Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/compscitech
Abstract
The dynamic damage behavior of carbon-epoxy laminated beams, having initial geometric imperfections, subject to an axial
impulse was investigated numerically and experimentally. The study focused on investigating the damage initiation and damage
mechanism in the beams impacted axially by a moving mass. The dynamic equilibrium equations were developed based on the
Timoshenko beam assumption with the consideration of beams transverse inertia, transverse shear deformation and the cross
sections rotational inertia eects. The Higher-Order Shear Deformation Theory was adopted to model the nonlinear distributed
shear strain across the beam thickness. The von-Karman StrainDisplacement nonlinear relationship was used to model the
deformation of the beam. Hashins failure criteria was used to predict the damage of beams. The experiments were conducted using
a horizontal linear bearing impact setup. Scanning Electron Microscopy results showed that delamination and matrix crack were
the primary damage mechanisms in the beams. Eect of ber angle, lay-up sequence and initial geometric imperfection on critical
energy of damage initiation was also investigated.
# 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: B. Impact behaviour; C. Damage mechanics; C. Delamination; B. Modeling; D. Fractography
1. Introduction
Due to their high specic stiness and strength, berreinforced plastic (FRP) laminated composites have been
widely used in industrial applications such as aerospace,
automobile, shipbuilding, marine and civil infrastructures. However, their susceptibility to damage
resulted from mechanical, physical and chemical factors,
greatly degrades their stiness, strength and durability.
Impact in particular is one of the most signicant sources
of damage that can cause matrix crack, delamination and
ber breakage. Often damages generated in FRP are
undetectable to the naked eyes, therefore, it is particularly important to understand the damage mechanism
(including initiation and progression) in FRP.
Although a great number of investigations have considered FRP impact characterization, most of such
works [110] have considered on the damage due to
transverse impact. Choi et al. [1] conducted analytical
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-902-494-3935; fax: +1-902-4846635.
E-mail address: farid.taheri@dal.ca (F. Taheri).
0266-3538/$ - see front matter # 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.07.002
720
@2 u @Nx
@u
CL
2
@t
@t
@x
@w0
@
N
x
@2 w @V
@w
@x
I1 2
CT
@t
@x
@t
@x
I2
@2 @Mx
@
V CR
@t2
@t
@x
1a
1b
1c
are the axial force per unit beam width, x is the axial
stress of each lamina;
h=2
x zdz
2b
Mx
h=2
721
h=2
V
xz dz
h=2
u0
at
at
x 0; x L
x0
5a
5b
at
is the shear force per unit beam width across the crosssection of beam, and x is the shear stress of each
lamina;
h=2
dz
4a
I1
Vtdt;
Ut
h=2
x L
5c
8a
@w0
@x
8b
xjt0
@w
j 0
@t t0
8c
@
j 0
@t t0
8d
ujt0 0x < L
8e
@u
j 0x < L
@t t0
8f
yz
xz
Q 44
Q54
Q 45
Q 55
9
38
Q 16 < "x =
Q 26 5 "y
:
;
xy
Q 66
yz
xz
9a
9b
10a
and
xz Q 55
xz
Q 12
Q 22
Q 62
10b
722
ux x; z; t ux; t z
2
@x
@x
3h
11a
uz x; z; t wx; t w0 x
11b
12a
2 @x
@x 2 @x
xz
@ux @uz
@z
@x
12b
5 1:0
13
Ff
SLT
SL
in which, FfT is the failure index of ber in tension
mode, the SL is the tension strength of lamina and SLT
is the shear strength of the lamina in the 13 plane.
2.6.2. Compressive mode
Under compressive status, ber is assumed to fail in
microbuckling and kinking of bers with the matrix.
Rosen [19] stated that bers under axial compression
buckle in a shear mode provided that volume fraction of
bers is higher than a certain limit (i.e., 60% for carbon/epoxy). The shear and compressive stresses both
contribute to the compressive failure of bers. The
deviatoric strain energy theory, also known as the Tsai
Hill criterion [20], is similar to Hashins failure criteria
for bers in tension, that is:
2
13 2
FfC 11
5 1:0
14
SL
SLT
is the compressive stress, FfC is the failure
in which, 11
index of ber in compressive status, the SL is the compressive strength of ber.
