Sie sind auf Seite 1von 70

Ministry of Defence

Defence Standard 02-729 (NES 729)


Issue 1 Publication Date 01 April 2000

Requirements For Non-Destructive


Examination Methods
Part 5
Ultrasonic

Incorporating NES 729 Category 2


Issue 1 Publication Date November 1984

AMENDMENT RECORD
Amd No

Date

Text Affected

REVISION NOTE
This standard is raised to Issue 1 to update its content.
HISTORICAL RECORD
This standard supersedes the following:
Naval Engineering Standard (NES) 729 Part 5 Issue 1 dated November 1984.

Signature and Date

Ministry of Defence

Naval Engineering Standard

NES 729 Part 5

Issue 1 (Reformatted)

November 1984

REQUIREMENTS FOR
NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION METHODS
PART 5
ULTRASONIC

This NES Supersedes


DGS/PS/9022 PART 6

Record of Amendments
AMDT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

INSERTED BY

DATE

NAVAL ENGINEERING STANDARD 729


REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-DESTRICTIVE EXAMINATION METHODS
PART 5
ISSUE 1 (REFORMATTED)
ULTRASONIC

The issue and use of this Standard


is authorized for use in MOD contracts
by MOD(PE) Sea Systems and
the Naval Support Command

ECROWN COPYRIGHT
Published by:
Director of Naval Architecture
Procurement Executive, Ministry of Defence
Sea Systems, Foxhill, Bath BA1 5AB
i

ii

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

SCOPE
1.

This NES covers the procedures and methods to be used for the Quality Assessment of
Ultrasonic Examining Authorities and for production ultrasonic examination. The methods
described are the minimum requirements for the detection of surface and sub-surface
imperfections in welded and brazed joints, cast and wrought materials and for the
measurement of plate and tube wall thickness, but does not contain acceptance criteria for
defects thus revealed. Manual methods only are covered but automatic and mechanically
assisted methods and associated recording systems are to be applied whenever the extent of
the examination justifies the need to minimize operator induced variables and the equipment
cost.

2.

The effective application of ultrasonic examination may be restricted in materials with


inherently high or variable attenuation or which produce severe scattering of the ultrasonic
beam. Complex shapes may also limit satisfactory application and the examination is to be
applied at stages during manufacture when the geometry of the component is relatively simple
provided that subsequent specified treatments of the material do not render the examination
ineffective.

3.

The extent to which ultrasonic examination is required is not included herein. This will be
stated in the Contract Documents.

4.

This NES does not apply to nuclear plant and machinery to which DG Ships/PS/5108 applies.

iii

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

iv

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

FOREWORD
Sponsorship
1.

This Naval Engineering Standard (NES) is sponsored by the Procurement Executive, Ministry
of Defence (MOD(PE)), Deputy Controller Warships (DCW), Section NA 133.

2.

It is to be applied as required by any MOD(PE) contract for the non-destructive examination


of metals and is applicable to Surface Ships and Submarines.

3.

This NES comprises:


Requirements for Non-destructive Examination Methods
Part 1

Radiographic

Part 2

Magnetic Particle

Part 3

Eddy Current

Part 4

Liquid Penetrant

Part 5

Ultrasonic

4.

If it is found to be technically unsuitable for any particular requirement the sponsor is to be


informed in writing of the circumstances with a copy to Deputy Controller Warship
Equipment (DCWE), Section TE 112a.

5.

Any user of this NES either within MOD or in outside industry may propose an amendment
to it. Proposals for amendments which are:
a.

not directly applicable to a particular contract are to be made to the sponsor of the NES.

b.

directly applicable to a particular contract are to be dealt with using existing


departmental procedures or as specified in the contract.

6.

No alteration is to be made to this NES except by the issue of a formal amendment.

7.

Unless otherwise stated, reference in this NES to approval, approved, authorized or similar
terms means by the Procurement Executive, Ministry of Defence.

8.

Any significant amendments that may be made to this NES at a later date will be indicated
by a vertical side line. Deletions will be indicated by 000 appearing at the end of the line
intervals.

Conditions of Release
General
9.

This Naval Engineering Standard (NES) has been prepared for the use of the Crown and of
its contractors in the execution of contracts for the Crown. The Crown hereby excludes all
liability (other than liability for death or personal injury) whatsoever and howsoever arising
(including but without limitation, negligence on the part of the Crown, its servants or agents)
for any loss or damage however caused where the NES is used for any other purpose.

10.

This document is Crown Copyright and the information herein may be subject to Crown or
third party rights. It is not to be released, reproduced or published without written permission
of the MOD.

11.

The Crown reserves the right to amend or modify the contents of this NES without consulting
or informing any holder.

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

MOD Tender or Contract Process


12.

This NES is the property of the Crown and unless otherwise authorized in writing by the MOD
must be returned on completion of the contract, or submission of the tender, in connection
with which it is issued.

13.

When this NES is used in connection with a MOD tender or contract, the user is to ensure that
he is in possession of the appropriate version of each document, including related documents,
relevant to each particular tender or contract. Enquiries in this connection may be made of
the local MOD(PE) Quality Assurance Representative or the Authority named in the tender
or contract.

14.

When NES are incorporated into MOD contracts, users are responsible for their correct
application and for complying with contracts and any other statutory requirements.
Compliance with an NES does not of itself confer immunity from legal obligations.

Related Documents
15.

In the tender and procurement processes the related documents listed in each section and
Annex A can be obtained as follows:
a.

British Standards

British Standards Institution,


389 Chiswick High Road,
London W4 4AL

b.

Defence Standards

Directorate of Standardization and Safety Policy,


Stan 1, Kentigern House, 65 Brown Street,
Glasgow G2 8EX

c.

Naval Engineering Standards

CSE3a, CSE Llangennech, Llanelli,


Dyfed SA14 8YP

d.

Other documents

Tender or Contract Sponsor to advise.

Note: Tender or Contract Sponsor can advise in cases of difficulty.


16.

All applications to Ministry Establishments for related documents are to quote the relevant
MOD Invitation to Tender or Contract Number and date, together with the sponsoring
Directorate and the Tender or Contract Sponsor.

17.

Prime Contractors are responsible for supplying their subcontractors with relevant
documentation, including specifications, standards and drawings.

Health and Safety


Warning
18.

This NES may call for the use of processes, substances and/or procedures that may be injurious
to health if adequate precautions are not taken. It refers only to technical suitability and in
no way absolves either the supplier or the user from statutory obligations relating to health
and safety at any stage of manufacture or use. Where attention is drawn to hazards, those
quoted may not necessarily be exhaustive.

vi

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

CONTENTS
Page No

TITLE PAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

iii

FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sponsorship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conditions of Release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MOD Tender or Contract Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Related Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Health and Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

v
v
v
v
vi
vi
vi
vi

CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

vii

SECTION

1.

ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.1

SECTION

2.

INSPECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.1

SECTION

3.
3.1
3.2

GENERAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS . . . .


Test Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Personnel Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIGURE 3.1 SPECIMENULTRASONIC
EXAMINATION PROCEDURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment Performance Characteristics . . . . . . . . .
Equipment Qualification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sensitivity Calibration Reference/Test Blocks . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Finish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.1
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.5

4.7

PLATE MATERIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compressional Wave Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shear Wave Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TABLE 4.1 NOTCH DIMENSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recording . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.3

SECTION

5.
5.1
5.2
5.3

PLATE THICKNESS MEASUREMENT . . . . . . . .


Instrument Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Coverage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1

SECTION

6.
6.1

BUTT WELDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1
6.1

3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
SECTION

4.
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6

vii

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

6.2

Probes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TABLE 6.1 BEAM ANGLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TABLE 6.2 USE OF T-TYPE PROBES . . . . . . . . .
Surface Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIGURE 6.1 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCKS
FOR WELD THICKNESS UP TO AND
INCLUDING 38mm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIGURE 6.2 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCKS
FOR WELD THICKNESS GREATER THAN
38mm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIGURE 6.4 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCK FOR
WELD STRADDLE SCANNING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIGURE 6.5 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCK
DIAGRAMMATIC SET-UP FOR STRADDLE
SCAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1
6.1
6.1
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.3

7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1

7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.10

TEE-BUTT WELDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Test Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIGURE 7.1 COMBINATION BLOCK
COVERING DIFFERENT WELD AND PLATE
THICKNESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plotting Weld Width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Search Sensitivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Search Scanning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Defect Indication Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.2
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.4

8.
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.6.1
8.6.2
8.6.3
8.6.4
8.7

OVERLAY CLADDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Calibration/Test Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sensitivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Probes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Manually deposited cladding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Procedure tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machine deposited cladding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.2

6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6

SECTION

SECTION

7.
7.1
7.2
7.3

viii

6.4
6.4
6.6
6.6

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

SECTION

9.
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7

BRAZED PIPE JOINTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Probes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sensitivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIGURE 9.1 TYPICAL CRT DISPLAYS . . . . . . . .

