Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
e-Governance in Municipalities
Contents
Abbreviations & Acronyms _____________________________________________ 1
List of Tables ________________________________________________________ 3
Preface _____________________________________________________________ 5
General Instructions for DPR Preparation_________________________________ 7
1.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
2.
2.1
Goals ____________________________________________________________ 11
2.2
Benefits __________________________________________________________ 11
2.3
Objectives ________________________________________________________ 12
2.4
3.
3.1
Overview _________________________________________________________ 15
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
4.2.5
4.2.6
4.2.7
4.2.8
4.2.9
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.3.1
5.3.3
5.4
5.5
5.5.1
5.5.2
5.5.3
5.6
Knowledge Management____________________________________________ 37
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
Stakeholders Involvement___________________________________________ 53
9.2
Institutional Structure______________________________________________ 53
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
10
10.1
10.2
10.3
11
Annexures ____________________________________________________ 62
11.1
11.2
11.3
Description
ACA
BOM
Bill of Material
CBOs
CEO
CSC
CSMC
D2D
Department to Department
DPR
G2B
Government to Business
G2C
Government to Citizen
G2G
Government to Government
HR
Human Resources
ICT
JNNURM
MeDD
MIS
MMPs
MoUD
NeGP
NGOs
NMMP
POP
Point of Presence
PPP
RWAs
SDC
Description
State e-Governance Mission Team
State Implementation Consultant
SLNA
SLSC
SLSS
SMART
SWAN
ULB
M&E
List of Tables
Table
Number
Description
Classification of ULBs
10
11
12
Benefits Perceived
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Stakeholder Identification
Table
Number
Description
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Stakeholder Involvement
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Preface
The Government of India has formulated the National e Governance Plan (NeGP), part of
which includes a National Mission Mode Programme (NMMP) for e Governance in
Municipalities. This NMMP intends to roll out e-Governance in Municipalities on a nationwide basis and has now been included as a part of the Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal
Mission (JNNURM). National Mission Mode Project (NMMP) on e-Governance in
Municipalities envisages covering Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) in 35 mission cities identified.
e-Governance in Municipalities is expected to:
Focus on clearly identified list of citizen services that would be covered with clearly
laid down service levels and outcomes that would be achieved.
Improve efficiency and effectiveness in interaction between local-government and its
citizens and other stakeholders (i.e. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs),
community based organizations (CBOs), residents welfare associations (RWAs),
private sector, etc);
Improve quality of internal local-government operations to support and stimulate
good governance;
Bring about transparency and accountability in the governance of urban local bodies;
Enhance interface between urban local bodies and citizens; and
Help improve delivery of services to citizens.
Following are the services / management functions that will be covered in the first phase of
the project, as provided in e-Governance guidelines of JNNURM as in Table 1
Table 1: List of identified eight services
S.No.
S.No.
2.1
Property Tax
2.2
Building Approvals
5.1
e-Procurement
5.2
Health Programs
6.1
Licenses
6.2
Accounting System
The SLNA/ ULB will prepare Detailed Project Report (DPR) for development of State Level
Software Solution (SLSS) of e-Governance in municipalities to be covered under the Mission
Mode Project on e-Governance. This document provides reference format and guidelines for
preparing State Level DPR for e-Governance project in ULBs. This document has been
prepared in reference to Municipal e-Governance Design Document (MeDD) prepared by
MoUD, guidelines for preparation of DPR by Ministry of Information Technology (MIT), eGovernance guidelines under JNNURM etc.
DPR for state level solution shall be prepared and submitted by selected ULB along
with the state (SLNA).
The state level DPR will cover design, development, implementation and roll-out of
the state level software solution (SLSS) including O&M for 2 years.
The DPR will also include the IT infrastructure requirements & application
customization requirements for selected ULB, in order to avail the services from
SLSS.
The DPR shall also indicate the capacity building requirements for state and selected
ULB.
The DPR shall be appraised by SLNA at state level as per checklist attached at
Annexure-1 and the approval note should be accompanied with DPR.
The DPR is to take into account the various open standards published/ being
published by GOI under NeGP (http://egovstandards.gov.in)
Further feedback and suggestions for improving the DPR Preparation Toolkit are
welcome and may be suggested to the MoUD.
The title of the project should describe the proposed services to be provided under the project,
period and location of implementation and any other critical aspects.
1.2
The DPR should mention in this section if the proposed state falls under the purview of
JNNURM Mission Mode Projects.
1.3
All the DPRs will follow the funding pattern as per JNNURM Guidelines.
Table 2: Project Funding Criteria
S.No.
Category of Cities
Grants
Central State
plus
35%
15%
50%
50%
20%
30%
1.4
Permissible Components
1.5
Project Phases
In this section, the DPR shall clearly mention all the phases of the Project and implementation
in addition to a strategy for carrying out the activities of various phases in detail.
1.5.1
Pilot Phase
In this section, the DPR shall define a road map/ strategy for roll out of SLSS in the
remaining mission cities of the state. The DPR shall also mention how the learning for the
pilot phase shall be incorporated while rolling out the solution in a large scale.
1.6
Details of stakeholders
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Name
Address
Fax
Landline
Mobile
Email
:
:
:
:
:
:
Name
Address
Fax
Landline
Mobile
Email
:
:
:
:
:
:
1.7
Name
Address
Fax
Landline
Mobile
Email
:
:
:
:
:
:
The SLNA/ULB shall provide details about appraised project details by State Level
Steering Committee (SLSC) to State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) and whether the
project is considered for approval by SLSC. The appraisal report of the SLNA shall be
provided along with the DPR.
10
2.
Project Overview
Based on the project background details, the DPR shall define goals & objectives of the
project. Examples are provided in this section for easy understanding and reference purposes.
2.1
Goals
Goals are high order objectives/long term outcomes that the project shall contribute. The
general practices of the project are guided by goals. It is critical to set realistic and relevant
goal(s) for the project as it helps to:
2.2
Benefits
The JNNURM guidelines have laid down the outcomes that are desired as part of the National
Mission Mode Project for e-Governance in Municipalities. The service levels are desired to
ensure efficiency, transparency and reliability of such services at affordable costs to realize
the basic needs of common citizens. The impact of successfully achieving this vision would
be a more satisfied citizen/ business/ government. Thus, each goal should state the impact in
terms of:
Examples of benefits:
Decrease in cost of accessing/ using services
Free availability of application forms online etc.
Reduction in time for accessing/ using services
By instant uploading of online applications leading to automated approval process etc.
Improved quality of services
Lack of errors in processed documents etc.
Reduction in red tape
Reduction in number of levels required for approval etc.
Simplification of procedures
No need to visit various Departments/Offices for approvals, sanctions etc.
11
2.3
Objectives
Identify SMART Objectives : Objectives are the specific and immediate outcomes of the
project. S.M.A.R.T refers to the acronym that describes the key characteristics of meaningful
objectives, which are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time Bound.
Specific (concrete, detailed, well defined): Specific means that the objective is
concrete, detailed, focused and well defined. Objectives must be straight-forward and
emphasize action and the required outcome.
Measurable (numbers, quantity, etc.): If the objective is measurable, it means that the
measurement source is identified and we are able to track the actions as we progress
towards the objective. Measurement is the standard used for comparison.
Time-Bound (a defined time line): Time-bound means setting deadlines for the
achievement of the objective. Deadlines need to be both achievable and realistic.
2.4
the
Minimizing the number of customer visits for registration of birth and death from 5 to 2 times.
Reducing the time required to request the service by 50% and overhead costs by 20%.
Solving 100% grievances within stipulated time of 3 months
The following captures an analysis of these criteria for the stated objective:
An overall cost estimate shall be prepared for the complete duration of the project ( 1 year
implementation & 2 years of O&M) with documented assumptions against each item. The
cost in the state level DPR shall include both:
A summary of total project cost estimated shall be provided in the format given in Table 3
below.
