 10% of the employees say they disagree and 3% of
them they strongly disagree and the 23% of them say no comments.
Inference:
From the above interpretations it is inferred that the majority of the
employees feel that their associates are committed to doing quality work and
some say no to that.
GRAPH : 10
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
20%
1% 3%
10%
23%
43%
TABEL 11
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
4
6
18
18
18
No
Comments
Interpretation:
From the above chart it is interpreted that 23% of the respondents say they
strongly agree that they have best friend at work, 25% of them say agree,
9% say they disagree, 6% say they strongly disagree that have a best
friend at work 265 say they neither agree nor disagree.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it can be concluded that 505 of the
respondents feel that they have a best friend at work and some say they
dont have.
GRAPH : 11
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
9%
6%
9%
25%
26%
25%
TABEL 12
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
11
7
16
12
19
No
Comments
Interpretation:
From the above chart it can be Interpreted that 27% of the employees say
they strongly agree that some one at work talked to them about progress,
17% say they agree, 10% , 16% say they disagree and strongly disagree
that some one at work talked to them about their progress. And 23% of
them say they neither agree nor disagree.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it is concluded that majority of them feel that
some one at work talked to them about their progress and some they dont
agree to it and the rest 23% neither agree nor disagree.
GRAPH : 12
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
7%
16%
27%
10%
17%
23%
TABEL 13
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
2
10
17
16
18
No
Comments
Interpretation:
It can be interpreted from the above chart that 26% of the employees say
they strongly agree that they had opportunities at work to learn and grow,
23% agree for the same, and 14% , 3% say they disagree and strongly
disagree that had opportunities at work to learn and grow , and the rest 24%
say that they neither agree nor disagree.
Inference:
It inferred from the above interpretation that half of the employees feel that
they had the opportunities at work to learn and grow , and some say they
had opportunity at work to learn and grow.
GRAPH : 13
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
10%
3%
14%
26%
24%
23%
looking
for a
meaningful
TABEL 14
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
6
3
12
28
21
No
Comments
Interpretation:
It can be interpreted that 30% of the employees strongly agree that they will
recommend akzonobel to other looking for a meaningful career, 40% agree
for the same, 4% , 9% disagree and strongly disagree that they will
recommend akzonobel to others looking for a meaningful career.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it can be inferred that majority of them say
they will recommend akzonobel to others looking for a meaningful career
and some say they dont.
GRAPH : 14
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
9%
30%
4%
17%
40%
now , I see
myself continuing to
work for
TABEL 15
No of
Respondents
Frequency
1
2
3
4
5
7
5
13
20
20
No
Comments
Interpretation:
From the above chart it is interpreted that 28% of the employees strongly
agree and 29% of the employees agree that two years from now they see
themselves continuing to work for their sBU/ company, 7%, 10% of them
say they disagree and strongly disagree that two years from now see
themselves continuing to work for their sBU/company.
Inference:
From the above interpretation it can be inferred that majority of themwill
continue tio work for their sBU/company and some say they wont.
GRAPH : 15
1 = Strongly disagree or totally
2 = dissatisfied or mostiy failse
3 = neither satisfied nor disagree or true half of the time and not true the rest of the time
4 = Agree or mostly true
5 = Strongly agree or almost always true
Na = Not Applicable/don't
7%
10%
7%
28%
19%
29%
CONCLUSION
The Research Study Entitled The Study on Organization Climate
focusing on Employee Engagement & HR Effectiveness highlights
the benefits of the organization and the employees. In general the
benefits of the organization climate include: employee
engagement, communication, HR effectiveness, and Profitable
organization.
Specifically, the Benefits can be : more positive feeling towards
ones self
( greater Self-esteem), more Positive towards
one job ( improved job satisfaction and involvement), more
positive feeling towards the organization (Stronger commitment
to the organization goals ), improved physical and psychological
health, greater growth and development of the individual as a
productive member of the individual as a person and as a
productive member of the organization, higher quality and
quantity of the output of goods and services.
Hackman and Suttle present six strategies which have frequently
been used for improving Quality of work life in Organizational
settings. These are
The development of careers path
Work design
Organizational rewards system
Design and maintenance of group and inter group relationship
Managerial practices
Internal and external strategies for change
About You:
Name (Optional):
ifb/Department:
Functional Area:
Production
Finance /IT
Quality
Support
Others
4 or less than 6
8 or more years
A+
Do not know
List of books ,
Employee welfare and social security-pallavi
Dinesh.N