9.1
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.2
9.2
9.4

SECTION

10.
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5

PIPES AND TUBES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Probes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10.1
10.1
10.1
10.1
10.1
10.1

SECTION

11.

PIPE OR TUBE WALL THICKNESS


MEASUREMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Probes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1

12.4
12.5
12.6

FORGINGSINCLUDING FORGED,
EXTRUDED AND WROUGHT BARS . . . . . . . . . .
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Probes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIGURE 12.1 REFERENCE STANDARD . . . . . . .
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12.1
12.1
12.1
12.1
12.2
12.3
12.3
12.3

SECTION

13.
13.1
13.2
13.3
13.4
13.5
13.6

CASTINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Surface Condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Probes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Method of Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assessment of Defects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

13.1
13.1
13.1
13.1
13.1
13.1
13.2

SECTION

14.

SAFETY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14.1

ANNEX

A.

RELATED DOCUMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A.1

ANNEX

B.

DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . .

B.1

ANNEX

C.

PROCUREMENT CHECK LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C.1

11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
11.6
11.7
SECTION

12.
12.1
12.2
12.3

ALPHABETICAL INDEX
ix

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

1.

ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
a.

The standards for acceptance of defect indications detected by ultrasonic


examination are to be as specified in the Contract Documents. Where not
specified therein, DG Ships/G/10000B, DG Ships/PS/9010B or DG Ships 86C are
to apply as appropriate.

1.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

1.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

2.

INSPECTION
a.

It is not the intent of this NES to exclude proven inspection procedures which
can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the MOD QAR to meet the quality
requirements. Prior approval is to be obtained before such procedures are used.

b.

Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, acceptance inspection


is to be performed on an item in the final surface condition and the final heat
treated condition.

2.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

2.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

3.

GENERAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS

3.1

Test Procedure
a.

Ultrasonic examination is to be performed in accordance with a written test


procedure. Each Examining Authority is to certify that the procedure is in
accordance with this NES and is to submit each procedure to the MOD QAR for
written approval.

b.

The test procedure is to include the following information:


(1)

Descriptive component details including material type, shape and size; for
welds: the weld preparation and welding details. Sketches as necessary.
Surface finish.

(2)

Equipment details: model or type and make, monitoring and recording


details. Special features, ie probe guides or saddles. Positive identification
or probes, types, makes, including transducer sizes, frequency and beam
angles. Couplant type.

(3)

Technique details: scanning method, ie manual, automated, immersion


etc. Scanning directions and the test surfaces used.

(4)

Calibration procedures and sensitivity checks with details of reference


blocks used. The method and frequency of sensitivity checks in
production.

(5)

The method of recording the results of examination.

(6)

Pre examination and post examination cleaning methods as applicable.

A suitable form for ultrasonic procedure is given as FIGURE 3.1.

3.2

Personnel Requirements
a.

The Examining Authority is to ensure that all personnel associated with


ultrasonic examination have been adequately trained to the levels appropriate
to their responsibilities and maintain records accordingly. Personnel
performing and interpreting ultrasonic examination are to be able to carry out
an operational type test using the test method or technique to be used in
production. The Examining Authority is to be able to interpret the results and
be familiar with the standards to which they are working. Personnel are to be
considered qualified when they have demonstrated their ability to meet the
requirements of the approved procedure. Personnel are to be conversant with
the effects of:
(1)

surface condition;

(2)

material structure (grain size, attenuation etc);

(3)

transducer size and type (compressional, shear and surface wave;

(4)

the effect of dead zone;

(5)

test frequency;

(6)

acoustic couplant;

(7)

method of calibration;

(8)

use of attenuator;

(9)

display characteristics;

(10) flaw indication measurement.

3.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

Procedure No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...................
...................

Issue No . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Procedure drafted by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Approved by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Examination conducted by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Title . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Drg No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Materials specification . . . . . . . .

Contract Order No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Casting/Forging/Weld/Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Area Examined
(a) Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(b) Thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TECHNIQUE DETAILS
1.

Instrumentation
(a)
(b)
(c)

Drive Unit Make . . . . . Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Monitor(s) Make . . . . . Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recorder(s) Make . . . . Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Probe(s) Type: Twin crystal/Single.


Crystal type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Size . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.

Frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MHz.

Type of Test
Automatic/Immersion/Irrigated Probe/Manual/Contact
Couplant: Water/Glycerol/Cellulose paste/other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scan control: Mechanical/Template guide/other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.

Sensitivity Calibration
Test piece material . . . . . . . . .

Thickness(es) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Calibration Target
(a)
Flat Bottom Hole: Diameter . . . . mm
Beam path length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b)
Notch length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mm
4.

Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mm.
Depth . . . . . . . . . . mm. Width . . . . mm.

Scanning Details
Directions, surfaces used, and coverage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diagrams to be used as necessary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.

Acceptance Standard Specification

6.

Supplementary Information
FIGURE 3.1 SPECIMENULTRASONIC EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

3.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

3.3

Equipment Requirements
a.

3.4

Ultrasonic equipment is to consist of the following:


(1)

Electronic apparatus capable of producing, receiving and displaying high


frequency electrical pulses at the required frequencies and energy levels.
The apparatus is to have the capability to meet the calibration
requirements for specific tests and feature a calibrated attenuator. The
display is to include a well defined and permanently marked graticule.

(2)

Probes, single and double types, capable of transforming electrical


impulses into mechanical ultrasonic vibrations and vice versa at specific
frequencies. Probes are to be capable of transmitting the ultrasound into
the material and/or receiving the returning energy via a suitable coupling
medium.

(3)

Couplant liquid or gel having good wetting properties for the transference
of mechanical ultrasonic vibration to and from the test surface.
Environmental conditions may preclude the use of all couplant types
other than water.

(4)

Calibration blocks for the assessment of probe and electronic apparatus,


characteristics and performance.

(5)

Reference/Test blocks for the pre-test calibration procedure with which to


set the applicable acceptance or rejection test level to aid interpretation
and the reproduction of test results.

Equipment Performance Characteristics


a.

Note:

Prior to use in production, inspection, after maintenance or at intervals not


exceeding one month, the following equipment performance characteristics are
to be assessed and the results recorded, using block A2 to BS 2704 and the
methods in BS 4331 (Parts 1 and 3):
(1)

time base linearity over the required working range;

(2)

linearity of amplifier;

(3)

swept gain (if featured);

(4)

overall system gain;

(5)

Signal-to-Noise ratio;

(6)

calibrated attenuator accuracy;

(7)

beam characteristics, dead zone and resolution;

(8)

probe(s) angle(s) of refraction and index points.


Suppression/Reject and Swept Gain controls are to be in the OFF
position when checking linearity of amplifier.

3.3

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

3.5

Equipment Qualification
a.

Equipment is to be considered qualified when records of the characteristics in


accordance with Clause 3.4a. show:
(1)

time base linearity measured between at least five multiple echoes is


within 1%;

(2)

amplifier linearity 1dB, ie the difference in the attenuator figures noted


in reducing a backwall echo from a steel sample from 80% Full Screen
Deflection (FSD) to 40% FSD to 20% is to be 6dB 1dB in each case;

(3)

swept gain signal amplitudes are within 2dB over the working range
observing at least five multiple echoes;

(4)

overall system gain with at least 35dB in reserve using a 20% FSD echo
from the 1.5mm hole in the A2 test block. (See BS 4331, Part 3, Fig 16);

(5)

Signal-to-Noise Ratio based on a 20% FSD echo from the 1.5mm hole in
the A2 test block. This echo is to exceed noise level by 12dB;

(6)

calibrated attenuator covers the working range required in steps not


greater than 2dB with an accuracy of 1dB over any 20dB range;

(7)

minimum resolution of compressional wave probes complies with BS 2704


Fig 13c;

(8)

minimum resolution of shear wave probes using test block to BS 3923


Part 3, Fig 1a. 2 to 6MHz probes shall be capable of resolving the 2mm
step;

(9)

the area of each transmitting and/or receiving crystal does not exceed 350
square mm and that no dimension of the crystal face exceeds 25mm;

(10) probe angle of refraction is within 2 degrees of stipulated angle;


(11) probe index point as marked is within 1mm of that measured using the
A2 test block.
b.