2.7. Delamination
Delamination occurs in laminates due to the normal
and inter-laminar shear stresses. For the current onedimensional laminated beam subject to axial impulse, as
described by the dierential equations, the normal and
through-the-thickness stresses are ignored. The failure
criteria can then be described by [18],
31 2
Fd
5 1:0
15
STL
in which, Fd is the failure index of delamination and STL
is the through-the-thickness shear strength of the
lamina.
3. Experimental setup
3.1. Experimental setup
Drop weight setup is a common mean for applying
impact load for dynamic testing, as reported in several
experimental works [110]. The disadvantage is that it is
dicult to eliminate the rebound impact. To overcome
this problem, a new impact setup was designed to perform the axial impulse, as shown in Fig. 2. The major
components of the system include a pendulum, a guiding tube with linear bearings along its full length, specimen support xtures and an impactor. The linear
bearings were horizontally xed on a strand. The linear
bearing, xture and specimen were calibrated horizontally so that the impact contact would be collinear.
When the pendulum hits the impactor, it forces the
impactor to travel through the tube on the bearings. By
this system the impactor does not rebound and impact
the specimen more than once. Two non-contact optical
sensors were used to monitor the velocity of the impactor. The rst optical sensor also acted as a trigger for
the data acquisition setup to collect the data. The extant
of damage in the specimens was inspected by visual
method and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
3.2. Specimen preparation
The material used in this study was TENAX/R6376
carbon ber/epoxy pre-preg by HEXCEL. R6376 is a
high performance tough matrix formulated for the fabrication of primary aircraft structures. It oers high
impact resistance and damage tolerance. The laminate
was cured 2 h at temperature 175 C and 700 kN/m2
pressure with heating rate of 2 C to 5 C per min in an
oven, as recommended by the manufacturer. The laminate was then cut into beams. The mechanical properties of the laminate and geometric properties of beams
are listed in Table 1.
723
Table 1
Physical and mechanical properties of carbon-ber/epoxy laminated
beams
Specimen length (mm)
Specimen width (mm)
Specimen thickness (mm)
Imperfection magnitude W0 (mm)
Longitudinal modulus E11 (GPa)
Transverse modulus E22 (GPa)
In-plane shear modulus G12 (GPa)
Major Poissons ratio (v12)
Density (Kg/m3)
Longitudinal tensile strength S+
L (MPa)
Longitudinal compressive strength S
L (MPa)
Transverse tensile strength S+
T (MPa)
Transverse compressive strength S
T (MPa)
In-plane shear strength SLT (MPa)
Through-the-thickness shear strength STL (MPa)
300
20
1.6
Factor thickness
1.18E+02
5.54E+00
4.77E+00
0.27
1512
1094.8
712.9
26.44
84.33
84.42
65.36
22:5
45
67:5
12
3 s
3 s,
3 s
0=903 s and 0=902 =02 s . The support condition of
the beam is shown in Fig. 1. The initial geometric
shapes of the beams were either in sinusoidal or random
forms [21,22]. Fig. 3 shows the typical initial geometric
imperfection forms. The imperfection values were
obtained using a measuring gauge after the beams were
mounted on the test xture (jig), before the impact tests
were conducted. The damping coecient of the beam is
approximately 0.04, as measured by a GrindoSonic
MK5 Industrial instrument [23].
4.1. Strain records
Fig. 4 shows typical strain values recorded by two
strain gages mounted on beams top and bottom surfaces, at the mid-span of the beam. When a geometrically imperfect beam is impacted axially, it would
vibrate in both axial and transverse directions. From
Fig. 4, we can see that both top and bottom surfaces
experience compressive strain at the beginning of the
event, because the beam is deformed axially due to the
impact compressive load. As the stress wave propagates
along the beam, the beam experiences a combined
bending and axial compressive loading, in which the top
surface of the beam is in compressive state, while the
bottom is in tension. Due to the damping eect, the
vibration diminishes gradually. From this gure, we can
see the maximum strain or stress that occurred during
the rst transverse vibration cycle. Considering the
724
Fig.
6. Initial
and deformed beam shape of one of the beams with
67:53 s lay-up.
