Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BROOKLAND
WASHINGTON DC
FINAL REPORT
MARCH 2007
This report was prepared by David Volkert & Associates, Inc. and Michael Baker Jr., Inc. for the District
Department of Transportation, using funds from the Federal Highway Administration.
Acknowledgements
Consultant Team:
Alexandria, VA 22312
with:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Brookland study was initiated by the Transportation
Brookland .
The
recommendations
streetscape
for
improvements
are
transportation
a
and
culmination
recommendations.
of
improvements.
An
overall
theme
of
sustainability
with
social,
MADISON ST NE
S RD
NE
CHILLUM PL NE
20TH ST NE
OTIS ST NE
H
UT
DA
TA
KO
N
ST
RD
TA
VI
S
N
ST
31ST ST NE
28TH ST NE
30
TH
NE
22ND ST NE
NE
BU
RG
V ST NE
NS
CONIFE
DE
R RD NE
HICK EY LN NE
E
EN
S TIA
AV
NE
M ST NE
H
NE
E
AY
JAY ST NE
AN
GR
HAYE
HAYES ST NE
44TH ST N
ST
NE
TE
PL
EA DS ST
NE
MEADE
LE E ST
NE
SHERIF F RD NE
ST
E ST NE
ST
21ST ST NE
F ST NE
FO
LANE PL NE
48TH ST NE
LANG PL NE
CO
CRABTREE RD NE
RD
E
EN
AV
ND
LA
RY T NE
A
M
IS
H ST NE
BE NN
ING R
GALES
D NE
ST N
E
15
AVE
14TH PL NE
26TH ST NE
TE
NE S S
T
A
RS L ST NE
ES
N
TN E
E
LI
VE
JA
TN
IL
NS
RD NE
KE
N
EE
ME ADOW
AN
A
ES
VI
R
NE
IN
I
AV
R ST NE
UN
O R 45 TH
ST
TH
NE
AV
E
NE
NE
BL
A
RD
D
O
NE
7TH ST NE
REED ST NE
PL N
NT
RD N
E
LN
QU
13TH ST N
SEY
F ST NE
E ST NE
33 RD
NE
ST
IE
N
LI
ADAMS ST NE
OLN
HAMLIN ST NE
LINC
24TH ST NE
EN
NE
MO
G ST NE
11TH ST NE
10TH ST NE
H ST NE
AV
W PL NE
I ST NE
W ST NE
OA
8TH ST NE
K ST NE
AN
AV
13TH ST NE
12TH ST NE
ST
OK
N
VE
ISL
FO
10TH ST NE
9TH ST NE
8TH ST NE
RH
DE
EVARTS ST NE
14
TH
A
RK
YO
W
NE
NE
AL
PL
NE
FL
OR
ID
AA
M ST NE
VE
NE
L ST NE
2ND ST N
JE R
GEORGIA AVE
SO
NEWT ON ST NE
MONROE ST NE
LAWRENCE ST NE
KEARNY ST NE
JACK SON ST NE
IRVING ST NE
R ST NE
Q ST NE
NEW
16TH ST
18TH ST NE
17TH ST NE
PERRY ST NE
NE
S ST NE
NORTH CAPITOL ST
K ST NW
5TH ST NW
DR
RANDOLPH ST NE
QUINCY ST NE
QUINCY ST NE
NE
U ST NE
T ST NE
1ST ST NE
M ST NW
4TH ST NW
CH
D
KR
V ST NE
P ST NW P ST NE
O ST NW
1ST ST NW
7TH ST NW
BE
A
NE
MA C
T ST NW
4TH ST NE
8TH ST NW
MARION ST NW
VE
NA
SHEPHERD ST NE
RITCHIE PL NE
FRANKLIN ST NE
EVARTS ST NE
DOUGLAS ST NE
CHANNING ST NE
3RD ST NE
U ST NW
E ST NW
4A
COR
RD NE
2ND ST NW
4TH ST NW
5TH ST NW
3G
UPSHUR ST NE
TAYLOR ST NE
ST NE
N ST NW
MILITARY RD
OD
HAREWO
PL NW
AVE NW
NW
R ST
NW
5TH ST
6TH ST NW
W ST NW
V ST NW
R ST NW
T NW
C
NM
2ND ST NE
PA RK
WARDE
GE ORGIA
MIC
ST NW
Q ST NW
ST NW
ST NW
HIG
WEBSTER ST NE
VARNUM ST NE
UPSHUR ST NE
B r o o k l a n d
5
S ST NW
NE
ENT RD
VE
JOH
IA
IRVING ST NW
GIRARD
BRYA NT
T NW
AI
HAL F PL NE
M ST NW
UPSHUR ST NW
TAYLOR ST NW
SA RG
HA
W
13TH ST NE
EMERSON ST NE
CATUR ST NW
CRITTENDE N ST NW
HANAN ST NW
ALLISON ST NW
WEBSTE R ST NW
16TH ST NE
ARRAGUT ST NW
ERSON ST NW
11TH ST NE
12TH ST NE
GALLOW AY ST NE
BR
E
8TH ST NW
RIG G
INGRAHA M ST NW
HAMILTON ST NW
GALLATIN ST NW
7TH ST NE
T NW
LLOW ST NW
5T
H
KA
NS
AS
A
1ST ST NW
FITC
4B
MIS
S
OU
R
I AV
E
S
G
IG
4D
3E
3F
4C
NORTH CAPITOL ST
R
2D
2B
K ST
23RD ST
K ST
AN
ISL
VE
DA
W
NE
FL
OR
2C
2F
CONSTITUTION AVE
2A
R
YO
IDA
KA
AV
VE
5B
E
BENN
6C
12TH ST
2E
15TH ST
14TH ST
CA
NA
LR
DE
HO
U ST
5C
AV
1B
TA
KO
1C
DA
3B
5A
H
UT
3C
3D
1A
1D
SO
W
M
6A
ING R
7D
I
OR
EM
7A
6B
7C
ST
EAST CAPITOL ST
AL
PK
7E
M ST
SO U
TH
CA P
ITO
L ST
6D
7B
8A
8B
2002 Wards
8C
Major Roads
Water
8D
Parks
Source: Government of the District of
Columbia; Citizen Atlas Map Gallery,
prepared by the Office of Planning for DC
GIS, October 1, 2003.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements......................................................2-3
Executive Summary...........................................................4
Table of Contents...............................................................7
1.
2.
3.
4.
Connectivity...................................................26
Context-Sensitive Development..................28
Special Events................................................29
Prospective.....................................................30
Overview of Short- & Long-Term
Recommendations........................................31
7.3
7.4
8.
8.6
6.
8.7
8.8
Study Methodology..............................64
Traffic Engineering Analysis................65
Walking Environment...........................76
Bicycling in Brookland.........................78
Public Transit System............................80
Steetscape.....................................................82
Street Lighting & Utility Poles.........................84
Sidewalks........................................................86
Street Furnishings...........................................88
Street Trees.....................................................90
Utility Undergrounding Pros & Cons.........92
Approach........................................................94
Consideration of 4-Way Stops at
Unsignalized Intersections.............................95
Traffic Calming Measures..............................96
Transportation Recommendations for
Areas not Included in the Public Realm
Study Area......................................................98
Transportation Recommendations.........................94
7.1
7.2
5.
7.
9.
10.
STUDY AREAS
The Brookland/12th Street Transportation and Streetscape
Two blocks of Newton Street connecting the was released for public review and comment. This
comprehensive draft report combines, expands and
Brookland/CUA Metro Station and 12th Street.
considers comments on three documents:
In order to tailor the recommendations to the existing
and evolving urban fabric, seven sub-districts have been
identified based on their character, predominant use, and
(1)
location within the public realm study area (see chapter (2)
8.4)
(3)
is
located
in
the
Northeast
Figure 2-2: Map of rapid development of the Brookland area ca. 1890.
(Source: The Heritage of CUA. Courtesy of the American Catholic History Research Center and
University Archives, CUA)
In 1840, the Colonel and his wife Ann Margaret Queen built
an elegant brick Greek revival mansion, which still stands
at 901 Newton Street, N.E., and called it Bellair, meaning
beautiful air. The neighborhoods reputation for clean,
fresh air persisted well into the 20th century.
During the American Civil War, a ring of forts was built on
the outskirts of Washington to defend the city from
the Confederate Army. Two of those forts were
located in the area. First, Fort Slemmer and second,
Fort Bunker Hill on land belonged to the Queen
and Brooks families. Later the Old Soldiers Home
was constructed to the northwest. The population
of the city itself increased with the expansion of
the federal government.
The Brookland area evolved in the early 1870s,
when the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad opened its
western branch line in this area to downtown.
10
wooden
houses
from
Victorian,
growing
residential
community.
The
11
community
with
both
two.
Washingtonians
Wagner,
the
first
were
African
Robert
American
Figure 2-7: Photo of the Newton Theater Building today, occupied by CVS Pharmacy.
Figure 2-6: Picture of the Scott Building and Andersons Cottage, U.S. Soldiers
Home.
12
its heritage.
ASSETS
k
The neighborhoods strategic location in an area with
r
strong institutional anchors like the Catholic University
of America offers the opportunity to emphasize on
and benefit from the unique neighborhood that has
maintained continuity with the past.
The presence of two metro stations Brookland/CUA and
Rhode Island Avenue, gives Brookland the benefit of
being linked to the rest of the city and region via public
transit.
transportation
and
streetscape
improvements
13
DEVELOPMENT FORECAST
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
BROOKLAND
The
The
Metropolitan
Washington
growth
of
the
region
is
development
cooperative
future
Based
years.
forecasts
of
forecasts
include
the
activities
in
and
following
Employment
(ANCs),
District
Department
of
of
Columbia
Transportation
14
Figure 2-9:
Comprehensive Plan
Existing Land Use Map
for the Brookland Area.
Source: District Office of
Planning.
CONCLUSION
The
estimated
growth
for
the
Figure 2-10:
Comprehensive Plan
Generalized Land Use
Map for the Brookland
Area.
Source: District Office of
Planning.
15
Emerson Park
Madeline Gardens
Apartments of Brookland
RD
MADISON ST NE
S RD
NE
CHILLUM PL NE
EMERSON ST NE
H
E
N
ST
TA
N
ST
28TH ST NE
30
TH
31ST ST NE
LN
BU
RG
V ST NE
NS
CONIFE
DE
NE
PL N
22ND ST NE
NE
RD
N
LI
R RD NE
RD NE
E
AV
S TIA
CO
KE
N
IL
AN
A
FITCH PL NE
DIX ST
NE
BROOKS
ST NE
AMES ST NE
EAST CAPITOL ST
A ST SE
AS
TS
E
B ST SE
C ST SE
C ST SE
Figure 2-11: Map showing 1-mile radius around Brookland/CUA Metro station
16
50TH ST NE
E
EN
AV
NE
TA
ST
SO
NE
35
TH
MIN
42ND ST NE
14TH PL NE
19TH ST NE
1ST ST NE
CLAY PL NE
48TH ST NE
44TH ST NE
NE
IA
ST
SE
49TH ST NE
PL
CO
HAYES ST NE
HAYES ST NE
A
AN
FW
AN
CLAY ST NE
BLAINE ST NE
JAY ST NE
GR
17TH PL NE
14TH ST NE
C ST SE
BAY ST SE
ST
EA DS ST
NE
A ST SE
INDEPENDENCE AVE SE
TE
MEADE ST NE
LE E ST
NE
SHERIF F RD NE
ST
E ST NE
LANE PL NE
NE
FO
EAST CAPITOL ST
A ST SE
ST
E
AY
F ST NE
LANG PL NE
16TH ST NE
CONSTITUTION AVE NE
M ST NE
E
EN
AV
ND
LA E
N
RY
MA I S T
H ST NE
BE NN
ING R
GALES
D NE
ST N
E
15TH ST NE
C ST SE
C ST NE
NE
F ST NE
E ST NE
A ST NE
CRABTREE RD NE
RD
26TH ST NE
G ST NE
JA
NE
13TH ST NE
C ST NE
EE
NS
TN
E
TE
NE S S
T
MO
A
RS L ST NE
ES
N
TN E
E
21ST ST NE
H ST NE
D ST NE
LI
VE
QU
DIVISION AVE NE
ME ADOW
EN
AV
NE
O R 45 TH
ST
TH
NE
AV
E
NE
NE
BL
A
HICK EY LN NE
LN
L R
D NE
NCO
9TH ST NW
FO
IE
OA
11TH ST NE
10TH ST NE
K ST NE
5TH ST SE
C ST SW
VE
L ST NE
6TH ST NE
C ST SW
NE
AA
I ST NE
1ST ST S
JEFFERSON DR SW
INDEPENDENCE AVE SW
NW
C ST NW
AVE
D ST NW
RID
8TH ST NE
SEY
D ST NW
VI
S
NE
FL
O
M ST NE
2ND ST NE
JE R
10TH ST NW
E ST NW
24TH ST NE
LP
L
1ST ST NE
NEW
5TH ST NW
4TH ST NW
I ST NW
H ST NW
NE
NORTH CAPITOL ST
1ST ST NW
7TH ST NW
K ST NW
ST
E
NE
TN
ST
SS
O ST NW
M ST NW
W ST NE
33 RD
W
NE
P ST NW
K ST NW
AV
U ST NE
T ST NE
N ST NW
L ST NW
TA
V ST NE
ADAMS ST NE
PL NE
MARION ST NW
R ST NW
Q ST NW
MADISON DR NW
C ST SW
T ST NW
S ST NW
W
8TH ST NW
12TH ST NW
14TH ST NW
13TH ST NW
G ST NW
F ST NW
U ST NW
H ST NE
W ST NW
V ST NW
S ST NW
Q ST NW
T NE
D
CHAN
RD ST NE
T ST NW
AN
HAMLIN ST NE
4TH ST NW
5TH ST NW
V ST NW
U ST NW
HIG
GIRAR
2ND ST NW
11TH ST NW
W ST NW
V ST NW
C
MIC
ST NW
BRYA NT
OTIS ST NE
RD NE
OD
HAREWO
NE
N
E
EUCLID ST NW
T NW
IRVING ST
PL NW
NW
R ST
NW
5TH ST
6TH ST NW
GIRARD ST NW
PA RK
RD NW
COLUM BIA
AVE NW
RK
PA
KENYO N ST NW
WARDE
GE ORGIA
NW
RD
NW
OTIS PL NW
NE
UR
U
R ST
S T NE
SHEPHERD ST NW
RANDOLPH ST NW
QUINCY ST NW
ES
AV
AI
VARNUM ST NW
UPSHUR ST NW
TAYLOR ST NW
NT
IO
HA
W
6TH ST
S NE
FARRAGUT ST NW
EMERSON ST NW
DECATUR ST NW
CRITTENDE N ST NW
BUCHANAN ST NW
ALLISON ST NW
WEBSTE R ST NW
H ST NE
GALLOW AY ST NE
BR
E
9TH ST NW
8TH ST NW
13TH ST NW
RIG G
INGRAHA M ST NW
HAMILTON ST NW
GALLATIN ST NW
5T
H
MADISON ST NW
LONGFE LLOW ST NW
ST
NICHOLSON ST NW
H ST NE
ST NE
KA
NS
AS
AV
EN
1ST ST NW
W
ONEIDA ST NE
NW
OGLETHORPE ST NW
NE
NW
PL
IR
13 T
H
A
BL
PL
N
SHERIDAN ST NW
RITTENHOUSE ST NW
QUACKENBOS ST NW
PEABODY ST NW
1S
T
TUCKERMAN ST NW
impact analyses.
3RD ST NW
Avenue
B ST SE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The Brookland Transportation and Streetscape Study
Community Walk
ANCs
Merchants
Residents
CUA Administration
Trinity Administration
Providence Hospital
Hospital for Sick Children
John Paul II and Basilica
Brookland Main Street
Brookland Community Development
Corporation
District Government Agencies
Federal Government Agencies
WMATA (Washington Metropolitan
Area Transit Authority
PEPCO
Community Workshops
As part of the effort to set up a comprehensive
development strategy to integrate 12th Streets streetscape
with its transportation needs, the study team met with
17
Anthonys School.
18
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Ward 5 Transportation Summit
Eckington)
Farmers Market
Metropolitan
transit
Area
enhancement
Transit
plans
Authoritys
along
the
Corridor,
Pedestrian and bicycle improvement programs,
Brookland Community Development ,
Brookland Small Area Planning Initiative,
12th Street Main Street Improvements.
19
The following table lists public comments that were noted during the public involvement process. The
numbers correspond to the locations indicated on figure 3-4 (please see next page).
Comments
Comments
Monroe Street bridge art looks trashy. Replace with stone veneer.
Traffic speeds coming from Irving Street onto Michigan Avenue need
to slow down. Cars are traveling very fast on Irving with interstate
speeds (40-50 mph) then make the light onto Michigan Avenue
and dont slow down to lower speeds (25 mph posted speed limit).
Collisions happen here at Irving/Michigan.
No bike rack at Metro stop. The old ones are rusted out and served
as seats for groups of kids in the afternoon.
20
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Comments
Comments
Please brighter lights Monroe at 7th Streets to 7th & Franklin Streets
NE 20017-1403.