3.6

The above equipment checks inherently qualify both the probe and the
electronic equipment. It is essential therefore that qualification is established
for each probe that is to be used.

Sensitivity Calibration Reference/Test Blocks


a.

Immediately prior to the examination of each item the required equipment


sensitivity is to be established by the use of reference/test blocks which simulate
the item as regards to the material type and thickness range. The test blocks are
to contain suitable calibration target reflectors, eg flat bottom holes or slots, in
simulation of the characteristics of defect types expected to occur in the item to
be examined. The targets are to be positioned away from other reflecting
surfaces to ensure they can be clearly and individually resolved by the
equipment used.

3.4

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

3.7

3.8

Method of Examination
a.

A controlled reproducible examination at the specified sensitivity is to be


consistently achieved and maintained.

b.

The equipment is always to be calibrated to the appropriate reference standards


before the examination begins. Calibration is to be checked at intervals during
the examination.

c.

Probe characteristics and probe movement, signal amplitude and the material
attenuation effects are to be taken into consideration when the significance of
defects is being assessed.

d.

The movement or rotation of the probes or test item is to be controlled as closely


as possible to maintain a uniform testing speed. The test speed is not to exceed
the maximum speed at which the reference standard can be scanned and
produce clear resolution of the targets, and is to be consistent with operator
readout efficiency.

e.

It may be necessary to verify indications of defects revealed during ultrasonic


examination by the use of an alternative ultrasonic technique or
non-destructive test method.

f.

The attenuation difference between the test material and that of the simulation
test block is to be compared by the use of the first backwall echo height in
compressional wave examination, and by the use of a target corner echo height
for shear wave examination. As necessary the equipment sensitivity is to be
adjusted to compensate for attenuation variations between the test item and the
test block. These adjustments will normally be minimal and it must be ensured
that the signal from the least apparent calibration target is still detectable. On
test items that do not present a target corner for the shear wave examination,
the attenuation difference established with the compressional wave probe is to
be used.

g.

The use of a distance amplitude curve is recommended. Curves are to be


constructed for the particular equipment combination in use.

h.

The effect of dead zone under the probe is to be minimized by a complementary


examination from the opposite surface to that first used on the item under test
or by the use of a twin crystal probe unless the material in the deed zone is
subsequently to be removed by machining.

Surface Finish
a.

The surface of the item to be tested is to be clean and free from dirt, loose scale
or paint or other foreign matter to ensure effective acoustic coupling and test.
Ideal surfaces are those smooth and clean to bright metal. On completion of the
test the couplant is to be removed in accordance with the requirements of the
specification applicable to the test item.

3.5

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

3.6

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

4.

PLATE MATERIAL

4.1

Application
a.

4.2

Surface Preparation
a.

4.3

The plate is to be in the pickled, shot or abrasive condition and the test surface
is to comply with Clause 3.8a. The test surface may have one coat of primer. As
necessary the surface may be smoothed to assure effective acoustic coupling and
test.

Compressional Wave Inspection


a.

4.4

The methods described are to be used for the examination of plate material of
6mm thickness and greater.

The test frequency range is 2 to 5MHz. The transducer size is to conform to the
requirements in Clause 3.5a.

Calibration
a.

A test block is to be prepared from sound material of the same material group
(ie low alloy steel, austenitic stainless steel, copper nickel, monel etc) and within
10% of the thickness of the material to be examined:
(1)

For plate material up to and including 25mm thick, a 6mm dia flat bottom
hole is to be drilled from one plate surface to depth one half of the test
block thickness.

(2)

For thicknesses over 25mm two or more 6mm dia flat bottom holes will
be required. Holes are to be drilled from one plate surface to depths 12mm
from each surface, and intermediate such that the difference in the depths
of successive holes does not exceed 26mm, eg:
28mm thickness2 holes minimum12mm and 26mm deep
50mm thickness2 holes minimum12mm and 38mm deep
75mm thickness3 holes minimum12mm, 38mm and 63mm deep
100mm thickness4 holes minimum12mm, 38mm, 63mm and 88mm
deep.

(3)

The time base is to be calibrated and the graticule marked to show


nominal plate thickness.

(4)

Maintaining the same gain control position throughout, the instrument


sensitivity is to be adjusted to display a 20% Full Screen Deflection (FSD)
at each of the following stages, and the indicated attenuator figure
recorded:

(5)

The first backwall echo through an undrilled section of


the test block

= eg A dB

The least detectable hole in the test block

= eg B db

The first backwall echo through the plate to be examined

= eg C dB

Each of the remaining holes in the test block

= eg D db
etc

The difference between attenuator figures A and C will be the


compensating factor to be used in the production examination. The
Minimum Search Sensitivity will be C (A B) dB.

4.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

(6)

Note:

4.5

Where the amplitude of the first backwall echo is reduced to 20% FSD or
less unaccompanied by evidence of laminar inclusions, the plate surfaces
are to be checked and dressed if necessary to ensure adequate acoustic
coupling.

Method of Examination
a.

4.6

The assessment of defect significance is to be made relative to the depth


of the indication below the test surface. Defects at depths other than that
of the least detectable hole, are to be assessed using an adjusted search
sensitivity value derived by substituting the attenuator figure recorded
for the equivalent depth hole in the test block.

Each plate is to be marked on one major surface with grid lines normal to the
direction of rolling and separated by not more than 5% of the plate width or 90%
of the transducer diameter whichever is the greater. Each grid line is to be
scanned in accordance with Clauses 4.6b. and 4.6c. In addition each edge of the
plate is to be similarly scanned along a parallel track not exceeding 50mm from
the edge, unless included in the grid pattern.

Shear Wave Examination


a.

Where examination using shear wave is specified or required, the shear wave
sensitivity is to be set to a reference notch of dimensions given in TABLE 4.1.
The notch is to be suitably positioned in a reference/test block that conforms to
Clause 3.6a. The instrument calibration is to be carried out using a shear wave
probe of suitable angle and frequency. The time base of the oscilloscope is to be
calibrated by obtaining peak amplitude reflections from the notch at half-skip
distance, ie with probe placed on the surface opposite the notch; and at full-skip
distance, ie with the probe placed on the surface containing the notch. The test
sensitivity is to be such that the minimum signal amplitude from the notch at
full skip distance is 20% FSD. Equipment sensitivity is to be adjusted to
compensate for attenuation variation between the item under test and the test
block.
SQUARE NOTCH DIMENSIONS

Depth of notchexpressed as a
percentage of plate thickness

3%
or 0.1mm whichever
is the greater

Width of notch

2 depth

Length of notch

approx 40mm
TABLE 4.1 NOTCH DIMENSIONS

b.

Shear wave testing is to be performed by scanning one major surface in two


directions, ie parallel to and normal to the direction of rolling of the plate. The
probe unit is to be moved in parallel paths. In the event of defect indication that
approaches in amplitude that of the reference notch, the adjacent area is to be
scanned by the continuous method indexing approximately 90% of the width of
the transducer sufficient to establish the size and location of the discontinuity.

c.

Detection of a defective area or an area of attenuation wholly contained within


a 75mm diameter circle is to require 100% examination of adjacent material
within 600mm of the defect. Detection of a laminar inclusion is to require 100%
check of adjacent material within 300mm of the defect. Details are to be
recorded as required by Clause 4.7a.

4.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

4.7

Recording
a.

The following information is to be recorded in addition to the test procedure:


(1)

location and size of any true lamination;

(2)

location and size of any area where the first backwall echo is attenuated
to 20% FSD or less after plate surface preparation;

(3)

location and size of laminar inclusions having a reflectivity in excess of the


equivalent depth 6mm dia hole;

(4)

when using shear waves the location and signal amplitude of any
indication above the reference level (Clause 4.6a.)

