Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TAMMY LARABIE
Plaintiff
10
v.
CHRISTOPHER CUI
IRIS LEE
Defendants
15
R E A S O N S
F O R
J U D G M E N T
20
25
APPEARANCES:
M. Jacquesson
R. Brown
30
R. Brown
(i)
Table of Contents
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
T A B L E
5
O F
C O N T E N T S
W I T N E S S E S
WITNESS:
Examination
In-Chief
CrossExamination
ReExamination
10
E X H I B I T S
EXHIBIT NUMBER
ENTERED ON PAGE
15
20
LEGEND
[sic] - Indicates preceding word has been reproduced
verbatim and is not a transcription error.
25
AG 0087 (rev.07-01)
1.
Larabie v. Cui
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2015
R E A S O N S
F O R
J U D G M E N T
RICHARDSON DJ (Orally):
The trial of this action, together with closing
arguments was heard on October 21st, 2014 and
December 12, 2014, and I reserved judgment until
today.
10
The defendant
15
The defendants,
20
25
Therefore he was
The terms of
payment were $40 per day until Ziven was one and
30
2.
Larabie v. Cui
Iris, to provide two weeks written notice in the
event that they were to remove Ziven from the
daycare.
It is also
10
It is also
15
20
25
30
One, the
3.
Larabie v. Cui
terms of the contract stated that, No smoking is
allowed on the premises.
It is their position
Number two, it
10
15
20
25
30
4.
Larabie v. Cui
Ms. Larabie has any training or expertise in diet
or in medicine.
I now deal with the smoking issue.
The wording
premises.
Counsel
15
20
25
30
5.
Larabie v. Cui
They stated they were actively seeking an
alternative licensed daycare but could not find
one and therefore elected to keep Ziven with the
plaintiff.
10
15
I am therefore not
20
Services Act.
25
30
6.
Larabie v. Cui
The plaintiffs evidence is that her reporting is
based on Section 7.2(1) and (2) of the Act, which
reads as follows,
If there is a risk that the child is
10
15
20
25
30
7.
Larabie v. Cui
Until the time of the report to the Childrens
Aid Society, I found nothing to suggest that
Ziven was in any danger, nor was it ever
suggested by the plaintiff.
Ziven, in my view
He
10
of diarrhea.
raised.
How did the parents deal with these issues?
Iris
15
She
20
As
25
doctor.
I find nothing in Zivens health history, either
individually or in totality to suggest that he
was in any physical danger.
30
I find no evidence
8.
Larabie v. Cui
to his physical needs.
It was only after the reporting to the Childrens
Aid Society and after Ziven was removed from the
plaintiffs daycare that the plaintiff wrote
10
15
neglect.
20
The plaintiff
30
It
9.
Larabie v. Cui
required more sleep.
I find that
10
They go so far as
15
20
evidence is in conflict.
It is most important in
25
30
10.
Larabie v. Cui
protect Ziven.
I do not accept this explanation.
I find that
10
20
30
11.
Larabie v. Cui
In the contractual relationship between the
parties, the plaintiff had a duty of care to the
parents not to make boundless complaints.
The
10
15
the parents.
20
the plaintiff.
25
The
12.
Larabie v. Cui
damages.
The defendants are a young couple in their early
30s who now have their second child.
Christopher is a business analyst.
Iris is a
10
He was very
20
underdeveloped.
25
30
At the time
She was
13.
Larabie v. Cui
totally shocked and taken by surprise.
guilty, tense and stressed.
She felt
The
10
high in sodium.
Iris had in the past suffered from depression.
She saw a psychiatrist as a result of this
episode.
15
milligrams of Zoloff.
milligrams.
20
30
emotionally as a result.
AG 0087 (rev.07-01)
14.
Larabie v. Cui
Counsel for the defendants, suggest damages in
the amount of $10,000 would be appropriate, 2,000
for the husband and 8,000 for the wife.
totally.
I agree
10
Im ready.
MR. JACQUESSON:
Im ready.
THE COURT:
Mr. Brown.
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
Id like to be...
15
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
All right.
MR. BROWN:
25
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
MR. JACQUESSON:
30
THE COURT:
minute...
AG 0087 (rev.07-01)
15.
Larabie v. Cui
MR. BROWN:
Honour.
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
10
claim?
MR. BROWN:
accepted.
15
20
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
Pardon?
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
Yes, yes...
THE COURT:
...obviously...
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
All right.
25
THE COURT:
Thats correct.
All right.
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
16.
Larabie v. Cui
accepted to...
THE COURT:
The
All right.
Your Honour...
10
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
I am relying on the
15
THE COURT:
decision?
20
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
25
was alleged.
30
So, I wont...
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
MR. BROWN:
THE COURT:
Mr. Jacquesson?
MR. JACQUESSON:
AG 0087 (rev.07-01)
17.
Larabie v. Cui
friend is asking for is quite excessive.
THE COURT:
MR. JACQUESSON:
THE COURT:
10
All right.
For purposes of
15
Im just going
25
$8,000.
There shall be pre-judgment interest from August
1, 2013 youll get copies of this, and postjudgment interest pursuant to the Courts of
30
Justice Act.
18.
Larabie v. Cui
judgment.
The defendant,
at $3,175.
Mr. Registrar, the first endorsement is one page
and the second endorsement goes on the second
page.
10
COURTROOM REGISTRAR:
THE COURT:
(Indecipherable).
15
20
25
30
AG 0087 (rev.07-01)
19.
Larabie v. Cui
Certification
FORM 2
Certificate of Transcript
Evidence Act, Subsection 5(2)
in
15
20
____________________________
Signature of an Authorized Person
Nancy Gabrielse
ACT 6272854394
For Videoplus Transcription
25
30
AG 0087 (rev.07-01)