Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. INTRODUCTION
Storage
Technology
Energy Capacity
Pumped
Hydro
CAES
TABLE I
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ENERGY STORAGE TECHNOLOGY
Discharge
Response
AC-AC
Duration at Max
Power Level
Time
Efficiency
Power Level
Life
Time
12 hours
< 2000 MW
30 ms
70 80 %
40 yrs
4 24 hours
100300 MW
3-15 min
85 %
30 yrs
Fly Wheel
Minutes to 1 hour
< 100 kW
5 ms
80 85 %
20 yrs
Battery
1 8 hours
< 30 MW
30 ms
60 80 %
SMES
0.6 kWh
10 s
200 kW
5 ms
90 %
40 yrs
Capacitors
0.3 kWh
10 s
100 kW
5 ms
90 %
40 yrs
Applications
210 yrs
Energy arbitrage
Frequency regulation
Ancillary services
Energy arbitrage
Frequency regulation
Ancillary services
Frequency regulation
Power quality
Emergency bridging power
Fluctuation smoothing
Peak shaving for T&D
upgrade deferral
Backup power
Small load leveling
applications
Power quality
Emergency bridging power
Power quality
Emergency bridging power
Fluctuation smoothing
Fig. 1. Power system with a wind farm connected with pumped hydro storage
Considering the wind farm with the pumped hydro storage, the
energy storage techniques can stabilize the wind power output
such that a constant power shown in Fig.4 is generated in each
hour to follow the system demand trend over 24 hours. Note
that the forecasted wind power output shown in Fig. 2 is high
during off-peak period (hours 1-9 and 19-24) and is very low
during peak loads (hours 13-17). However, the coordinated
wind power output shown in Fig. 4 is low during off-peak
period (hours 1-9 and 19-24) and is very high during peak
loads (hours 10-18). After comparing Fig. 2 and Fig. 4, we can
find that a certain amount of inexpensive wind power during
off-peak load hours is stored in the pumped hydro storage, and
used during peak load hours. As a result, the total operation
cost of the power system is reduced since it is not necessary to
get the power from expensive conventional generators during
peak load hours. Therefore, the integration of wind farm with
the energy storage will firm up the wind energy output and
make the system economic.
B. Grid Energy Storage
The batteries can also decrease the power flow on the lines
during the peak load. The power flow on line 1-6 at hour 3 is
35.53 MW in this case, but 40 MW in Case 1. So, such
application could be helpful in deferring the transmission line
upgrade due to the aging of lines or the increase in loads.
Case 3: Considering the contingency without battery
Consider the outage of line 1-2 at hour 2. If the system has no
batteries, the load at the second hour could not be met because
the outage of line 1-2 restricts the supply from G1 to 40MW
through line 1-6. Thus, the total power that the generators
could supply is 120 MW which can not meet the load of 125
MW at hour 2.
Fig. 6. Six-bus power system with the battery energy storages
30
47.2973
58.29429
P2 (MW)
72
77.7027
73.70571
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
P.F. Ribeiro, B.K Johnson, M.L. Crow, A. Arsoy, and Y. Liu, Energy
Storage Systems for Advanced Power Applications, Proc. IEEE, 2001,
89, (12), pp. 17441756
G.D. Rodriguez, A Utility Perspective of the Role of Energy Storage in
the Smart Grid Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2010.
IEEE
Challenges in Energy Storage Technologies" A Report from the APS
Panel on Public Affairs Committee on Energy and Environment, May
2007
J.H.R. Enslin, Dynamic Reactive Power and Energy Storage for
Integrating Intermittent Renewable Energy Power Engineering Society
General Meeting, 2010. IEEE
H. Ibrahim, A. Ilinca, J. Perron, Comparison and Analysis of Different
Energy Storage Techniques based on their Performance Index IEEE
Electrical Power Conference, Canada, 2007. pp. 393 398
B.P. Roberts, Deploying Battery Energy Storage in the Utility
Distribution Grid Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2010.
IEEE
J.M. Eyer, J.J. Iannucci, G.P. Corey.: Energy Storage Benefits and
Market Analysis Handbook, Sandia National Laboratories REPORT,
SAND2004-6177, December 2004.
A. Mohd, E. Ortjohann, A. Schmelter, N. Hamsic, D. Morton,
Challenges in Integrating Distributed Energy Storage Systems into
Future Smart Grid IEEE International Symposium on Industrial
Electronics, 2008, pp. 1627 - 1632
R.B. Schainker, Executive Overview: Energy Storage Options For A
Sustainable Energy Future IEEE Power Engineering Society General
Meeting, 2004. (2), pp. 2309 2314
S.M. Schoenung, J.M. Eyer, J.J. Iannucci, S.A Horgan, Energy storage
for a competitive power market Annual Reviews of Energy and
Environment,1996,pp. 341-370.
M. Khatibi, M. Jazaeri, An Analysis for Increasing the Penetration of
Renewable Energies by Optimal Sizing of Pumped-Storage Power
Plants IEEE Electric Power Conference, Canada 2008. pp. 1 5
R. Walawalkar, J. Apt, Market Analysis of Emerging Electric Energy
Storage Systems DOE/NETL-2008/1330, July 30, 2008.
http://earth2tech.com/2009/05/13/faq-energy-storage-for-the-smart-grid
M. Black, G. Strbac, Value of Storage in Providing Balancing Services
for Electricity Generation Systems with High Wind Penetration J
Power Sources 2006;162: pp. 949-953.
J.S. Anagnostopoulos, D.E. Papantonis.: Simulation and Size
Optimization
of a
PumpedStorage
Power
plant for