When we arrived to the 9th & Monroe Street intersection one resident
(who has worked many years for WMATA since then retired) notes
that the metro bus station on the north side of 9th Street could
share the station with commuters/vehicles since the buses are
around 20 minutes apart and there arent many buses using this
station.may help improve the higher traffic volumes down 10th
Street; maybe the bus station can allow exiting southbound from
the 9th & Monroe Street intersectionhence theyd enter from the
north side of that station and continue through drop-off/pick-up
and exit southbound at 9th/Monroe Streets.
Get rid of the gingko trees on 12th Street & Perry Street. Replace
with cherry blossoms.
Monroe Street from 9th to 12th Street is too narrow for 4 lanes but is
used as 4 lanes. Walking and lighting is poor.
12th Street between Perry and Otis Streets (east side of 12th Street)
double parking occurs in front of Day Care facility.
Need for a 4 way stop sign at the intersection of 12th & Newton
Streets. It is dangerous for pedestrians as well as motorists driver
has to come too far into line of traffic before venturing across.
Trucks park at corners which block ones view.
Monroe Street between 12th Street NE and 10th Street NE has very
wide lanes in each direction there is an opportunity to narrow the
lanes and create wide sidewalks and a tree line/median.
21 Moreover, vibrations from buses and large trucks are ruining our
homes. Monroe Street needs to be redone in terms of surfacing.
22 Streets are falling apart. Paved 1 time in 16 years (1991).
21
22
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Figure 3-4: Map of Public Comments/Specific
Issues
Refer to previous page (Table 3-1 ) for enumerated legend.
23
Figure 4-2: Photos showing public realms that are aesthetically pleasing and serving multiple uses (locations vary).
Figure 4-3: Photos showing how businesses benefit from a vibrant public realm (locations vary).
24
Figure 4-7: Photo of street lighting with focus on roadway, dimly lit
sidewalks.
25
pedestrian
to
realm
12th
environments
Streets
are
connectivity.
recommendations
and
severe
While
funding
respectively. While these Avenues offer cars quick access should be focused on 12th Street, ignoring these
to 12th Street and to the neighborhoods, they lack in impediments will limit its role as a Main Street.
convenient and safe pedestrian crossings, and more
importantly, do not adequately announce the beginning
of an important Main Street environment.
The longitudinal orientation of the Metro and heavy rail
* Locations vary.
Figure 4-10: Photo of pedestrian bridges for safe and convenient access
over streets and train tracks*.
26
ENHANCED
CONNECTIVITY
BROOKLANDS
BARRIERS
Roadway Barrier
Limited connectivity
between the
Brookland community
and areas to the west,
e.g.:
Catholic University
and
Trinity College.
Metro Station
(Brookland/CUA)
Roadway Barrier
Create Gateway
10-Minute Walking
Radius (approx.
1/2 mile)
Enhance Access/Gateways
through Bridge Improvements
Commercial Center of 12th Street
(Designated Main Street)
Capitalize on Brookland/
CUA Metro Station: Improve
Pedestrian Access &
Announce Brooklands
Commercial Center
Enhance Access
& Pedestrian
Travelways from and
to the west & east.
27
28
elements
open
landscape
accents
in
the
such
space
enhancements
should
be
as
design,
and
considered
recommendations
and
intersection.
Cooperation
29
4.4 Prospective
Districts Small Area Plan update, special attention will
be paid to the vicinity around the Brookland/CUA Metro
Station. The studies will examine accessibility and safety
around the station, development needs and potential,
zoning, and urban design improvements to further
enhance the Brookland community. Information may be
obtained at the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority
(WMATA) and the District Office of Planning.
With this transportation and streetscape study, DDOT
intends to analyze and propose a plan that facilitates
Figure 4-17: Photo of 12th Street displaying a lack of maintenance. Wide sidewalks
offer great improvement potential.
plan
and
series
of
streetscape
preliminary
implementation
strategy
for
the
assistance needed
30
31
32
Each
Common
33
The posted regulatory speed limit for the 12th Street corridor
is 25 mph.
At this four-way signalized intersection, both 12th Street Monroe Street are two-lane minor arterials. Monroe Street
and Franklin Street are two-way, two-lane minor arterials. begins at Michigan Avenue and continues through South
Franklin Street within the study area terminates at Michigan Dakota Avenue (study terminus). These intersections along
Avenue and continues through Rhode Island Avenue Monroe Street contribute a significant amount of traffic to
(study terminus). These intersections along Franklin Street the Brookland Study area. East of 12th Street, Monroe Street
34
In addition, Fire House Engine Company No. arterial while Quincy Street is a 2 lane local road. Quincy
17 is located along the south side of Monroe Street, just Street has both Michigan Avenue and 14th Street as termini.
east of 12th Street. Parking restrictions in the vicinity of the The Quincy Street approaches to 12th Street are stop sign
intersection are as follows:
receiving lane.
through Saturday.
Street, Monroe Street has both unrestricted on-street Quincy Street has no posted signage regarding through
35
Friday.
Street.
Parking is prohibited on the south side of Quincy
block.
36
37
38
39
MICHIGAN AVENUE
STREET, N.E.
AT
NORTH CAPITOL
Street.
East of Monroe Street to 7th Street, the roadway changes
to a two-way, five-lane facility having three lanes travel
40
Posted regulatory speed limit signs for speed limit of 25 mph whereas Harewood Road has a
eastbound Irving Street were not observed in the vicinity posted regulatory speed limit of 30 mph north of Michigan
of the intersection. Irving Street was under construction at Avenue and 25 mph south of Michigan Avenue. Parking
the time of this study. Parking restrictions in the vicinity of restrictions in the vicinity of the intersection are as follows:
the intersection are as follows:
intersection.
through Friday.
Street.
MICHIGAN AVENUE
N.E.
AT
HAREWOOD ROAD,
At this signalized intersection, Harewood Road is a fourlane minor arterial. This intersection is a four-way signalized
41
undivided minor arterial while Michigan Avenue is a six- traffic onto Monroe Street is prohibited.
lane undivided minor arterial, east of 4th Street, and a fivelane undivided minor arterial, west of 4th Street. 4th Street Truck prohibitions for through trucks over 28,000 lbs
is a four-lane roadway with two approach lanes and two gross vehicle weight are prohibited from traveling onto
receiving lanes. The Basilica Driveway has one southbound eastbound Monroe Street from Michigan Avenue. In
lane exiting the Basilica grounds and one receiving lane addition, through trucks are prohibited westbound along
entering the Basilica grounds. This intersection is a four-way Monroe Street. Michigan Avenue and Monroe Street
signalized intersection with 4th Street approaching from have a posted regulatory speed limit of 25 mph. Parking
the south and the Basilica driveway approaching from restrictions in the vicinity of the intersection are as follows:
the north. Traffic from the Basilica can exit in any direction.
As well, traffic may enter from any of the approaches.
Street.
Road intersection.
MICHIGAN AVENUE
DRIVEWAY, N.E.
AT
7THSTREET / CUA
to 9:30 PM and 4:00 PM to 6:30 PM, Monday through transition to three lanes at the mid-block west of the 7th
intersection.
MICHIGAN AVENUE
N.E.
AT
MONROE STREET,
At this three-way signalized intersection, Monroe Street is a the bridge to the Brookland/CUA Metro station drop off
four-lane divided minor arterial. Westbound Monroe Street point (Past the Pizza Hut).
has one lane of traffic that opens up to two lanes at the
intersection. At the intersection both lanes may continue Through truck prohibitions for Michigan Avenue are posted.
onto westbound Michigan Avenue and the right lane may In addition, there are no bus stops in the immediate vicinity
also turn right onto eastbound Michigan Avenue. Right of the intersection. Michigan Avenue and 7th Street have a
turns on red are prohibited for the westbound Monroe posted regulatory speed limit of 25 mph. Parking restrictions
Street traffic. The eastbound Michigan Avenue intersection in the vicinity of the intersection are as follows:
approach has three lanes with the curb lane required to
turn right onto Monroe Street; an exclusive traffic signal
42
Avenue.
North of the intersection, 10th Street allows for onstreet parking on both sides of the street away from
the intersection.
follows:
r
intersection.
43
44
The Districts Pavement Condition Indices (PCIs) are listed along 12th Street and along Monroe Street were in good
for various segments of each corridor to indicate pavement condition, whereas pavement markings along Michigan
conditions; these ratings indicate the condition of the Avenue are typically worn out and need to be remarked.
existing pavement and range from excellent to poor. In
general, the roadway surfaces along 12th Street were in
good condition. However, the pavement conditions along
Monroe Street and Michigan Avenue show a significant
TABLE 5-1: Condition of 12th Street, N.E. from Michigan Avenue to Rhode Island Avenue
Location
Width1
PAVEMENT
Cond2 Comment
MARKING
Cond3 Comment
SIGN
Cond** Comment
12th Street, NE
Rhode Island AveDouglas St.
Douglas St-Evarts St.
40
88
Good
Good
Good
40
90
Good
Good
Good
40
92
Good
Good
Good
40
70
Good; NW corner:
curb & gutter deteriorating
Worn
40
86
Utility patch
Renew crosswalks
and stop bars at
Hamlin St.
40
40
40
82
84
90
Good
Utility patches
Good
40
79
Good
89
40
81
Good
Good
Good
40
82
Utility patches
Good
Good
40
76
Good
Good
Good
50
43;
New
Good
Good
Good
50
Good
Good
Good
Randolph St.-Michigan
Ave.
50
Good
Good
Good
45;
New
87;
New
Good
Good
High intensity crosswalk all 4 approaches. NB rumble strips.
Rumble strips, stop
bars.
Good
45
TABLE 5-2: Condition of Monroe Street, N.E. from 7th Street South Dakota Avenue
Location
Width1 PAVEMENT
Cond2 Comment
MARKING
Cond3 Comment
SIGN
Cond** Comment
50
88
Good
Good
Good
50
50
81
91
Good
Bridge
Good
Good
Good
Good
50
78
Rutting WB traffic
50
51
Cracks
Poor
30
71
Rutting
Poor
30
30
73
61
Rutting
Poor
Rutting, Utility Patches Good
Good
Good
30
30
Good
30
30
59
83
Good
67
87
Rutting
Good
Rutting,
Good
Rutting, Utility Patches Good
30
30
66
92
Monroe Street, NE
Michigan Ave.-7th
St.
7th St.-8th St.
8th St.-9th St.
Potholes
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
TABLE 5-3: Condition of Michigan Avenue, N.E. from North Capitol Street to Randolph Street
Location
Michigan Avenue, NE
North Capitol St
Gentain Ct
Gentain Ct Franklin St
Franklin St Irving St
Irving St.-Harewood Rd.
Harewood Rd.-4th St.
4th St.-Monroe St.
Monroe St.-7th St.
7th St.-John McCormack Rd.
John McCormack
Rd.Bunker Hill Rd (W)
Bunker Hill Rd (W) 9th St
(S)
9th St (S) 10th St (S)
10th St Bunker Hill Rd
(M)
Bunker Hill Rd (M) Perry
St
Width1
PAVEMENT
Cond2 Comment
MARKING
Cond3 Comment
SIGN
Cond**
65
92
Good
Good
Good
60
60
58
58
58
91
81
58
89
85
Good
Good
Good
Worn
Worn
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
54
86
Good
Rutting
Rutting
Rutting
Rutting
Rutting; Wood utility pole
in the sidewalk along eastbound side.
Worn
Good
47
85
Rutting
Worn
50
95
Rutting
Worn
52
90
Rutting
Worn
52
96
Rutting
Worn
45
86
Rutting
41
79
Rutting
Perry St Quincy St
40
Quincy St Randolph St
40
Randolph St 12th St
40
46
62,
New
88,
New
91,
New
Comment
No Parking signage is
faded.
No Parking signage is
faded.
Two lanes not
marked
Two lanes not
marked
Two lanes not
marked
TABLE 5-4: Condition of Michigan Avenue, N.E. from 12th Street to Eastern Avenue
Width1
PAVEMENT
Cond2 Comment
40
79
Rutting
Worn
Good
53
67
Rutting
Worn
Good
52
52
48
78
49
100
48
98
50
94
Rutting
Northwest corner of Sargent Rd needs curb cut
Questionable, perhaps
old rating. Fair
Questionable, perhaps
old rating. Fair
Questionable, perhaps
old rating. Fair
50
77
42
87
40
Location
MARKING
SIGN
Cond3 Comment Cond** Comment
Michigan Avenue, NE
Worn
Good
Worn
Good
Worn
Good
Worn
Good
Worn
Good
Worn
Good
Worn
Good
84
Worn
Good
82
Worn
Good
98
Worn
Good
Worn
Good
42
Questionable, perhaps
old rating. Fair
46
98
42
98
Worn
Good
45
98
Worn
Good
98
Worn
Good
98
Worn
Good
Mangled No Parking..
sign for westbound traffic
TABLE NOTES
1
3
Excellent:
Good
Fair:
Poor:
New markings
Not new, acceptable
Minor treatments recommended, faded
New marking recommended
(No reflectivity, marking gone, worn)
Excellent:
Good:
Fair:
Poor:
86 - 100
76 - 85
36 - 75
0 - 35
47
Signals
A, B, F, I
A, B, C, F
A, B, D, F
A, B, D, F
A, B, D, F
A, B, C, D, F
A, B, D, G
A, B, D, F
A, B, C, D, F
A, B, D, F (new)
A, B, D, F
New Signals. Mast arms for northbound & southbound South Dakota
Ave.
D (for Monroe St.), E (for South Dakota).
Intersection Under Construction (on the day of field survey).
Mast arms for all 4 approaches.
A, B, D, H
B, D, H
A, B, C, D, H
B, D (for westbound Michigan Ave), E (for all other approaches).
B, D
A, D, F
A, B, C, D, F
AD-11s, utility poles, decorative poles.
A, B, J
Mast arms are used for all 4 approaches. B (at southeast and northeast
quadrants).
Westbound Varnum St left pedestrian signal head (for crossing 18th St) is
misaligned. K, D (for eastbound Michigan), E (for all other approaches).
K, Mast arms for both east and westbound Michigan Ave. Westbound:
mast arm traffic signal head visor damaged.
K
Note: Only out of the ordinary items are mentioned in the signal findings inventory. If an acceptable standard signal head application
is used, no mention is made of it. For example if standard pendant posts (Streetlight/ Traffic Signal Combination Poles are used then it
would not be mentioned; if no mast arms are noted it is because it would be needed at this location. Survey conducted December,
2004.
48
Traffic volume counts were collected for ten intersections are also shown graphically on Figures 5-5 and 5-6 for the
along the three study corridors. The firm of O. R. George & morning and evening peak hours, respectively. Details of
Associates provided TMCs for four additional intersections the turning movement counts are contained in Appendix
that were identified during the initial public hearing phase A under separate cover.
of the study. In addition, DDOT and other consultants
conducting studies in the general area collected TMCs
for intersections along the 3 study corridors during the AM
and PM peak periods.
49
50
51
52
53
Total Traffic*
Trucks
%Trucks
Buses
%Buses
3674(3508)
1761(1793)
1622(1777)
656(863)
1318(1289)
1358(886)
1963(2067)
4981(4899)
3230(3226)
3851(3762))
3591(3544)
3515(3372)
2054(2263)
2339(2233)
2578(2414)
2783(2783)
1680(1784)
3354(3415)
1634(1923)
N/C
73(38)
46(21)
27(13)
N/C
N/C
91(41)
137(59)
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
57(15)
N/C
54(19)
50(16)
N/C
74(42)
40(12)
N/C
4.1(2.1)%
2.8(1.2)%
4.1(1.5)%
N/C
N/C
4.6(2.0)%
2.8(1.2)%
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
2.8(0.7)%
N/C
2.1(0.8)%
1.8(0.6)%
N/C
2.2(1.2)%
2.4(0.6)%
N/C
71(27)
63(42)
40(26)
N/C
N/C
40(21)
146(78)
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
48(44)
N/C
69(55)
40(24)
N/C
51(21)
16(12)
N/C
4.0(1.5)%
3.9(2.4)%
6.1(3.0)%
N/C
N/C
2.0(1.0)%
2.9(1.6)%
N/C
N/C
N/C
N/C
2.3(1.9)%
N/C
2.7(2.3)%
1.4(0.9)%
N/C
1.5(0.6)%
1.0(0.6)%
54
of a comprehensive strategy for managing truck traffic and distinctly different types of through truck traffic restriction
deliveries. It is known as the Motor Carrier Management signing (regulatory (white) vs. guide (green) signs).
and Threat Assessment Study. The results of the study,
which was conducted by VOLPE National Transportation These signs should be in compliance with the Manual
Systems Center (VOLPE), can be found on the DDOT web of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Note that in
page. A synopsis relevant to the Brookland Study follows.
Operational characteristics associated with heavy vehicles South Dakota Avenue in the vicinity of the study area were
differ from automobiles and consequently produce different inventoried for through truck signage. Other local roadway
effects on the traffic flow. Field observations indicate that intersections are not accounted for in the inventory shown
there is a constant flow of truck traffic throughout the on the map.
day. It should be noted that very few deliveries occurred
during peak hour field visits; however, public comments Fort Totten Transfer Station and Concrete Plant are
indicate that truck un-/loading slows traffic along the 12th generators of truck traffic.