4.3

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

4.4

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

5.

PLATE THICKNESS MEASUREMENT


a.

5.1

5.2

Instrument Calibration
a.

Calibration is to be carried out using a suitable test block of the same material
type and of thickness that is within the permitted thickness tolerance applicable
to the item to be tested. Direct readout instruments are to be calibrated and
checked for drift, suitability and accuracy in accordance with the instrument
manufacturers instructions.

b.

Test blocks may consist of machined step wedges or a series of machined discs
that cover the range of materials and thicknesses to be tested. Blocks and discs
are to be clearly marked preferably by engraving to indicate material type and
thickness.

Coverage
a.

5.3

Plate thickness may be measured by using conventional pulse-echo flaw


detection equipment or direct readout ultrasonic thickness gauging
instruments with meter or digital display. Flaw detection equipment is to
comply with Clause 3.5a. Direct readout instruments are to be used only for
measurement of thickness within the manufacturers marked ranges and
provided that the instrument accuracy is within the permitted thickness
tolerance for the item to be tested.

The extent of coverage of thickness gauging is to be as specified in the Contract


Documents. Thickness gauging of plate carried out in conjunction with
Clause 4.5a. is to be measured on the grid lines at intervals not greater than
600mm. Reference to DG Ships 137 may also be required.

Surface Preparation
a.

Plates are to be free from any surface imperfection that will interfere with the
test. Surface imperfections may be removed by wire brushing or light grinding
to sound metal provided the thickness is not reduced below the minimum
thickness permitted by specification and the ground area faired into the
surrounding metal.

5.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

5.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

6.

BUTT WELDING

6.1

Application
a.

6.2

The application of ultrasonic methods to the examination of butt welds is


influenced by the types of materials in use, their thickness and geometry, and
the required flaw sensitivity. The influence of the properties of the structure in
the weld and heat affected zone may restrict application. The use of modified
probes may be essential where testing is carried out on materials which have
differing acoustic velocities to those for which commercial probes are normally
designed. When testing these materials it will be necessary to ensure that the
probe refracted angle used is correct.

Probes
a.

Compressional and shear wave probes may be single or combined double (twin)
crystal types of test frequency 26MHz. In addition to the requirements in
Clause 3.5a. the compressional transducer area is to be not less than 100 square
mm and the shear transducer area not less than 70 square mm. The weld
preparation and material thickness are to be taken into account when selecting
the shear wave probe angle; it is also to be noted that a beam incident on a
reflecting surface at 30 will undergo mode conversion which may give rise to
spurious indications, there will also be a loss of shear wave energy of up to 20dB.
The direction of the beam is to be as near to normal to the angle of the weld edge
preparation as possible.

b.

The use of various probe refracted angles may be necessary for the assessment
of defect type and severity. Beam angles generally suited to different thicknesses
of material are given in TABLE 6.1.
PROBE
REFRACTED ANGLE
70 80

PROBE FEATURE

MATERIAL THICKNESS

Single or
combined
bi d d
double
bl

6mm15mm

60 70

12mm35mm

Single or combined
d bl and
double
d
probes-in-tandem

45 60
60
45

35mm60mm
Over 60mm

TABLE 6.1 BEAM ANGLES


c.

A T-type probe is one that is referenced to its half-skip distance in terms of


plate material thickness T in preference to the probe angle (eg 1T probe = 45 ).
The use of T-type probes offers immediate advantages in this half-skip
distance-material thickness relationship and in the range of refracted angles
covered (see TABLE 6.2.) They are therefore suitable for both initial and
complementary inspections.
PLATE THICKNESS

PROBE REFRACTED ANGLE

12mm up to and including 50mm

56 20i to 68 12i
(1T to 2T)

above 50mm

45 to 56 20i
(1T to 1T)

TABLE 6.2 USE OF T-TYPE PROBES

6.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

6.3

Surface Preparation
a.

6.4

6.5

The condition of the probe contact surface of the item to be examined is to be


such that satisfactory coupling between the probe and test surface can be
maintained. Surfaces are to be free from scale, rust, weld spatter and other
foreign matter. The surface condition of the weld is to be such that it does not
adversely influence the examination; preparation of the weld surfaces is to be
completed consistent with the requirements to carry out effective ultrasonic
examination and accurate interpretation. Depending on the profile and surface
condition, dressing of the weld area may be necessary even when probe contact
is only to be made with parent material.

Calibration
a.

The calibration test piece ideally comprises a sample weld that simulates both
the geometry and material features of the weld to be examined. In the absence
of such a sample a machined test block of the same material and thickness as
the item under test can be used, see FIGURE 6.1 and FIGURE 6.2. Calibration
targets consist of holes drilled normal to the examining surface or slots placed
as shown. The calibration target type and size is to be as specified by the Design
Authority who may require hole type targets for particular applications
regardless of the thickness to be examined. As differences in the production
material may cause attenuation, frequent checking is essential during
inspection to ensure the required working sensitivity is maintained.

b.

The use of the Suppressor/Reject control will adversely affect the linearity of the
amplifier. Suppression is therefore to be minimal. Should subsequent
adjustment of this control be necessary changes in amplitude linearity are to be
noted for consideration in defect sizing.

c.

The instrument is to be calibrated to show a corner reflection of 20% FSD from


the hole or notch with the probe index placed at full skip distance on the selected
test block. When a distance amplitude curve is in use the reflection from the
target is to be set to the curve.

d.

Attenuation variation due to beam path length and the material is to be taken
into account before assessment of defect severity.

Method of Examination
a.

Plate material adjacent to the weld through which the shear wave must pass is
to be inspected in accordance with Clauses 4.4a. and 4.5a. and any defective
areas recorded.

b.

Shear wave scanning is to be carried out from both sides of the weld on one plate
surface. Signal amplitude, location in the weld and probe movement and
position are to be taken into consideration in assessment of defect.
(1)

Welds up to 12mm thick The shear wave scan may be carried out by
directing the probe normal to the weld, with the probe index positioned
at the optimum distance of twice the probe skip distance from the centre
line of weld and by moving the probe in a path parallel with the centre line
of weld. The probe may be oscillated as in Clause 6.5b.(2) provided that
full weld coverage and defect location is achieved.

6.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

(2)

Welds over 12mm up to and including 50mm Shear wave inspection


may be carried out in a series of scanning movements parallel with the
weld at intervals not exceeding 60% of the transducer diameter or length.
Alternatively the probe may be oscillated to and from the weld and
progressed along the weld at intervals not exceeding the width or diameter
of the tranducer. The probe system is to be directed normal to the weld
centre line, preferably by mechanical means.

(3)

Welds greater than 50mm Examination is to be considered in two


stages. Stage onescanning is to be carried out as required in
Clause 6.5(2). The effectiveness of this scan will be dependent upon the
knowledge of the weld preparation detail; provided that it has first been
established that this scan will provide for the complete and effective
examination of the weld, the first stage scan will suffice.
Stage twothis scan is to follow stage one when the effectiveness of
stage one scan is in doubt and in all situations where there is insufficient
knowledge of the weld geometry. Stage two is to comprise a minimum of
three separate scans on each side of the weld using transmitting (Tx) and
receiving (Rx) probes in tandem. The probes are to be suitably linked so
that the required distance between them for each scan is maintained
(see FIGURE 6.3).

(4)

Note:

6.6

For the detection of transverse defects irrespective of the material


thickness, direct inspection from the surface of the weld is preferred.
Where the necessary surface preparation cannot be achieved, separate
transmitting and receiving probes are to be employed in a guided straddle
scan, (see FIGURE 6.4 and FIGURE 6.5). The proper angle between the
probes is to be maintained by using a probe guide/jig for the purpose.
Referring to FIGURE 6.4, determine the optimum angle between the
probes for the maximum response from top and bottom slots A and B in
the test block. Note the time base position of each slot response and spread
to a convenient scale relative to this block thickness. Adjust sensitivity to
give a 20% FSD response from slot A (ie at full skip distance). Search
sensitivity is to take account of losses due to surface and beam path length.

Records
a.

Records of the weld examination are to include the results of the compressional
wave examination required by Clause 6.5a. Defect indications that result from
the shear wave examination having a reflectivity of 5% FSD and greater are to
be recorded in sufficient detail to apply the acceptance standard in
DG Ships/G/10000B.