12
Costs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
2.4
2.4.1
In this section, DPR shall mention setting up a steering committee at the state to provide
guidance and assistance for implementation and rollout. It shall include the details of
arrangements such as
Project Steering Committee
Project management team comprising of representatives from state, ULBs and SIC
SLNA shall also create the following teams under its control to carry out the overall project
implementation and monitoring.
SLNA shall clearly define the roles and responsibilities of all the teams. Further, DRP should
also propose the contractual arrangements between SLNA, ULBs and Agency for project
implementation & rollout. Also, the road map/ phasing strategy for all ULBs (under mission
and non-mission cities)for joining the state level solution needs to defined in the DPR.
13
14
3.
3.1
Overview
In this section, the DPR shall provide details like demographic characteristics of the State,
population growth, economic base, key drivers of economy and municipal revenues &
expenditure for the selected ULB.
Table 4: Population Details of State and Selected ULB
S.No.
Year
Population (lakh)
1981
1991
2001
2011(Projected)
Average Annual
Growth Rate (%)
Year
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
Non Tax
Expenditure
( Rs. Lakhs)
State Transfers
/ Grants
15
Reform Areas
Service
Interface
Function
Service
Category
External
G2C
External
G2C
External
G2C
Building Approvals
External
G2C, G2B
Internal /
External
G2G
External
G2B / G2C
Accounting System
Internal
D2D
Internal
D2D
Function
Services
16
Associated
Processes
Inter-relation
No. of
Municipalities
No. of
Corporations
No. of Notified
Area Authority
Any Other
b. Details on Municipal Act(s) in the state and byelaws in the ULBs (for pilot study, ULBs
for mission cities / class-I cities or beyond can be considered) in table below. The DPR
shall also provide details of municipal act(s) and byelaws in the table 9 and variations in
table 10 below.
Table 9: Summary of Municipal Acts and Bye-Laws
Act(s) of State
Bye-Laws
Prevailing in
Municipal Acts
Building Approvals
17
Bye-Laws
S.No.
Municipal Acts
Accounting System
Bye-Laws
Other Modules
(Other modules to be mentioned here)
3.5
In this section, DPR shall provide details on existing status and level of implementation of
other e-Governance initiatives like SWAN/ SDC/ CSC etc. in the State.
3.6
Based on the study conducted in the pilot ULBs in the above section, this section shall
include:
*Note: The details of the proposed modules have to be covered in terms of functional
requirement specifications has been provided in Annexure 2 separately.
3.7
In this section, the DPR shall identify service level benchmarks for each service module (as
per below table), in line with Handbook on Service Level Benchmarks for e-Governance in
Municipalities published at the national level. A roadmap on how these service levels shall
be attained needs to be provided. In case the state chooses an intermediary service level
during the initial phases of the project, the an intermediary service level should be clearly
defined and roadmap & timeline for achieving the final service levels should also be
provided.
18
Service Modules
Service Level
Benchmarks
Intermediary
Service Level
Benchmarks
(if any)
Timelines to
achieve the
final Service
Level
Benchmarks
Building Approvals
Accounting System
3.8
Perceived Benefits
The DPR shall also detail out the benefits for the various categories of stakeholders like
citizens, SLNA, ULB, vendors, etc.
For example : The value/ benefits can be in terms of indicators like reduction in time-frame
for processing of activity/ service/ function etc, reduction in terms of costing, etc.
The details for the same shall be provided in the table 12 below.
19
Services
Building Approval
e-Procurement
Monitoring of Projects /
Ward Works
Licenses
10
Accounting System
11
Personnel Information
System
Delivery
Channel
Time
Taken
Efficiency /
Functionality
Corporation /
Citizen Centers
/ Web enabled
Min/
Hrs /
Days
%
( Internal/
External )
20
User
Charges (eGov)
(Rs)
Cost of
Service
Frequency
of Visits
(Rs)
Number of
visits
required
Benefits to
Citizens
Benefits
to ULBs
4.
This section shall provide the details of SLSS fulfilling the key requirements from technology
prospective, keeping in view the centralized e-Governance solution being conceptualized,
designed, developed and implemented to deliver identified services. This solution must cater
to the Municipal Act(s) of the State, and should have the provision for ULB specific
customizations. It should be designed in a way to manage the variations in bye laws of ULBs.
4.1
AS-IS IT landscape
This section shall provide details of IT software applications, and infrastructure that currently
exists in the state.
4.1.1
Application Details
This section of DPR shall provide details about applications that are currently available
in the state. The details of such applications are to be provided as per below table.
Table 13: Details of Existing IT System/ Applications in State
S#
Applicatio
n Suites /
Modules
Services
Performe
d by
Applicati
on Suite
Year of
Implem
entation
Technology
Platform
(Complete
technology
stack
including
front end,
back end,
middleware
etc.)
Applicat
ion
Architec
ture
No of Users,
Transaction
Volume per
year & data
volume
1
2
4.1.2
In this section, the DPR shall provide details on existing hardware, network & infrastructure
components (if any) available in the state and how the existing components can be re-used or
integrated with the proposed setup.
The DPR shall also provide details of number of physical locations, departments / offices,
users in the department, existing delivery channels like Citizen Facilitation Centers (CFC),
SWAN, SDC etc.
Table 14: Details of Hardware, Network & Infrastructure (Existing)
S.No.
Department
/ Location
21
Re-usability
(Yes/ No)
Impleme
nted At
(State /
ULB
Name)
S.No.
Department
/ Location
Re-usability
(Yes/ No)
Component
Status
Re-usability status
(Yes/ No)
1
2
3
4.1.3
This section shall provide details of existing network/server architecture (if any) of the state:
A detailed diagram of current network & server architecture should be provided.
Existing network architecture/devices details (including disaster recovery, hosting servers
etc.) that can be used by the state.
Table 16: Network / Server Architecture for Existing System
Existing (AS-IS) Scenario
Description
Location 1
Location 2
Location 3
Location
(n)
Total
Network devices (the existing network design should be provided schematically separately)
22
4.1.4
The following are the key points that need to be discussed in this section with regard to
managing data security:
State should examine if the current security measures can be re-used for the proposed egovernance infrastructure. The same should be clearly mentioned in the DPR.
4.2
TO-BE IT Landscape
State Level Software Solution (SLSS) is the centralized solution that would facilitate the
delivery of municipal services to various stakeholders across the state. The centralized
application software shall deliver all the identified services, as per JNNURM guidelines.
In this section, DPR shall describe the technical components required as a part of the
centralized solution to be deployed. This should include technology platforms, database
software, application / web server software, application frameworks/products or any other
component that shall be used to implement the solution. In case different modules use
different technology components, all details for all these modules shall be included.
4.2.1
Solution Architecture
(ii)
(iii)
Plug & Play Facility: The SLSS should be able to provide independence to ULBs in
availing selected services, as required.
(iv)
Scalability: The solution architecture should be able to address the future scalability
requirements, in terms of both application (to add new services in SLSS) and
infrastructure (to provide services of other ULBs of state as they are also expected to
23
plug into the same solution in future), even though the current DPR shall include the
requirements of all the ULBs in the Mission cities only.
(v)
Sizing: The DPR shall analyze and suggest technologies like virtualization, cloud
computing etc for seamless addition hardware/ software to meet the requirements of
ULBs in future and also to handle seasonal loads and future expansion.
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
Audit trail: As there shall be critical users carrying out critical transactions, the
application should have a facility to record & generate audit log for data access in the
solution. The DPR shall provide details on the same.
(ix)
Domain name: The SLSS will be used by multiple ULBs in the state. The usage of
domain name for individual ULBs should also be finalized before hand. Preferably,
sub-domain nomenclature should be followed and domain names must be registered
before hand. The DPR shall provide details on the same.
(x)
External Interfaces: The DPR shall provide details on how the SLSS will interact
with external systems like GIS, Payment Gateway, Other existing systems in ULBs
etc. The above interaction should be seamless in nature.
