Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
External Equity
12.2
12.3
12.4
Pay Surveys
12.5
Summary
12.6
Review Questions
12.7
Suggested Readings
37
Compensation Structure
and Differentials
38
When the information is gathered from different units, a summary should be prepared
from the data so collected and comparison made with the company's existing wage
structure so that future rates are constructed accordingly.
External Equity is the Comparision of both Infra & Inter-Industry pay rates. Most
frequently the payer says that they are paying as per the on-going rates For that very
need, we go for the comparision between the similar jobs in the industry and out of
the industry. There are three main types of pay surveys i.e. informal, external and
commissioned.
Informal Surveys: These are conducted in an informal way and can vary from
personal contacts to specific arrangements for exchanging information with a number
of local companies, or with companies in a particular industry, as even with a wide
cross section of fines.
The exchange ,method of obtaining data has major advantages. It can provide exactly
the type of reliable information on existing rates of pay which firms seek, as well as
giving them an indication of the likely trends in increases of pay during the year. But
real usefulness depends on the types of arrangements for exchange and on the
information obtained.
External Survey: These surveys are almost entirely confined to salary earning
groups. Few comparable surveys of wage earners are produced however, many of
them annually on every 5110 years. They fall into three main categories, first those
produced by professional bodies about their own members' pay. Secondly, those
prepared by consultants with their other activities and are mainly for a range of
management posts or on a particular area. Thirdly, published surveys of employment
agencies and career registrars based on applicants salaries. The main problems in
these kind of reports is that they give insufficient or sometimes no information on
survey methods, samples etc. which are meant for better consideration of results.
Commissioned Method: It is the most reliable method among all the three existing
methods. This is what is done either by commissioned consultant or by the company
itself. Due to their convincing nature more often pay commissions also resort to hire
consultants.
While such surveys can be enormously useful, it is crucial that they ask the right
questions in the first place. The data thus observed must clearly be expressed in
common terms.
Many other sources like newspaper advertisement etc. are also equally helpful for the
guidance on current rates of pay.
External Survey Method
Whether the pay survey is commissioned through a consultant or by the enterprises
self, the approach the same. There are three methods of wage survey: (I) by job title
(ii) by job description, and (iii) by job evaluation.
Job Title Method: In the job title method, the company collecting information gets
the pay details for similar job titles in other companies. For example, the information
with regard to wages may be collected for job titles like "turner", "fitter" and
"welder". The information obtained from various companies in respect of each job
title is tabulated and compared with the wages paid to each of these jobs in the
company in question.
This method is easy and quick, but not accurate. Many companies will have the same
job titles, but the job contents may vary considerably. For example, the job duties of
a welder in one company may be entirely different from a welder in another
company. Similarly a pattern maker's job in one foundry may be far easier than
another pattern maker in another factory. There may be variations in skill, working
conditions, and other factors. Thus a wage survey based on job titles does not provide
accurate information. The job title method may be used in those cases where the job
content and the titles are more or less standardised. Some examples are "Driver" and
"
Conductor" is a transport company.
Job Description Method: This is the most common method used in the pay survey.
The comparison is made on the basis of the job description. The wage data in other
industries are collected for these jobs which have the same job-descriptions in the
company doing the pay survey. This provides a more realistic basis since the
39
Compensation Structure
and Differentials
comparison is made job content-wise. The wage differences if any due to variation in
job contents can be easily traced.
Job Evaluation Method: This is an improvement over the job description method.
The descriptions are collected for the jobs selected for wage survey in other
industries. These jobs are evaluated under the same plan that was used by the
company undertaking the wage survey. If the points obtained by the similar jobs in
other industries are the same as the ones for the company, then the jobs are deemed to
be identical and a comparison of wages for these jobs would be made. Though this
may give accurate results, it is very time-consuming, and the details need to be
collected personally by the job analyst. This method is not normally used in wage
surveys.
Selection of Jobs for Wage Survey: While doing a pay survey it may not be possible
to collect information for all the jobs that have been evaluated. It is sufficient if the
information is collected for certain representative jobs from which it would be
possible to derive the wage curve. These jobs are known as key-jobs or bench-mark
jobs and that are commonly understood in the industry. However, a careful selection
of these key jobs would be necessary. Some of the considerations which need to be
given are (Smyth & Murphy):
a these jobs should be distributed over the whole range of jobs;
b jobs should have remained relatively stable in recent years;
c the jobs should exist in nearby or competing companies
d the jobs should be filled by as large a number of workers as possible;
e there should not be an unusual shortage or surplus of workers qualified to fill the
jobs.
