Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2009-2010
Structural Testing
By
T. MUKAI
International Institute of
Seismology and Earthquake Engineering,
Building Research Institute
STRUCTURAL TESTING
by
Tomohisa MUKAI
( SRI)
o Dimensions and
L...At-J\J""'LvU
\JVIIIt-'lv~~IYv
~U"""II~UI
I""\.~
VI
vVllvl\;o\V"
Loading
The 50 tonf capacity loading machine for flexural test will be used. Antisymmetrical moment distribution will be represented by Ohno-type loading set up.
-1-
Measurement
Load, displacement, strains of steel bar and crack pattern will be measured.
Channel information is as follows,
CH.1 : Load (tf)
CH.2 & 3 : Displacement (mm)
CH.4 to 13 : Strain of longitudinal steel bar (micro=1 0. 6 )
CH.14 to 18 : Strain of shear reinforcement (micro=10 6 )
Material test
Yield strengths, tensile strengths, Young's moduli and stress - strain
relationships of steel bars and compressive strength, Young's modulus and stress strain relationship of concrete will be measured by material test, which will be
conducted before the structural test.
-2-
Specimen-A
06 @1 95
D1 0 @6 5
4 0
01 0 @6 5
o
o
i-
~ ~
II
M,_
r--
1/
I-- r- !- I--
Specimen-B
010 @6 5
/
~
"-- '
ML
,
I -
~L
I
ir-
I
"
'"
112 0
5 20
780
2 060
Test area
40
D10 @6 5
o
o
01 0 @6 5
7
tf-
---
f-
----'
Or
40
~l ll~)1
0
1_
520
\120 I
J:- ;
06
O~
:::..
J t r ai n g auq e
~ I 01 6
C\J 1
C\J I
6.
11
O !
I
r--1 r -
I--
0,V'-
4 0
!2 0 0 I
D16
01
390
910
Load ( P)
CII. I
Q Displacement
520
780
CII.2&3
\S 2 0
Test area ~
5
6
7
8
CH . 4 \~~~------------------------------------\7
,
t--
t---
f--
16
15
14
f--
f---
r--
10
11
18
17
r-
12
r--
~\
L
780
-J
~f--_
.=-_
-_
- _ --Te-s-t-ar-e-a--~
Fig. 3 Location of strain gauges
13
Report (Requirement)
~Fig.
~Fig.
4. Material Test
4.1 Concrete
4.2 Steel bars
5. Test Results
5.1 Failure pattern and Damage state
5.2 Shear force - deflection relationship
5.3 Strain distribution of longitudinal steel bar
5.4 Strain distribution of shear reinforcement bars
6. Comparison between Test Results and Prediction
-.j)
C~O(.V\
~I",.J )
.
~V-o
location relationship
location relationship
(Ptv \5)
7. Personal Impression
Participants should describe your personal impression individually.
-5-
->
I(dSwov
Calculation of Strengths
1. Dimensions
Dimensions and strengths of materials used in the calculation are as follows.
L
LID
M
P
V
MNd
cr B
reinforcement ( 26 cm)
distance from the centroid of the compressive resultant to the centroid
of the tensile resultant ( = (7/8) d = 22.25 cm)
distance between top and bottom bars in a beam ( 22 cm)
clear span of a beam ( 78 cm)
= length-depth ratio ( = 2.6 )
= moment ( = 15.6 P = 15.6x2.5V = 39 V (kgf . cm))
== Load (kgf)
shear force (kgf)
= shear span ratio ( = 1.5 )
concrete compressive strength ( 180 kgf/cm 2)
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
- 6-
M c = 1.8 f a B . ' Z c
1.8 f 180x3000 = 72449 kgf-cm 72.4 tf'cm
V c = M cI 39 = 1858 kgf = 86
P c = V c x2.5 4645 kgf = 4.65 tf
Following calculation is a case when the steel is taken into account.