Street corridor. Delivery trucks often double-park along ways: via John McCormack Road and / or Taylor Street.
storefronts (e.g., CVS Drug Store) to unload or load. This Traffic signal timings and phasing encourages the use of
has been observed on weekends more so than during the northbound South Dakota Avenue via Taylor Street as
week. Double-parked trucks create the loss of a through- a preferred truck route rather than South Dakota Ave /
lane, which leads to build-up and queuing behind the Michigan Avenue. There is not any prohibitive through
trucks. It also causes dangerous weaving patterns as truck signing that discourages such use by trucks destined
vehicles swerve to avoid being delayed behind the truck. for the Transfer Station from using northbound South Dakota
The existing truck regulations are shown on Figure 5-8.
12th Street offers some loading zones for delivery trucks Monroe Street receives its fair share of truck traffic as
for the stores and merchants near Monroe and Newton well. Some of it may be from the tourist buses that go
Streets. Double-parking of delivery trucks was observed to the Basilica of the Shrine of the National Shrine of the
near these portions of 12th Street. This not only detracts Immaculate Conception as well as other tourist sectors of
from the drivability of this section but it also makes it the city. Buses are supposed to be waiting at the available
difficult for crossing street traffic to enter or cross 12th Street waiting areas in the Basilica parking lot on the corner of
when the double parking occurs near the corners of the Harewood Road and Michigan Avenue. However, it has
intersections.
55
they generate often contribute to its non-acceptance in study. Most of the restrictions are on residential streets and
residential areas. Safety issues associated with speeding and were enacted as a result of complaints from residents.
traffic violations downgrade their acceptance. Officially Many restrictions are in the high-truck-traffic areas in the
designated truck routes would be of great benefit to the eastern part of the District and predominantly residential
Washington DC area. The District does not currently have areas in the northern part of the District. The truck crash
designated truck routes but over time it has developed data collected by DDOT TSA staff indicate crash data
de facto truck routes. North Capitol Street and Rhode from 2000 to 2002. Throughout the city, about 10% of all
Island Avenue are such major de facto truck routes. crashes involve trucks yet trucks only represent about 5%
Truck traffic in the District would greatly benefit from the of the total city traffic. As anticipated, the streets with the
logical determination of routes and restrictions. Regional heaviest truck traffic have the highest concentration of
cooperation is needed to avoid restriction mismatches truck traffic. North Capitol Street is the only such street
found between the District and Maryland.
Major truck trip generators found in the study area are locations in the Brookland study area. They are Taylor and
the Catholic University of America area, Fort Totten Trash 12th Street and Michigan Avenue & Eastern Avenue, and
Transfer Station, the Concrete Facility adjacent to the Varnum Street & Eastern Avenue. The first is designated
Fort Totten Transfer Station, the major retail area found on as a high accident location and the second and third
Rhode Island Avenue at the new Home Depot and Giant are designated as priority accident locations. Neither of
locations, and the U.S. Postal General Mail Facility found these locations were shown to have trucks involved in the
at Brentwood Road.
accidents.
In 2003, a perimeter volume count was performed at In the study, several stakeholders concerns were
various city border points. Four of these locations were identified. It was noted that the time of day trash haulers
near the Brookland study area and were found to have are allowed to be on the streets is part of the problem.
truck volumes ranked from heaviest to lightest: Rhode Since they cannot begin working until after 7:00 AM, due
Island Avenue, Riggs Road, Queens Chapel Road (i.e. to the noise generated by their vehicles, they contribute to
Michigan Avenue), and Sargent Road. Over 40% of the the morning rush hour traffic congestion and cause further
trucks entering the city enter from the northeast border delays with their frequent stops. The necessity for the Fort
with Maryland, whereas 30% of the trucks exiting the city Totten Transfer Station to remain easily accessible was also
depart from the northeast border with Maryland. While noted.
truck traffic volumes may be small, they disproportionately
impact traffic due to their large size and difficulty in As per the Volpe Study, recommended preferred truck
maneuvering tight curves and intersections with acute routes that are in the Brookland study area are Rhode
angles. Also, one should accept that the city experiences Island Avenue, North Capitol Street, and South Dakota
heavy construction related truck traffic, depending on the Avenue. Per the Volpe recommendations, special permits
location of major construction sites at any given time.
Information from the Metropolitan Washington Council particularly apply to trash trucks using the Fort Totten
of Governments (MWCOG) was used to generate truck Transfer Station. Resident complaints can best be handled
traffic forecasts for the Brookland traffic analysis zones via improved enforcement of traffic laws (i.e. speeding
(TAZs) for the years 2000-2015. The Volpe study shows that and weight restrictions).
all but one of the 15 to 20 TAZs in the study area were
found to have 0-1500 commercial vehicle trips per day.
Only one TAZ was found to have the next higher grouping
of 1501-3500 commercial vehicle trips per day. Existing
truck restrictions are outlined and mapped in the Volpe
56
Ward 5 has significant industrial facilities, which needed along Randolph Street between Bunker Hill Road
generate truck traffic. These facilities include a major and 17th Street (near the South Dakota Ave intersection).
beer distributor (at Queens Chapel Terrace) and Problem intersections were also noted to occur along
a solid waste transfer facility (at John McCormack 14th Street at the following 3 intersections: Taylor Street,
Road).
Rhode Island Avenue experiences high volumes of traffic is a problem in the area of Rhode Island Avenue at
truck traffic but little congestionthe road works well Newton Street, Otis Street and Bunker Hill Road.
as a corridor for trucks.
North Capitol Street experiences high volumes of
truck traffic.
Eastern Avenue and Randolph Streetat the border
between the District and Marylandis supposed to
be restricted to trucks, but some trucks still use it.
Trucks are encouraged to use Taylor Street, but local
residents are unhappy about it.
57
58
59
improvements.
Using accident data from January 1, 2000 to December 31, Safety improvements should be considered at intersections
2003 obtained from District Department of Transportation, of Michigan Avenue, N.E. at Franklin Street and South
a four-year safety assessment of provided intersections Dakota Avenue. Some of the counter measure possibilities
along the three corridors was performed. The results of in the ITE manual for rear-end collisions include:
the analyses are summarized in Tables 5-7 through 5-9.
The tables show an overall accident summary of the three
intersection as well as day of the week and time of day.
Consider prohibiting
movements,
certain
turning
60
6
ota u be o cc de ts o
Co s o
ypes
Intersection
Number of Accidents
Number of Accidents by Time of Day
Total
along 12th
by Day of Week
Accidents
Street
Weekday Weekend AMPeak MIDDay PMPeak Evening
Corridor
Totals
106
31
16
70
19
39
144
Rhode Island
22
7
5
10
2
13
30
Evarts
6
2
0
5
2
1
8
Franklin
11
6
0
6
3
9
18
Girard
6
0
3
3
0
1
7
Hamlin
2
0
0
2
0
0
2
Irving
3
0
0
2
0
1
3
Jackson
3
0
0
2
1
1
4
Kearney
2
1
0
2
0
1
3
Lawrence
1
2
0
2
0
1
3
Monroe
15
4
2
11
3
3
19
Newton
11
2
1
10
1
3
15
Otis
5
4
1
4
2
2
9
Perry
3
0
0
3
1
0
4
Quincy
4
0
1
2
0
1
4
Randolph
3
2
0
2
3
0
5
Michigan
9
1
3
4
1
2
10
Total
Injuries
105
22
12
7
3
1
1
7
5
6
5
12
4
5
2
6
7
*
*
*
*
Table
Accident
frequency
collision
types.
TABLE5-7b:
6B: Accident
Frequency
forfor
All all
Collision
Types
Intersection
Day of Week as %
Time of Day as % of Total Accidents
Total
Total
along 12th
of Total Accidents
Accidents Injuries
Street
Weekday Weekend AMPeak MIDDay PMPeak Evening
Corridor
Totals
106
31
16
70
19
39
144
105
*
Rhode Island
21%
23%
31%
14%
11%
33%
30
22
Evarts
6%
6%
0%
7%
11%
3%
8
12
*
Franklin
10%
19%
0%
9%
16%
23%
18
7
*
Girard
6%
0%
19%
4%
0%
3%
7
3
Hamlin
2%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
2
1
Irving
3%
0%
0%
3%
0%
3%
3
1
*
Jackson
3%
0%
0%
3%
5%
3%
4
7
Kearney
2%
3%
0%
3%
0%
3%
3
5
Lawrence
1%
6%
0%
3%
0%
3%
3
6
Monroe
14%
13%
13%
16%
16%
8%
19
5
*
Newton
10%
6%
6%
14%
5%
8%
15
12
Otis
5%
13%
6%
6%
11%
5%
9
4
*
Perry
3%
0%
0%
4%
5%
0%
4
5
Quincy
4%
0%
6%
3%
0%
3%
4
2
Randolph
3%
6%
0%
3%
16%
0%
5
6
8%
3%
19%
6%
5%
5%
10
7
Michigan
* Missing data; AM Peak (07:30-09:30), Midday (09:00-16:00), PM Peak (16:00-18:30), Evening
(18:30-07:30).
Left
Turn
Right
Turn
Rear
End
Side
Swipe
Head
On
Parked
Totals
Right
Angle
Parked
Head
On
Side
Swipe
Rear
End
Right
Turn
Left
Turn
Right
Angle
29
1
1
3
4
1
0
3
2
2
1
3
2
3
0
2
1
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
15
2
8
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
1
1
0
2
0
2
25
7
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
3
1
1
2
1
2
7
1
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
19
2
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
5
4
1
0
0
1
0
122
29
6
16
6
2
3
3
3
2
17
12
6
4
4
4
5
Table
Frequency
of vehicle-to-vehicle
type collisions.
TABLE 5-7d:
6D: Frequency
of Vehicle-to-Vehicle
Type Collisions
Side
Swipe
Head
On
Parked
Totals
7
14%
14%
29%
14%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Rear
End
Head
On
25
28%
4%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
24%
12%
4%
4%
8%
4%
8%
Right
Turn
Side
Swipe
36
42%
6%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
11%
3%
3%
0%
6%
0%
6%
Left
Turn
Rear
End
5
1
60%
0%
0%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Right
Angle
Right
Turn
29
3%
3%
10%
14%
3%
0%
10%
7%
7%
3%
10%
7%
10%
0%
7%
3%
Parked
Left
Turn
Right
Angle
Intersection
along 12th
Street
Corridor
Totals
Rhode Island
Evarts
Franklin
Girard
Hamlin
Irving
Jackson
Kearney
Lawrence
Monroe
Newton
Otis
Perry
Quincy
Randolph
Michigan
19
11%
3%
5%
17%
5%
19%
5%
67%
5%
50%
11%
0%
0% 100%
0%
67%
0% 100%
26%
6%
21% 25%
5%
33%
0%
75%
0%
0%
5%
50%
0%
20%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
52%
33%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
24%
8%
17%
0%
50%
0%
40%
24%
17%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
35%
25%
17%
25%
50%
25%
40%
3%
17%
13%
17%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
17%
6%
17%
50%
67%
0%
0%
0%
29%
33%
17%
0%
0%
25%
0%
122
29
6
16
6
2
3
3
3
2
17
12
6
4
4
4
5
61
Other*
Totals
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
8
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
8
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
12
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
1
2
Other*
Totals
Rhode Island
Evarts
Franklin
Girard
Hamlin
Irving
Jackson
Kearney
Lawrence
Monroe
Newton
Otis
Perry
Quincy
Randolph
Michigan
Pedestrian
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
Totals
8
0%
13%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
25%
13%
0%
0%
13%
13%
Other*
Totals
Rhode Island
Evarts
Franklin
Girard
Hamlin
Irving
Jackson
Kearney
Lawrence
Monroe
Newton
Otis
Perry
Quincy
Randolph
Michigan
Pedestrian
Other*
4
25%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
Pedestrian
0%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
50%
12
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
1
2
Total
Injuries
90
12
3
5
3
5
3
8
11
6
5
10
4
15
Table
5-8b: Accident frequency for all collision types.
TABLE 7B: Accident Frequency for All Collision Types
Intersection
Day of Week as %
Time of Day as % of Total Accidents
Total
along Monroe
of Total Accidents
Accidents
Street
Weekday Weekend AMPeak MIDDay PMPeak Evening
Corridor
Totals
87
40
13
53
22
38
127
Michigan
10%
15%
0%
11%
9%
18%
15
8th
5%
3%
15%
2%
5%
3%
5
9th
8%
3%
15%
2%
9%
8%
8
10th
5%
3%
0%
4%
9%
3%
5
12th
17%
10%
15%
21%
14%
8%
19
13th
5%
8%
0%
8%
5%
5%
7
14th
10%
10%
31%
8%
5%
11%
13
15th
8%
3%
8%
8%
5%
5%
8
16th
2%
13%
8%
6%
5%
5%
7
17th
7%
18%
0%
9%
9%
16%
13
18th
10%
3%
8%
9%
9%
5%
10
22nd
2%
5%
0%
4%
0%
5%
4
S.Dakota
10%
10%
0%
9%
18%
8%
13
Total
Injuries
90
12
3
5
3
5
3
8
11
6
5
10
4
15
Left
Turn
Right
Turn
Rear
End
Side
Swipe
Head
On
Parked
Totals
Parked
Head
On
Side
Swipe
Rear
End
Right
Turn
8
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
12
1
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
0
2
1
0
1
110
13
4
5
3
17
5
11
8
6
12
9
4
13
Table
5-8d: Frequency of vehicle-to-vehicle type collisions.
TABLE 7D: Frequency of Vehicle-to-Vehicle Type Collisions
Rear
End
Side
Swipe
Head
On
Parked
Totals
Right
Turn
Left
Turn
Intersection
along Monroe
Street
Corridor
Totals
Michigan
8th
9th
10th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
22nd
S.Dakota
Right
Angle
11
2
0
1
0
1
2
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
18
2
2
1
2
6
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
1
Parked
50%
0%
100%
0%
100%
50%
100%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
31
6
1
4
0
4
0
6
2
1
1
3
1
2
Head
On
Totals
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Side
Swipe
Other*
8
13%
0%
13%
0%
13%
13%
25%
0%
13%
13%
0%
0%
0%
8
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
Rear
End
Pedestrian
3
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
Other*
Totals
Michigan
8th
9th
10th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
22nd
S.Dakota
Intersections along
Monroe Street Corridor
Pedestrian
32
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
4
4
9
2
3
4
Right
Turn
11
2
0
1
0
1
2
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
Left
Turn
8
1
0
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
Left
Turn
Totals
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Right
Angle
Other*
8
1
0
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
Right
Angle
Pedestrian
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Other*
Totals
Michigan
8th
9th
10th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
22nd
S.Dakota
Intersections along
Monroe Street Corridor
Pedestrian
32
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
6%
9%
13%
13%
28%
6%
9%
13%
8
1
13%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0%
13%
0%
13%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
38%
0%
31
19%
3%
13%
0%
13%
0%
19%
6%
3%
3%
10%
3%
6%
18
11%
11%
6%
11%
33%
6%
6%
0%
0%
0%
11%
0%
6%
8
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
13%
0%
0%
13%
0%
25%
12
8%
0%
0%
0%
42%
0%
8%
8%
0%
17%
8%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
40%
27%
50%
67%
75%
22%
75%
31%
8%
0%
0%
33%
6%
20%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
23%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
46%
25%
80%
0%
24%
0%
55%
25%
17%
8%
33%
25%
15%
15%
50%
20%
67%
35%
20%
9%
0%
0%
0%
22%
0%
8%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
13%
0%
0%
11%
0%
15%
8%
0%
0%
0%
29%
0%
9%
13%
0%
17%
11%
0%
8%
110
13
4
5
3
17
5
11
8
6
12
9
4
13
62
Other*
Totals
24
5
4
1
1
4
2
1
0
2
4
0
8
1
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
24
5
4
1
1
4
2
1
0
2
4
0
32
6
7
2
2
4
2
2
0
2
4
1
8
1
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
24
21%
17%
4%
4%
17%
8%
4%
0%
8%
17%
0%
Totals
8
13%
38%
13%
13%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
13%
Other*
Totals
N.Capitol
Franklin
4th
Monroe
10th
Bunker Hill Rd
12th
13th
14th
S.Dakota
Eastern Ave
Pedestrian
177
26
24
11
12
23
1
7
20
14
22
17
Intersections along
Michigan Ave
Corridor
Other*
Pedestrian
Intersection
Day of Week as %
Time of Day as % of Total Accidents
Total
along
of Total Accidents
Accidents
Michigan Ave
Weekday Weekend AMPeak MIDDay PMPeak Evening
Corridor
Totals
168
61
26
84
40
79
229
N.Capitol
16%
20%
19%
18%
25%
11%
39
Franklin
15%
15%
15%
5%
28%
20%
35
4th
8%
7%
0%
11%
8%
6%
17
Monroe
5%
10%
0%
7%
5%
9%
15
10th
13%
11%
12%
14%
8%
13%
28
Bunker Hill Rd
1%
3%
0%
4%
0%
1%
4
12th
5%
2%
12%
5%
3%
3%
10
13th
9%
8%
4%
11%
8%
9%
20
14th
7%
5%
4%
10%
3%
6%
15
S.Dakota
16%
13%
27%
11%
13%
18%
35
Eastern Ave
4%
7%
8%
6%
3%
4%
11
Other*
Table
Accident
frequency
for all collision
types.