(xi)
Offline working at ULB: The DPR should specify the services that shall continue to
operate in case connectivity to SLSS is temporarily unavailable. Such services should
be worked out in coordination with SLNA. It will also include details on offline
working of these services (part / full cycle). DPR shall also identify the risks involved
while carrying out critical transactions in the offline mode particularly for financial
transactions.
Keeping in view, all the above key requirements, a solution needs to be conceptualized, and
details of the solution needs to be provided here. Illustrative solution architecture for the State
Level Solution can be as shown below.
24
Application Architecture
This section should provide details of all applications/modules that would be part of the
solution, along with business functions, which each of these modules would cater to, and the
technical architecture of each of these applications. The same should be provided as per
below illustrative table:
Table 17: Details of Application Architecture
S.
No.
Application/
Module
Service /
Function
delivered
Technology
Stack
Type &
number of
Users
----
ULB users,
and
Citizens.
Approx.
Users = 1
25
Transaction
Volume p.a.
Data
Volume
50,000
50 GB
(Approximately
equal to the
number
of
births / deaths
million
reported in a
(equivalent year)
to
the
population
of
the
ULB)
4.2.3
This section should provide details of all important data entities/ data sets, along with the
owner system. This information should be provided as per below table. Please note that these
data entities must comply with metadata and data standards notified by DIT on the
website http://egovstandards.gov.in.
Data
Brief Description
Entity
/
Data Set
e.g. Name
Owner System
Key Attributes
This section should also provide details of all interactions/ interfaces, that each of the
application modules has with other modules. This information should be provided as per
below table.
Table 19: Details of Application Interfaces
S. No.
Originating
Target
Purpose
Module
/ Module /
Application
Applicatio
n
4.2.4
Type
of Data Set Technolog
to
be y / Tool
Interface
exchang used
ed
None
This section should provide details of various types of servers to be deployed along with the
software components would be deployed on these servers. The DPR will also identify the
26
hosting facility (SDC / or third party data centre) for SLSS in this section. Details on suitable
technologies adopted to help in scalability of hardware and software should be provided here.
The deployment architecture should be able to be upgraded or replaced independently as
requirements change. Suggestive three-tier deployment architecture has been provided below.
4.2.5
User Interface
The DPR shall identify various types of user interface required while dealing with various
stakeholders. For example,
External users like citizens/business users would be able to access non-restricted
areas of the application over internet. The public web server and the internal
firewall a part of the public DMZ would be configured to render only those
application pages that can be accessed publicly.
The following figure depicts the access path in case of external users:
27
In this section, the DPR shall propose network architecture for connecting the SLSS. For the
same, the DPR shall provide details on:
28
Network architecture to connect the State Data Centre (SDC)/ third party data
centre and various ULBs over State Wide Area Network (SWAN), wherever
available, or any local network service provider
Appropriate business to technical requirement mapping should be provided
while discussing about solution infrastructure
Essential components such as routers, switches, etc.
Interfaces
that
would
be
provided
to
external
governmental
agencies/departments viz. State Police, Courts, etc.
Infrastructure in terms of back-end, middleware and front-end
Location 1
Location 2
29
Location 3
. Location
(n)
Total
Location 1
Location 2
Location 3
. Location
(n)
Total
Network devices (the proposed network design should be provided schematically separately)
Information Security
4.2.7
Security architecture
The State DPR shall define security architecture for SLSS and its various components in this
section. For example: An illustrative security architecture for the centralized application and
the various components have been shown as below:
30
This section should discuss integration of the application and the associated hardware
with the SWAN and SDC. Some of the salient points of this section will be:
Details about integrating the solution with the SWAN infrastructure
Details about the backbone on which all departmental and core applications
would reside
Details about how the municipalities and other field offices can hook to the
nearest PoP of the SWAN, through leased lines
Details for the centralized access of key applications the State would host for the critical
servers in the State Data Center (SDC).
4.2.9
DPR shall identify and define the SLA to measure the performance standard and the processes
executed through application solution. For example:
As some of the service levels will be met at the State and some at the ULB level, DPR
has to also propose a mechanism and process to monitor the service levels at the State
and ULB level to measure the SLAs. The DPR shall also identify any SLA monitoring
tools to track SLAs at both state and ULB levels.
4.3
4.3.1
Conformance to Standards
Interoperability Standards
This section should provide details of standards in terms of message formats, protocols and
technology that shall be adopted across various modules / applications. DIT is currently
working on technical standards for interoperability. The DPR should ensure that complete
solution designed under this DPR should comply with these standards.
31
4.3.2
Data Standards
In this section, the DPR shall provide details on all key data sets & meta data. Care should be
taken that the data definitions and standards of all important data entities should be in line
with standards published by DIT. These can be accessed at http://egovstandards.gov.in
4.3.3
Security Standards
Guidelines for security standards including biometrics and digital signature certificates are
notified and available on DIT website http://egovstandars.gov.in. The DPR should ensure that
complete solution designed under this DPR should comply with these standards, to ensure
that appropriate security controls are in place to ensure the security of the applications.
4.3.4
Localization Standards
Localization standards, like Font standards are notified, and available at the DIT website. All
applications should comply with these standards to ensure common look and feel across
various applications deployed in government.
4.4
IT Change Management
In this section, the DPR shall provide details on the IT change management strategy to be
adopted once the centralized software application is adopted by multiple ULBs. Since multitenancy architecture is chosen for the implementation of the software, the issue of version
control should be addressed sufficiently. In case of a new version of software, a clear strategy
of how all ULBs will be informed and migrated should be detailed out in DPR.
4.5
In this section, the DPR should provide details on how the solution would be delivered to the
ULBs. The solution would be centrally deployed and ULBs from mission cities across the
state would plug into this solution. The details on the approach that is adopted to facilitate this
should be provided in this section, along with the steps that service provider (SLNA/ ASP), or
the service consumer (ULB / private parties) would need to follow.
4.6
Continuity Measures
This section should describe the issues and risks surrounding the IT infrastructure
(hardware and software) and the risk mitigation plan for the continuity of the services in
case of unforeseen events. Some of the key points that shall be covered are:
Details of the data backup policy
Details of the Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery plan
Compliance with DIT guidelines on business continuity and disaster recovery
4.7
In this section, the DPR should provide details on the How the Operations would be managed
and users provided support once the system is implemented. The DPR should provide details
on the structure of the helpdesk, and channels through which this support would be provided.
The DPR should provide details on any service levels, that this helpdesk / support group is
intended to maintain.
4.8
32
DPR should provide details on the strategy of rolling out the solution to remaining ULBs of
mission cities in the state. This should include timelines and ULBs where the solution would
be rolled out. The DPR should also define the strategy to roll out solution other ULBs of the
state.
4.9
Option Analysis
After having a fair idea of overall architecture, this section shall provide details on various
technology options available and provide an analysis on which technology to be adopted.
While rating the options, details about the re-use of existing infrastructure shall also be
provided. The DPR should cover the following points:
Detailed costs benefit analysis of all the options.
Reasons and details of the option selected.
The description of various options considered should be provided in Table 21below.
Table 21: Option Analysis for Selecting Proposed Technology
Detailed description of various options and reasons for selection/rejection
(For example: Technology including Back-end, middleware, front-end, networking, and
security standards being adopted)
Option 1:
Option 2:
Option 3:
Selected Option:
33
5.
Managing large-scale change programme for multiple ULBs simultaneously will pose various
technical and cultural challenges for SLNA. To address these challenges, it will be essential
for SLNA to have a structured plan in order to usher in the new changes. This section should
detail out change management and capacity building plans of the ULB. The Change
Management Plan should be detailed and exhaustive to include the topics of governance,
working groups, change readiness assessment, case to change, identification of various
stakeholders, communication strategy, monitoring performance, etc. The costs specific to
each item identified under capacity building should be included in the DPR.
All change management issues raised by the stakeholders from all quarters may be recorded
and processed by the SLNA on a periodic basis. This may comprise of amending any of the
personnel policies of the ULB or MA & UD.