<p = 12(1/3-g 1 +g 12)+12n'p t{(1-g 1-d t1) 2+(g 1-d c1) 2. y} = 1.52
'. 1+n' Pt(1.5+2y) =1 +11 . Pt(1.5+2y) =1.44
Ze= le/(O/2) = 1.44' 45000 I 15 = 4320cm 3
Mc=1.8(fal3)Zc
1.8 ( f 180) . 4320
= 107224 kgfcm = 104.33 tf'cm
V c = M cl 39 = 2.68 tf
P c V c x2.5 = 6.69 tf
= (0.043 +1.64
= (0.043 + 1.64
= 0.2988xO.7511
= 0.224
-7-
c = b .j .k
(500 +0 B) .
(V. c)
~.~~5+ 1.7
M 1 (V
=Vc +Vs
where, V c: shear strength provided by concrete
V s: shear strength provided by shear reinforcement
V c
= b . j {k u . k p (180 +0 B) .
d~
M 1 (V .0 2+ O. 12
Vu
=Vc +Vs =
(Specimen-A)
Vu (11.5tf) < V y (12.5tf)
~ Specimen-A will fail by shear before yielding of member.
(Specimen-B)
V u( 16.3 tf) > V y ( 12.5 tf )
~ Specimen-B will not fail by shear before yielding of member.
-8-
= b .j t . p
wy
v=
(for Specimen-B)
R p
0
0.025
v
cot<p
V u (tf)
0.61
1.361
23.1
0. 564
1.361
21.7
0 005
.
0.519
1.361
20.3
-9-
I 0.01
0.473
1.25
18.7
<
p)
~.015
0.427
1.0
16.9
0 02
.
0.381
1.0
16.9
(ACI318, Eq.11-2)
Vn
=V c +V 5
=A
'
y'
w'
(V u . d)1 M u)b
w'
(AC1318, Eq.11-5)
(AC1318, Eq.11-15)
dIs
..r f c
50.6 psi
P w (~ l lJi~A1i lt) = A 51 b w ' d = 3 . 1.991 (20 ' 26) = 0.0115
V u . dIM u 0.667
bw
20 I 2.54 7.874 in
26 I 2.54 10.236 in
d
{2' 0.320/6.45163 0.0992 in 2 (Specimen-A)
Av
2 . 0.713/6.45163 0.2210 in 2 (Specimen-B)
f y
3500 I 0.07031 49780 psi
= {19 .5/2.54 = 7.677 in (Specimen-A)
s
6.5 I 2.54 2.559 in
(Specimen-B)
=
=
=
=
- 10 -
(Specimen-A)
V s
= 0.0992 . 49780 . 10.236/7.677
= 6584 Ib = 6584x0.453592 kgf = 2987 kgf = 2.99 tf
(Specimen-B)
V
= 0.221 . 49780 . 10.236/2.559
= 44006 Ib
V s :-::;; 8 (.r f c) b w d = 32626 Ib
Then
V s = 32626x0.453592 kgf = 14799 kgf = 14.8 tf
5
V
u
(Specimen-A)
(Specimen-B)
Pu3=7.2*2.5=18.0tf (Specimen-A)
Pu3=19.0*2.5=47.5tf (Specimen-B)
(Specimen-A)
Vu (7.2tf) < V y(12.5tf)
- Specimen-A will fail by shear before yielding of member.