TABLE5-9b:
8B: Accident
Frequency
for All Collision
Types
Totals
N.Capitol
Franklin
4th
Monroe
10th
Bunker Hill Rd
12th
13th
14th
S.Dakota
Eastern Ave
177
26
24
11
12
23
1
7
20
14
22
17
Intersections along
Michigan Ave
Corridor
Pedestrian
Total
Injuries
17%
43%
50%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
83%
57%
50%
50%
100%
100%
50%
0%
100%
100%
0%
32
6
7
2
2
4
2
2
0
2
4
1
Right
Angle
Left Turn
Right
Turn
Rear End
Side
Swipe
Head On
Parked
Right
Angle
Left Turn
Right
Turn
Rear End
Side
Swipe
Head On
Parked
Totals
yp
Distribution of Accident Type by Intersection Distribution of Total Accidents by Accident Type
Intersection
along
Michigan Ave
Corridor
Totals
N.Capitol
Franklin
4th
Monroe
10th
Bunker Hill Rd
12th
13th
14th
S.Dakota
Eastern Ave
33
3
1
2
0
10
0
1
10
2
3
1
20
4
1
1
1
1
0
0
3
2
3
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
73
15
11
5
6
8
0
2
6
7
13
0
34
7
4
5
2
2
1
2
0
0
6
5
18
1
4
2
3
3
0
0
1
1
3
0
11
1
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
33
3
1
2
0
10
0
1
10
2
3
1
20
4
1
1
1
1
0
0
3
2
3
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
73
15
11
5
6
8
0
2
6
7
13
0
34
7
4
5
2
2
1
2
0
0
6
5
18
1
4
2
3
3
0
0
1
1
3
0
11
1
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
190
32
27
15
13
24
1
5
20
13
30
10
Table
5-9d: Frequency of vehicle-to-vehicle type collisions.
TABLE 8D: Frequency of Vehicle-to-Vehicle Type Collisions
47%
41%
33%
46%
33%
0%
40%
30%
54%
43%
0%
22%
15%
33%
15%
8%
100%
40%
0%
0%
20%
50%
3%
15%
13%
23%
13%
0%
0%
5%
8%
10%
0%
Totals
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Parked
13%
4%
7%
8%
4%
0%
0%
15%
15%
10%
40%
Side
Swipe
Head
On
Right
Angle
Left
Turn
9%
4%
13%
0%
42%
0%
20%
50%
15%
10%
10%
Rear
End
11
9%
55%
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9%
18%
0%
Right
Turn
18
6%
22%
11%
17%
17%
0%
0%
6%
6%
17%
0%
Parked
Rear
End
Side
Swipe
Head
On
Right
Angle
Left
Turn
Right
Turn
3%
22%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
7%
0%
190
32
27
15
13
24
1
5
20
13
30
10
63
Automobile
Walking
Bicycling
Public Transit
The following discuss the study methodology and traffic engineering analysis using traffic
simulation modeling. The resulting intersection service levels during the morning and evening
peak hours are presented in both textual and tabular format.
and circulation.
64
signal system timing adjustments were developed to peak periods; there are significant queues on westbound
improve traffic operations (see Appendix B for optimized Franklin Street during the AM peak and on eastbound
timings from Synchro outputs). Furthermore, conceptual Franklin Street during the PM peak. The major movements
intersection improvement alternatives were developed on northbound 12th Street operate near capacity LOS
for public concerns that had been raised regarding traffic (E) and LOS (D) during the AM and PM peak periods
safety and congestions.
Peak-Hour Levels of
Service
Generally, operation of an intersection is represented
by peak-hour levels if service (LOS). Intersection service
levels range from A, representing very low vehicle
delay (good conditions) to F describing excessive delay
(failing conditions). In most jurisdictions, including District of
Columbia, a level-of-service D or better is considered as
the minimum acceptable operational standard. A more
detailed description of service levels along with selected
Synchro model outputs is included in Appendix B.
r
The following sections discuss operation of individual
intersections during the morning and evening peak hours.
PM PEAK HOUR
12th St. at
95
De95 %
DeFranklin St,
V/C
LOS
V/C
LOS %
lay
Q
lay
N.E.
Q
Eastbound,
0.48 17.90 B
8
0.82 34.60 C
22
Franklin St
Westbound,
0.79 29.10 C
20
0.41 19.00 B
8
Franklin St
Northbound,
0.99 68.20 E
20
0.91 46.70 D
18
12th St
Southbound,
0.51 22.10 C
10
0.51 21.10 C
10
12th St
Overall Inter0.99 34.60 C
-0.91 32.40 C
-section
Notes: V/C= Volume /Capacity, Delay=Delay in seconds, 95% Q=
Queue in vehicles per lane.
The intersection of 12th Street and Franklin Street during the peak period. There are significant queues on westbound
r
AM peak operates at an average LOS (C). During the PM Monroe Street during the AM peak period and on
peak period, the intersection operates at LOS (C). The major eastbound Monroe Street during the PM peak period.
movements on Franklin Street during both peak periods
65
66
67
68
69
The major movements on 12th Street operate at LOS (C) TABLE 5-12: 12th Street at Michigan Avenue, N.E.
during both peak periods. As shown in table 5-11, the Intersection Performance
queues developed for the 12th Street approach are not
significant during either peak period.
TABLE 5-11: 12th Street at Monroe Street, N.E. Intersection
Performance
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR
12th St. at
V/C De- LOS 95 % V/C De- LOS 95 %
Monroe St
lay
Q
lay
Q
N.E.
Eastbound,
0.46 17.20 B
8
0.86 65.40 E
25
Monroe St
Westbound, 0.76 26.90 C
20
0.34 15.30 B
6
Monroe St
Nortbound, 0.50 23.80 C
10
0.66 27.50 C
13
12th St
Southbound, 0.56 24.50 C
11
0.55 24.30 C
11
12th St
Overall Inter- 0.76 23.90 C
-0.86 39.10 D
-section
Notes: V/C= Volume /Capacity, Delay=Delay in seconds, 95% Q=
Queue in vehicles per lane.
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR
12th St at
95
De95 %
DeMichigan
V/C
LOS
V/C
LOS %
lay
Q
lay
Ave., N.E.
Q
Northbound,
0.44 21.8 C
8
0.63 30.2 C
13
12th St
Southbound,
0.94 47.0 D
27
0.79 36.6 D
17
12th St
Eastbound,
0.28 15.1 B
5
0.79 21.3 C
19
Michigan Ave
Westbound,
0.83 26.6 C
19
0.27 11.9 B
5
Michigan Ave
Overall Inter0.94 29.2 C
-0.79 23.6 C
-section
Notes: V/C= Volume /Capacity, Delay=Delay in seconds, 95% Q=
Queue in vehicles per lane. Roadway capacity for all intersection
movements is not exceeded during either peak period of operation.
Roadway capacity is not exceeded for any of the operates at LOS (C) during the AM peak period and at
approaches to the 12th Street and Monroe Street LOS (E) during the PM peak period. The major movements
intersection, however, roadway capacity for eastbound on Monroe Street during the AM peak period operate at
Monroe Street nears capacity during the PM peak acceptable LOS without significant queues, however the
eastbound Monroe Street movement operates at LOS
period.
The intersection of 12th Street and Michigan Avenue or better during both the AM and PM peak periods with
operates at LOS (C) during both the AM and PM peak average queues for both movements. Details are provided
periods. Northbound 12th Street operates at LOS (C) during in the following table.
both peak periods with average queues. Southbound 12th
Street operates at LOS (D) during both peak periods with
significant queues during the AM peak period and above
average queues during the PM peak period. Eastbound
Michigan Avenue operates at LOS (B) during the AM peak
period and LOS (C) during the PM peak period with below
average queues for the AM peak period and significant
queues during the PM peak period. Westbound Michigan
Avenue operates at LOS (C) during the AM peak period
and LOS (B) during the PM peak period with significant
queues during the AM peak period and below average
queues during the PM peak period. Details are provided
in the following table.
70
MICHIGAN AVENUE
AVENUE, N.E.
AT
SOUTH DAKOTA
LOS (B) during the AM peak period and LOS (C) during
the PM peak period. There are significant queues for
eastbound Michigan Avenue during the PM peak period.
The westbound Michigan Avenue movement operates at
LOS (C) during the AM peak period and LOS (B) during
the PM peak period.
AM PEAK
AM PEAK HOUR
AM PEAK HOUR
HOUR
Michigan Ave
De95 %
De95 %
V/C
LOS
V/C
LOS
at S Dakota NE
lay
Q
lay
Q
Eastbound,
0.36 17.50 B
5
0.86 28.80 C
21
Michigan Ave
95 % Westbound,
0.94 29.00 C
25
0.37 13.40 B
5
Q
Michigan Ave
Southbound, S
0.45 230.1 F
8
0.69 353.0 F
12
Dakota Ave
3
Northbound, S
0.71 24.60 C
13
0.53 22.80 C
9
Dakota Ave
5
Overall Inter0.94 63.20 E
-0.86 100.9 F
-section
2
Notes: V/C= Volume /Capacity, Delay=Delay in seconds, 95% Q=
Queue in vehicles per lane.
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR
Michigan
Ave at 18th/
De95 %
DeV/C
LOS
V/C
LOS
Varnum St
lay
Q
lay
NE
Westbound,
0.58 47.90 D
6
0.26 40.50 D
Varnum St
Northbound,
0.14 34.20 C
2
0.37 37.90 D
18th St
Southbound,
Michigan
0.73 21.80 C
6
0.37 13.90 B
Ave
Eastbound,
Michigan
0.29 17.10 B
5
0.79 5.30 A
1
Ave
Overall Inter0.73 23.40 C
-0.79 11.10 B
-section
Notes: V/C= Volume /Capacity, Delay=Delay in seconds, 95% Q=
Queue in vehicles per lane.
Roadway capacity is not exceeded for any movement (F) operations for the southbound South Dakota Avenue
at the intersection of Michigan Avenue at 18th Street & movement during both the AM and PM peak period.
Varnum Street.
71
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR
DeV/C
LOS
lay
AM PEAK HOUR
95 %
DeV/C
LOS
Q
lay
Michigan at
95 %
10th St NE
Q
Northbound,
0.46 31.60 C
6
0.48 30.80 C
5
10th St
Southbound,
0.53 29.50 C
8
0.33 23.20 C
8
10th St
Eastbound,
Michigan
1.12 5.50 A
3
0.89 16.60 B
6
Ave
Westbound,
Michigan
0.80 84.40 F
20
0.30 11.80 B
21
Ave
Overall Inter0.80 59.40 E
-0.89 17.40 B
-section
Notes: V/C= Volume /Capacity, Delay=Delay in seconds, 95% Q=
Queue in vehicles per lane.
Michigan at
7th St/CUA
Ent., NE
Eastbound,
Michigan Ave
Westbound,
Michigan Ave
Northbound,
7th St
Southbound,
CUA Driveway
Overall Intersection
V/C
Delay
0.30
PM PEAK HOURS
95 %
V/C
Q
Delay
LOS
95 %
Q
23.50 C
0.77
8.30
18
0.71
14.50 C
13
0.40
14.90 B
0.19
14.50 B
0.15
15.00 B
0.09
23.30 C
0.56
31.80 C
0.71
17.10 B
--
0.77
12.80 B
--
LOS
72
MICHIGAN AVENUE
STREET, N.E.
AT
NORTH CAPITOL
MICHIGAN AVENUE
N.E.
AT
MONROE STREET,
Michigan Ave
at Monroe St.,
N.E.
Eastbound,
Michigan Ave
Westbound,
Michigan Ave
Northbound,
Monroe St
Overall Intersection
V/C
Delay
0.28
PM PEAK HOUR
95 %
V/C
Q
Delay
12.30 B
0.74
137.7 F
29
0.72
75.60 E
19
0.31
6.50
0.69
410.9 F
14
0.27
246.2 F
--
--
--
--
--
--
LOS
LOS
95 %
Q
73
during the AM peak period and at a near capacity LOS TABLE 5-21: Michigan Avenue at Harewood Road, N.E.
(E) during the PM peak period. The westbound Michigan Intersection Performance
Avenue movement operates at LOS (F) during the AM peak
period and LOS (B) during the PM peak period. There are
significant queues for westbound Michigan Avenue during
the AM peak period. The northbound 4th Street movement
operates at LOS (F) during the PM peak period and LOS
(D) during the AM peak period; the southbound Shrine
entrance/exit approach operates at LOS (C) during the
AM peak period and LOS (B) during the PM peak period.
The 4th Street and Shrine entrance/exit movements do not
experience significant queues during either peak period.
Details are provided in the following table.
TABLE 5-20: Michigan Avenue at 4th Street, N.E. Intersection
Performance
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR
Michigan
De95 %
De95 %
Ave. at 4th St, V/C
LOS
V/C
LOS
lay
Q
lay
Q
N.E.
Eastbound,
0.61 6.90 A
1
0.96 72.60 E
2
Michigan Ave
Westbound,
1.15 135.9 F
43
0.51 19.10 B
12
Michigan Ave
Northbound,
0.27 35.20 D
4
0.72 133.3 F
11
4th St
Southbound,
Shrine En0.10 22.20 C
2
0.24 19.00 B
3
trance
Overall Inter1.15 100.3 F
-0.96 63.00 E
-section
Notes: V/C= Volume /Capacity, Delay=Delay in seconds, 95% Q=
Queue in vehicles per lane.
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOURS
Michigan
Ave at HareDe95 %
De95 %
V/C
LOS
V/C
LOS
wood Rd,
lay
Q
lay
Q
N.E.
Eastbound,
Michigan
0.70 28.10 C
11
1.16 123.7 F
29
Ave
Westbound,
Michigan
1.03 46.50 D
0
0.47 2.20 A
1
Ave
Southbound,
Harewood
0.51 46.80 D
25
0.41 47.10 D
19
Rd
Northbound,
Harewood
0.75 99.30 F
11
0.40 49.80 D
9
Rd
Overall Inter1.03 47.80 D
-1.16 79.50 E
-section
Notes: V/C= Volume /Capacity, Delay=Delay in seconds, 95% Q=
Queue in vehicles per lane.
MICHIGAN AVENUE
N.E.
AT
HAREWOOD ROAD,
MICHIGAN AVENUE AT IRVING STREET, N.E.
The intersection of Michigan Avenue and Harewood Road The intersection of Michigan Avenue and Irving Street
operates at LOS (D) during the AM peak period and LOS operates at LOS (A) during the AM peak period and
(E) during the PM peak period.
LOS (B) during the PM peak period. Southbound Irving
Street operates at LOS (C) during both peak periods with
74
Intersection
AM
PEAK
Monroe St at South
Dakota Ave, N.E.
Michigan Ave at
South Dakota Ave,
N.E.
Michigan Ave at
Monroe St, N.E.
Michigan Ave at
Harewood Rd, N.E.
Level of Service
PM
COMMENTS
PEAK
Franklin St / 12th
St
Monroe St / 12th
St
Quincy St / 12th
St *
Monroe St /
S.Dakota
N.Capitol / Michigan
Irving / Michigan
Ave
Harewood /
Michigan
4th St / Michigan
Ave
Monroe St /
Michigan
7th St / CUA /
Michigan Ave
10th St /
Michigan Ave
12th St /
Michigan Ave
S.Dakota Ave /
Michigan Ave
Varnum / 18th /
Michigan Ave
AM Overall LOS
Approach LOS
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
B
C
E
C
B
C
C
C
C
B
A
A
B
D
C
B
C
E
C
C
A
A
-C
C
D
F
D
A
F
D
C
B
E
F
--
C
B
B
C
A
F
C
C
B
C
C
D
B
C
C
F
B
D
C
C
PM Overall LOS
Approach LOS
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
C
B
D
C
E
B
C
C
C
C
A
A
F
C
B
C
D
E
C
B
F
A
-C
E
A
D
D
C
B
F
B
F
A
F
--
B
B
B
C
B
B
C
C
C
B
C
D
C
B
C
F
A
D
D
B
75
throughout
the
Brookland
community.
Hence, the nearby bus stops, metro stations, schools, and It should be noted that not all of the intersections shown
stores generate increased pedestrian traffic. This section in the table were part of the initial data collection for this
describes pedestrian movements and counts, availability study. When available, additional intersections, footnoted
of pedestrian crossing signals, and historical accident by a letter, were included to supplement the pedestrian
data for the three study corridors with emphasis on the counts conducted for this study.
intersections.
The
current
east-west
and
north-south
pedestrian
9:00) and the PM peak (4:00-6:00) are shown in table 525. In the table, east-west indicates that the pedestrian Pedestrian movements in the study area do not appear to
is crossing the intersection in the east-west direction. Thus impact vehicular traffic. However, pedestrian movements
at Monroe Street and 12th Street, the east-west direction are greatly impacted by vehicular traffic. Causes for
would be crossing 12th Street and the north-south direction restricted movements at many intersections include (1)
would be crossing Monroe Street. For intersections along heavy vehicular traffic along Michigan Avenue and 12th
Michigan Avenue, which runs diagonally across Brookland, Street, (2) wide vehicular right-of-ways along Michigan
the north-south direction is assumed to be crossing Avenue, and (3) lack of signal timing for pedestrian
Michigan Avenue. At Michigan/18th/Varnum however, crossings at locations were pedestrian indications are not
the east-west direction would be for crossing 18th Street present.
and the east leg of Michigan Avenue, whereas the northsouth direction would be for crossing Varnum Street and There are some locations where advance pedestrian
AM Peak
East-West
43
12
22
65
18
84
5
31
9
34
PM Peak
East-West
9
11
47
58
23
22
7
18
6
72
AM Peak
North-South
49
27
3
68
36
47
4
22
14
145
PM Peak
North-South
5
18
5
77
51
16
4
18
28
17
76
Notes
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
2-way stop
Traffic Signal
2-way stop
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
1-way north
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
2-way stop
traffic signals).