5.1
Since, e-Governance program envisages fundamental attitudinal and technical change, The
DPR shall detail out the need for change management at various levels. The DPR shall also
comprise the critical issues envisaged by the SLNA in the change management process at
both the SLNA and ULB, along with the mitigating strategies.
5.2
Identification of Stakeholders
In this section, the DPR shall mention the key stakeholders identified in the Stakeholder
Analysis exercise including key areas to be addressed for the overall change. An example for
the same has been provided in Table 22 below:
For example: The State Implementation Consultant (SIC) shall be a primary stakeholder
whose role and responsibility shall include ensuring all aspects of project management i.e.
scoping, implementation, monitoring cost, time, quality, human resource, risk,
communication, procurement, change, partnership.
Table 22: Stakeholder Identification
S.
No.
Stakeholder
Roles and
Responsibilities
SLNA
Define policies
Approval of
works/projects
Monitoring
Intervention
Strategic decision
making
Dual role in Change
Management
Communication:
Communication
partners as well as
audience
34
Training and
Communication
Needs
Change
Management
Impact
Shift in the
Decision
Making
Response time
Customer
Orientation
Technical
Training
Training
Strategy
Communication
Strategy
Wear
Communication
the
hat of both
Training
Partner and
Audience
Long Term
Training
Technical
and
Behavioral
training.
clearly
demarcated
of the policy
changes, to
enable the
working group to
define and frame
work plan
Partnership
S.
No.
Stakeholder
Roles and
Responsibilities
Employees
5.3
5.3.1
Training and
Communication
Needs
Responsiveness
Customer
Centricity
System and
Data
Operations
Perform duties in
timely manner
Interface with
internal and
external customers
Participate in
defining policies
Training
Strategy
Communication
Strategy
Skill
and
competency
building
through
training
programme
Long Term
Behavioral
and Short
Term
Rigorous
Technical
Training
Awareness
creation and
sensitization
of change
through
communicati
on
Organization Structure
Current Organization
In this section, the DPR shall provide details of existing functional entities/ departments and
their detailed organization structure at State and selected ULB. Roles and responsibilities of
all key positions, various working groups, committees, and relationships shall also be
highlighted. The details of the existing number of employees under each functional entity
shall be provided in DPR to understand the user base for various applications.
Relationships with other departments/ stakeholders to understand the functional integration of
departments needs to be provided.
5.3.3
Proposed Organization
Looking at the current organization structure and future requirements, the DPR shall propose
an organization structure at State and ULB for carrying out project. The proposed
organization structure shall highlight how the gaps envisaged with the earlier structure have
been overcome. Elaboration on new roles and responsibilities, nature of the relationship
between governing committees and stakeholders, their objectives and reporting structure
envisaged for the new organization structure needs to be provided. Special focus should be
given to the IT Organization within SLNA as it will be the backbone of the entire project.
For example: The team formed at the state can act as the Project management Unit (PMU)
reporting to a Project Steering Committee. The State Implementation Consultant (SIC) shall
assist the PMU at the state level and help in implementation and roll-out of the project.
The SLNA can obtain guidance from the organization structure envisaged by MoUD for the
programme as shown below.
35
MoUD
State e-Governance
Mission Team (SeMT)
Advisory
SLNA
Capacity
Building Team
SLNA
Process/
Functional
Team
Technical
Team
Urban Local
Bodies (ULB)
5.4
In this section, the DPR shall provide the current and proposed staffing and deployment plan
eliciting the staff strength, roles, skill sets required, duration etc for each team (Existing and
proposed). DPR shall identify process specialists comprising of functional experts for the
eight identified processes, Capacity Building, Change Management and M&E experts for the
project.
The DPR shall mention the mechanism for staffing, sourcing plan, role description of the
proposed new positions and the deployment plan at relevant stages of the project.
For example: The modus operandi for selection of staff can be by deploying or deputed from
any of the existing SLNA team, ULBs or any other department or appointment of external
consultants.
5.5
Training Strategy
In this section, the DPR shall include a strategy on how training needs shall be assessed at the
state and ULBs along with the detailed training requirements.
For example: Training needs can assessed at the state level considering the proposed
organization structure at the state and ULB level and in consultation with the SIC (if
applicable). The trainings may include functional, technology, soft skills trainings etc. for
identified stakeholders.
36
MoUD at the National level shall assist the State in identifying trainings and developing a
skeleton for the content to be delivered for the e-Governance project. The DPR shall make
provision for the customization and localization of the content at the state level at per the
requirement of the state and the ULBs.
5.5.2
In this section, the DPR shall provide a strategy to identify various delivery channels (e.g.
training institutions) at the state and ULBs for imparting the proposed trainings to the various
stakeholders.
For example: The delivery channels can be ATIs, local educational institutes, in-house
training centers etc.
5.5.3
The DPR shall include tentative training schedule/ plan & frequency proposed for the various
trainings to be conducted.
5.6
Knowledge Management
DPR shall propose a knowledge management tool or any other mechanism for managing the
critical content, lesson learnt, best practices etc. for the project.
37
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) will help in the process of measuring, recording,
collecting, processing and communicating information to assist in project management
decision making.
A diagrammatical representation of the M&E process has been given in figure shown. M&E
will play a critical role in all the phases viz. of the overall project implementation.
Initiation Phase
Implementation Phase
Post-Implementation Phase
Hence, to have smooth and effective M&E system
in place, it is important for State to have an
integrated and streamlined M&E Framework at
State & ULB level.
6.1
38
Illustrative Objectives
State
Program Level
Identify state coordinator for Monitoring and Evaluation of all ULBs
Define scope of M&E for state and ULBs in line with the M&E
framework defined at National level
Create M&E plan and oversee its roll out (Physical and Financial
progress)at State and ULBs
Design standard reporting templates for Monitoring for ULBs for
capturing data for State and ULBs
Co-ordinate with MoUD and provide reports at regular intervals
without fail
Provide guidance to involved stakeholders as and when required
Project Level
6.1.2
For overseeing M&E at ULB, it has to identify a high-level committee at ULB level. M&E
team and other co-ordinators needs be identified along with their roles and responsibilities.
An illustrative organization chart for M&E with roles and responsibilities has been presented
in table 24 below. DPR shall provide the details in the same format.
Table 24: Roles & Responsibilities for Monitoring &Evaluation
Role
State Level Steering
Committee (SLSC)
State
Level
Nodal
Agency (SLNA)
Illustrative Responsibilities
Oversee overall progress of the project
Circulate notices pertaining to department functionalities
and co-ordinate with SLNA for high level intervention if
required
Chair review meetings with project In-Charge
39
Role
Project In-charge
Technical Team
Change
Team
Management
Illustrative Responsibilities
Overall in-charge of Program execution, Monitoring and
Evaluation
Provide direction and assist M&E team as and when
required
Handle critical project deviations and risks and devise
resolution and Mitigation plans
Make action plans for future
Update progress status to project Steering Committee on a
regular basis
40
Evaluation
Evaluation would be carried out at post implementation stage as End-Line survey.
Evaluation would also be carried on continuous basis after Program Implementation as ExPost Implementation survey for continuous improvements till achievement of desired goals.
State has to identify variables/ indicators for input, process, output as a part of monitoring
process and outcome/ impact as a part of evaluation process. The identified indicators would
be measured/ verified (in terms of Progress, Timelines, Resources allocated, Deviations,
Risks and Funds utilised) against pre-defined plan. Illustrative list of variables/ indicators for
input, process, output and outcomes/ impact have been presented in table 25. DPR shall
include details in the same format.
Table 25: Approach for Monitoring &Evaluation
Phases
Input
Process
Output
Outcome/ impact
Variables/ Indicators
Define M&E framework
Define monitoring plan and schedule
Empowered committee formed
Process of identification of stakeholders
Vendor selection process
Customisation of software application
Testing and integration
Implementation
System Integration
Capacity building
Risk Management
Training of identified personnel
Opening of CFCs/ Kiosks/ Facilitation centers etc.
