Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
10.
Lois is running for political office. She trails the incumbent and decides to start running a series of "attack
ads." The attack ads are very effective and one week before the election it appears that she has drawn
even with her opponent. Lois admits that the attack ads were exaggerations and contained some
distortions. Which statement is correct?
a. Lois has engaged in unethical behavior.
b. Lois has engaged in ethical behavior since she has an obligation to her supporters to run a campaign
that will help her get elected.
c. It is not possible to determine whether Lois's attack ads were ethical or unethical.
d. Assuming Lois's attack ads were unethical, her conduct is justified and proper if she gets elected.
11. Nortron Corporation wants to create an ethical environment in its company. Which of the following has
been found to help foster a sense of ethics within an organization?
a. The company may develop a formal, written ethics code.
b. The company may institute a formal ethics training program for the employees.
c. The top executives may provide good examples by behaving ethically themselves.
d. All of these alternatives have been used by U.S. companies to create an ethical
environment in their organizations.
12. Jim told his manager, Lana, that a co-worker, Diane, had been in prison for theft. Lana checked into the
matter and, when she learned that Diane had served time in prison for theft, fired her.
14. Adam decided to play a practical joke on Linda, a co-worker. As Linda was leaving the office one night,
Adam, wearing a mask, stepped out from behind some bushes. He pointed a handgun made out of licorice
at her and demanded her purse. He then pushed the candy gun to her head and told her if she told
anybody he'd kill her. Linda was very scared during the whole incident. She did not think it was funny
when Adam pulled the mask off and took a bite out of the gun as he gave her the purse back. Which
statement is correct?
a. Adam committed an assault but not a battery.
b. Adam committed a battery but not an assault.
c. Adam committed an assault and a battery.
d. Adam committed neither an assault nor a battery since he used a candy gun and was only playing a joke on
Linda.
15. The United States and Argentina have signed the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of
Goods (CISG). Oxtron, Inc., a U.S. company, and Leer, an Argentinean company, have entered into a
contract under which Oxtron is to ship medical devices to Leer. The contract does not include a choice
oflaw provision. The contract will be governed by:
a. the CISG.
b. the UCC.
c. the domestic contract law of Argentina.
d. the domestic contract law of the United States.
16. The United States and Singapore have signed the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of
Goods (CISG). Notren, Inc., a U.S. company, and SWT, a Singapore company, have entered into a
contract under which SWT is to ship party supplies to Notren. One of the terms of the contract states,
"The validity and performance of this contract will be governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
of the state of New York, not the Convention of the International Sale of Goods (CISG)." The contract will
be governed by the:
a. CISG.
b. Uniform Commercial Code of New York.
c. common law.
d. World Trade Law.
17.
18. Zebra Toy Company, located in Chicago, sells $500,000 worth of toys to a London, England, wholesaler.
This contract could be governed by:
a. Illinois's Uniform Commercial Code.
b. English law.
c. the CISG.
d. All of these are correct.
19. The primary goal of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is to:
a. allow Canada, the United States, and Mexico to compete as a common economic entity against
other countries in the world.
b. allow for the free and unrestricted movement of people from one country to another to improve the
labor market of all three counties.
c. eliminate almost all trade barriers between the three nations.
d. All of these are correct.
20. Kjell is the vice president of international sales for Oxtren, Inc, a U.S. company. To secure a multimillion
dollar contract for his company, Kjell paid a Mongolian governmental officer $10,000. Kjell:
a. has violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
b. has not violated the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act because the payment was a grease payment.
c. has not violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act because the government official was from
Mongolia, not the United States.
d. has not done anything illegal because Congress has not ratified the Convention of Combatting Bribery
of
Foreign Public Officials in International Transactions.
21. What is not required to establish promissory estoppel?
27.
Which of the following offers are considered to be irrevocable for a given period?
a. Finn offers.
b. Option contracts.
c. A writing signed by a merchant offering to hold open an offer for the sale of goods for a stated period.
d. All of these.
In January, Alex promised to pay Y-K Inc. $5,000 if it would refrain from filing suit against him on a
breach of contract action. Y-K agreed and accepted a $5,000 check from Alex. Which of the following
statements is correct?
a. Y-K's promise to refrain from suing Alex was not supported by legal consideration.
b. Y-K's promise to refrain from suing Alex was supported by legal consideration and is
enforceable.
c. This is an accord and satisfaction, and Y-K cannot sue.
d. The courts would apply promissory estoppel in this situation.
30.