Pedestrian activity declines after dark on both weekdays Elementary School pedestrian movements. Crossing guards
and weekends, which is expected for a residentially were not observed at the nearby school intersections at
oriented neighborhood. However, based on comments 18th and 20th Streets. The Michigan Avenue and 7th Street,
received from various stakeholders, a lack of safety, mostly N.E. intersection has significant pedestrian volume crossing
attributed to deficient sidewalk lighting, may contribute to to the Catholic University and its dormitory at the corner of
the intersection. The Brookland Metro station with access
this pattern.
Michigan Avenue:
12th Street
pedestrian traffic with the focus of pedestrian traffic avoid to use that sidewalk as speeding bicyclists often
occurring between the Monroe Street and Michigan conflict with pedestrians.
Avenue intersections. The heaviest pedestrian traffic was
77
78
79
of
the
Washington
80
81
that define it. The condition of the public realm will help
realized.
Figure 6-1 shows the general public realm study area that
12th Street.
82
fro
et
ro
St
at
io
n 1/2
(1 M
0
m ile
in ra
.w d
al ius
k)
1/
M
il
St e ra
at d
io iu
n s
(5 fro
m m
in M
.w e
al tro
k)
83
Light Mounted on
Utility Pole
Utility Pole
Hydrant
84
Figure 6-2: Map of street lighting & utility poles - existing conditions.
Figure 6-7: Photo of varying distance between light fixtures and trees.
Figure 6-4: Photo of existing cobra type roadway lighting with 25-30 in
height.
Figure 6-8: Photo of roadway lights on east side of 12th Street between
Kearny Street to Rhode Island Avenue.
85
6.3 Sidewalks
SIDEWALK MATERIALS
The majority of the sidewalk materials along 12th Street is concrete
and its condition varies from poor to good. Some sidewalks consist
of either concrete or concrete with brick accent bands, which
is often found at intersection corners in the commercial areas.
The following sidewalk issues have been expressed by residents
at the public meetings/community walks and observed by the
study team: sidewalks in disrepair; uneven pavements; careless
patching with inappropriate materials (asphalt); and cracking
or buckling due from tree roots (see photos next page).
SIDEWALK WIDTHS
Sidewalk widths along 12th Street vary from approximately five to
fifteen feet, except at some intersection corners where sidewalks
are much larger. Inconsistent sidewalk widths and the inability
to comfortably walk along the 12th Street corridor is a concern
within the community. Some of the narrowest sections have tree
boxes, street pole lights, and poorly located bus shelters that
further reduce the walking zone for pedestrian circulation. The
legend and map identify narrow (less than 6), standard (6-10),
and wide (more than 10) sidewalks. Along 12th Street, most of
the sidewalks are considered standard, approximately 20%
are considered narrow, and the remaining sidewalks, usually
at intersection corners, are considered wide.
CURBS, GUTTERS AND RAMPS
Curb and gutter materials and combinations vary throughout
12th Street. Curbs are typically constructed of granite or
concrete, gutters are made of concrete. Concrete curbs are
usually found along the corridor, and concrete gutters with
granite curbs are usually found along the southern portion of
the corridor connecting to Rhode Island Avenue. As with the
sidewalks, the curb and gutter conditions differ by block, and
lack consistent materials and designs. Community comments
have revealed several curb, gutter, and curb ramp issues, such
as curbs in disrepair, sinking and uneven pavements and poor
drainage along some roadways. Several of the intersections
along the corridor have substandard single corner curb or ADA
ramps, which misdirect users into the intersection instead of
safely across street. Other issues involve street pole lights and
newspaper boxes that physically intrude into the curb ramp
area, and instances at intersections where curb ramps are
missing completely.
86
Legend
Narrow Sidewalk
(Less than 6)
Standard Sidewalk
(6 - 8)
Wide Sidewalk
(More than 8)
Pedestrian
Crossing
Uneven Pavement
87
Legend
Bus Shelter
Bus Stop
Mail Box
Bike Rack
Trash Receptacle
Public Phone
88
Figure 6-24: Photo of bus stop, located on every other block. Several bus
stops lack trash receptacles.
Figure 6-25: Photo of mail boxes, located in several areas along the
corridor.
Figure 6-26: Photo of damaged bike rack along 12th Street. Lack of racks
causes bikes to be locked on random poles and parking meters.
89
90
Decaying Tree
These trees show clear
signs of decay and will
not recover. Some large
trees may be a liability and
should be removed as
soon as possible
Dead Tree
These trees show no sign
of life and are a liability
91
Utility wire undergrounding and relocation projects are for the necessary private-property work; this makes it more
expensive. Communities would have to convince their efficient for the contractor and sometimes yields cost
local officials and utility companies of the benefits of wire savings for each property owner.
SIDE VIEW
~30
~20
OPTION:
ADD PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS
BELOW THE 20 WIRES AT
~ 16 ABOVE GROUND.
~16
FRONT VIEW
COBRA LIGHT
ADDED PEDESTRIAN
LIGHTS
Curb
92
sidewalks.
Cost
Undergrounding existing utility lines is very expensive.
Cost estimates range as high as $1 million per mile just
for the power lines. Undergrounding telephone and
cable-television lines adds to the cost.
Disruption streets have to be excavated and conduit
installed,
Reduced Maintenance
Falling tree limbs, high winds, heavy snows, and vehicle
although
pairing
undergrounding
with
Repair
Visible Equipment
While undergrounding would eliminate all above
Economic Development
Many revitalization experts agree that investing in improving
the appearance of traditional commercial areas is one of the
best ways to attract new business and stimulate economic
development. Beauty benefits business, and minimizing the
visual impact of utilities can be a major strategy to beautify
Trees
The process of undergrounding utilities on tree-lined
streets may damage the roots and therefore threaten
the survival of the existing tree canopy.
93
7. TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 Approach
The transportation improvement recommendations were developed based on the existing conditions assessment
and traffic engineering analyses. Draft recommendations were reviewed by and discussed with District agencies and
Brooklands stakeholders to be further refined by the study team. The results are presented in two chapters:
CHAPTER 7. TRANSPORTATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Chapter 7 addresses community concerns regarding Chapter 8 describes both transportation and public realm
traffic control and speeding, including considerations of related improvements for the same study areas as they are
four-way stop control and traffic calming options as means interdependent and derived from each other. Contained
of reducing speeds. It also contains recommendations for herein are lists of short- and long term improvements as
corridor sections that are outside the public realm study well as conceptual plans of recommendations for the 12th
area such as Michigan Avenue.
94
TRANSPORTATION - RECOMMENDATIONS
As the basis for the analysis, traffic volumes were obtained at impact on safety, traffic volumes (and possible diversions
five (5) unsignalized intersections along 12th Street, N.E. and to nearby streets), and travel speeds.
three (3) unsignalized intersections along Monroe Street,
Highest volumes, entering the intersections from side streets, for any 8 hours of an average day
54
48
40
36
35
33
28
24
63
51
37
32
30
29
28
26
43
35
33
30
27
26
24
23
70
57
56
43
70*
70*
70*
70*
181
158
155
130
* : Assumed worst-case scenario
181*
181*
181*
181*
Highest volumes, entering the intersections from side streets, for any 8 hours of an average day
26
24
22
20
20
20
15
12
39
34
29
29
26
19
17
15
46
37
28
27
26
24
23
23
95
Northbound
Southbound
34 MPH
34 MPH
CORRIDOR
ADVANTAGES OF BULB-OUTS:
Eastbound
Westbound
37 MPH
38 MPH
BULB-OUTS:
Bulb-outs (also known as curb extensions) can be installed
at intersections to shorten pedestrian crossing distances,
define location of on-street parking spaces, reduce travel
speeds, and provide additional space for streetscape
features. This can be achieved without affecting the
number of parking spaces that currently exist. Bulb-outs, in
combination with other modifications are recommended
at several intersections within the study area. Figure 7-3
shows a typical layout for a bulb-out. They can be painted
initially as short-term improvements and subsequently
constructed when necessary engineering design has been
completed. The specific dimensions (i.e., radius, width,
size, etc.) may vary from one location to another based
on prevailing conditions. As shown in the figure, the curb is
typically extended by 8 feet (width of parking lane).
Bulb-outs offer many advantages and disadvantages. A
summary of the pros and cons associated with bulb-outs
is listed as follows:
96
TRANSPORTATION - RECOMMENDATIONS
Figure 7-3: Typical layout of bulb-outs
r
r
DISADVANTAGES OF BULB-OUTS:
Bulb-outs may present difficulties for large
vehicles that are turning adjacent to the
bulb-out. Therefore, each location at
which bulb-outs are proposed must be
carefully designed to accommodate
the geometric requirements of large
vehicles.
Extensions of curbs line may have a
negative impact on drainage (i.e., runoff
of rain water). Appropriate drainage
design features have been employed in
the past to address this issue, including
the previously mentioned Low Impact
Development (LID) techniques as part of
a sustainable stormwater management
program.
97
AT
ENTRANCE
TO
These plans included repairs to any physical defects This intersection is currently unsignalized. At times during
and installation of new DDOT ADA ramps, signing and peak hours, vehicles entering or exiting the apartment
pavement markings, including high visibility crosswalks at complex experience difficulties due to long vehicle
12th Street, N.E.
98
TRANSPORTATION - RECOMMENDATIONS
As a long-term solution, considerations should be given to
vehicles.
Currently, this signalized location operates as three unsignalized and is located at the west-end of the
intersections in one, with two traffic signal controllers. Charles R. Drew Memorial Bridge. John McCormack
The operation consists of concurrent/redundant signal Road was formerly a two-way roadway, however the
timing intervals which accommodate various through current operation is one-way northbound for the first
and turning movements. During field observations, it was portion north of Michigan Avenue. Southbound vehicles
noted that, at some point during the signal cycle, the still try to exit John McCormack Road onto Michigan
westbound approach on Michigan Avenue receives Avenue.
a green signal indication at Taylor while the signal
immediately to the west at 13th Street has a red signal. A short-term improvement is to provide improved signage
rThe segment of Michigan Avenue between these two (Do Not Enter R5-1 sign) informing those southbound
intersections is very short - only sufficient to store one drivers that they must enter Catholic University or turn
vehicle in each of the two lanes. The short distance around and continue north. A long-term improvement
between these two intersections and what appears to would be to geometrically preclude this southbound
be conflicting signal indications may compromise traffic movement by extending the curb to control access.
safety.
r
2)
system.
Install vehicle detectors such that the intersections items, it should be noted that the hospital is well served
can operate in a semi- or fully-actuated mode. by existing shuttle busses from and to the Brookland and
option has the potential to increase the Ft. Totten Metro stations. The shuttle service begins at
This
overall
3)
minutes to 30 minutes.
99
100
TRANSPORTATION RELATED
SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS
MAINTENANCE of pavement markings.
[P,B, M]
Provide consistent truck prohibition signs
for the Brookland area. Currently, there
are different types of signs in use. This
effort will help mitigate the impact of truck
traffic within the Brookland community
(the District currently uses white signs for
regulation and green signs as guides for
trucks traffic). [M]
Encourage local businesses to utilize
smaller trucks, if possible, for delivery
of supplies and materials. This would
minimize visual impacts of truck activity,
curb space requirements, and impact
on sight distance at intersections. [M]
Install pavement markings along onstreet parking spaces to better define
parking areas and adjacent travel lanes.
[M]
STREETSCAPE RELATED
SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS
SIGNAGE (replacement of deteriorated
or non-reflective signs, community
signage in designated areas, entrance
markers). [B,M,P]
MAINTENANCE of all public realm
elements, including landscaping. [P]
REPLACEMENT
OF
DETERIORATED
SIDEWALKS TO IMPROVE SAFETY IN THE
INTERIM. [P]
CURBING (where absent or broken). [P]
LIGHTING (Replacement of existing
wooden utility poles and installation
of pedestrian-level lighting along 12th
Street to enhance safety use of twin
tear-drop fixtures.) [P]
101
TRANSPORTATION RELATED
LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS
exist. [M]
LOADING ZONES: Provide additional designated
TIMING/PHASING: Install updated traffic signal timing
with appropriate phasing adjustments to reflect
102
STREETSCAPE RELATED
LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS
ART/ENTRANCE
MARKERS:
Create
and
k
UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITY LINES. [B,M,P,PT]
LIGHTING: Install new decorative roadway and
pedestrian level lights to provide higher levels of
illumination and beautify the streetscape. [P]
INTERSECTION MODIFICATIONS: In line with the
transportation improvements, provide safe
pedestrian crossings and more green space around
intersections. This may include bulb-outs and
103
and
streetscape
projects
offer
great
4. Tree Planting
104
S O C I A L
RESPONSIBILITY
Social sustainability is related to how we make choices
that affect other humans in our global community - the Earth.
Social sustainability is focused on the development of
programs and processes that promote social interaction and
cultural enrichment. It emphasizes protecting the vulnerable,
respecting social diversity and ensuring that we all put priority
on social investments and services that create the basic
framework for society. It lowers the cost of working together,
facilitates cooperation, and also relates to more basic needs
of happiness, safety, freedom, dignity and affection.
Systematic community participation, a strong civil
society, including government, commonly shared
values, rules and resources, and equal
rights promote social sustainability.
SUSTAINABILITY
Sustainable
development
is a process which enables all
people to realize their potential
and improve their quality of life
in ways which protect and
enhance the Earths life
support systems. Forum
for the Future
ECONOMIC
SUSTAINABILITY
Economic sustainability is maintenance of capital,
...the amount one can consume during a period
and still be as well off at the end of the period.*
Economics values things in money terms, and has difficulties
valuing natural resources (water, land, air, minerals, ecosystem
services), intangible, intergenerational, and especially common
access resources, such as air. Therefore, economic policy
needs to use anticipation and the precautionary principle.
In practice, community planning should retain dollars
in the local economy, save energy, attract jobs
and development, reduce pollution and traffic
congestion and conserve open space.
105
In order to organize the recommendations in the most The public realm recommendations are mostly based
context-sensitive manner, the study area has been divided on
necessary
improvements
to
the
transportation
into the following seven sub-districts that represent areas infrastructure. While the transportation recommendations
with distinctive functions and character (see map on next are described in word
page spread):
1. NORTHERN GATEWAY
2. SOUTHERN GATEWAY
3. THE MAIN STREETS CORE
4. NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL
5. NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL
6. MONROE STREET BRIDGE
7. MONROE STREET
area,
the
study
team
proposes
sub-district
The study area for both the transportation and public realm
analysis has been divided into two corridors:
1.
2.
106
Each sub-district is described on one page spread, supported by a photo of the existing condition. The recommended
improvements are depicted in sections and sketches. Written recommendations are made in bullet-point format, using
an easy-to-use reference system: Each icon represents a category of streetscape elements (see below) that is listed in
the STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS LIBRARY (CHAPTER 8.9). The library contains more detailed descriptions of recommended and alternative elements. As stated in the previous chapter, the five unifying elements are recommended for all sub-districts.
Figure 8-2: Streetscape Elements Library
& Reference System
Example:
107
108
1. NORTHERN GATEWAY
2. SOUTHERN GATEWAY
4. NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL
(Secondary Commercial District)
5. NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL
APPROACH:
Develop two distinct gateways to the north and the
south of 12th Street. These gateways will signal entry to
the Main Street. Michigan Avenue and Rhode Island
Avenue are natural points of entry to 12th Street.
*) The lighter colored areas of Sub-District 7 are not part of the original study area. The portion of Newton Street
connecting the Brookland Metro Station and 12th Street, and the western bridge approach area on Monroe Street
were added in the final stages of the study to address arising concerns about connectivity and comprehensiveness.
109
Within the study area, 12th Street, N.E. is a two-lane, two-way minor arterial running
north-south from Michigan Avenue to Rhode Island Avenue.
The recommended improvements for this corridor are described by sub-district,
starting with both gateways (Sub-Districts 1 and 2), followed by the commercial,
mixed use and residential areas of 12th Street (Sub-Districts 3, 4, and 5).
Conceptual plans of proposed and alternative improvements for the Northern
Gateway (figures 8-7 and 8-8) and 12th Street (figures 8-12a and 8-12b) tag onto
the written descriptions.
Chapter 8.6 continues with recommendations specific to the corridors public
realm.
110
SUB-DISTRICT 2
Michigan Avenue, N.E. in this area is forty feet wide with This intersection serves as the southern gateway to the
two travel lanes in each direction. The eastbound and Brookland community and operates at very good service
westbound left-turn movements on Michigan Avenue, levels during morning and evening peak hours (LOS A).
N.E. are currently prohibited. Eastbound vehicles desiring Therefore, transportation related modifications are not
to travel northbound on 12th Street, N.E. turn right onto recommended at this time.
eastbound Randolph Street, N.E. and then turn left on to
the northbound lanes of 12th Street, N.E.
In an effort to accommodate various movements and Streets experiences long queues in the eastbound
improve the operation and safety of these intersections, direction. Drivers feel that recent traffic signal re-timing
a reconfiguration concept with two alternatives was may have resulted in longer queues. In addition, longer
developed as a long-term improvement:
111
Figure 8-7: Conceptual Plan of Proposed Improvements at Michigan Avenue, N.E. at 12th and Randolph Streets
(Alternative 1)
112
113
SUB-DISTRICTS 3-5
SUB-DISTRICT 3
pedestrian safety.