Turn around Time
41
Phases
Variables/ Indicators
Number of visits required to the office per service per customer
Time taken to provide service
Percentage increase in revenue
Customer satisfaction level
Customer awareness
WHEN: Defines the frequency of reporting the results obtained from monitoring
and evaluation
ULB would determine frequency for reporting and would be appropriately spaced, so that
the data collection is not repetitive or cannot be interpreted to obtain accurate results.
WHO: Identify key resources for carrying out the monitoring process. Illustrative
data has been presented in table 26. DPR shall include the details in same format.
Table 26: Monitoring Process: Ownership & Timeframe
Process
Responsibility
42
Timeframe
With the broad understanding of above sections, the section on Assumptions and Risk
Management would cover the following:
7.1
Organization
management
Benefits envisaged
management
structure
due
for
risk
to
risk
Policy
Decision
Examples
Policy coordination
Central / State coordination and support unit
Adopting standardized guidelines defined at
National/ State level
43
Stakeholders
Involved
Risk
Examples
Environmental/
Regulatory
Risks
Administrative Risks
Transfer of key officials
Legal and Contractual Risks
Stakeholders
Leadership commitment
Lack of co-ordination with MoUD/ State
Financial Risk
Stakeholders
Involved
Project Level Risk: This deals with risks related to the ability to understand and manage the
project complexities and project environment. Not addressing them will result in not
delivering the expected results that can bring in desired benefits. DPR shall provide list of
Project Level Risk in Table 28 below. An illustrative list has been provided for reference for
addressing the risks at Project level in line with the vision to achieve the desired objectives.
Stakeholders involved against each shall be identified in advance.
Table 28: Project Level Risks
Risk
Project Scope,
Planning and
Management
Financial Risk
Environmental/
Regulatory
Risks
Technology
Risk
Examples
Administrative Risks
Improper or insufficient Legal and contractual
risks
agreement with the vendors, contractors etc.
Intellectual Property Rights
Data Privacy and Security
44
Stakeholders
Involved
Risk
Examples
Stakeholders
Achieving
Outcomes
Human
resources
Stakeholders
Involved
Operational Level Risk: These risks will arise out of day-to-day activities and management of
the project from inadequate or failed processes, people, and systems or from external events.
The Project Manager or the Team Leader appointed by state would manage these risks on a
day-to-day basis. DPR shall provide list of Operational Level Risk in Table 29 below. An
illustrative list has been provided for reference. Stakeholders involved against each should be
identified in advance.
Table 29: Operational Level Risks
Risk
Examples
45
Stakeholders
Involved
Risk
Organizational
factors
Examples
Data and
information
system
Procurement
Risks
Schedule/
Timeline/ Cost
Overrun
Stakeholders
Involved
* Please note that the above-mentioned list of risks is an indicative list and DPR shall identify
risks depending on the environment of State. DPR shall also identify the stakeholders (i.e.
who is involved or affected) against the risks identified.
b. Risk Assessment and Evaluation
Risk assessment would provide the:
Details on the likelihood (Probability and frequency) of the risk event to happen, and
Details of the impact, cost or consequences (Economic, political, social) of that event
occurring?
In this section, DPR shall describe the risk assessment criteria to be used by the State and also
provide a rationale behind choosing the risk assessment criteria. For each risk identified in
above section, the DPR shall analyze the potential consequences/ impact and frequency/
likelihood of occurrence of the potential harm in terms of cost, schedule, performance etc. A
risk assessment matrix may to be prepared combining the frequency/ likelihood and the
impact. Thus,
46
Low -1
Medium -2
High -3
(Score 1)
(Score 2)
(Score 3)
Low
Low
Medium
(Score 2)
(Score 4)
(Score 6)
Low
Medium
High
(Score 3)
(Score 6)
(Score 9)
Medium
High
High
Probability
Low -1
Medium -2
High -3
The description of the value obtained from the Risk Ranking chart is as mentioned below.
Table 31: Chart for Risk Ranking
Score
Risk Category
Description
6, 9
Extreme
3, 4
Medium
1, 2
Low
Transfer/ Share : Transfer or share the risk with various partners involved
47
d. Risk Monitoring
After identifying, assessing and preparing risk mitigation plan, it is very important to monitor
the risks on periodic basis. Risks can be entered in the Risk Logs which is to be reviewed in
its entirety by ULB on a pre-determined frequency. A sample of Risk Log has been attached
at Annexure 3.
Risk monitoring shall also include:
48
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
In this section, the DPR shall identify the PPP arrangements for implementing e-Governance
programme in partnership with private sector. The term private in PPP encompasses all nongovernment agencies including corporate sectors, voluntary organizations, self-help groups etc.
8.1
In this section, the DPR shall define the need for PPP in context of the e-Governance project. For
example the needs can be:
8.2
Lack of capital
Inadequate infrastructure
Technological complexities
Lack of capacity & resources
Based on the above needs, DPR shall detail out the PPP arrangements that can be implemented either
in part or as full service component. PPP can be envisaged in:
Service Provisioning
Service Delivery
Service Provisioning: Service provisioning is the process of preparing and equipping a system to
allow it to provide services to its users. For e-Governance in Municipalities program, development,
deployment, maintenance & operations of the SLSS in terms of application/ hardware/ network/ other
infrastructure etc., shall form the service provisioning.
Service Delivery: Service delivery refers to making sure that the implemented solutions reach the
stakeholders, people and places effectively and in agreed time-frame. For e-Governance in
Municipalities program, delivery channels that will be utilized by ULBs to access SLSS for delivering
the services to citizens shall form the service delivery.
Different models that can be envisaged in service provisioning are given below:
ASP (Application Service Provider): In this model, the infrastructure is owned by state while the
application is developed and managed by the private partner. The government contracts to avail the
services of partner for delivery of services as per mutually agreed services levels and commercial
terms. In this model, the public and private sectors work together to implement ASP model and
build the networks and portals to provide e-governance services.
SaaS (Software as a Service): In this model, private partner owns complete infrastructure and
application and customers pay to access and use application over a network through a hosted, webnative platform operated by the software vendor (either independently or through a third-party).
Under such arrangement, the asset transfer on service termination of the private partner is very
critical.
Thus, the DPR shall weigh the various options/ models available for PPP. The options range along a
continuum within the extreme of almost complete ownership and responsibility of operations,
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
maintenance, capital investment and commercial risk with the public sector through joint responsibility
to complete private responsibility.
8.3
BOO (Build Own Operate): In this model, the preferred partner designs, develops and
implements the project, most often, entirely at its cost and operates the system for a pre-specified
period. It is characteristic of this model to entrust the end-to-end responsibility to the selected
partner i.e. both the back-end and the front-end. The options of the partners, in terms of the
disposition of assets and control at the end of term are kept open till the end of period sometimes
called the concession period.
BOOT (Build Own Operate Transfer): Build, Own, Operate, and Transfer (BOOT) model is a
popular PPP model used to build and improve infrastructure, enhance efficiency and economic
growth. A BOOT funding model involves a single organization, or consortium (BOOT provider)
for designing, building, funding, owning and operating the scheme for a defined period and then
transferring the ownership to an agreed party.
Joint Venture: A joint venture (often abbreviated as JV) is an entity formed between two or more
parties to undertake any economic activity together. The parties agree to create a new entity by
both contributing equity, and they then share in the revenues, expenses, and control of the
enterprise. The venture can be for one specific project only, or a continuing business relationship.
Joint venture (JV) model implies co-operation of public and private sectors to provide services.
However, the basic idea of JV in PPP is sharing of benefits (joint) and risks (venture) by the public
and private sectors in the long-term.
8.4
Revenue Model
The DPR shall provide the details on selected revenue model envisaged under the PPP arrangements.
While selecting the revenue model, the DPR shall understand the business requirements of a sample
set of ULBs as the revenue model chosen based on study conducted for selected ULB might not be
feasible or right fit for rest of the ULBs in the state.
Few revenue models are explained below:
Transaction Based Approach: Under this approach, private party would make an initial
investment in setting up systems and structures and in return would be allowed to charge based on
the number of transactions.