6.3

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)
For both blocks:
Thickness T = Weld Thickness to be Examined

FIGURE 6.1 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCKS FOR WELD THICKNESS UP TO AND


INCLUDING 38mm

FIGURE 6.2 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCKS FOR WELD THICKNESS GREATER THAN 38mm

6.4

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

FIGURE 6.3 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCK

6.5

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

(REFER TO CLAUSE 6.5b.(2)

FIGURE 6.4 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCK FOR WELD STRADDLE SCANNING

FIGURE 6.5 REFERENCE/TEST BLOCK DIAGRAMMATIC SET-UP FOR STRADDLE SCAN

6.6

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

7.

TEE-BUTT WELDING

7.1

Application
a.

Ultrasonic examination is applied to T-butt welds for the detection of defects in


the welding, and in the plate in the vicinity of the weld. Defects in the plate may
include defects of laminar form, and cracks in the toes of the welding orientated
at an angle with the plate surface.

b.

Reference is made to:


(1)

(2)

two types of examination:


(a)

Complete examinationThis requires the use of compressional


wave and shear wave techniques;

(b)

Partial examinationThis requires the use of compressional wave


technique only. This application may be adequate to examine
table-web connections of fabricated frames.

signal amplitudes DL and SL, which are defined as follows:


DL = Datum Line = 20% FSD from the relevant test block target;
SL = Six dB Line = DL minus 6dB of attenuation= 40% FSD from the
relevant test block target.

7.2

Surface Preparation
a.

7.3

The test surface is to be free from loose scale and any loose foreign matter which
could interfere with the test. Shot blasted surfaces covered with a thin coating
of spray primer are usually satisfactory, but any successive layers of paint must
be removed and the test surface lightly disc or belt sanded for reproducible
results.

Test Blocks
a.

The test block required for partial and or complete examination is as shown in
FIGURE 7.1. The test block thickness is to be within 10% of the thickness of
the T-butt joint member that is under the probe and is used for the examination.

b.

Probes
(1)

Note:

Compressional wave probes are to be combined double type, of test


frequency 4 to 6MHz. The transducer area is to be not less than 100 square
mm. The transducer size is to conform to Clause 3.5a.
This type of probe is subject to varying response with probe orientation
and certain types of defect. To obviate this feature the acoustic baffle of
the probe is to be positioned as follows:
Normal to centre line of weld when plotting weld width.
Normal to centre line of weld when plotting defect width.
Parallel to centre line of weld when plotting defect length.

(2)

Note:

Shear wave probes are to be single or combined double type, of frequency


2 to 4MHz. The transducer area is to be not less than 70 square mm. The
transducer size is to conform to Clause 3.5a. The angle of refraction is to
be 45 .

The use of probes with refracted angles greater than 45 will be necessary when
the examination method in Clause 7.4a.(2) is used.

7.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

FIGURE 7.1 COMBINATION BLOCK COVERING DIFFERENT WELD AND PLATE


THICKNESS

7.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

7.4

Method of Examination
a.

7.5

7.7

(1)

using the surface of the continuous member that is remote to the standing
leg and scanning with compressional and shear waves. This is the
preferred method and it is to be used whenever possible.

(2)

using both surfaces of the standing leg and the surface of the continuous
member that supports it and scanning with shear waves only.

Plotting Weld Width


a.

7.6

T-butt welds may be examined by:

Prior to the weld search using the preferred method the weld width is to be
plotted. Use a compressional wave probe (see Clause b.(1)), and adjust the first
bottom echo from adjacent plate material to a convenient height eg 40% FSD.
Move the probe slowly towards the weld and mark the weld edge at the probe
index position when this echo reduces to 20% FSD, ie 6dB drop. This procedure
is to be repeated on both sides of the weld. Plot the weld edges at intervals not
exceeding twice the thickness of the plate under the probe.

Calibration
a.

Compressional wave probe Obtain DL (Clause 7.1b.) and SL from the


relevant test block target, (see FIGURE 7.1). Both signal amplitude lines are to
be identifiable on the oscilloscope graticule.

b.

Shear wave probe Note the horizontal displacement of the probe index from
the test block target at probe half skip distance.

c.

The time base is to be calibrated to a range equal to the combined thickness of


the material and weld under the probe with the probe contact face set at zero
when using compressional or shear wave probes.

Search Sensitivity
a.

(1)

(2)

7.8

Compressional wave probe The compressional wave search


sensitivity is to be established by the method used in Clauses 4.4a.(4) and
4.4a.(5) and by using the attenuator figures obtained in displaying:
(a)

a 20% FSD first backwall echo from an undrilled portion of the test
block;

(b)

a 20% FSD echo from the test block target;

(c)

a 20% FSD first backwall echo from the plate material adjacent to
the weld to be examined.

Shear wave probe The shear wave search sensitivity will be established
by displayed DL amplitude from the test block target cornerdirect or
first bounce depending on the technique to be used, and increasing this
signal by the difference in the attenuator figures obtained for operations
(a) and (c) in Clause 7.7(1).

Search Scanning
a.

Weld search scanning using compressional and shear wave probes is to be a


rectilinear scanning pattern with sufficient traverse to ensure complete
examination of the weld section and adjacent plate material. Forward
progression is not to exceed one transducer width between each traverse. For
partial examination the forward progression is to be as required by the Design
Authority.

7.3

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

7.9

Defect Indication Measurement


a.

7.10

The length and width of all defect indications of signal amplitude 20% FSD and
greater are to be measured using the 6dB-drop method (Clause 7.4a.). The
acoustic baffle of the compressional wave probe is to be positioned as required
in Clause b.(1) The depth of defect is to be measured relative to the surface of
the plate material remote to that under the probe.

Records
a.

Defect indications of signal amplitude 20% FSD and greater are to be recorded
together with their positions and defect dimensions, in sufficient detail to apply
DG Ships/G/10000B.

7.4

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

8.

OVERLAY CLADDING

8.1

Application
a.

8.2

Surface Preparation
a.

8.3

A cladded calibration test block is to be prepared using materials similar to


those used in the item to be examined. The test block base material is to be at
least 25mm thick. The metal cladding is to be deposited using the same welding
process and procedure to the same thickness and surface finish as the item to
be examined. A 3mm diameter flat bottomed hole is to be drilled through the
base material so that the bottom of the hole forms a reflecting surface at the
interface of the base material with the cladding material.

Sensitivity
a.

8.5

The test surface and reflecting surface are to be free from burrs, loose scale,
machining or grinding particles or other loose foreign material. Surfaces are to
be smooth and sufficiently free from waviness to allow a proper and uniform
examination of all areas, at the required sensitivity level.

Calibration/Test Block
a.

8.4

The following requirements apply to the ultrasonic examination of the bond


between weld deposited overlay cladding and the base material. Specific
requirements due to special shapes or manufacturing processes will be given in
the appropriate specification or weld procedure.

The instrument is to be calibrated to display a 20% FSD signal from the test
block target.

Probes
a.

Probes are to be twin crystal compressional wave of test frequency 26MHz.


They are to comply with the requirements in Clause 3.5a.

8.6

Method of Examination

8.6.1

General
a.

8.6.2

Manually deposited cladding


a.

8.6.3

Manually deposited cladding is to be examined over the entire surface area.


Adjacent scans are to be separated by approximately 80% of the probe crystal
width to ensure adequate overlap.

Procedure tests
a.

8.6.4

Scanning is to be carried out from the cladding surface and may be performed
manually or automatically by moving the probe in a directed path or by moving
the material in a directed path with the probe held stationary. Scanning speed
is to be uniform and at a rate determined during backwall can be used to obtain
a back reflection be increased to show the back reflection and thus assure
adequate coupling.

The examination of cladding procedure test samples is to be carried out in


accordance with Clause 8.6.2a.

Machine deposited cladding


a.

Machine deposited cladding is to be examined along grid lines spaced at 50mm


intervals and normal to the direction of welding. Additionally continuous
scanning is to be applied to a width of 50mm from the edges of the perimeter
of the cladded area and penetrations. Continuous scanning is also to be applied
to an area with a minimum radius of 150mm around any significant defect.

8.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

8.7

Records
a.