Walter worked nights as a clerk in a fast-food store. On his last work shift, Walter's boss told him, "I'm
really grateful for the year that you have worked here. I am going to give you a bonus of $1,000 in your
last paycheck." When Walter got his last paycheck, there was no bonus. If Walter sues, the likely result
will be:
a. Walter will win, as the promise is
enforceable.
b. Walter will lose, as he gave no
consideration.
c. Walter will lose unless the promise was in writing.
d. Walter will win, as no consideration is required to modify an employment contract.
31.
If Rudy offers Oscar $200 for his laptop valued at $600 and Oscar agrees, a court will probably:
a. set aside the agreement as being unfair.
b. set aside the agreement because the consideration is inadequate.
c. not set aside the agreement based on the adequacy of the
consideration.
d. not set aside the agreement because of the UCC.
36. Barb has been a children's day care provider for several years in the small town of Sallton. She has decided
to give it all up and move to the big city for excitement and adventure. She sells her business to Ken,
agreeing not to open a competing business within five miles of Sallton for a period of nine months. After five
months of the big city life, Barb is broke and moves back to Sallton. She opens a small day care business.
Ken sues on the non-compete clause. What is the most likely result?
a. Ken wins. The agreement is enforceable.
b. Barb wins. The agreement is denying her the right to do the only thing she knows how to do.
c. Barb wins. The agreement is not enforceable because it is not ancillary to a legitimate bargain.
d. Barb wins. The agreement is not reasonable as to time.
37. In the case of Worldwide Insurance v. Klopp, the Supreme Court ofDelaware found that:
a. a contract provision requiring arbitration and then permitting appeal by either party was
void as unconscionable.
b. the contract provision requiring arbitration was clear, unambiguous, and fair to both parties.
c. the arbitration clause in Klopp's auto insurance contract was valid because it furthered the state policy
favoring the use of arbitration to resolve disputes.
d. the automobile insurance policy was governed by UCC, Article 3.
38. To be valid, a noncompete clause must be:
a. ancillary to a legitimate bargain.
b. reasonable in time, geographical area, and scope of activity when ancillary to the sale of a business.
c. necessary to protect trade secrets, confidential information, or customer lists developed over an
extended time when ancillary to an employment contract.
d. All of these.
39. The Tavern's secret recipe for its pizza sauce would be considered:
a. a trade secret, and an employment noncompete clause would be enforceable to protect it.
b. a trade secret, and an employment noncompete clause would NOT be enforceable to protect it. c. just
a secret recipe and not something the Tavern could protect in a noncompete clause.
d. an exculpatory clause and not enforceable.
40. Wendell, new to the area, selects a doctor from the telephone book and visits that doctor to have a
splinter extracted. Unbeknownst to Wendell, the doctor has never passed the state licensing exams. Later,
when Wendell discovers the truth, he refuses to pay his bill. If the doctor sues for recovery of the fee, will
the court support the doctor's claim?
a. Yes, it was up to Wendell to verify the doctor's qualifications prior to having the splinter extracted.
b. No, the court is likely to take the position that it is not in the public's best interests to enforce
contracts with unlicensed doctors.
c. It depends on whether Wendell's injury healed properly.
d. No, but the doctor could probably recover under quasi-contract.
41. Larry has the largest pizza business in the city. He learns that Henry is thinking of opening a competing
pizza and pasta delivery business. Larry gives Henry $25,000 to not open his proposed business in the
same city. Which statement is correct?
a. The contract is voidable at Larry's option.
b. The contract is void for lack of
consideration.
c. The contract is illegal and void.
d. The contract is enforceable.
42. Which of the following is an example of an exculpatory clause?
a. Creditor charges 38% interest on a loan.
b. Seller is not responsible for property damage regardless of the cause of the injury.
d. travel.
46. Judicial review can best be described as the power of federal courts to:
a. review state court decisions. b.
review state executive action.
c. review state and federal legislative and executive action.
d. none of these.
47. The issue of the constitutional protections afforded flag burning was addressed in:
a. Texas v. Johnson.
b. United States v. Lopez.
c. Marbury v. Madison.
d. Palmore v. Sidoti.
48. The "dormant" aspect of the Commerce Clause:
a. is also known as the "negative" aspect.
b. means that there are many unused powers still available to the government to regulate trade between the
states.
c. guarantees that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign countries that have not yet
developed trade practices with the United States.
d. guarantees that the states have the power, even if unused, to impose regulations affecting interstate
commerce.
49. Which of the following limitations does not apply to the government in civil proceedings to take a person's
liberty or property?
a. Procedural Due Process.
b. The Takings Clause.
c. Substantive Due Process.
d. The Equal Protection Clause.
50.
The Supreme Court's approach during the period from the 1950s through the 1970s in deciding cases on
constitutional grounds is described as:
a. judicial restraint.
b. judicial activism.
c. judicialreview.
d. the dormant aspect of its judicial power.