Fee Based Approach: Under this approach the private party would make an initial investment in
setting up systems and structures and in return would be allowed to fix nominal charges (in
consultation with government) for public services to be collected either from government or
public, e.g. Collecting nominal charges for issuance of birth certificate, death certificate etc.
Cost Saving Approach: This approach is specifically used where the Government brings about
substantial changes in existing processes through extensive Government process reforms and use
of information technology, which leads to large scale of savings in terms of staff and real estate.
Under this approach, private party provides the initial investment along with their management
expertise and in return, they are entitled to share the cost saved, e.g. cost saving due to online
processing of property transfer and registration document can be shared.
50
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
Full Service Approach: Under this approach, the private sector is hired as a contractor to take
over certain responsibilities of the Government, and may retain staff on the governments behalf,
in return for a fee.
Shared Revenue Approach: The shared revenue approach is adopted where there are ways in
which the government may generate new revenue from enhanced services. This increased revenue
can be used as a way to offset project costs, or finance the investment made by the private sector.
Licenses: For internal services as personnel management system and financial management,
sharing of revenue can be based on licenses required.
Advertising & Sponsorship Fee Approach: Under this approach, the government may collect
fees in exchange for direct advertising by a private company on a government website, indirect
marketing or by sponsorship arrangements. The advertising arrangements could be based upon a
measurable outcome, such as the number of users who visit or purchase items from the website
advertised.
8.5
Key considerations
The DPR shall provide details on how revenue arrangements can be made considering various types of
services and their nature. The DPR shall also address the some key considerations as details provided
below.
(i) Roles and responsibilities: DPR shall clearly define role and responsibilities of all parties i.e. State
Govt, ULB and private partner. For example: Role of the SLNA shall be creation of Policies for
adopting e-Governance
(ii) Key Considerations: Some of the key features of PPP implementation that shall affect the overall
cost/revenue model for potential private partners are:
Ownership definition
IPRs
Asset Transfer
Entry / Termination provisions
Security requirements
Service level agreements
Confidentiality requirements
Business continuity requirements
Change management
Risks Involved in PPP
(iii) Business Model: The proposed PPP shall clearly be explained in the areas of:
Service deployment plan
Demand projections and price elasticity of demand
Fees and fee setting mechanism
Revenue projections for the operator
Estimated investment (including phasing of investment) and operating costs
Proposed cost sharing arrangements between state, centre and private participant
(iv) Financial Analysis: A Cost benefit analysis of PPP shall be carried out to explain the
sustainability of the model in the future.
51
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
(v) Feasibility Management: Feasibility Management shall provide clear information concerning all
existing and expected factors, which may support or oppose the implementation of the PPP options.
For example: Feasibility management of selected PPP option shall be defined in terms of following:
Analysis of a government commitment and community support for a certain option
Well-researched and negotiated legal contract
Strong regulatory and institutional environment
Analysis of the state of utility, existing regulation, financial viability and risks
52
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
9.1
Stakeholders Involvement
DPR shall identify stakeholder groups, their stake, roles and relevant benefits accruing to them. Table
32 below illustrates some primary stakeholder and beneficiaries who are directly impacted by the
services.
Table 32: Stakeholder Involvement
Stakeholder and their Roles
Example of Benefit
Citizens
Municipality
Ease of process
Less workload
Less paper work & no cumbersome manual
processes
Level of service provided, legislation, taxation,
etc.
Employees
9.2
Institutional Structure
Identify an institutional structure to guide the implementation and management of project at state and
ULBs along with defined roles and responsibilities of each position. An illustrative institutional
structure at state is shown in figure 11.
53
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
9.3
The DPR shall identify and provide details on various tendering processes to be undertaken for
implementing the project. Some of them are as following:
Selection of Software Development Agency / Application Service Provider
Selection of technology/ hardware/ network infrastructure
Selection of capacity building consultant
9.4
9.5
The DPR shall specify detailed quarter-wise schedule of phasing of project activities and schedule of
implementation for each phase. It should also include strategy on application roll-out in the remaining
ULBs in mission cities and non-mission cities in near future. DPR should mention critical
dependencies identified in the project and expected timelines for completion of key milestones. The
details should be provided in Table 33 provided below.
54
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
Responsibility
Target
Date
Project Duration
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3 and so on
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
9.6
Sustainability Plan
In the sustainability plan, DPR shall describe the procedural, staffing, budgetary and contractual
arrangements that will ensure sustainability of project and its outcomes during and beyond the mission
period.
Procedural Sustainability
In this section, the DPR shall provide information on processes and procedures that shall be
followed for smooth functioning of the project.
Resource Sustainability
In this section, DPR shall provide the information related to sustainability of the human
resources deployed for the project. It includes tenure commitments of the key officials from the
government, key technical staff identification, Strategy for hiring, training and replacing key
technical staff to ensure the smooth project implementation.
Financial Sustainability
In this section DPR shall provide the factors considered for the financial sustainability of the
project, like Government commitments for O&M budgetary support, how the ongoing staffing
costs be absorbed, and the source of the funding in case of a PPP failure etc.
Note: Since the Additional Central Assistance (ACA) is limited for only two years after the
completion of implementation of project, the State and selected ULB shall clearly mention the
sources of funds and explain its proposed financial plan (i.e. sources of funds) & sustainability
after 3 years. The DPR shall also include details of existing charges levied by ULB & the
volume of revenue (if any) for the service components for at least last three years; and the
proposed charges & expected volume of revenue beyond three years.
Contractual Sustainability
In this section, DPR shall provide the steps required for the issues related to legal and policy
framework, authentication/security of Private Partner transactions, design of Service Level
Contract and ability to enforce them for project consultant, suppliers, vendors and private
partners, ways to prevent monopoly of PPP.
Table 34 mentioned below shall be filled in by the State & selected ULB for the different
sustainability areas identified and the key factors considered.
55
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
S. No.
Areas
Procedural Sustainability
Resource Sustainability
Financial Sustainability
Contractual Sustainability
Description
Key factors
Action steps
56
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
10 Project Costing
10.1 Detailed Bill of Material For State level solution
The DPR shall provide detailed BOM (Bill of Material) separately under two categories i.e. one time
capital investment cost and recurring cost for every component for state level implementation in table
35 and 36. It should be noted that:
Table 35: State: Summary of Project Cost (Investment & Recurring Costs)
S.No.
Particulars
Quantity
Unit Cost
(in Lacs)
Total Cost
(in Lacs)
A. Capital Investment
1.
Network Infrastructure
Components
2.
3.
Security Infrastructure
Components
4.
System Software
5.
Application Software
6.
GIS Components
7.
STQC certification
8.
Monitoring Tool
9.
Help-Desk
10.
Knowledge Management
11.
B. Operational Cost
11.
Project Management
12.
Capacity Building
57
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
S.No.
Particulars
13.
Network Connectivity
14.
Licenses
15
AMC
Quantity
Unit Cost
(in Lacs)
Total Cost
(in Lacs)
Particulars
Year 0
(in Lacs)
Year 1
(in Lacs)
Year 2
(in Lacs)
A. Capital Investment
1
Network Infrastructure
Components
2.
3.
Security Infrastructure
Components
4.
System Software
5.
Application Software
6.
GIS Components
7.
STQC certification
8.
Monitoring Tool
9.
Help-Desk
10.
Knowledge Management
11.
B. Operational Cost
11.
Project Management
12.
Capacity Building
58
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
S.No.
Particulars
13.
Network Connectivity
14.
Licenses
15
AMC
Year 0
(in Lacs)
Year 1
(in Lacs)
Year 2
(in Lacs)
TOTAL COST:
Table 37: Selected ULB: Summary of Project Cost (Investment & Recurring Costs)
S.No.
Particulars
Quantity
Unit Cost
(in Lacs)
Total Cost
(in Lacs)
A. Capital Investment
1
Network Infrastructure
Components
2.
3.
Security Infrastructure
Components
4.
System Software
5.