(Specimen-B)
Vu( 19.0tf) > V y(12.5tf)
- Specimen-B will not fail by shear before yielding of member.
a-2) Bond stress at large deflection after yielding when the hinge length elongate to
D
T (2
d b fla/ [ 4 (L-D) ]
= 1.6 . 2 . 3500 / [4 . (78-26) ]
- 11 -
= 53.8 kgf/cm 2
a-3) Bond stress required for truss mechanism
T I 3
b . P w a w y cot<pIL4J
= { 20 5.74 . 2.0 1(3 . 5)= ~5.3 kgf/cm 2 2 (Specimen-A)
(Specimen-B)
b) Bond strengt~O . 38.5 . 1.361 1(3 . 5)- 69.9 kgf/cm
T b u = Teo +T 1
=(OAb i+0.5)~aB+[(20/N t+5Nu/N l)p'wb~aB]/db
where,
Teo: bond splitting strength provided by concrete
T t: bond splitting strength provided by shear reinforcement
S
bi
Nt
Nu
b u
Since the bond stress requirement at member yielding is satisfied, though the
bond stress required for tress mechanism is not satisfied, Specimen-B will exhibit
member yielding. However, since the bond stress requirement at large deflection
after yielding when the hinge length elongate to D are not satisfied, Specimen-B will
fail by bond splitting after yielding of member.
kgfcm
Flexural cracking
V c =1.9tf
(5 c
0.082 mm
Member yielding
V y
12.5tf
(5 y
=2.47 mm
Shear Cracking
V
6.3 tf .
5
Shear strength
< Specimen-A>
V u(Arakawa's equation) = 11.5 tf
V u(AIJ Guidelines)
9.6 tf (without planning of yield hinge)
V u(ACI Building Code) = 7.2 tf
- Specimen-A will fail ~y shear before yielding of member.
=16.2 tf
=23.1 ,tf (without planning of yield hinge)
=16.9 tf (with planning of yield hinge: R
=19.0 tf
> 0.025)
=
=
- 13 -
T r
15.3 kgf/cm
69.9 kgf/cm
2
2
(Specimen-A)
(Specimen-B)
Bond strength
{
{
26.0 kgf/cm 2
(Specimen-A)
39.1 kgf/cm 2
(Specimen-B)
8.6 tt (Specimen-A)
12.9 tt (Specimen-B)
Specimen-B
At beginning of the loading, initial stiffness (S) will be 6.89><10 8 kgf-cm.
First flexural crack will initiate at V= 1.9 tt, (5= 0.082 mm.
First shear Crack will initiate at V= 6.3 tt.
Since the predicted shear force at member yielding, V=12.5 tt, is smaller than
predicted shear force when the shear failure occur, V=16.2 tt by Arakawa's equation,
V=23.1 tt and 16.9 tt by AIJ Guidelines without and with planning of yield hinge (at
Rp > 0.025), respectively, and V=19.0 tt by ACI Building Code, and also since the
bond stress requirement at member yielding is satisfied, flexural yielding will be
exhibited at V=12.5 tt, (5=2.47 mm.
However, since the bond stress requirement at large deflection after yielding
when the hinge length elongate to D are not satisfied, Specimen-B will fail by bond
splitting after yielding of member.
Then, Specimen-B is predicted as to fail by bond splitting after yielding of
member. Shear failure will not be occurred even in the large deflection state after
yielding of member.
- 14-
[p(tfJJ
V(t{)
[37.5J
15.0
I Yielding I
[31.3tf!
12.5tf
S.bSl~r.Jllill~~~tY..Qf..s.I>~f.imSlg_~_.(A).
[25J
10.0
I Shear Cracking I
6.33tf [15.8tfl(Arakawa's Eq.)
......
VI
f12.5J
5.0
[4.8tfl
'"
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
,,
,,
,
,,
S.bSl~r.J:lill~~~tY ..Qf..s.I>_~f.imSlg_~_.m).
, .'
1?.9.ni.S.p'l}..Hin..K.S.tr..~J).,g,1;b_(._:r_.~.\l.2
. I
Specimen - (A)
r b u = 26.0kgflcm 2
Specimen - (B)
r b u = 39.1kgflcm 2
~ Flexural Cracking
~..........--
1.9tf
,,~
,/
w\",OS
S
0.082 nan
,/
1.0
2.0
2.47 mm
>r
>r
at member yielding
3.0
= 15.3kgflcm 2
35.9kgflcm2
4.0
8 (mm)