For those beams with 012 lay-up, matrix cracking
occurred normal to the ber direction, and the beam
was split into two or more parts.
4.2.1. Damage analysis of beams with 22:53 s lay-up
of beams, having lay up sequence of
Three groups
22:53 s had three dierent lengths of 105, 128 and
148 mm. Each group had 4 specimens and each specimen was impacted with dierent impact energy.
Damage, mostly in the form of delamination, was
observed between plies 6 and 7. Some of the delaminations extended along the whole length of the beams but
was limited between the two restrained ends. Fig. 7(a)
and (b) show the time history results of axial displacement and lateral deection at station 0.7 of the beam
(0.7 indicates 7/10L distance from the cantilever support
end of the beam), obtained though our numerical analyses for one of the specimens. Fig. 7(c) shows the lateral deformed shape at time 0.4ms compared with the
initial shape of the beam. Fig. 8(a) and (b) show the
failure indices of ber breakage for each layer, and
delamination failure for each inter-laminar interface at
station 0.7 of the beam, obtained though Eqs. (13)(15).
From the gures, we can see that all ber failure indices
are less than 1.0, which indicates that the bers do not
break; some of the delamination failure indices are
however grater than 1.0, indicating that delamination
would have occurred. Further analysis of Fig. 8(b)
indicated that even though failure indices of interface 5
725
Fig. 8. Numerical results of the failure Indies. (a) Failure index for
ber breakage. (b) Failure index for delamination.
Fig. 9. SEM
showing typical delamination and matrix
fractograph
crack of a 453 s specimen.
726
4.2.3. Damage analysis of beams with 0=903 s lay-up
In this group of beams, the two 90 plies placed at
the beams mid-plane did not contribute much in
carrying the axial force. During the transverse deformation stage, outer plies endured most of the tensile
and compressive loads. The 3rd, 5th, 8th and 10th 0
plies would have endured the maximum shear strain.
Therefore, it is reasonable to see that delaminations
would occur between plies 12, 1112, 56 and 78,
as was the case. Moreover, the 56 interface delamination was connected to the 78 by a matrix crack
running through plies 6 and 7. Fig. 12(a) is an example of delamination between plies 1 and 2. Fig. 12(b)
Fig. 12. SEM fractographs. (a) delamination between ply 1 and 2. (b)
delamination between plies 5 and 6 connected to delamination
between plies 7 and 8 by a matrix crack.
727
5. Conclusion
Dynamic damage behavior of FRP laminated slender
beams, having various lay-ups, subjected to axial impulse
was investigated experimentally and numerically. Several
factors (such as the beams axial transverse inertia, cross
sections rotational inertia, the non-uniform distribution
of shear stress across the beam cross-section, damping
eect, the nonlinear strain-displacement relationship
between axial strain and transverse displacement) were
accounted by our numerical solution.
Our experimental investigation subjected carbon/
epoxy laminated beams with dierent lay-up and slenderness ratio to axial impact load. The following conclusions could be drawn from the results obtained
through our numerical and experimental analyses:
Fig. 13. Histograms from all specimens of failure occurrence in the
FRP beams. (a) Delamination initiation location. (b) Lamina interface
number.
728
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
Acknowledgements
[13]
[14]
References
[16]
[1] Choi HY, Wang HS, Chang GK. Eect of laminate conguration
and impactors mass on trhe initial impact damage of graphite/
epoxy composite plates due to line-loading impact. J Compos
Mater 1992;26:80527.
[2] Christoforou AP, Yigit AS. Normalized impact response and
damage in a thin thin composite laminate supported by a rigid
substrate. J Compos Mater 1994;28:155373.
[3] Pavier MJ, Clarke MP. Experimental techniques for the investigation of the eects of impact damage on carbon-ber composites. Compos Sci Technol 1995;55:15769.
[4] Zhou G. Damage mechanisms in composite laminates impacted
by a at-ended impactor. Compos Sci Technol 1995;54:26773.
[5] Sohn MS, Hu XZ, Kim JK, Wlker L. Impact damage characterization of carbon ber/epoxy exompoasite with multi-layer reinfotrcement. J Compos B 2000;31:68191.
[6] Park SW, Zhou M. Time-resolved impact response and damage
[15]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]