Customization of
Application Software
6.
GIS Components
7.
59
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
S.No.
Particulars
Quantity
Unit Cost
(in Lacs)
Total Cost
(in Lacs)
B. Operational Cost
8.
Project Management
9.
Capacity Building
10.
Network Connectivity
11.
Licenses
12.
AMC
13.
Particulars
Year 0
(in Lacs)
Year 1
(in Lacs)
Year 2
(in Lacs)
A. Capital Investment
1
Network Infrastructure
Components
2.
3.
Security Infrastructure
Components
4.
System Software
5.
Customization of
Application Software
6.
GIS Components
7.
60
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
S.No.
Year 0
(in Lacs)
Particulars
8.
Project Management
9.
Capacity Building
10.
Network Connectivity
11.
Licenses
12.
AMC
13.
Year 1
(in Lacs)
Year 2
(in Lacs)
Period
Centre
State
ULB
Amount
Amount
Amount
(Rs. Lakhs)
(Rs. Lakhs)
(Rs. Lakhs)
Other
Sources of
Funds (If
any)
Total
(Rs. Lakhs)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
Since the Additional Central Assistance (ACA) is limited for only two years after the completion of
implementation of project, the State & selected ULB shall clearly mention the sources of funds and
explain its proposed financial plan after 3 years, i.e. the sources of funds / financing plan to sustain the
project. The SLNA/ ULB shall provide details of the existing charges levied by ULB and the volume
of revenue (if any) for the service components of at least last three years and the proposed charges and
expected volume beyond the three years.
61
Model Guidelines for State Level DPR for implementation of e-Governance in ULBs under JNNURM
Ministry of Urban Development
11 Annexures
11.1
1. Planning Phase
(A) Process:
1
How has the BPR been done for the identified services under NMMP, JNNURM?
S.
No.
Domain Expertise
Information Technology
Process Champions
Capacity Building
Urban Planning
Component
State e-Governance
Mission Team (SeMT)
State Implementation
Consultant (SIC)
Remarks/ Role
S.
No.
Proposed by
(month-year)
Existing
Existing
Proposed by
(month-year)
Remarks/ Role
(B) Technology:
1
Does that software application proposed support multi-tenancy for all the ULBs in the State?
Have Open Standards, and the other software standards described under the NeGP programme
been applied in the software application?
Is the application proposed integrated with other State Mission Mode Projects like e-Procurement,
SDC, SWAN, SSDG, State portal etc. and other internal functions?
Have exhaustive details regarding the software solution design been provided as part of the DPR
submitted?
Framework for common application across the state following details are to be provided:
S.
No.
Component
Existing
Proposed by
(month-year)
Remarks
Proposed
Remarks
Project Management/
applications)
Features of Application:
S. No.
Component
Customized/
Existing
Bespoke
development
Platform / technology
Scaling up facility
63
S. No.
Component
Existing
Proposed
Remarks
S. No.
5
6
7
8
Component
Usage
State eProcurement
portal
National Urban
Information
System (NUIS)
scheme
State Portal
State Service
Delivery
Gateway (SSDG)
e-Forms
Existing in the
State/ Proposed to
be in place by
(month/year)
Utilization
mentioned in
DPR
For process
standardization
2. Implementation Phase
1 Details to be provided for the following personal and process:
S. No.
Component
Domain experts
IT skills personnel
e-Governance personnel
Existing
Proposed by
(month/year)
Remarks
64
S. No.
Component
Training
institutes
identified
Process standardization
7
8
Existing
Proposed by
(month/year)
Remarks
Have the NeGP Guidelines for Operational Model for implementation of State MMPs and
(Replicable Central/ Integrated MMPs) by the Line Ministries/State Department been followed?
Have the DPR consider PPP for all the service provisioning & delivery components (Application,
IT infrastructure, Network, Delivery infrastructure)?
Have the service levels for PPP framework like Availability/ Accessibility/ Reliability been
defined?
What are the engagement model, revenue model and service delivery model considered in the
DPR?
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Component
Existing
Proposed
Remarks
65
11.2
Note: Indicative functional specifications for the proposed centralized e-Governance application has
been provided below based on MeDD guidelines. However, functionality for the proposed solution
shall be prepared in light of the pilot study conducted across the state based on the Municipal Acts and
Bye-Laws.
1.1
S.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes /
No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes /
No)
Existing
Module
(Yes /
No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes /
No)
User Authentication
1
S.
No.
66
Death Registration
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
67
2.1
S.
No.
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
User Authentication
1
68
S.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
22
23
69
S.
No.
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
70
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
User Authentication
1
Capturing of
Applications.
the
details
for
Closing/Holding/Reconnection
71
S.
Requirement
No.
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
72
S.
Requirement
No.
64 Preprinted Demand Notice
65 Bill collector wise collected Water charges
S.
Requirement
No.
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
73
3.1
Public Grievances
S.
Requirement
No.
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
User Authentication
1
11
12
13
14
74
S.
Requirement
No.
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A section wise grievance register is printed for a given period with its
status.
Statistics Report on section-wise number of grievances received/
handled/ pending/ disposed (Type wise/Zone wise/ward wise) and the
details of staff attending it.
Grievance Disposal Register department wise
Grievance Status Summary
Action taken reports
Analytical reports for Performance evaluation as an ULB and
department wise.
Department wise SLA Parameters.
Status by source of complaint.
Department-wise compensation paid along with Response Time for
Grievance Resolution.
Survey report for Awareness levels among Citizens about the
Grievance cell.
Grievances raised to public disclosure.
75
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
User Authentication
1
6
7
76
S.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
the scrutiny.
Generate application reference for Building Plan Application/ Layout
Application for the applicant and facilitate online tracking of the
status of the application.
9
Online help should be available to the user for each system function.
Topics covered in the user manual shall also be available through the
online help.
10 Enable integration of the module with the following module to
facilitate exchange of data: Property Tax, Vacant Land Tax, Water
Tax, File Movement, Grievance Redressal, Court Cases, Financial
Accounting, Assets & Inventory, Advertisement Tax, Trade Licenses,
Project/ward works, and schemes.
11 Track delays in approval steps and maintain an audit log of the
approval process steps.
12 Ability to check for pending taxes if any add as functionality
interface.
13 Ability to track arrears due to the ULB and the robustness of the
system needs to be maintained
Layout Approval
8
1
2
3
6
7
8
77
S.
No.
Requirement
9
10
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
78
5.
5.1
e-Procurement (Works)
S.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
User Authentication
1
3
4
79
S.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
Allows the bidder to bid against a parameter, if the bidder does not
fulfill the minimum requirement specified against that parameter.
8
Allow selection of multiple bid evaluation stages.
9
Facility to enter the tender schedule in the system.
10
System automatically disallows downloading of tender form beyond
the last date of procurement of tender document, disallow viewing of
a bid by the department staff before the bid opening date, etc.
11
Allow online submission of the draft NIT to the competent authority
for approval.
12
Facilitate time-tracking based escalation in case of delays at any
stage of approval.
13
Supports online review and approval of the draft NIT.
14
Allows upcoming, open, and awarded tenders to be posted on the eProcurement website
15
Viewing of the NIT requires the login information of the enlisted
contractors.
16
Facility to upload multiple corrigendum and addendum linked to the
original NIT.
17
Allow tenders to be tracked throughout their lifecycle in terms of
stage of processing, comments at various stages of evaluation, and
the decisions made.
18
Online generation of reports regarding sale/download of tender docs
and receipt of fees/EMD, list of bidders, etc.
Receive Bids
1
Allows intending bidders to download the tender document from the
e-Procurement website without paying the tender document fee (or
on payment as decided by the State).
2
Provides Integration with payment gateways for online payment of
EMD, tender document fee, etc., as decided by the State.
3
Allows registered contractors to upload and store the frequently
required certificates, statements.
4
Allows registered contractors to log-on to the e-Procurement website
for submission of bids.
5
Provides templates and support multiple contractors bidding as a
consortium.
