Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The Lepirudin continued to infuse at the maximum dose over the course of that day. The
patient developed shoulder pain with movement, as well as hypotension and decreased
responsiveness. The Lepirudin was held as her hematocrit (HCT) was checked. She was
found to be profoundly anemic and was transfused. She was transferred to the Medical
Intensive Care Unit (MICU), where it was noted that she might have received too much
Lepirudin over the course of the day. There is no reversal agent for Lepirudin, and the
only available treatment was discontinuation of the drug, which had been discontinued
already. She continued to suffer from profound anemia and began oozing from all IV
sites. She passed away the following day from a hemorrhage.
The hospital prepared a Preventability Determination Narrative regarding the care
received and noted that the nurses note from the 11/22/10 night shift revealed the
Lepirudin dose of 0.5 mg/hr. It was initially thought that there had been a
misunderstanding of the dosage instructions at the time of the handoff from the night
nurse to the day nurse. Upon further discussion and interviews with the involved staff, it
was determined that the day nurse understood the intended dosing but made an error
when entering the dose into the IV pump.
The Root Cause Analysis revealed that documentation and communication of the dosing
of medication varied from the standard system of mg/kg/hr. The standard, pharmacy
approved dosing guideline for Lepirudin was followed until early in the morning of
11/23/10. Further, the blood specimen for the PTT taken at noon on 11/23/10 was
rejected as a compromised sample, and was not redrawn for some nine hours. It
appears that the compromised specimen was instead just a sample with no obtainable
clot. It was noted that the excessive medication dose was preventable and was a result
of a failure of systems within the hospitals control.
The plaintiff alleged that the doctors and nurses violated the standard of care when they
gave the patient an improper dose of medication, and failed to appreciate or correct the
error. As a direct result of the deviations from the accepted standard of care, the patient
suffered an excessive overdose of Lepirudin, directly leading to hemorrhage and death.
The defendants contended there was a systems error more than a failure of any one
individual. The defendants further contended that the patient was in dire medical
condition to begin with and may well not have survived the admission even if there had
been no medication error. Further, the defendants contended that the hemorrhage and
death may have been due to an underlying bleeding disorder unrelated to the medication
overdose.
The case was settled a month after the lawsuit was filed for $1,250,000.