Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Introduction
1.1. Rock strength, particularly the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is an important parameter in rock
mass classication methods and in various rock
engineering design approaches. Measurement of rock
strength requires testing which must be undertaken on
test specimens of particular sizes in order to fulll testing
standards. However, there are some shortcomings
associated with these conventional tests. When rock
cores are only divided into small discs, due to the
presence of thin bedding or schistosity planes, the core
length may be too short to allow preparation of the
specimens long enough even for the point load strength
index test.
1.2. To overcome the above-mentioned difculty, the
possibility of using relatively short samples for a rock
strength or index test has always been attractive. The
block punch strength index (BPI) test apparatus, which
was similar to that used for the measurement of direct
shear strength of a thin plate of rock [12], has been
developed in Delft University, The Netherlands, as an
index test in directly assessing UCS by Schrier [3].
However, in the previous studies, rock-disc specimens of
about 40 mm in diameter and 10 mm in thickness were
tested, and the size effect of the test specimens and the
use of the BPI test in rock engineering have not been
considered.
The studies by Ulusay and Gokceoglu [46] indicated
that size correction was indispensable in the BPI test and
the use of a generalized size correction factor established
from the experimental data should be used. A considerably important correlation found between UCS and BPI
indicates that BPI tests lead to insignicant errors in
determining UCS when compared to those obtained
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +90-312-297-7767; fax: +90-312-2992034.
E-mail address: resat@hacettepe.edu.tr (R. Ulusay).
1365-1609/01/$ - see front matter r 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
PII: S 1 3 6 5 - 1 6 0 9 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 0 7 8 - 8
2. Scope
2.1. The block punch strength index test is intended as
an index test for the strength classication of rock
materials. It is also be used to predict other strength
parameters with which it is correlated, for example
uniaxial compressive and tensile strength.
2.2. The test measures the size-corrected block punch
strength index BPIs of rock specimens, and their
strength index in the strongest direction BPIs90 which
is calculated from the multiplication of a strength
anisotropy transformation factor with the BPIs value
of the specimens obtained from cores inclined at any
angle to the weakness planes.
2.3. Rock specimens in the form of thin cylindrical
discs prepared from cores or blocks are placed into an
apparatus which is designed to t the point load device,
and are broken by the application of load by a
rectangular rigid punching block.
1114
R. Ulusay et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 38 (2001) 11131119
3. Apparatus
3.1. There are no published standards for construction of the apparatus for a block punch index test, and
since this test apparatus is not commercially available, it
has to be designed and fabricated in-house. The end
result of the design and fabrication process is a unit
consisting of two major parts: a lower platen (base
support) and an upper platen (punching block) as can be
seen in Fig. 1a. Both these platens should be machined
from hardened tool steel with a Rockwell hardness of 40
Fig. 2. BPI test device tted into a point load testing frame (PB:
punching block; BS: base support; R: ram).
Fig. 1. (a) A general view from the BPI test apparatus consisting of
base support, steel bars and punching block; (b) a plan view from the
base support before clamping of the specimen; (c) a perspective view of
the base support after the specimen is xed; and (d) a schematic view
from the punching canal of the base support.
R. Ulusay et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 38 (2001) 11131119
1115
4. Procedure
4.1. Specimen preparation
4.1. Test specimens should be right cylindrical thin
discs. For the purpose, the cores are cut into discs of
various raw thicknesses ranging between 5 and 15 mm
using a diamond saw perpendicularly to the core axis.
The diameter of the disc specimens should preferably be
not less than BX core size approximately 42 mm.
4.2. Although nearly all of the specimens are prepared
without special treatment, care should be taken to
ensure that the disc faces are as parallel as possible and
the sides of the specimens are smooth and free of abrupt
irregularities. However, if it is required, a surfacegrinding machine can be used to smooth the end faces of
the discs.
R. Ulusay et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 38 (2001) 11131119
1116
Fig. 4. A view from the block punch index testing in point load test
device.
Fig. 6. Views from the specimens after BPI test, and the failure
patterns for valid and invalid tests.
5. Calculations
BPI
103 Ft;D
;
A
R. Ulusay et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 38 (2001) 11131119
1117
punch strength index value for the rock sample and one
that can be used for purposes of rock strength
classication.
