1.

The Gravity Problem

I have, since I was very young, thought of the universe in a very different way
than most. E=mc2 is the conventional way of converting matter to energy and
vice versa. However, as you know, this equation lacks the ability to accurately
perform the same conversion on a quantum level. I am of the opinion that this is
simply because of the persisting desire to include gravity as the longest acting,
weakest force. I propose different.

The more I thought of the universe the less I was able to reconcile the idea of
gravity as the longest acting, weakest force. Suppose there is no gravity
because there is no mass in the universe (as it may have been in the very early
universe):

Question: What would move massless objects if there was no gravitational

attraction?

Answer: An unbalanced equilibrium between heat and cold.

Argument: The laws of thermodynamics state that heat moves toward cold. So,
regardless of gravity, objects will move in the direction of the colder of any two
(or more) objects in any system. So, massless particles are swimming about in
the early universe just after the Big Bang and if we removed gravity entirely,
these objects would still ‘move.’ Why? Because they lack thermal equilibrium.
Hot objects, regardless of their gravitational attraction, are going to move toward
a colder part of space in order to find balance.

This process lead me to devise a more complete equation for the conversion of
energy to anything: E=FT or, Energy equals Force times Time.

Note: I realize that the most current and complete equation

for energy conversion is: E=K+mc2 where K represents the
kinetic energy within the system. Bearing in mind that I have
chosen to remove gravity and replace it with a simple ‘heat
to cold’ process, one can see how K and m combine in my
equation, while the time component represented by c2 in the
classic equation is now represented by T in my equation.

Also, my equation incorporates a place in spacetime that

goes unrecognized in its predominant feature: A singularity
is an object whose temperature is Atomic Absolute
Zero. Think about it: The only thing a singularity can ‘do’ is
draw things towards it. Why? Because it is at Atomic
Absolute Zero. Heat moves toward cold. The only thing that
can happen to a singularity (or any point or place in space
that is at AAZ) is that objects (including massless objects like
 light) move toward it. Why would a massless object move
toward anything? Gravity should have no effect. Light is
hot, singularities are cold.

A singularity cannot do anything but wait for ‘the world to

pass them by.” Because they have no heat, no moving
matter, no kinetic energy of their own with which to move
around or react to anything, they must wait and draw in
objects which are hotter than they are; even if those objects
are only a billionth of a degree warmer than they, in space a
singularity will become a popular spot to be drawn to.

Now, the material around the singularity will become hot,

dense and full of various interactions, up to and including
‘gravity’ but the singularity, in order to incorporate ‘new
material’ must first have the material presented in useful
form. [Diamonds don’t become diamonds by just some
application of force and some carbon; the amounts are
specific and necessary to form a diamond.] Same goes with
the addition of matter/force to a singularity: Essentially, in
order to incorporate anything into a singularity (or any AAZ
point) the material must be properly Tetrised™ into the
object.

My theory predicts that improperly reverse fractionated

material will cause a very common phenomenon: Gamma
Ray Bursts or GRB’s. I believe that Gamma Ray Bursts are
a result of thermal cracking on a huge scale around a point
whose temperature is Atomic Absolute Zero and whose
incoming hot, dense material was not properly introduced
into the system.

So, gravity is not the longest acting, weakest force. Rather, thermodynamic
processes are the root of all movement in the universe. As the universe grows in
complexity and matter is created by quantum interactions, the force we describe
as gravity becomes apparent: It emerges from a quantum state. This is why I
believe E=mc2 is unacceptable for a reverse conversion from stable matter to
quantum particles. It is a threshold which cannot be reverse engineered (moving
against time’s arrow,) but must be deduced in the direction of the flow of time and
then recognized as emergent from the quintillions of interactions up to that point.

E=FT
 2. The Problem of the Proper Calculation of the Passage of Time

Pi is a better measuring stick for the passage (and type) of time than the
atom (though we currently use Caesium for this purpose in our atomic
clocks).

Pi as a more useful measuring stick for the passage of time

As is generally accepted for quantum theory atoms cannot exist in quantum time
and are therefore, a poor gauge for the passage of time or the measurement of
the expansion or contraction of spacetime.

Question: When is Pi stable after matter is created?

Answer: I have no exact answer for this as I am still working on it.

My theory: Pi is representative of an ever expanding coil, the tightness of which

is representative of the speed with which time is passing and with which
spacetime is growing.

Argument: We are aware that Pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to

its diameter. Unfortunately, time has not been accounted for in this measurement
and that leaves a vital clue about the nature of Pi unrepresented.

If we think of time using Prof. Hawking's representation of it as a light cone, then

one must conclude that when one measures the diameter of any given circle,
there is a beginning to the measurement and an ending to the measurement
during which time has passed. This being the case, and knowing that a beginning
and an end cannot happen simultaneously, one must conclude that the passage
of time has offset the beginning measurement from the end measurement by a
length of time represented as lp (a Planck length). This means that the start point
and the end point can never meet - they pass each other always by length lp
[...because time and space are being created not only while the measurement is
taking place, but also after the measurement has taken place. Whatever markers
were used to denote 'start' and 'stop' will move away from each other due to the
expansion of spacetime.] Thus, the calculation never actually ends -- it is merely
marked along the way with whatever points we assign it. Essentially, Pi doesn’t
represent anything about a circle: It is more accurately described as
representing a spiral when Time is included in the calculation. I believe this way
of thinking is more useful when contemplating things like the ‘random walk’ of
photons in stars. Though the ‘walk’ is generally a series of straight lines (or so
we are assuming because of their short length…[I believe their path experiences
a curvature due to a Correolis type effect which is pervasive throughout the
universe and contingent upon each photon’s relative position to other forces,
matter and, if we must, gravity…] it seems feasible to me that this ‘walk,’ too, can
be ‘flattened out’ so to speak, so that its overall pattern of escape from the inner
star is represented by a misshapen coil.

How does Pi work for measuring time?

If we were to superimpose a dot onto Prof. Hawking's light cone representing a

start point, and then add another dot representing an end point, we would see
clearly that these points were offset (if even by the minutest of lengths) and that
picture would (if drawn though enough time for an observer to reveal a long term
pattern) show a spiral or coil that is indistinguishable from the skin of the light
cone which expands (as does the light cone itself) with the passage of time.

Special Note: It is important in every calculation to include

a measurement for the passage of time since the flow of
time does not stop while humankind makes their
calculations. Obviously, most calculations such as
measuring the lengths of wood for a new deck on one’s
house need not include a variable for time since the flow of
time will have a negligible effect on the final length and
placement of the wood. But if we are to consider the
expansion of spacetime, quanta and minute matter/force
interactions, it is vital to include a variable to represent the
effect of the flow of time and the simultaneous creation of
spacetime on these particles.

E=FT

Conclusion

Heat moves toward cold. E=FT. Gamma Ray Bursts are caused by thermal
cracking on a grand scale. Singularities are points whose temperature is Atomic
Absolute Zero. Light is drawn to a singularity because it is warmer than the
singularity itself, and gravity is a result of thermodynamic processes in the early
universe which resulted in force reactions which caused objects to spin due to
the growth and expansion of spacetime and the flow of time itself. There is no
Higgs Boson because who needs a “God Particle” when: A) there is no God, and
B) the interaction and resultant particle it tries to describe are already accounted
for by my theory.

******