Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
This report presents a theory for the calculation of the tangential residual stress
distribution in curved beams of constant rectangular cross-section. The theory is based
on the fact that if such a beam is residually
stressed and a thin layer is removed from its
periphery the radius of curvature of the beam
will change. By knOWing this change, it is
possible to calculate the stress that was in
the layer removed. The assumption is made
that the residual stresses in the radial and
axial directions are negligible.
THEORY
[ 195 ]
S.E.~.A.
PROCEEDINGS
VOL. XVI
N.O. 1
t.
de/>
-R+dr-e
(e/>+d)-
::
b
R-e
b
R-e
R - e - R - dR + e
R - e
dR
(1)
if
I
-+-
I
FI G. I.
FIG.2.
pure bending moment and a force that produces a direct stress uniformly distributed
over the cross- section. For the latter the
force must be applied at the centroid of the
cross-section [3]. If this is done, the moment
arm o~ the pure bending moment is t/2 as indicated in the figure, and its magnitude is
s dz' t/2. The magnitude of the direct stress
is s' dZ/t.
Now consider the beam shown in Fig. 2 as
the radius of curvature of the centroid changes
from R to R + d R due to pure bending. The
neutral axis is denoted by n - n and the centroid
by c-c. The angle.ep subtends an arc length b
on the neutral axis as does the angle ep + d
and e is the radial distance between the neutral axis and the centroid.
Now consider the ratio de/> Ie/> This ratio
appears in many of the equations of curved
beams. To measure either quantity, however,
would be difficult. But d/ may be expressed
'in terms of the radius of curvature of the centroid of the beam which is easily determined.
t- z
2
M " - S(z,z)dz - .
(2)
M::-AeE~,
(3)
[ 196 ]
THEORY
THE
FOR
CALCULATION
(10)
[2R(z) - t + z + 2m][R(z) - e]
-2EeR'(z)dz
dS=dSd+dS b = [R(z)-e](t-z]
FIG.3.
But
and
A: (t - Z),
dR(z)
R(z)-e'
so
2EeR'(z)
5(z,z) = - - - R(z) - e
(5)
S(z,z)dz
t-z
(11)
(4)
(6)
1o
dS = S(z,z) - 5(0,z):
1
0
2EeR'(z) dz
- o..[R(z)-eJ(t-z]
'ER'(z)[(t - z) - 2e - 2m] dz
[2R(z)-(t-z)+2m][R(z)-e]'
(12)
S(O, z): -
(7)
R(z)-e
,+ 2Ef
eR'(z)dz
...,.------=-=-----=-
o [R(z)-e][t-z]
i
R'(z)dz
+2E(t-Z)1
o [R(Z) - eJ[2R(z) + t + Z - 2z]
s- s
ZR'(z>[(t - z) - 2e] dz
(13)
dS b = Ae(r -y) ,
(8)
t -
Y=-2-- e - m ,
A= f-z,
(t - z) 2
(14)
e=--.
J2R(z)
Ee R'(z) dz (t - z)
= - S(Z,Z) dz -2-
t -
2E(t-Z)2 R ,(Z)
J2 [R (z )] 2
R(z) - e
(9)
r = R( z) - e.
+ 2E(t - z)
_ 1%
E
( 197 ]
(t - z) 2
Z (t-z)R'(z)dz
+ 2E1--~-----='
0
12 [R (z )] 2
(t - z) 2
. J2R(z)R'(z)dz
{12 [R(z)] 2
_ (t _
Z)2}[2R(Z)
+t +
Z -
[12(t-z)R(z)-2(t-z)']R'(Z)dZ
+ Z - 2z]
2z]
(15)
S.E.S.A.
PRoe EEDINGS
t-z
-2- + -2- ,
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
(16)
NO.1
CONCLUSiON
R(z) ::
VOL. XVI
(17)
81 BLiOGRAPHY
[1] Timoshenko, S., "Strength of Materials", (Part IT), D.
Van Nostrand, New York, 2nd edition, 1941, p. 7l.
[2] Timoshenko; S. and Goodier, J. N., "Theory of Elasticity", McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd edition, 1951, p. 64.
[3] Timoshenko, S., "Strength of Materials", p. 69.
[4] Ibid, p. 67.
[5] Ibid, p. 70.
[ 198 ]