114
SUB-DISTRICT 4
115
Figure 8-12a: Conceptual Plan of 12th Street, N.E. Corridor Transportation Improvements.
116
117
118
C2
A1
D3
D1
Crosswalk Thermoplastic
markings.
ic
hi
ga
Av
en
Randolph Street
12th
Stree
D2
Crosswalk
optionConcrete
pavement.
E1
ue
C2
Alternating placement of lightscombination teardrop roadway/
pedestrian lights and pedestrian lights.
119
Figure 8-19: Photo of 12th Street and Rhode Island Avenue intersection.
120
Figure 8-20: Sketch displaying some of the recommended improvements for Sub-District 2.
121
122
Otis Street
C2
A2
Crosswalk - Thermoplastic
markings.
D2
C2
D1
A1
E2
Furnishing
zone near
pedestrian
lights.
E1
D3
C2
Permeable pavers
over continuous root
zone.
A1
M2
12th Street
N
J
News stand
E1
E2
D1
D3
Potential community
space
Newton Street
123
Newton Street
C2
I
H
H
L
C2
Alternating placement
of combination teardrop
roadway/pedestrian lights and
pedestrian lights.
D1
A1
A1
D2
12th Street
E2
E1
Furnishing
zone near
pedestrian or
combination
lights.
M2
M2
G
I
C2
M2
D3
F2
Permeable pavers
over continuous root
zone.
Monroe Street
124
Branch Trail.
Additional elements requiring the business/residential communitys involvement: Custom planters to enhance the
storefronts and sidewalks.
Please refer to the STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS LIBRARY (CHAPTER 8.9) for detailed
descriptions of the recommended streetscape elements.
Replacement of
wooden utility poles
with steel lighting poles
that can adapt DDOTs
decorative pendant and
accommodate existing
overhead utility wires.
Installation of pedestrian
lights to strengthened
steel poles (two per pole,
aligning parallel to the
sidewalk about 16 above
ground).
Sidewalk (varies)
Furnishing
Zone
Painted
Median (2)
Furnishing
Zone
Sidewalk (varies)
125
126
Additional elements requiring the business/residential communitys involvement: Custom planters to enhance the
storefronts and sidewalk.
Please refer to the STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS LIBRARY (CHAPTER 8.9) for detailed
descriptions of the recommended streetscape elements.
Long-Term Short-Term
Recommendation Recommendation
Combination of new
teardrop roadway and
pedestrian lights after
undergrounding of utility
wires.
Replacement of
wooden utility poles
with steel lighting poles
that can adapt DDOTs
decorative pendant and
accommodate existing
overhead utility wires.
Installation of pedestrian
lights to strengthened
steel poles (two per pole,
aligning parallel to the
sidewalk about 16 above
ground).
Painted
Median (2)
Sidewalk (varies)
127
128
Long-Term Short-Term
Recommendation Recommendation
Combination of new
teardrop roadway
and pedestrian
lights after
undergrounding of
utility wires.
Replacement of
wooden utility
poles with steel
lighting poles that
can adapt DDOTs
decorative pendant
and accommodate
existing overhead
utility wires.
Installation of
pedestrian lights to
strengthened steel
poles (two per pole,
aligning parallel to the
sidewalk about 16
above ground).
Setback (varies)
Sidewalk
(varies)
Painted
Travel Lane (11)
Median (2)
Sidewalk
(varies)
Setback (varies)
129
for details.
recommendations
achieve
several
objectives
bicycle access to the Brookland/CUA Metro station including a potential reduction in travel speeds, enhanced
and is one of the main points of entry to the Brookloand pedestrian/bicycle safety and connectivity, and provision
community and the commercial area of 12th Street.
Figures 8-41a and b show the recommended improvements Street at 9th Street, N.E. is the access point to the Metro
along Monroe Street, N.E. between Michigan Avenue, station for buses (i.e., via 9th Street, N.E.).
130
SUB-DISTRICT 7
NEWTON STREET BETWEEN BROOKLAND/CUA METRO
STATION & 12TH STREET,
WESTERN MONROE STREET BRIDGE APPROACH
(Refer to chapter 8.8 for the public realm
recommendations)
131
Figure 8-41a: Conceptual Plan of Monroe Street, N.E. Corridor Transportation Improvements.
132
133
Figure 8-42:
Context plan &
section displaying
some long-term
recommendations for
Sub-District 6.
Painted
Median (2)
Long-Term Short-Term
Recommendation Recommendation
Combination of new
teardrop roadway
and pedestrian
lights after
undergrounding of
utility wires.
Replacement of
wooden utility
poles with steel
lighting poles that
can adapt DDOTs
decorative pendant
and accommodate
existing overhead
utility wires.
Installation of
pedestrian lights to
strengthened steel
poles (two per pole,
aligning parallel to
the sidewalk about
16 above ground).
134
Setback (varies)
Bike
Lane
(5)
Bike
Lane
(5)
Parking Lane/
Zipcar Spaces
(8)
Sidewalk/
Furnishing
Zone (varies)
Setback (varies)
area.
utility poles.
Bus stops
Bulb-outs for to break up parking areas,
accommodate landscaping, and to shield
pedestrians from traffic lanes.
Metal banners announcing the transition to 12th
Street.
Please refer to the STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS LIBRARY (CHAPTER 8.9) forr
detailed descriptions of the recommended streetscape
elements.
135
136
Bridge fencing to
be part of gateway
into Brookland.
A1
K1
K2
Monroe Street
Paving - Concrete
K1
A1
A1
C2
D2
I
D3
D1
F1
C2
L
H
Paving - Concrete
K1
Lighting
incorporated in
bridge fencing
I
t
9th Stree
E3
E1
E2
A2
D1
G
F1
N
Figure 8-48: Conceptual design of the
recommended improvements for SubDistricts 6 and 7.
D1
D2
137
Figure 8-51: Photo of Monroe Street looking east towards 12th Street.
138
139
Example:
You found this icon as one of the
suggested unifying streetscape
elements in the public realm
recommendations (Chapters 8.6 and
8.8).
Now locate the detailed description
of the recommended pedestrian street
light on the following pages using
the alphabetic order of the icons.
140
A1
ITEM: PAVINGS
Purpose
Sidewalks should provide for convenient, safe, and accessible pedestrian traffic while adding an element to the streetscape that -space permittingallows for public gathering places, street furniture, and public art. Materials should be weather-resistant, economically feasible, and easy to maintain.
The design should take into consideration maximum widths, the architecture, styles and colors of the adjacent buildings and infrastructure, stormwater
management, and the location or incorporation of landscape strips, island or planters and street furnishings.
Application
Sidewalks are installed between the building or right-of-way line and the curb, preferably with a landscape strip replacing either the entire length along
the curb or a portion, in which case different materials are recommended between the landscaped areas to signal the distinction between walking
and landscape/furnishing zones, and, ideally, to allow for permeable surfaces as part of the stormwater management.
Accessible curb ramps provide persons with disabilities, and other pedestrians with push carts or strollers, a safe means of access to crosswalks. Curb
cut ramps shall be provided at all curbed intersections where sidewalks and trails are present in accordance with ADA and DDOT standards.
WALKING ZONE
Option One (Recommended): Exposed Aggregate Concrete Pavement (a)
Exposed aggregate concrete could add to the symbolic natural character of Brookland by providing a
consistent visual connection along the changing uses and neighborhoods of 12th Street.
Design Standards:
Color: varies
Thickness: 3
Furnishing/Planting Zone: A continuous planting strip in residential areas and permeable unit pavers in
mixed-use and commercial areas, to complement the color and finish of adjacent walkway and spill
out zones. The extend of permeability will be decided on a project-by -project basis.
Technical Specifications: For more information, refer to the DDOT Design & Engineering Manual.
Design Standards:
Color: Grey (buff)
Thickness: 4 (DC Standard)
Score Line: 2 foot grid
Furnishing/Planting Zone: Permeable unit pavers, to complement the color and finish of adjacent
walkway and spill out zones. The extend of permeability will be decided on a project-by -project
basis.
Technical Specifications: For more information, refer to the DDOT Design & Engineering Manual.
FURNISHING ZONE
The following options are walkable surfaces that enhance sidewalk aesthetics while balancing the negative
impacts of surrounding impermeable surfaces and thus contributing to a more sustainable stormwater
management plan, natural irrigation for landscaping and healthier trees due to undisturbed underground tree
trenches. Some areas may become uneven as roots may shift pavers over time.
Option One (Recommended for the Main Street Core): Block Pavers on Granular Base (c)
Block pavers on a granular base allow for an undisturbed underground tree trench (refer to D3 for details).
Option Two (Recommended for the Neighborhood Retail Area): Cobblestones on Granular Base 9d)
Cobblestones on a granular base ensure increased permeability and allow for an undisturbed underground
tree trench (refer to D3 for details).
d
Figure 8-55: Streetscape Elements Library
- A1 photos, various cities.
NOTE: Please refer to M2 for incorporating innovative design such as Low Impact Design techniques. In
residential areas a landscape strip replaces the furnishing zone, which provides maximum benefits in terms of
drainage/stormwater management, tree health, and -if maintained properly- aesthetics.
141
ELEMENT: SIDEWALK
A2
ITEM: ACCENTS
Purpose
Decorative pavement accents can create interest and add to the uniqueness of the place by incorporating special motives that are representative
of the community.
Application
Decorative pavement, brick or metal accents can be added during or after the construction of new sidewalks and near street intersections.
Purpose
Curbs define the transition between the roadway and sidewalk. Gutters convey stormwater to inlets.
Application
Curbs and gutters should be located at the edge of the roadway and/or sidewalk.
Option One (Recommended): Brick Gutter with Standard or Granite Curb (a)
Option One (concrete curb) or granite curb can be combined with a brick gutter that measures up
to two feet in width. This option offers a significant yet cost-effective visual improvement. As part of
the recommended low impact development, a trench drain for stormwater management should be
incorporated.
Option Two (Alternative): Standard Curb (b)
Design Standards:
Material / Curb: Concrete
Material / Base: Base, subbase, and subgrade for sidewalks and curb shall be compacted as per
current DDOT specifications.
Length: Uniform sections, approximately 10 feet in length, no section shall be less than 6 feet.
Aggregate material shall extend under curb a minimum distance of 6 inches beyond back of curb.
Thickness: Aggregate under curb shall be in excess of depth of gutter face or a minimum of 4 inches,
whichever is greater.
Curb Height: 6 inches for roadways
Gutter Width: 2 feet wide (Standard)
Option Three (Alternative): Mountable Curb (c)
Mountable curbs allow vehicles to leave the roadway and drive into a clear zone, in emergencies only. In
locations where a mountable curb is required, it should be 4 high.
Design Standards:
Material / Gutter: Concrete
Material / Base: Base, subbase, and subgrade for sidewalks and curb shall be compacted as per
current DDOT specifications.
Dimensions are same as above (Standard Curb), except that Mountable Curbs and Gutters DDOT
Standards apply.
142
C1
Option Two: Decorative Teardrop Pendant Street Light (here shown as Intersection Light)
Design Standards for both options:
Mounting Height: DC Standard;
Typically:
Teardrop Pendant Street Light: 30 above ground
Twin Pedestrian Level Light: 16 above ground
Spacing: Approximately 40 O.C. for Pedestrian Level Lights; 80 O.C. for Vehicular
Street Lights.
Light Color: DC Standard
Illumination: Refer to District of Columbia Streetlight Grand Plan
Poles: New steel poles shall be constructed per DC standard to accommodate
additional load of the utility wires and twin pedestrian lights, Black (Federal Chip #
27038).
If regulated parking is enforced, light pole spacing shall be coordinated with parking
meters.
Option 2
Option Three (Alternative): Decorative Teardrop Pendant Street Light and Twin
Pedestrian Level Lights attached to Existing Wooden Poles.
ELEMENT: LIGHTING
C2
Figure 8-59:
Sreetscape
Elements
Library -C2
drawings/photo
of combination,
roadway &
pedestrian lights.
Options 1-3 are recommended as long-term improvements that require the burial of all utility
wires. The teardrop pendant (Option 2) is a DC Standard light; in order to follow the lighting
scheme of the short-term lighting alternative, its design series could be extended to include
a combination of street and pedestrian lights (Option 1) and a separate twin teardrop
pedestrian lights (Option 3; two per pole, aligning parallel to the sidewalk about 16 above
ground). Depending on the land use, activity levels, and location of intersections, the three
options should be alternated to provide the most effective and appealing illumination for
all travel modes.
Option One: Combination of Decorative Teardrop Pendant Street Light with Twin
Pedestrian Level Lights.
Option Two: Decorative Teardrop Pendant Street Light (here shown as Intersection Light)
Option 1
Option 3
Option 2
143
ELEMENT: LANDSCAPING
D1
ITEM: TREES
Purpose
Healthy urban trees promote safety, health and tranquility. They raise the value of real estate and enhance attractiveness of commercial areas. By
providing shade, purifying the air, reducing wind, glare, reflection and noise, and helping with the infiltration of stormwater, street trees moderate the
environment of urban areas. Street trees provide an excellent wildlife habitat when combined with surrounding vegetation. They will also complement
the scale of the right-of-way, strengthen the line of sight, and create a coherent appearance. Planting for ceremonial access can be used along the
roadway, to define the edge of the street. Appropriate street trees under overhead utilities define the street edge, and maintain the natural habitat of
the tree while not conflicting with utility services.
Application
All plant selection, design, and separation distances for trees shall be in accordance with the Districts Urban Forestry Standards. Trees planted under
overhead utilities shall be from the ornamental kind.
Plant Selection:
Shade Trees
Flowering Trees
Design Standards:
Noninvasive
Disease resistant
Tolerate urban conditions
Require minimal maintenance
Tolerate high wind and flood conditions
Create visual seasonal interest
Have naturally high branching habit
Provide good wildlife habitat
Planting size (shade tree: min. 3.5 caliper
Planting size (ornamental tree: min. 2.0
caliper
Pedestrian Clearance: 8 to lowest
branch
Sargent Cherry
Star Magnolia
Kwansan Cherry
Landscaping Practices:
Good general landscaping practices increase the ecological value of a site and add visual interest, whilst
decreasing stormwater runoff and heat island effect.
All landscapes change, grow and evolve in a process of accession. By sensitively working with these natural
dynamics, good landscaping can provide economic, efficient and visual satisfaction.
High branching trees help avoid potential
interference with street traffic and nearby
buildings but require the burying of overhead
utilities.
144
Designing plantings that foster biodiversity should be a consideration for any streetscape improvement
project. With the increasing loss of open space, providing wildlife habitat and wildlife corridors in the
landscaping around buildings is increasingly important ecologically. Small pockets of songbird habitat and
patches of tall-grass prairie around buildings are helping to stem the decline of many threatened animals
- from birds to butterflies.
D2
Understory plantings can include ornamental grasses, groundcover, shrubs, and perennials. Such plantings add aesthetic value to the streetscape,
reduce stormwater runoff, and provide visual and physical barriers for pedestrians and motorists. Understory plantings can also help create a
neighborhood identity.
Application
Landscape areas between street trees should be located between the curb and the sidewalk. A carriage way maximizes planting space while
allowing for car doors to open. All planting designs shall be in accordance with the DDOT Design & Engineering Manual.
Option One (Recommended for residential areas): Standard Turf Planting
Lawn areas provide a clean and developed appearance in dedicated areas requiring maintenance. Refer to
DDOT Specification Standards for lawn seeding.
Option 1
Option 2
The example (see photo) shows how landscaping can create an attractive traffic barrier while ensuring and enhancing
storefront visibility.
Option Three (Recommended for commercial areas): Planting boxes, edging and tree guards
Planting boxes, raised planter edge and/or metal railings hold the soil, mulch and plants in place and maximize
the sidewalk and furnishing area between the trees. They can also direct pedestrian travel paths, prevent soil
compaction, and help define a space. Planter edging is effective if roots are above grade. Metal tree guards
(see photo) are usually made of galvanized metal steel painted and primed. ADA accessibility between planters
must be provided.
Option 3
ELEMENT: LANDSCAPING
D3
Purpose
Many street trees exist in conditions hazardous to their survival, including poor soils with inadequate drainage, damage by heavy truck traffic, pollution
and vandalism. In addition, competition for underground growing space is a concern in dense urban areas where pavement and underground
utilities take increasingly large amounts of room. Correct street tree planting methods offer the best solution to street tree survival. Different surfaces
require different subsurface treatments as the water infiltration changes, which, in turn determines the measures that must be taken for an efficient and
environmentally friendly stormwater management plan. The illustrations below show how the recommended paving methods (see A1) and subsurface
treatments in the planting/furnishing zones allow for a continuous underground tree trench, creating a greater area for root growth and the sharing of
resources between individual street trees Please refer to DDOT standards for more technical specifications.
NOTE: Please refer to M2 for
incorporating innovative
design such as Low Impact
Development techniques.
Continuous
underground tree
trench.
Figure 8-62 a,b: Streetscape Elements Library -D3, photo & diagram of surface treatment and underground tree trench.
145
ELEMENT: FURNISHING
ITEM: SEATING
E1
Purpose
Design Standards:
Dimensions: 6 length with center arm places at equal intervals.
Metal Components: All fabricated metal components are steel shotblasted, etched, phosphatized, preheated,
and electrostatically powder-coated with Triglycidyl Isocyanurate TGIC polyester powder coatings. The coating
shall be a rust inhibitor with an UV and flake resistant topcoat finish of thermosetting polyester powder.
