Inconveniences to give the right of vote to women in Per

By Roy Palomino
By being born to be a mother, the psychology of women has its own mode. Her
modality is determined by her special constitution and organic operation, which
makes it completely different from the male. For this reason all acts of her life
are influenced by their excessive sensitivity, being so noticeable has served
since ancient times to be considered as "weaker sex".
The great affection of women is not something you say baseless and be used
as an argument in order to keep her out of public life, neither as a roman
thought, as feminists might think. It is based on scientific research that they
have concluded their existence, since the functioning of the nervous and
endocrine systems. Gregorio Maran, a major endocrinologists, as well as
other medical specialists have come to this conclusion.
First, referring to the psychic, says: "As far psychic, special constitution of the
nervous and endocrine system that makes it infinitely suitable for sensitive and
emotional stimuli so characteristic of motherhood, however unwilling ago - in
the average of the cases for abstract and creative work ".
We also have to take into account the great dependence of women on their
sexual process, because as Lord Byron says: "Man's love is something different
from your life; while the love of a woman is her whole life "and Gregorio
Maran," The woman is embedded in her sex and almost all his life, a slave to
him, "if it operates normally, what which gives it a very special psyche. A
predisposition for being noticed, extraordinarily, for the influence of man.
Think that give rights for women does not undermine the structure and
functioning of the family is something I consider wrong. Could not be accepted
at any time that such a thing would not happen if the woman has to fulfill a
new role, which otherwise seems strange in it. The family became not what
actually should be, but in a very different thing.
It is true that this fight originally they were avocados feminist had its rationale,
and who aspired to recognition for women's rights by her human condition.
However, feminists are not limited in that. There are not happy in their new
situation. Neither have been concerned to become aware of its rightful state,
both at home and in society. Quite the contrary, they have continued,
encouraged by politicians interested in their struggle and with a new goal:
political vote.
I let feminists ask: Could the woman, exercising functions quite unrelated to his
status and what has come into the world, carrying, in the broad sense of the
word, their role in the home and society?

It is necessary that before giving an answer, make memories of what has been
the responsibility of their mothers, and women who, by circumstances of fate,
had to be in charge of education and home address in which they were formed.
After they have thought about it, you will understand that the dispute would
result in great harm to society. That this would not get anything but the
removal of women from home and neglect she will of their own functions. It will
not contribute to the solution of national problems, but rather would create one
of greater importance.
Given this situation it is imperative that the Peru need to protect the integrity
of the family, which otherwise is a social good state. And the nation needs to
worry about the defense of the.
Lima, December 31, 1949. Thesis by Gustavo Echevarra Legua, National
University of San Marcos. Lima, 1949