Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This House Believes That Parents Should Be Held Responsible For Their school-going Children
Discipline Problem
Thank you, mdm speaker. A very good morning I bid to our chairperson, our honourable adjudicators, ever
precise time keeper, my most worthy oppositions members and members of the floor. The motion of this
debate is This House Believes That Parents Should Be Held Responsible For Their school-going Children
Discipline Problem. Let me start this debate by defining the key terms of the definitions.
(a) According to the 7th Edition of Oxford Advanced Learner English Dictionary, the word parents means
the ones who beget, give birth to, or nurture and raise a child , or a father or mother.
(b) While should is a modal word to show what is right, appropriate that is expected as true at or will
happen.
(c) held responsible means carrying out a job or is in charge of something or somebody.
(d) Both the U.N. convention and Malaysias Child Act define a child as anyone under the age of 18.
Therefore, school-going children is defined as children under the age of 18, who are still going to school.
(e) The word discipline is defined as the practice of training to obey rules and orders and punishing them
if they do not and control behaviour or situation that results from this training. and problems means that
something that is difficult to deal with or to understand. Hence, discipline problem here, we, the
government team defines as the delinquency or misbehaviours that occur as a result of the failure of obeying
rules.
We, the government team propose our stand that this house believes that parents are in charge of or have the
responsibilities of handling the misbehaviours of their under-aged children who are studying at schools.
Therefore, we strongly agree with the motion today, which is, This House Believes That Parents Should Be
Held Responsible For Their school-going Children Discipline Problem.
Before I go on with my point, please allow me to introduce the roles of our speakers. We, the government
team, are going to put forward to you three points. I, as the prime minister will be highlighting on parents
responsibility as their childrens legal guardians. Here with me to support this motion is my deputy
prime minister, who will be expanding on two points, which are First, Parents are morally responsible for
their children and Second the collaborative approach which requires the commitment of the parents.
My third minister will rebut all the arguments presented by the opposition members.
Members of the floor, many countries such as UK and Michigan have started practicing punishing parents
for their children's misbehaviour. This is to alert the parents of their legal parental responsibility as guardians
and require parents "to exercise reasonable parental control" over children under 18.
How does this make sense to you that parents are punished for not fulfilling their legal parental
responsibility?
According to Daily Mail, in U.K, a mother was jailed for 60 days her daughters truancy. It was forced to act
as a last resort because there had been no improvement in school attendance. Surprisingly, the daughter who
initially giving so many excuses for her absentee managed to make it to school ever since the mother was
jailed. This is because I quote from the daughter who played truant, who said that It wasn't right my mum
has been punished for something I did. and they said they had learnt the lesson.