Slats: Slats should be either metal or reinforced recycled plastic (40%-100%), UV resistant, rot resistant, and
easily cleaned. They shall be approved by DDOT.
Color: Black for all metal components
Placement: Two feet from the curb (District Standard)
Option Two (Alternative for public gathering places in the core): Steelsites Series Bench and Picnic Table
Areas along 12th Street that could be transformed into larger public gathering places could accommodate picnic
tables such the following:
Design Standards:
Dimensions: Overall: 69 w x 69 l, Table: top 30 h x 69 l, Seats: 18 w 69 l. Slat width 2
Metal Components: All fabricated metal components are steel shotblasted, etched, phosphatized, preheated,
and electrostatically powder-coated with Triglycidyl Isocyanurate TGIC polyester powder coatings.
Slats: Scrolled steel slats are formed from 1/4 x 1-1/2 solid steel bars; steel slats are welded to cross members
of 1-7/8 diameter tubular steel legs
Color: Black for all metal components
Placement: Two feet from the curb (District Standard) or within appropriate setting of a larger open space
that does not obstruct the walking path clearance.
Other: All other designs shall be in accordance with District standards and approved by DDOT and applicable
agencies.
Figure 8-63: Streetscape Elements
Library -E1, photos of benches, various
locations.
ELEMENT: FURNISHING
E2
Purpose
Trash receptacles and ash urns shall be provided at highly visible and utilized locations.
Application
At locations where people are expected to congregate and/or a high volume of trash is expected to be generated.
Design Standards:
Capacity: 42-gallon (159 liters)
Door: Standard side-door-opening with dome lid receptacle limits what can be placed into it.
Lid: Formed dome lid attached to frame
Trash Receptacle: Standard tapered formed riveted lid, optional S-2ASD formed dome with stainless steel
ashtray and D2-32 formed dome with self-closing door
Placement: Minimum 2 from curb.
Color: Black topcoat with Thermosetting polyester powder coat
Optional custom plaques or decals: Steel plaques in various sizes and pressure sensitive vinyl outdoor decals,
affixed to plaques
Option Two (Alternative): Plainwell Trash Receptacle
146
Design Standards:
Capacity: 35-gallon (132 liters)
Lid: Cable attached black top lid
Trash Receptacle: Standard tapered formed riveted lid, optional S-2ASD formed dome with stainless steel
ashtray and D2-32 formed dome with self-closing door
Placement: Minimum 2 from curb.
Color: Black topcoat with Thermosetting polyester powder coat
Optional custom plaques or decals: Steel plaques in various sizes and pressure sensitive vinyl outdoor decals,
affixed to plaques.
E3
High security bike racks allow cyclists to lock bikes with most bike locks. Where required or space permits, multiple bike racks shall be provided along
pedestrian walkways. Frequent and well sited placement encourages bike trips.
Application
At visible and prominent destination locations preferably adjacent to building entrances. Not blocking entrances or inhibiting pedestrian flow.
Option One (Recommended): Inverted U-Shaped Posts
Design Standard:
Spacing: Each rung shall be placed 30 inches apart
Distance from Curb: Minimum of 2 feet
Length: 21 inches or 30 inches
Material: 2.0 schedule 40 steel pipe
Capacity: 2 bicycles
Mounting: Embedded
Finish: Hot-dipped galvanized; Rubber coated (optional); Thermoplastic powder coat (optional);
Color: Black or custom, as approved by DDOT
Option Two (Recommended where tree guards are not installed): The X-Type
c Table
Design Standard:
Placement: Around street trees, where space is permissible
Height: A 4x4 footprint is 2-6above ground
Material: 1 1/2 or 2.0 schedule 40 steel pipe
Capacity: 3-4 bicycles, three sides of the tree pit
Mounting: Available with flanges that accomodate three drive screws, or without flanges to be sunk into
concrete footings.
Finish: Standard black powder coat, per DDOT standards
Color: Black or custom, as approved by DDOT
ELEMENT: FURNISHING
nd applicable
Purpose
E4
Safety posts may be installed for the safety of pedestrians and cyclists and definition of spaces. Where required and determined by DDOT, the posts
shall be removable to allow the passage of emergency vehicles. Bollards may be connected with chains to demarcate green areas or edges of public
spaces. Where appropriate, posts should be designed to provide seating.
Application
Safety posts shall be installed (permanent or removable) in the commercial areas along public rights-of-way and sidewalks, usually 2 from the curb.
Option One (Recommended for commercial areas to divide vehicular and pedestrian traffic and
define and illuminate public spaces): Bollards with lighting features (a & b).
Design Standards for Annapolis Smart Bollard (a):
Dimensions: 2-9 high, Diameter: 6
Material: Structural Steel (Tube), Aluminum Casting (Top)
Finish: PangardII Powdercoat, custom colors available
Solar Lighting Components: Encapsulated in patented domed polycarbonate housing,
Light Output Effective Intensity: ~2 candela, Minimum Autonomy: 150 hours, Min. Equivalent
peak Sun Hours to Maintain Min. Autonomy: 3 hours, Illumination Technology: 16 White LEDs,
Lifespan of LEDs: up to 100,000 hours (see landscapeforms.com for more details)
a)
b)
d)
c)
a) Removable Annapolis Smart Bollard with
integrated solar powered lighting and LED technology
(source: landscapeforms) b) Contemporary bollard
with lighting feature, c) granite bollard, d) traditional
bollard.
147
F1
Purpose
The District aims to increase bike ridership to supplement other transit options. The DC Master plan increases the number of bike lanes on city roads. To
ensure maximum usage of this transportation option, bike lanes and transition zones on city streets should be clearly marked with distinctive materials
and colors to stress the safety of bikers.
Application
12th Street varies in width from 40 to 50 feet. Based on experiences in many North American cities, the ideal minimum street width to accommodate
bikes lanes was established at 44 feet. However, in Brookland, options to adjust the 40 feet street width could be explored as part of the streetscape
improvement implementation. Otherwise, on those sections narrower than 44 wide that are recommended for bicycle travel, the District may post
special signs that indicate the street is a designated bike route, but would not use any pavement markings. The following examples describe options
for the location, materials, and colors of designated bike lanes. The common goal is to provide the highest degree of separation between vehicular
and bicycle traffic and awareness of one another.
F2
Purpose
Where buses make stops, a concrete pad is required to accommodate the additional weight of the buses and to counter the vibrations they cause
on the sidewalk.
Application
The concrete for bus stop pads should be integrally colored to closely match the asphalt paved surface in the adjoining lanes and to hide oil and other
leaked fluid stains.
148
Design Standards:
Color: dark grey (closest color to match asphalt in adjoining lanes)
Dimensions: Minimum Length should be per DDOT Standards; Minimum Width should match lane
width; Jointing: Minimum Width of 6.
Replacement/Rehabilittions: DDOT must approve samples for integrally colored concrete.
Material:
Pigment: ASTM C 979, synthetic mineral-oxide pigments or colored waterreducing admixtures.
Color: stable, free of carbon black, non-fading, and resistant to lime and other
alkalis.
Jointing: Suitable precast concrete separator should be used between bus stop
pad and adjoining asphalt lanes.
Expansion joints in concrete should be placed at appropriate intervals.
Technical Specifications: For more information, refer to the DDOT Design & Engineering Standards.
The multi-space parking system has proven to accommodate more cars, be more convenient for drivers, and to generate more revenue.
Application
The implementation of this system will be beneficial for the commercial area of 12th Street.
Multispace Parking (Recommended for commercial areas)
Solar-powered multispace parking machines - the same technology installed along M Street in Georgetown- is
recommended for 12th Street to benefit business patrons and the Districts and thus the communitys revenue. With
this proven system, a motorist parking in the designated stretch on a given block no longer will have a single meter.
Instead, the driver will walk to the machine in the middle of that block, pay with coins or a credit card, and then return
to the car and place the receipt on the dashboard.
Pedestrian crossings should be located where sight distances for both pedestrians and motorists are adequate to allow for safe crossings, and for
vehicles to observe other motorists entering the roadway at un-signalized intersections. High visibility intersections promote pedestrian safety and
should be used extensively.
Application
Marked crosswalks should be provided when sidewalks cross roadways such as driveways, parking lot entrances, roads, etc. Crosswalks should not be
constructed with a different material than the rest of the street unless it is durable and will not have joints or cracks that interfere with pedestrian and
bicycle safety; uneven materials like cobblestones should be avoided. All crosswalks shall be in compliance with current ADA standards.
Bulb-Outs/Curb Extensions
Curb extensions are intended to improve pedestrian safety by shortening crossing distances, calming
traffic, and providing more visible crossing points for pedestrians. Curb bulbs refer to locations where the
sidewalk area is extended into the street. This treatment can occur mid-block, but is most commonly used at
intersections. In addition, the curb extensions leave space for transit buses to pull to the side of the roadway
out of the travel lanes rather than on the edge of the travel lane to load and unload passengers.
Higher-visibility ladder or concrete crosswalks can supplement the curb extensions (see above). Strong yellowgreen pedestrian crossing warning signs and new Yield to Pedestrians, $100 to $500 Fine for Violations signs
can further enforce pedestrian safety.
Despite the benefits for pedestrian safety, curb bulbs generally impede on bike lanes. Therefore, a careful
examination of the curb bulb locations and rerouting of bike lanes is necessary.
149
ELEMENT: SIGNAGE
Signage improves pedestrian and vehicular orientation and movement. It also adds visual interest and character to the streetscape. Signage should
be simple, legible, properly scaled to fit its surroundings and accessible to all. Signage placed at key locations helps to orient visitors, highlights transit
options, open space and other destinations.
Application
At visible, continuous locations along 12th Street to provide orientation and improve overall site identity.
DC Wayfinding Signage
Wayfinding signage shall be installed at visible locations along 12th Street
to direct visitors toward building entrances, public spaces, attractions,
and/or parking facilities. Material, color and texture shall comply with
District Standards. Educational signs that engage residents and visitors are
attractive streetscape elements highlighting the communitys history and
attractions.
Street Sign Attachments
The attachments shall be integrated with the standard District street signs
and installed on the street light posts to enhance the neighborhood identity
and create a sense of place. The design of the attachment varies as desired
by the community but shall comply with DDOT design standards.
News Stands can combine unsightly arrangements of newspaper boxes and provide an opportunity for the community to post notices and distribute
neighborhood information. This may foster a sense of community and ownership, which has positive effects on the maintenance of the public
spaces.
Application
A news stand may be installed on public or private property with the consent of the owner, given that the sidewalk is not encroached upon.
150
hat naturally
Monroe and
K1
ITEM: RAILINGS
Purpose
Attention should be paid to the treatment of railings. Railings can incorporate other fixtures, such as lights, banners, neighborhood totems, at the
discretion of the designer and in consultation with DDOT.
Application
Specific designs for railings should be created by the designer but must adhere to DDOT standards for safety and crash test requirements.
ELEMENT: BRIDGE
K2
Entrance markers on bridges have a significant impact on the introduction to the neighborhood. They represent a form of public art and may be
designed in cooperation with the community.
Application
Entrance markers are usually placed on both sides at the beginning and end of the bridge.
Design Guide:
As part of the bridge/railing design, entrance markers are subject to DDOT
approval and shall comply with all applicable codes and regulations. They can
vary in material and color but should be designed is a way that is compatible with
the anticipated multi-modal use of the bridge, the light fixtures, planters and curb
barriers.
151
Public art is an important element of the streetscape and should reflect the communitys history, assets and interests. The focus can be on the art itself
or, as preferred by many Brookland community members, public art can be designed and incorporated to enhance and emphasize the surrounding,
such as buildings and landscaping.
Application
Public art can be part of virtually any streetscape element or it may be designed as a separate, free-standing structure. Below are several examples
of public art. Each one was created with input from the community, applicable agencies and donors. This selection of public art shall serve as an
inspiration for the Brookland neighborhood, DDOT and artists to help in the creation of their own public art.
M1
Purpose
Renewable green energy, compared to conventional forms of power, has no or little adverse environmental impacts, and its use reduces dependence
on current power sources. Many local governments, including the District, have increased funding and support for innovative and sustainable
development practices. Streetscape improvement projects offer great opportunities to incorporate innovative design ideas in the construction process.
Below are examples of how alternative energy sources can enhance the streetscape while reducing energy and maintenance costs. By displaying
information about the respective technologies, their efficiency and operation, these site elements may engage and educate the community.
Application
Renewable energy sources can be applied to all streetscape elements that require energy for operation, including but not limited to vehicular and
pedestrian lighting, parking meters, fountains, and illuminated signage and public art.
Public Solar Art & Streetscape Applications with Interactive
Components:
Example (a): The three columns to the left contain 27 solar modules
with an output of 1.965 Watts, resulting in a PV production of 800
kWh per year. Assuming an average illumination of 12 hours,
the 54 blue lights (48 Watt) require 210 kWh per year. Thus, this
art structure produces three times as much energy as required
for its illumination and the surplus can be fed into an utility grid
and/or used to supply other streetscape elements.
152
Figure 8-76: Streetscape Elements Library -M1, photos of solar powered art & lighting, various locations.
a) solar powered vertical markers, b) rotating and lit solar sculpture solar-ikosaeder, c) solar sculpture, d) fiberwave art,
e) LED lit city sign, f) LED edge-illuminated pedestrian crossing, stop & street name signs, g) solar powered street lights ,
h) solar flashing beacon installed on existing sign post, i) self-contained lighting device with energycache technology
for decorative or traffic flow purposes.
Sources: solarserver.de/solarmagazin/artikelmaerz2004.html, robertlipinsky.com, roadpro.ca
M2
Purpose
Low Impact Development (LID) is an innovative stormwater management approach with a basic principle that is modeled after nature: manage
rainfall at the source using uniformly distributed decentralized micro-scale controls. LIDs goal is to mimic a sites pre-development hydrology by using
design techiniques that infiltrate, filter, store, evaporate, and detain runoff closest to its source.
Application
Instead of conveying, managing, and treating stormwater in large, costly end-of-pipe facilities located at the bottom of drainage areas, LID addresses
stormwater through small, cost-effective landscape features, known as Integrated Management Practices (IMPs). Almost all components of the urban
environment have the potential to serve as an IMP. This includes not only open space, but also rooftops, streetscapes, parking lots, sidewalks, and
medians. LID is a versatile approach that can be applied to new developments, urban retrofits, and redevelopment/revitalization projects. Below are
four examples recommended to be part of Brooklands streetscape improvements.
a
Street Trees:
Street trees create a strong visual framework for urban areas and can be used to help create
identities for neighborhoods and commercial areas. Planting areas help break up large
expanses of pavement, increase permeable surfaces and reduce stormwater runoff. Tree
canopy intercepts rainfall, allowing water to evaporate into the atmosphere, and reducing the
amount of runoff generated by storm events. In instances where pervious surfaces surround the
trees, root zone uptake also diminishes stormwater generation and removes pollutants. Healthy
urban tree canopies reduce peak storm runoff.
Effectiveness: Healthy urban tree canopies are estimated to reduce urban runoff volume
by 4 to 8% and peak runoff by 10 to 20%.
Maintenance: Requires occasional pruning and fertilization
with Interactive
Bioretention cells are small scale soil and plant-based devices that remove pollutants and
control runoff volume and peak rates through a variety of physical, biological, and chemical
treatment processes. They can contribute to neighborhood and roadway beautification, habitat
creation, and the reduction of heat island effects and can potentially reduce maintenance
costs for existing stormwater infrastructure.
Effectiveness: Bioretention cells effectively treat the first flush of stormwater, and
remove between 75 and 95% of several common urban pollutants.
devices that
ystems can be
the examples
public art and
supply energy
ers etc.) while
aracter of the
ards can be
posts, showing
, the batterys structure and
nergy.
7 solar modules
oduction of 800
on of 12 hours,
year. Thus, this
rgy as required
o an utility grid
ts.
Tree box filters enhance commercial, industrial and residential areas by providing a growing
medium for small trees or large shrubs. These can be used in conjunction with street trees to
create a strong visual presence. Tree box filters are concrete boxes filled with bioretention soil
installed below grade at the curb line and located upstream of a standard curb inlet to reduce
runoff volume, reduce peak discharge rate, improve water quality for small, frequently-occuring
storms and potentially reduce maintenance costs for existing stormwater infrastructure. For low
or moderate flows, stormwater enters through the tree boxs inlet, filters through the soil, and
exits through an underdrain in to the storm drain. For high flows, stormwater bypasses the tree
box filter of full and flows directly to the downstream curb inlet.
Effectiveness: Tree box filters effectively treat the first flush of stormwater, treat over
90% of the annual runoff volume, and remove between 75 and 95% of several common
urban pollutants.
Maintenance: Requires removal of trash and debris from the inlet. Plants and media
may have to be replaced after a long time period.
The above LID techniques can be applied as follows:
They can be located in medians or on periphery of road systems as offline or online
stormwater systems.
Facilities can be incorporated into streetscape design and tree boxes.
They can be located in grass strips or other landscape areas.
to include and
eas and visions.
plemented by
cell phones orr
Figure 8-77: Streetscape Elements Library -M2, photos of LID techniques, various locations.
a) Permeable pavers used in a perking lot/plaza and parking lane, b) Street trees create a visual
frame, provide shade, aid in stormwater management and absorb emissions, c) Stormwater planter
showing landscaping with planter wall, sand set concrete pavers/parking egress zone, curb cut with
ornamental trench grate, Portland, d) retention cell/path of stormwater.