Organisations to be included: In practice, similar units and units which have similar
jobs are selected for wage survey. As far as possible, units situated in and around the
same locality should be selected since location may have an important bearing on the
wages paid, in fact so also the size of the unit and type of ownership, etc. But this is
not always practicable since there may be only one such organisation in a locality or
a State. Hence a transport or an electricity undertaking in one State may collect
information from all the similar undertakings in other States. Competing
organisations in respect of manpower requirement are also included. For example, a
paper industry may include all the paper factories throughout the country in its wage
survey. If carefully selected, about ten organisation may be an adequate number to be
included in the survey.
Information to be collected: Collection of information is the most important aspect
in a wage survey, and requires careful planning. The informations collected through a
suitably designed questionnaire. The information gathered should include all the
fringe benefits in addition to wages. Information may be collected either by getting
the questionnaire filled up by the participating companies, or the job analyst himself
may collect the information by personal visits and record in the questionnaire, both
may be necessary in some cases.
The type of information to be collected in a pay survey is as follows:
i
ii
iii
iv
v
40
vi
vii Facilities such as conveyance, housing, children's education, free services like
electricity, water, fuel, uniform, and canteen.
Wage board reports on cotton, cement, chemical fertilizer type many chemicals
etc.
National Commission on Labour
Relevant Pay Commission Report
Bhoothalingam Committee Report
The data collected regarding the D.A. practices by the various companies in the wage
survey are also used.
The data collected from the 5 industries in the Faridabad region have been averaged
out for unskilled, semiskilled, skilled and highly skilled category and then compared
with the Raydong figures. Accordingly, the three process units average figures for the
4 different skills, have been compared with the Raydong figures. Even though only 3
units average have been compared with the Raydong, this average can be taken as a
representative one, since we have not included the extremely highly paying process
industries and the lowest paying units. These analysis have been done on three
different basis viz.
i
ii
iii
Basic + D.A.
Basic + D.A. + Incentives
Basic + DA + Incentives+Cash Allowances
These analysis show the comparative figures of the companies average total take
home pay (Basic + DA + Incentives + Cash Allowances) with the Raydong figures.
The Faridabad average is lower than the Raydong by Rs. 350/ While comparing
Basic+DA, by Rs.170/- while comparing Basic+DA+Incentive and Rs. 123/- while
comparing Basic+DA+Cash Allowances. In the case of comparison of average
'process industry with the Raydong, a peculiar pattern is noticed. The indirect jobs. in
lowest level and in the highest levels are following a straight line, but, the direct jobs
are having a hump. This clearly reveals that the selected process industries are paying
more piece rate/incentives to direct workmen than the indirect workmen.
41
Compensation Structure
and Differentials
RECOMMENDATIONS
All the hourly rated and day rated workmen's job at Raydong have to be reclassified into 4 classes as mentioned, and put in graphs.
The prevant base rate of Grade VI hourly rated jobs have been revised upwards.
All the workmen's personal pay have to be merged with the present base rate and
refixed as per the grades suggested.
In case any grade I and grade II workmen in any particular job performs the same
job to the desired satisfactory levels, both workmen should be fixed in the same
base rate. In case there is a definite change in the job as a whole between grade I
and grade II, they must be fixed in different base rates.
Pay Surveys: Supreme Court Ruling
The court is concerned with both intra and inter industry comparisions. The
importance attached with surveys is in line with international practice. According to
apex court, the surveys specifically should consider similar concerns in the same
region as well as the concern as whole". "Similar concerns" would be "those in the
same type of business as. the concern in question, but even in the same line of
business, it would not be proper to compare a small struggling concern with a large
flourishing concern. Even when the other concern is in the same type of business.
The tribunals have to take note of several relevant factors before they can justifiably
come to the conclusion that the other concern which is put-up for comparision is in
fact a comparable one.
These factors are the extent of business carried on, the capital invested, the profits
made, their market standing, strength of labour force, extent of reserves, declared in
immediate past, future prospects and such other factors."
12.5 SUMMARY
To get the idea of "Fair wage to fair work," the components of Pay such as incentive,
bonus and basic wage are considered. There are three methods of surveys based on
job title, job description and job evaluation. These are the bases on which variegating
jobs, both intra/inter industry nature are studied. Even though the information to be
collected for the purpose should be distributed over a large range, other data such as
the name of company, data related to fringe benefits/incentive holidays etc. are also
important to carry out a survey in the predetermined correct direction. No pay
fixation process how so ever simple it may be, can't be completed in absence of a
complete pay/wage survey.
42