Defect indications in the cladding are to be compared with the reference


standard in Clause 8.4a. for assessment. The position of each defect indication
in excess of the reference level is to be noted and explored to determine the area
and/or linear dimensions. Records of defect indications are to be sufficiently
detailed to apply the acceptance standard in DG Ships/G/10000B.

8.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

9.

BRAZED PIPE JOINTS

9.1

Application

9.2

a.

The following requirements apply to the ultrasonic examination of capillary


brazed joints in piping systems to assess the area of bond between the pipe wall
and coupling fitting.

b.

Reference is made to:

(2)

LandThe portion of the fitting adjacent to and/or between the insert


grooves.

The outer surface of the fitting is to be smooth and clean. Spelter, flux, paint or
any other material is to be removed to provide a satisfactory surface for the
examination.

Probes
a.

9.4

Insert grooveThe groove in the fitting socket prepared to contain the


brazing alloy.

Surface Preparation
a.

9.3

(1)

Probes are to be combined double compressional wave of test frequency


26MHz. Selection of probe type will depend on the dimensions of the fitting
and the width of lands. In view of the better resolution provided by focused
probes on thin materials, their use is recommended where material thickness
allows.

Calibration
a.

Test pieces are to be typical joint samples or manufactured sections of the same
material and geometric configuration as the production items to be examined.
The equipment is to be calibrated to display as distinct signals the:
(1)

combined pipe and fitting thickness;

(2)

fitting thickness in way of the joint;

(3)

insert groove depth (if applicable).

The signal positions are to be clearly marked on the instrument graticule.

9.5

Sensitivity
a.

Sensitivity is to be adjusted to obtain a FSD signal from the combined pipe wall
and fitting thickness, ie the bond condition, except for flange joints to which
Clause 9.6a.(6) refers. For those couplings where the fitting and pipe wall
thicknesses are similar a multiple echo pattern (not less than four) is to be
displayed for the zero-bond condition in the test fitting. The amplitude of any
one signal is not to exceed FSD. The assessment of the condition of bond or
no-bond is to be made with due regard to the complete trace pattern.

9.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

9.6

Method of Examination
a.

9.7

(1)

Recording is to proceed in parallel with the examination and to the


requirements in Clauses 9.7a. and 9.7b.

(2)

The acoustic barrier of the probe is to be placed parallel to the longitudinal


axis of the pipe and clear of the insert groove. Scanning is to be continuous,
moving the probe steadily in a circumferential path without reversing
until the scan of each division as marked (Clauses 9.7a. and 9.7b.) has been
completed.

(3)

Where possible the probe crystal is to be of a size that allows the joint to
be fully scanned in a number of passes without overlap. Where only one
pass scanning is possible the probe edge is to be held close to the spelter
groove edge during the scan.

(4)

Fittings without insert grooves are to be scanned as a single land joint.

(5)

Flange joints may be satisfactorily examined using the inner surface of


pipes depending on the size of probe available. The calibration procedure
will be similar to that for sleeved joints, ie successive echoes from the pipe
wall thickness will indicate zero bond. Bond condition will be indicated by
the absence of the pipe wall echoes or by their attenuation. The distance
between the pipe inner wall and the outer radius of the flange may be too
great to be shown in the display. Search sensitivity is to be set to show
three reflections from the zero-bond condition with the amplitude of the
first not exceeding FSD. To ensure proper contact with the inner surface
of the pipe, shaping of the probe may be necessary. This must be carried
out with care to avoid spurious signals and possibly confused
interpretation. The recording procedure is to be as for sleeved joints.

(6)

Hexagonal type fittings are to be examined by scanning the centre of


each flat. The percentage bond for the joint is to be assessed by averaging
the results obtained.

Records
a.

The use of tape as a means of recording as the examination proceeds is


recommended, but the use of alternative recording methods which can be
demonstrated and result in a comparable record are not excluded. Before
commencing the examination apply a band of removable adhesive tape to the
pipe adjacent to the fitting. Mark the tape to show equal divisions not exceeding
25mm circumferentially in a clockwise direction as viewed from the pipe facing
the fitting. Permanently mark the 12 oclock position on the fitting by etching,
and mark the position on the tape. As the examination proceeds the tape is to
be marked to show:
(1)

the extent and percentage bond as determined by the difference in bond


and zero-bond signal amplitudes for each division of each circumferential
scan. Typical examples are shown in FIGURE 9.1.

(2)

Not Tested areas marked NT, ie areas which cannot be examined due to
inaccessibility;

(3)

No Ultrasonic Penetration areas marked NUP, ie areas which cannot be


examined due to fitting material characteristics and spurious signals;

(4)

the number of circumferential scans on fittings without insert grooves;

(5)

the relative positions of lands, ie outer, middle, inner, where insert grooves
are a joint feature.

9.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

b.

The information recorded on the tape is to be transferred to a permanent record


which is required for each joint examined. The percentage bond assessment of
each circumferential scan will be the average of the percentage bond figures
established for each division. The percentage bond of the joint will be assessed
by averaging the percentage figures established for each circumferential scan.
The final figure is to be stated to the nearest whole number.

9.3

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

FIGURE 9.1 TYPICAL CRT DISPLAYS

9.4

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

10.

PIPES AND TUBES

10.1

Application
a.

10.2

Calibration
a.

10.3

Probes are to be shear wave and are to meet the requirements in Clause 3.5a.
The test frequency selected is to be compatible with the material type and the
wall thickness to be examined for the clear resolution of each calibration target
under production conditions.

Method of Examination
a.

10.5

A convenient length of pipe or tube of the same material and cross sectional
dimensions as that to be examined is to contain notch type targets, and is to be
used as a calibration standard. For transverse type defects an internal and
external notch is to be cut to the dimensions given in Clause 4.6a. except that
the notch may extend wholly around the circumference. The notches are to be
separated by at least 40mm and located to permit calibration when the probe
is positioned between the pipe or tube end and the nearest notch. For
longitudinal type defects an internal and external notch is to be cut to the
dimensions given in Clause 4.6a. parallel with the axis of the pipe. The notches
are to be separated by at least 30mm in a longitudinal direction. Each notch is
to be clearly identifiable on the oscilloscope display. The positions of the internal
targets are to be marked on the pipe or tube outer surface.

Probes
a.

10.4

The following requirements apply to the examination of pipes and tubes for the
detection of transverse and longitudinal discontinuities.

Pipes and tubes are to be scanned parallel to the longitudinal axis for the
detection of transverse defects, and in a transverse direction for the detection
of longitudinal defects by advancing the probes assembly as the pipe or tube is
rotated in such a way that the entire volume of the pipe wall is examined. The
speed of pipe or tube rotation is to be reasonably uniform and at a rate consistent
with the maximum rotational speed of the calibration standard which enables
clear and definite resolution of the notch being presented. This speed is not to
be exceeded. Scanning may also be performed by rotating the part and
automatically indexing the probes assembly so that crystal overlap of at least
10% is obtained on each successive pass. When the immersion method is used
the examination conditions are to duplicate the calibration conditions as
regards probes assembly alignment and wet or dry tube bore conditions. In
general the exclusion of the immersion fluid from the bore improves the
reproduction of the examination results. Each pipe is to be continuously
scanned.

Records
a.

The location extent and signal amplitudes of all indications in excess of the
agreed sensitivity level are to be recorded.

10.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

10.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

11.

PIPE OR TUBE WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENT

11.1

Application
a.

11.2

Surface Preparation
a.

11.3

The requirements in Clauses 5.a. to 5.1b. are to apply.

Method of Examination
a.

11.7

Compressional wave probes suitable for the purpose are to be used. These may
be single or combined double types. The frequency is to be compatible with the
material type and thickness of the pipe or tube to be examined. The probe size
selected for the examination of pipes or tubes that are in service, will depend
upon the configuration of the pipe or tube and the cross-sectional dimensions.

Calibration
a.

11.6

The requirements in Clause 5.a. are to apply.

Probes
a.

11.5

The test surfaces are to be free from loose scale, rust and any other foreign
matter which could interfere with the examination.

Equipment
a.

11.4

The following requirements apply to the examination of pipe or tube to


determine wall thickness at the probe contact position. The method will not
detect pin holes.