5.3. The size-corrected block punch strength index
(BPI10;50 or BPIs ) of a rock specimen is dened as
the value of BPI that would have been calculated from a
failure load converted to a corrected load for a nominal 50 mm diameter and 10 mm thickness by multiplying
BPI with the constants Kt and KD ; representing
correction factors for thickness and diameter,
respectively.
Because the load at failure is converted to a corrected
BPI value for a equivalent size (D 50 mm,
t 10 mm), the area of the surface through which
shearing takes place used in calculation of the corrected
BPI should be expressed in terms of equivalent specimen
dimensions. The equivalent area A10;50 is
921 106 m2. When testing single-sized disc specimen
with a diameter and thickness other than 50 mm and
10 mm, respectively, the size correction is accomplished
using the formula
Kt 13:741:1265
Ka
BPI10;50 BPIs
MPa:
A10;50
921 106
3
4a
4b
BPIs90
;
BPIsa
1118
R. Ulusay et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 38 (2001) 11131119
6. Presentation of results
6.1. Results for BPI test should be tabulated (see
typical results shown in Fig. 10). The report should
contain at least the following information for each
specimen tested:
(a) Lithologic description of the rock.
(b) Orientation of the axis of loading with respect to
specimen anisotropy, e.g. bedding planes, foliation,
etc. (angle a).
(c) The sample number, source location and sampling
depth.
(d) Number of specimens tested.
(e) Water content at time of test (air dried, oven dried
or value of water content in per cent).
(f) Date of testing.
(g) Failure pattern.
(h) A tabulation of the values of diameter and thickness
of the specimens, failure load and corrected block
punch strength index, and strength index in the
strongest direction if the angle between the direction
of loading and weakness planes is o901. All BPIc
values should be expressed to three signicant
gures.
7. Notes
R. Ulusay et al. / International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 38 (2001) 11131119
1119
Table 1
Classication of block punch strength index [7]
BPIs (MPa)
Strength class
o1
15
510
1020
2050
>50
Very weak
Weak
Moderate
Medium
High
Very high
Acknowledgements
Fig. 11. Rating chart of the block punch strength index and uniaxial
compressive strength for RMR and M-RMR rock mass classication
systems [7].
References
[1] Mazanti BB, Sowers GF. Laboratory testing of rock strength. In:
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Testing Techniques for Rock Mechanics, Seattle, Washington, 1965. p. 20727.
[2] Stacey TR. A simple device for the direct shear strength testing of
intact rock. J SA Inst Min Metall 1980;80(3):12930.
[3] Schrier van der JS. The block punch index test. Bull Int Assoc Eng
Geol 1988;38:1216.
[4] Ulusay R, Gokceoglu C. The modied block punch index test.
Can Geotech J 1997;34:9911001.
[5] Ulusay R, Gokceoglu C. An experimental study on the size effect
in block punch index test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1998;35(4
5):6289 (In: NARMS98 ISRM International Symposium,
Cancun, Mexico, Paper No. 008).
[6] Ulusay R, Gokceoglu C. A new test procedure for the
determination of the Block Punch Index and its possible uses in
rock engineering. ISRM News J 1999;6(1):504.
[7] Sulukcu S, Ulusay R. Evaluation of the block punch index test
with prime consideration on size effect, failure mechanism and its
effectiveness in predicting rock strength. Int J Rock Mech Min
Sci 2001;38(8):10911111.
[8] I.S.R.M. Rock characterization. In: Brown ET, editor. Testing
and monitoringFISRM suggested methods. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1981; 211p.
[9] Bieniawski ZT. Engineering rock mass classication. New York:
McGraw Hill, 1989. 237p.
[10] Unal E, Ozkan I. Determination of classication parameters for
clay bearing and stratied rock masses. In: Peng S, editor.
Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Ground
Control in Mining, West Virginia University, 1990. p. 2509.
[11] Ulusay R, Unal E, Ozkan I. Characterization of weak, stratied
and clay-bearing rock masses for engineering applications. In:
Myer LR, Cook NGW, Goodman RE, Tsans CF, editors.
Proceedings of the Conference on Fractured and Jointed Rock
Masses, Lake Tahoe, California, 1995. p. 22935.