153
an
effort
to
ensure
implementation
of
the
tentative schedule.
Implementation Strategy
following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Schedule
This
are:
The
IMPROVEMENTS
A. Transportation (see table 8-1)
B. Streetscape (see table 8-2)
Overall Total Costs
Total Cost
$9,325,660.50
$3,760,925.50
$13,086,586.00
discussed
in
more
detail
below,
Maintenance Activities
Short-Term Improvements
Enhancement Funds.
154
design activities within one (1) and two (2) years, followed
(7) years.
3.
Long-Term Improvements
Corridors
Michigan Avenue, N.E.
Improvements
Units
L.F. of Sidewalk
--
2,600
Rumble Strips
L.F.
--
2,500
**Pavement Markings - 4
L.F.
--
***Pavement Markings - 12
L.F.
--
Estimate Cost
4,000
$75.00
$495,000.00
--
$6.50
$16,250.00
9,800
9,500
$1.40
$27,020.00
4,500
2,700
$6.50
Short-Term
$46,800.00
Sub-Total
$585,070.00
Long-Term
Physical Bulb-outs
L.F. of C & G
--
1,100
280
$90.00
$124,200.00
L.F. of Sidewalk
--
12,000
4,000
$225.00
$3,600,000.00
EA
$200,000.00
$3,800,000.00
Sub-Total
$7,524,200.00
TOTAL COST
$8,109,270.00
Contingency (15%):
$1,216,390.50
TOTAL
$9,325,660.50
*) Further engineering design required to determine number, location and type of luminaires.
**) Thermoplastic Pavement Markings, Includes X-Walks, Painted Bulb-Outs, Re-Striping for Bike Lane, Parking Lane
***) Thermoplastic Pavement Markings, Includes Painted Medians
Monroe
Avenue,
N.E.
12,000
16,896
30
10
40
30
46
SF
SF
SF
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
Unit Price
800.00
10,000.00
108.00
10.00
25.00
25.00
1,300.00
1,000.00
500.00
800.00
15,000.00
539.00
Total Price
(average) 169,600.00
20,000.00
Signage
Cobblestone for
Furniture Zone
101,376
SY
Bridge Railing
Accent
Pavement
3,755
EA
Bollards
Sidewalk
Pavement
(Exposed
Aggregate
Concrete)
EA
Bicycle
Racks
Lawn-Sod
212
Unit
Trash
Receptacles
Bioretention Cell
(LID)
Quantity
Benches
12th
Street,
N.E.
Streetscape
Improvements
Furniture
Entrance Marker
& Art
24,794.00
Quantity
36
704
25,344
1,200
6,336
20
10
14
Unit
EA
SY
SF
SF
SF
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
25.00
1,300.00
1,000.00
500.00
800.00
15,000.00
70,000.00
158,400.00 10,400.00
8,000.00
10,000.00
8,000.00
Unit Price
800.00
108.00
10.00
25.00
Total Price
(average)
28,800.00
76,032.00
253,440.00
30,000.00
TOTAL/IMPROVEMENT
TOTAL COST
198,400.00
20,000.00
586.00
30,000.00 140,000.00
8,204.00
481,572.00 1,267,200.00 330,000.00 580,800.00 49,400.00 18,000.00 30,000.00 32,000.00 90,000.00 140,000.00
32,998.00
$3,270,370.00
Contingency (15%)
490,555.5
TOTAL
3,760,925.5
*) Aside from replacement of deteriorated signs , furnishings and sidewalks, which are considered part of DDOTs maintenance activities, the above table incudes long-term recommendations only.
Note for both tables: Lengths and areas used for calculation of the corridor improvements are based on their respective and approximate study areas. Lighting is calculated only for the public realm
study area.
155
DO
PARKING
SIDEWALKS
Break up surface
parking with
vegetation and
planting
Parking
different
SIGNAGE
look
quite
Respect
pedestrians desired
routes or direct
pedestrians on a
particular path
without
cars.
lots
Clear
paths
Use clearly
located and
properly scaled
signs
encourage
pedestrian
popular destinations.
activity
LANDSCAPING
and
parking zones.
Carefully
consider
positioning
of
relation
other
to
the
signs
Utilize planting as
a buffer and to
provide aesthetic
appeal to a
location
in
street
Noisy
and
unappealing
through
creates
differing perspectives of
edge
uses.
planting
a
that
boundary
between
or
differing
DONT
PARKING
SIDEWALKS
Provide large
expanses of asphalt
Fail to understand
pedestrian and
vehicular circulation
around your site
island
contribute
effects,
to
and
increased
Confusing
layouts
SIGNAGE
and
Signage
should
be
LANDSCAPING
Allow plants to
degrade and
detract from your
site
clear
streetscape degradation.
sidewalk needlessly.
156
DO
FURNITURE
Invest in high
quality and
durable street
furniture
LIGHTING
MULTI-MODAL/
SAFETY
Consider layout
hierarchy for high
visibility features
throughout the site
Consider
appropriately
scaled lighting,
spaced at regular
intervals
building entrances
Place
Pedestrian
lighting
Changes
utilitarian
and
highlighted
emergency
and
in
direction
grade
can
be
through
the
service
it should complement it
and/or landscaping.
visibility areas.
intersections.
DONT
FURNITURE
Provide street
furniture in locations
that people wont
use or fail to invest
in good quality
elements
Locate building
entrances in hidden
and inaccessible
locations
and
trash
cans
Overflowing or ill
For
site
to
LIGHTING
function
effectively
vehicular
and
pedestrian
access
must
MULTI-MODAL/
SAFETY
endangerment,
sufficient
clear
provide
illumination
unobstructed
destinations.
traffic.
and
accidents
157
of
the place that makes 12th Street special; its assets should
improvement.
Facade
improvement
158
programs
are
elements
be
applied
most
159
21
TABLE 5-1: Condition of 12th Street, N.E. from Michigan Avenue to Rhode Island Avenue 45
TABLE 5-2: Condition of Monroe Street, N.E. from 7th Street South Dakota Avenue 46
TABLE 5-3: Condition of Michigan Avenue, N.E. from North Capitol Street to Randolph Street
TABLE 5-4: Condition of Michigan Avenue, N.E. from 12th Street to Eastern Avenue
TABLE 5-5: Condition of Existing Traffic Signals
46
47
48
61
62
63
70
Intersection Performance
70
TABLE 5-13: Monroe Street at South Dakota Avenue, N.E. Intersection Performance
70
TABLE 5-14: Michigan Avenue at 18th & Varnum Streets, N.E. Intersection Performance
71
TABLE 5-15: Michigan Avenue at South Dakota Avenue, N.E. Intersection Performance
71
Intersection Performance
72
TABLE 5-17: Michigan Avenue at 7th Street & CUA Entrance, N.E. Intersection Performance
TABLE 5-18: Michigan Avenue at North Capitol Street, N.E. Intersection Performance
TABLE 5-19: Michigan Avenue at Monroe Street, N.E. Intersection Performance
72
73
73
75
75
95
96
154
154
160
ADDENDUM
FIGURES
Sketch of improved 12th Street Neighborhood Retail Area.
Brooklands Location within Washington DC
Figure 1-1: Map showing Brooklands Transportation & Public Realm Study Corridors
Figure 1-2: Map of Public Realm Study Area
10
Figure 2-3: Aerial photo of the CUA campus and its surrounding institutions ca 1930.
Figure 2-4: Photo of National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception
11
11
12
Figure 2-7: Photo of the Newton Theater Building today, occupied by CVS Pharmacy.
12
13
Figure 2-9: Comprehensive Plan Existing Land Use Map for the Brookland Area. 14
Figure 2-10: Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map for the Brookland Area. 15
Figure 2-11: Map showing 1- mile radius around Brookland/CUA Metro station
Figure 3-1: Photo of Brooklands community walk participants.
16
17
19
23
24
Figure 4-2: Photos showing public realms that are aesthetically pleasing and serving multiple uses.
24
Figure 4-3: Photos showing how businesses benefit from a a vibrant public realm. 24
Figure 4-4: Photo of Brookland/CUA Metro stations approach.
25
25
Figure 4-7: Photo of street lighting with focus on roadway, dimly lit sidewalks.
25
26
Figure 4-9: Photo of Brookland/CUA Metro Station today, looking east onto Newton Street.
Figure 4-10: Photo of pedestrian bridges .
Figure 4-11: Photo of designated bike lanes, bollards, planters, different pavings or colors.
Figure 4-12: Photo of public space.
26
26
26
26
Figure 4-13: Photo of entrance gates or markers announcing the community and commercial district. 26
Figure 4-14: Maps showing Brooklands vicinity, barriers and enhanced connectivity.
Figure 4-15: Photos of special events, various cities.
27
29
32
Figure 5-2: Photo of South Dakota Avenue and Monroe Street intersection.
Figure 5-3: Existing Signalized / Unsignalized Intersections
Figure 5-4: Photo of Michigan Avenue, 18th and Varnum Streets intersection.
Figure 5-5: Existing Traffic Volumes (AM Peak)
51
53
Figure 5-7: Photo of truck parked at the 12th and Newton Streets intersection.
Figure 5-8: Existing Truck Regulations
36
39
44
57
59
67
161
69
79
81
83
Figure 6-2: Map of street lighting & utility poles - existing conditions. 84
Figure 6-3: Photo of existing roadway lighting mounted on a utility pole.
85
Figure 6-4: Photo of existing cobra type roadway lighting with 25-30 in height.
Figure 6-5: Photo of existing lighting that focuses on the roadway.
85
85
85
85
Figure 6-9: Photo showing lack of pedestrian lighting throughout 12th Street.
Figure 6-10: Map of sidewalks - existing conditions.
85
85
86
87
Figure 6-12: Photo of concrete curbing, some showing signs of wear and tear.
Figure 6-13: Photo of various sidewalk treatments and materials.
87
87
Figure 6-14: Photo of concrete pavement, generally in good condition but uneven pavement exists. 87
Figure 6-15: Photo of sidewalk, partially interrupted by tree planting areas. 87
Figure 6-16: Photo of granite curbing in good condition.
87
Figure 6-17: Photo of ADA ramp, many do not meet current accessibility standards.
Figure 6-18: Photo of cracking concrete sidewalk.
87
88
Figure 6-20: Photo of bus shelter located at intersection of Quincy and 12th Streets.
Figure 6-21: Photo of trash receptacles, located throughout the corridor.
89
89
Figure 6-22: Photo of parking meters, located in the neighborhood retail area.
Figure 6-23: Photo showing lack of benches along 12th Street.
87
89
89
Figure 6-24: Photo of bus stop, located on every other block. Several bus stops lack trash receptacles. 89
Figure 6-25: Photo of mail boxes, located in several areas along the corridor.
89
90
Figure 6-28: Photo showing lack of defined tree canopy or hierarchy along the 12th Street corridor.
91
Figure 6-29: Photo of metal guards, they are not uniform and sometimes broken. 91
Figure 6-30: Photo of container plantings in the retail area, generally maintained by property owners. 91
Figure 6-31: Photo of dead and decaying trees, unsightly and a liability.
91
Figure 6-32: Photo showing conflict between trees and overhead utility wires.
Figure 6-33: Photo of the green strip between sidewalk and curb line.
91
91
91
Figure 6-35: Photo of sidewalk clearance compromised by tree plantings and overgrown hedges.
91
Figure 6-36: Photo of trees not in conflict with overhead utility wires are generally in good health.
91
91
92
92
96
97
100
FOLD-OUT: CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR 12 STREET & MONROE STREET (printed separately on 11x17 paper)
TH
100 A-B
105
162
ADDENDUM
110
111
Figure 8-6: Photo of Sub-District 1, view of westbound Randolph Street at 12th Street.
111
Figure 8-7: Conceptual Plan of Proposed Improvements at Michigan Avenue, N.E. at 12th and Randolph Streets (Alternative 1)
112
Figure 8-8 Conceptual Plan of Proposed Improvements at Michigan Avenue, N.E. at 12th and Randolph Streets (Alternative 2)
113
Figure 8-9: Photo of the 12th and Franklin Street intersection. 114
Figure 8-10: Photos of the Main Street Core.
115
Figure 8-11: Photo of westbound Randolph Street, N.E. at 12th Street, N.E. 115
Figure 8-12a: Conceptual Plan of 12th Street, N.E. Corridor Transportation Improvements.
116
Figure 8-12b: Conceptual Plan of 12th Street, N.E. Corridor Transportation Improvements.
17
118
118
118
120
120
Figure 8-19: Photo of 12th Street and Rhode Island Avenue intersection.
120
Figure 8-20: Sketch displaying some of the recommended improvements for Sub-District 2.
121
122
122
Figure 8-24a: Photomontage for Sub-District 3, east side of 12th Street between Otis and Newton Streets.
123
Figure 8-24b: Conceptual design of the recommended long-term improvements for Sub-District 3, 12th Street between Otis and Newton
Streets.
123
Figure 8-25a: Photomontage for Sub-District 3, east side of 12th Street between Newton and Monroe Streets.
124
Figure 8-25b: Conceptual design of the recommended long-term improvements for Sub-District 3, 12th Street between Newton and
Monroe Streets.
124
125
126
127
128
Figure 8-32: Sketch displaying some of the recommended improvements for Sub-District 5.
Figure 8-33: Photo of 12th Streets residential area.
128
128
Figure 8-34: Photo of a 12th Street residential area with varying topography.
129
129
130
Figure 8-37: Photo of Newton Street looking west towards the Brookland/CUA Metro Station.
Figure 8-38: Photo of Brookland/CUA Metro Station parking lot looking east.
131
131
Figure 8-39: Photo of Brookland/CUA Metro Station parking lot looking east onto Newton Street.
Figure 8-40: Photo of eastbound Newton Street from Brookland/CUA Metro Station.
131
131
Figure 8-41a: Conceptual Plan of Monroe Street, N.E. Corridor Transportation Improvements.
132
Figure 8-41b: Conceptual Plan of Monroe Street, N.E. Corridor Transportation Improvements.
133
Figure 8-42: Context plan & section displaying some long-term recommendations for Sub-District 6.
134
Figure 8-43: Context plan & section displaying some recommended improvements for Sub-District 7.
134
135
136
Figure 8-46: Photomontage displaying some of the recommended improvements for Sub-District 6.
Figure 8-47: Photo of Monroe Street Bridge looking east.
136
136
Figure 8-48: Conceptual design of the recommended improvements for Sub-Districts 6 and 7. 137
163
138
Figure 8-50 : Sketch displaying some of the recommended improvements for Sub-District 7.
Figure 8-51: Photo of Monroe Street looking east towards 12th Street.
Figure 8-52: Photo of butterfly.
138
138
139
140
142
Figure 8-58: Sreetscape Elements Library - C1 drawings of combination and roadway lights.
143
Figure 8-59: Sreetscape Elements Library -C2 drawings/photo of combination, roadway & pedestrian lights. 143
Figure 8-60: Streetscape Elements Library -D1, photos of planting and tree options, various locations.
Figure 8-61: Streetscape Elements Library -D2, photos of understory plantings.
144
145
Figure 8-62 a,b: Streetscape Elements Library -D3, photo & diagram of surface treatment and underground tree trench.
Figure 8-63: Streetscape Elements Library -E1, photos of benches, various locations.
146
Figure 8-64: Streetscape Elements Library -E2, photos of trash receptacles. 146
Figure 8-65: Streetscape Elements Library -E3, photos of bike racks, various locations.
Figure 8-66: Streetscape Elements Library -E4, photos of bollards.
147
147
Figure 8-67: Streetscape Elements Library -F1, photos/sketch of bike lanes, various locations.
Figure 8-68: Streetscape Elements Library -F2, photo of bus stop pad, Washington DC.
148
148
Figure 8-69: Streetscape Elements Library -G, photo of solar-powered multispace parking meter.
Figure 8-70: Streetscape Elements Library -H, photos of crosswalks & bulb-outs.
149
149
Figure 8-71: Streetscape Elements Library -I, photos of signs & banners, various locations. 150
Figure 8-72: Streetscape Elements Library -J, photos of news stands, various locations.
150
Figure 8-73: Streetscape Elements Library -K1, photos of bridge railings, various locations.
151
Figure 8-74: Streetscape Elements Library -K2, photos of bridge entrance markers, various locations.
151
Figure 8-75: Streetscape Elements Library -L, photos of entrance markers & public art, various locations.
152
Figure 8-76: Streetscape Elements Library -M1, photos of solar powered art & lighting, various locations.
152
Figure 8-77: Streetscape Elements Library -M2, photos of LID techniques, various locations.
Figure 8-78: Graphic, Application of Streetscape Elements.
153
157
Figure 8-79: Photo of southeast corner of 12th and Newton Streets. 158
Figure 8-80: Examples of 12th Street storefronts. 159
164
145
ADDENDUM
SOURCES
Appendix A
Intersection Turning Movement Counts.
Appendix B
Service Level Descriptions & Selected Synchro Output.
Appendix C
Consideration of Utility Undergrounding.
ANCs
Merchants
Residents
CUA Administration
Trinity Administration
Providence Hospital
Hospital for Sick Children
John Paul II and Basilica
Brookland Main Street
Brookland Community Development Corporation
District Government Agencies
Federal Government Agencies
WMATA (Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
PEPCO
165