Each pipe is to be placed on suitable rollers and rotated as the examination


proceeds. Each end is to be examined by turning the pipe through one full
revolution with the probe at the end; additional scans are then to be made at
intervals not exceeding 900mm along the entire length of the pipe unless
otherwise specified. In-service pipes and tubes are to be examined in accordance
with the applicable requirements of survey with particular attention to inner
and outer radii of bends. The use of a probe holder to hold the probe normal to
the pipe surface during in-service examinations is recommended. In all cases,
areas where the wall thickness approaches minimum tolerance are to be
subjected to a complete search to determine the extent.

Records
a.

Records are to provide for the positive identification of the pipe or tube, material
type, coverage given and the location of areas where the wall thickness
approaches minimum tolerance or otherwise as specified in the Contract
Documents.

11.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

11.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

12.

FORGINGSINCLUDING FORGED, EXTRUDED AND WROUGHT BARS

12.1

Application
a.

12.2

Surface Preparation
a.

12.3

The wide variety of forgings in respect of material type, size and geometry
required by MOD(PE) prevents the formulation of rigid ultrasonic examination
procedures for general application. Specific procedures must take into account
the material type and grain size, material attenuation factors, method of
manufacture, and the type, location and probable distribution of defects likely
to be encountered. In the examination of non-ferrous bar, detection of
sub-surface defects is limited by the relationship between material grain size
(approx diameter), the wavelength of the ultrasonic energy and the size of the
smallest detectable defect, since the diameter of the smallest detectable defect
will equate to one wavelength of the energy, and reduction in ultrasonic
frequency to overcome grain size problems will mean an increase in the size
(width) of the smallest detectable defect. Ultrasonic test of non-ferrous bar may
only be practical where attenuation through the material does not preclude the
use of reflection techniques, and may only be meaningfully used for quality
purposes where the maximum width of acceptable defect is not less than those
related to the diameter of the horizontal target holes in FIGURE 12.1. Bars may
contain defects of width less than the minimum acceptance standard which may
not be detected and which could extend throughout the length of the bar.
Diagnosis of defect indications in thick sections demands an accurate
knowledge of probe characteristics. For the examination of steel forgings,
excluding austenitic, BS 4124 Part 1 is to apply. For forgings to which BS 4124
Part 1 cannot be applied, and extruded and wrought bars, the following clauses
apply.

The condition of the test surface and the reflecting surface is not to cause
interference with the examination. Surfaces are to be free of loose scale, paint
or other foreign matter. Rough machined surfaces are to be reduced using a
broad-nosed tool to produce a regular smooth surface to avoid spurious
indications and excessive wear of the probe face.

Probes
a.

Probe selection will depend on the geometry of the item to be examined,


material type and grain size, and the area of probe contact surface. The best near
surface resolution will be obtained using combined double compressional wave
probe and this characteristic is of value in the examination of areas subject to
subsequent machining. Generally the probe test frequency will be in the range
26MHz but a lower frequency may be necessary to overcome the effects of
material large grain structure and long beam path length. Shear wave probe
techniques are to be used where specified. On bored items where the bore is
inaccessible for examination with a compressional probe an appropriate shear
wave technique is to be used. Shear wave is also to be used to cover areas where
the shape of the item prevents comprehensive examination by compressional
wave.

12.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

T = Thickness to be tested 10%


{= The block may be cut to this line to facilitate drilling where a single block is
required for use. Alternatively a number of separate reference blocks may be
employed.
Material
Steel

Phosphor Bronze

Hiduron

Thickness to be
examined (mm)
Up to and incl 25
Over 25 to 60 (incl)
Over 60 to 100 (incl)
Over 100 to 150 (incl)
Over 150

Dia of FBH (mm)

Dia of Horizontal
hole (mm)

1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
6.0

Up to and incl 50
Over 50 to 70 (incl)
Over 70 to 100 (incl)
Over 100

1.5
2.5
3.0
4.0

Up to and incl 50
Over 50 to 100 (incl)
Over 100

1.5
2.5
3.0

1.5
2.5
3.0

NOTES
1.

The flat bottom of the holes is to be parallel to the entrant surface.

2.

The reference standard is to be wide enough to permit sound transmission to


the flat bottom holes without side effects.

3.

The reference standard material is to be ultrasonically free from obvious defects


and similar to the material being tested. The surface finish is to be comparable
to the test surface and of similar contour.

4.

The test frequency is to be the same as the calibration frequency.

5.

The equipment is to be set to show a minimum echo of 20% full screen deflection
from each hole within the thickness to be inspected.

6.

Where shear wave examination of rod or bar is stipulated a reference standard


containing a hole drilled on the horizontal axis will be required. The first direct
corner reflection from the hole at the end face of the block is to be used in
setting sensitivity.
FIGURE 12.1 REFERENCE STANDARD

12.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

12.4

Calibration
a.

12.5

Method of Examination
a.

12.6

The reference standard FIGURE 12.1 is to apply. The attenuator figures


obtained from the adjustment of sensitivity to give 20% FSD signal amplitude
from the backwall of the reference standard, each of the flat bottomed holes and
the backwall from the material under examination are to be recorded and used
to derive the minimum search sensitivity by the method of Clause 4.4a.(4),
4.4a.(5), and 4.4a.(6). Sensitivity is to take account of local attenuation factors
and the depth of defect in the material when defect is evident.

Wherever possible forgings are to be examined from surfaces so arranged that


three major places are covered. The technique is to assure the detection of
defects that are parallel to and normal to the principal axes. Defect areas and
suspect areas disclosed under these conditions are to be further evaluated from
the surface opposite that used for their initial detection. Unless otherwise
specified in the Contract Documents the search unit is to be moved in parallel
paths. Each path is to overlap the previous and adjacent path by 10% of the
width of the transducer. This procedure is to be repeated on all examining
surfaces. Items of irregular section may require the preparation of a series of
examination techniques for effective coverage.

Records
a.

The size and location of all defect indications causing reflectivity of 20% FSD
and greater are to be recorded and marked on the item as the examination
progresses. Additionally in the examination of non-ferrous bars or rods the
location of indications causing reflectivity of 5%20% FSD are to be recorded.
Records are to be sufficiently detailed to apply the relevant acceptance standard
or as defined in the Contract Documents.

12.3

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

12.4

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

13.

CASTINGS

13.1

Application
a.

13.2

Surface Condition
a.

13.3

The choice of probes will be influenced by the casting material, geometry and
the type of defects to be detected. The use of both compressional wave and shear
wave probes may be necessary in defect assessment (Clause 12.3a. will apply).

Calibration
a.

13.5

The condition of the test surface and the reflecting surface is to permit effective
ultrasonic examination using the approved procedure. Shot blasted surfaces
will improve probe coupling efficiency. Rough machined castings may require
further preparation to provide a flat smooth surface to avoid spurious signals
and excessive wear of the probe face.

Probes
a.

13.4

The application of ultrasonic methods to the examination of ferrous and


non-ferrous castings requires the use of techniques that will enable defect
assessment for the proper application of the acceptance standard. It is to be
recognised that no single technique will suit all applications and also that the
casting material type and surface condition may inhibit useful and economical
application. The requirement to discriminate between defect types and their
varying degrees of severity in respect of area and volume etc and their position
in the material will demand exacting techniques, and in view of the apparent
difficulties the MOD(PE) will require the validity of ultrasonic techniques to be
confirmed by radiographic examination of selected areas of castings where both
examination methods can be usefully employed.

Reference blocks as required are to be prepared from sound material and to


conform to the requirements in Clause 3.6a.

Method of Examination
a.

It will first be necessary to establish that the material grain structure and
surface finish permit adequate ultrasonic transmission for the proper
examination of the area required. Each area will need to be checked for this
purpose by observing the backwall response using a compressional wave probe
or a corner reflection using a shear wave probe.

Note:

b.

In the as-cast condition the grain size of the material is large. Where the
grain diameter approaches ultrasonic wavelength high attenuation will
occur. In the heat treated condition the grain structure is refined with a
subsequent reduction of attenuation.