80
S.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
81
S.
No.
Requirement
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
82
S. No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
Supplier Management
1
3
4
5
83
S. No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
2
3
6
7
8
9
Rate contract catalog contains the item name, item code (system
generated or manual, as decided), a description of the item, unit of
measurement, supplier name, supplier part number (if any), rate
contract unit price, etc.
Allows products to be identified (searched) by more than one
specific identifier such as description, item code, etc.
Allows the maintenance and hosting of individual catalogues to be
controlled according to the terms of an individual agreement
between the department and its particular suppliers.
Allow catalogues in a compliant format, to be transacted through
the system for the
following options:
Supplier maintains and hosts the catalogues
Department maintains and hosts the catalogues
Suppliers and/or department maintain catalogues that are
hosted by the vendor.
Support steps for updating catalogues such as editing, reviewing,
and releasing catalogues for publishing. Any supplier updated
catalogue must be approved by the department before publishing.
Allows the department to construct and maintain menus (directory)
for the catalogues/items on the system.
Allows flexible pricing on the system for an item.
Facilitate assignment of unique code to items and sub items.
Facility to control viewing of selected item catalogues based on the
84
S. No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
85
S. No.
Requirement
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
86
S. No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
19
20
2
3
4
Localization
1
87
S. No.
Requirement
5
6
7
8
9
10
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
Personalization
1
Supports user specific portals (entry points). The user portals can be
differentiated based on the type and level of the user, such as different
views for departmental users, contractors, the Governmental users
(Secretary, Minister, CM, etc.). The views will contain content that is
relevant to the type of user.
2 Simple graphical user interface (GUI) providing ease in navigation and use.
Provision of clear display of server date and time, user details, etc. on all
pages.
88
5.2
S.
Requirement
No.
1
10
11
12
13
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
89
S.
Requirement
No.
14
15
16
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
90
6.
Health Module:
S.
Requirement
No.
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
User Authentication
1
First level of security
The municipal corporation users to have access to various databases
and to query on the different master maintenance tables based on the
user-ids and passwords.
2
Second level of security
The usage of pin codes, Token and key, Biometric Authentication
Methods such as Finger Print Technology etc for second level of
authentication may be considered and justification is to be provided
for the same
3
Ability to enter new records, modify existing records, delete existing
records.
4
Ability to generate acknowledgment.
5
Ability to generate field verification checklist report for any given
date.
6.1
Licenses Module
S. No.
Requirement
2
3
4
5
6
7
Existing
Module
(Yes /
No)
Propose
d
Module
(Yes /
No)
91
S. No.
Requirement
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Existing
Module
(Yes /
No)
Propose
d
Module
(Yes /
No)
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
92
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
93
7.
S. No.
Accounting Module
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
User Authentication
1
94
S. No.
10
11
12
13
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
Receipts
14
22
23
24
95
S. No.
25
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
ledger module
Some of the Reports required are
Financial reports regarding assets
Asset depreciation report
Quarterly statement of departmental assets
Transaction history report (Addition, transfer,
Retirement etc)
Asset register report
Asset retirement report
Asset by category report
Cost detail report
Budget
26
27
31
Balance sheet
Income and Expenditure account
Receipts and Payment Account Showing the receipts
and payments of cash major head wise along with
schedules
Cash Flow Showing the receipts and payments of cash
bifurcated into operating, investing and financing
activities
Regular Registers:
Abstract Register of Receipts and Payments
Register of Investments
Register of Adjustment
Advance Ledger
Deposit Ledger
Loan Register
Fixed Assets Register
Appropriation Register
Register of unpaid bills
Register of dishonored cheques
Borough/ Zone/ Ward wise Accounts
96
8.
Sr.
No.
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
User Authentication
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
97
Sr.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
(Yes / No)
Proposed
Module
(Yes / No)
qualifications.
Ability to administer shift plans considering defined requirements
along with employee preferences, qualifications, and availability.
18
Ability to process day-to-day changes in the shift schedule based on
transactions that affect requirements or availability of staff.
19
Ability to identify and utilize on-call staff.
20
Ability to administer various workweeks and part-time
arrangements.
Promotions
17
21
MIS can be for a particular date or date range, in different fields like
Department, section, name and designation of the employee etc. The
system should be able to generate, but should not be limited to, the
following reports:
Staff turnover
Staff movement
Vacancy requisitions
Promotions
Resignations
Employee Cost
98
Sr. Requirement
No.
Integration and Interface
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
28
99
Sr.
No.
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
100
Sr. Requirement
No.
Interviewing
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
45
46
Reporting
54
101
Sr.
No.
59
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
77
78
79
102
Sr.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
their position.
Managing Benefits
80
The system shall allow for the maintenance of the following benefits
costs and employee deductions information:
Age-graded rate tables
Salary rate tables
Service rate tables
Flat rate tables
Calculation rules tables
Premium
Coverage
Age
Service dates
Rounding rules
Min/max coverage
Benefits deduction from payroll (e.g. insurance premiums).
Managing General Provident Fund
81
82
Travel Management
83
84
85
103
Sr.
No.
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
104
Sr.
No.
100
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
105
Sr.
No.
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
106
Sr.
No.
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
107
Sr.
No.
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
108
Sr.
No.
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
years
Differences in salaries between new & resigned employees
Bonus Triggering
146
Allow for, but is not limited to, the following deductions and
advancement:
Medical benefit deductions
Special retirement scheme deduction
Ad hoc and regular deductions and payments
Loans and advancements
Housing Loans
Vehicle
Educational
Festival advances
Court order deductions
Fixed and variable payments and deductions.
Fixed Payments/ Deductions
151
152
153
Variable Payments/Deductions
154 Ability to calculate variable payments/deductions (VPD). VPDs
may be amount or formula-based.
155 Amount-based VPD is paid/ deducted directly from employee
payrolls.
156 VPD input and approval workflow can be decentralized to branch
departments.
109
Sr. Requirement
No.
Suspension Functions
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
157
158
110
Sr.
No.
170
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
176
177
178
179
180
181
111
Sr.
No.
182
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
Employee History
183
112
Sr. Requirement
No.
Employment Contracts
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
189
Tracking the system security level and the security key card(s)
issued to employees.
193 Ability to maintain the following security information:
Effective dates
Status
Card number
Comments
Employee ID.
194 Provision for information confidentiality and allow for different
user access level.
195 Allow users to audit, track, add, amend and delete information
based on user security access level.
Prior Work Experience
196
113
Sr. Requirement
No.
Checklists
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
197
203
204
205
206
207
114
Sr.
No.
208
Requirement
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
226
115
Sr. Requirement
No.
Employee Relationship Management - Disciplinary Actions
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
227
234
235
236
237
238
116
Sr. Requirement
No.
Management of Employees Qualifications - Qualifications Management
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
Existing
Module
Proposed
Module
117
Project :
Date of Log:
Prepared by:
Validated by :
Basic Risk Information
Risk
Number
Risk
Responsibility Date
Description
Reported
Date:
Impact
Impact
Mitigation
Description Strategy
H/ M /L
Day/
Month/
Year
Day/
Month/
Year
<<Enter
the date on
which the
risk was
reported>>
<<Enter
the latest
date
on
which the
risk was
Updated>>
<<Enter the
probability
of
impact
High/
Medium/
Low
according to
probability
definitions>>
<<What
will be the
impact on
the project
because of
the
identified
risk>>
<<Enter the
types
of
strategy to
be adopted
for
mitigating
the risk
a)Avoidance
b)
Reduction
c) Retention
d)Transfer/
Share>>
Timelines Completed
Actions
Day/
Month/
Year
Planned
future
Action
<<Enter
the
timelines
for
mitigating
the risk>>
<<List
by date
what
actions
will be
taken to
respond
to risk
in
future>>
<<List of
all actions
taken
to
respond to
risk>>
Risk Status
Day/
Month/
Year
a) Open
b)No
Plan
(NP)
c)Plan
enacted (PE)
d)Plan
Effective
e)Closed
118