The compressional wave search sensitivity level is to be as high as possible and


consistent with acceptable levels of reflections from material grain. Evidence of
defect is to be cause for adjustment of sensitivity before attempting assessment,
by taking account of its position below the surface and attenuation effects, and
local probe transfer losses. Assessment of defect severity may necessarily
combine amplitude and attenuation methods for different defect types. Areas
that cause the backwall echo to reduce to 20% FSD and less with no evidence
of reflecting defect are, after a check of local surface condition and coupling, to
be marked on the casting as attenuating defect areas as the examination
progresses for subsequent inclusion in the record of test.

13.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

13.6

Assessment of Defects
a.

The assessment of defect types and their severity as required for the proper
application of the acceptance standard DG Ships/PS/9010B may necessarily
require radiographic examination of the areas concerned to confirm or
determine their acceptability.

13.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

14.

SAFETY
a.

All equipment involving the use of main electrical supply is to conform to the
relevant statutory requirements and safety regulations.

b.

All examinations referred to in this NES are to be carried out with due regard
to the applicable statutory requirements, safety regulations, and Codes of
Practice.

14.1

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

14.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

ANNEX A.
RELATED DOCUMENTS
A.1

Reference is made to:


Referred to in
Clause
BS 2704

Specification for calibration blocks for


use in flaw detection
Glossary of terms used in non-destructive
testing: Pt 4Ultrasonic flaw detection
Method for ultrasonic examination of
welds
Non-destructive testing of steel forgings

3.4a., 3.5a.

BS 4331(Parts 1 & 3)

Method for assessing the performance


characteristics of ultrasonic flaw
detection equipment

3.4a., 3.5a.

DG Ships 86C
(*NES 793)
DG Ships 137
(*NES 736 Part 4)
DG Ships/PS/5108

Ultrasonic Acceptance Standards for


QT28, QT35 and Navy Q1 steels
Thickness measurement of steel plates

1.a.

BS 3683 (Part 4)
BS 3923 (Part 3)
BS 4124 (Part 1)

DG Ships/PS/9010B
(*NES 745)
DG Ships/G/10000B
(*NES 773)
Note:

B.1
3.5a.
12.1a.

5.2a.

Non-destructive Examination
Requirements
Classification, Inspection Requirements
and Acceptance Standards for Steel and
Copper-Base Alloy Castings

SCOPE 4.
1.a., 13.6a.

Minimum Acceptance Standards for


Welds in HM Ships and Submarines

1.a., 6.6a.,
7.10a., 8.7a.

*In course of preparation. When published will supersede stated


documents.

A.1

ANNEX A.

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

ANNEX A.

A.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

ANNEX B.
DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
B.1

BS 3683 (Part 4) is to apply to the terms in this NES.


Design Authority

This term as used refers to that section or group


within the MOD that has overall responsibility
for the material, item, structure, system or
vessel concerned.

Examining Authority

This term as used refers to the Company,


Organization, Establishment or Naval Base that
carries out the ultrasonic examinations within
the scope of this NES.

B.1

ANNEX B.

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

ANNEX B.

B.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

ANNEX C.
PROCUREMENT CHECK LIST
TITLE .......................
REFERENCE.....................

Notes:
1.

This Check List is to ensure that certain aspects of this Naval Engineering
Standard are consulted when preparing a Statement of Technical
Requirements for a particular application.
Clauses where a preference for an option is to be used or where specific data is
to be added are included in the Check List.
Each item is to be marked either

2.
3.

= included

NA

= not applicable

CHECK
CHECK
No
1
The extent to which ultrasonic examination is
required is specified in the Contract
Documents.

CLAUSE No
SCOPE 3.

The Standards for acceptance of defect


indications detected by ultrasonic examination
are to be as specified in the Contract
Documents.

1.a.

Acceptance inspection is to be performed on an


item in the final surface condition and the final
heat treated condition unless otherwise
specified in the Contract Documents.

2.b.

The extent of coverage of thickness gauging is


to be specified in the Contract Documents.
Records are to provide for the positive
identification of the pipe or tube, material type,
coverage given and the location of areas where
the wall thickness approaches minimum
tolerance, unless otherwise specified in the
Contract Documents.

5.2a.

11.7a.

The search unit is to be moved in parallel paths


unless otherwise specified in the Contract
Documents.

12.5a.

Records are to be sufficiently detailed to apply


the relevant acceptance standard unless
otherwise specified in the Contract Documents.

12.6a.

C.1

! or NA

ANNEX C.

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

ANNEX C.

C.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

ALPHABETICAL INDEX

C
Calibration
brazed pipe joints, 9.1
butt welding, 6.2
castings, 13.1
forgings, 12.2
overlay cladding, 8.1
pipe and tube, 10.1
pipe or tube wall thickness, 11.1
plate material, 4.1
plate thickness measurement, 5.1
sensitivity, 3.4
Tee-butt welding, 7.3
Castings, 13.1
Cladding, 8.1
Compressional wave inspection, 4.1

D
Defect indication measurement, 7.4
Definitions, 7.1, 9.1, B.1
Design Authority, B.1

E
Equipment, 3.2, 5.1, 11.1
Equipment performance characteristics, 3.3
Equipment qualification, 3.4
Examination methods
brazed pipe joints, 9.2
butt welding, 6.2
castings, 13.1
forgings, 12.2
general, 3.5
overlay cladding, 8.1
pipe or tube wall thickness measurement, 11.1
pipes and tubes, 10.1
plate material, 4.2
shear wave, 4.2
Tee-butt welding, 7.1
Examining Authority, B.1

F
Forgings, 12.1

I
Inspection, 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5

INDEX.1

INDEX

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

P
Personnel requirements, 3.1
Pipe joints, brazed, 9.1
Pipe or tube wall thickness measurement, 11.1
Pipes and tubes, 10.1
Plate material, 4.1
Plate thickness
gauging, 5.1
measurement, 5.1
Plotting weld width, 7.3
Probes
brazed pipe joints, 9.1
butt welding, 6.1
castings, 13.1
forgings, 12.1
general, 3.3
overlay cladding, 8.1
pipe or tube wall thickness measurement, 11.1
pipes and tubes, 10.1
Tee-butt welding, 7.1

R
Records
brazed pipe joints, 9.2, 9.3
butt welding, 6.3
forgings, 12.3
overlay cladding, 8.2
pipe or tube wall thickness measurement, 11.1
pipes and tubes, 10.1
plate material, 4.3
Tee-butt welding, 7.4

S
Safety, 14.1
Search scanning, 7.4
Search sensitivity, 7.3
Standards, acceptance, 1.1
Surface finish, 3.5
Surface preparation
brazed pipe joints, 9.1
butt welding, 6.2
castings, 13.1
forgings, 12.1
general, 3.3
overlay cladding, 8.1
pipe or tube wall thickness measurement, 11.1
plate material, 4.1
plate thickness measurement, 5.1
Tee-butt welding, 7.1

T
Test blocks, 3.4, 4.1, 5.1, 7.1
Test procedure, 3.1

INDEX

INDEX.2

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

W
Welding
butt, 6.1
Tee-butt, 7.1

INDEX.3

INDEX

NES 729
Part 5
Issue 1 (Reformatted)

INDEX

INDEX.4

Inside Rear Cover

Crown Copyright 2000


Copying Only as Agreed with DStan

Defence Standards are Published by and Obtainable from:


Defence Procurement Agency
An Executive Agency of The Ministry of Defence
Directorate of Standardization
Kentigern House
65 Brown Street
GLASGOW G2 8EX
DStan Helpdesk
Tel 0141 224 2531/2
Fax 0141 224 2503
Internet e-mail enquiries@dstan.mod.uk
File Reference
The DStan file reference relating to work on this standard is D/DStan/69/02/729.
Contract Requirements
When Defence Standards are incorporated into contracts users are responsible for their correct
application and for complying with contractual and statutory requirements. Compliance with
a Defence Standard does not in itself confer immunity from legal obligations.
Revision of Defence Standards
Defence Standards are revised as necessary by up issue or amendment. It is important that
users of Defence Standards should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest issue or
amendment. Information on all Defence Standards is contained in Def Stan 00-00 Standards
for Defence Part 3 , Index of Standards for Defence Procurement Section 4 Index of Defence
Standards and Defence Specifications published annually and supplemented regularly by
Standards in Defence News (SID News). Any person who, when making use of a Defence
Standard encounters an inaccuracy or ambiguity is requested to notify the Directorate of
Standardization (DStan) without delay in order that the matter may be investigated and
appropriate action taken.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen