Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In June last under the bold command of the present Army Chief a full
scale military offensive had been launched against the Taliban which is
successfully gaining ground. But internally the government appeared to
be as complacent as it had always been. For instance, on 18th January
2014, the Interior minister announced with much fanfare the
establishment of National Counter-terrorism Authority (NACTA), with an
ambitious plan to create a joint Directorate of 26 intelligence agencies
for enhancing the law enforcement, but nothing was ever heard about it
later. Even after lapse of a full one year, NACTA only exists on paper, and
is functionally dead. Besides, all terrorist organizations earlier banned by
the government are still operating openly and with impunity with
different names but under the same leaders which did not bother the
government. In most cases the ruling party itself freely gave party tickets
to the leaders and the activists of these out-lawed organizations and also
ensured their success in the last general election, some of whom adore
the benches in the Parliament. Thus it would not be wrong to say that
the government was following a policy of appeasement towards Taliban
bordering on hypocrisy. Publically they were debunked but inwardly they
were protected and even patronized. The policy against terrorism was
also ambivalent. The government patronized the terrorist organizations
with anti-Indian bias, but remained aloof and detached from those
responsible for insurrection in the Fata areas. There too, distinction
between good and bad Taliban existed for a long time till that distinction
was done away recently. The logic of keeping and later doing away that
distinction is not yet clear. The pro-Taliban terrorists formed the major
bulk of our religious parties and sectarian organizations which mixed and
mingled with our common people, who came to accept the Taliban cult
as a way of life for good or for bad. A survey carried out by 2014 Global
Attitudes of Washington based Pew Research Centre shows that 59% of
those questioned in Pakistan rejected the TTP but 33% were indifferent
towards the terrorist outfit. The result is that a startling 60 million
Pakistanis did not have any problem with the extremist worldview of the
Taliban.
one table under one roof. The presence of General Raheel Sharif proved
a great cementing bond. Without him this unity was hard to obtain,
because some of our pro-Taliban religious parties could not muster
courage to articulate their traditional stands vis--vis Taliban in view of
the solemnity of the occasion. Resultantly a full unanimity was achieved
on 20-point National Action Plan, a rare feat demonstrated in recent
times. This unanimity may prove to be tenuous in future, with Imran
Khan wriggling out of it if his demands are not met in the on-going
parleys with the government.
There is no doubt that this National Action Plan has been devised with
great care after fully reviewing the prevalent realities. Steps like
execution of convicted terrorists, creation of military courts, deployment
of a special counter-terrorism force, formulation of a comprehensive
policy to deal with Afghan refugees and settlement of IDPs with ban
against glorification of terrorist organizations etc. have been much
debated in the press. The public may have divided opinion on most of
these points, but it is generally agreed that the Plan must be
implemented in the larger interest of the nation. Now the real test of
Nawaz government would be in its will and seriousness to implement
this Plan. The past record of the government however does not bode well
for the future.
Even a bigger challenge awaits the Nawaz regime. For many months and
years, pledges had been made to crack down on violent Islamists with
Taliban leanings, but nothing concrete was ever done. As said earlier, it
had been a policy of appeasement towards parties overtly or covertly
In this context, one cannot overlook the question of religion which is the
core issue in our war against the Taliban, and which has been made to
instigate a mischief against the State dubbing it as un-Islamic. In the first
place, the Founder of this Nation never intended it to be a theocratic
state, and wanted it to retain a secular image where all citizens,
irrespective of their faiths, should have equal rights and duties toward
the state (reference Quaids speech of 11th August 1948). If, however,
Islam was later declared as the state religion, then proper safeguards
were provided in the constitution and the apex court was given powers
to strike down any law found repugnant to the Quran and Sunnah.
Besides a Council of Islamic Ideology was also set up to tender advice in
religious matters. If despite all this some section of people still wanted
to impose their own brand of Islam with force to disrupt the state
structure, that section must be crushed with the full might of the state.
And the people having leanings towards Taliban must bear this fact in
mind that Pakistan is as good an Islamic state in the present-day world
as any other state could be. The difference, if any is not in the state-craft,
but in the individuals own willingness to follow the pristine teachings of
Islam.
into the mainstream of the ordinary laws of the land (of course with
necessary and temporary exceptions) so that when their areas are
cleansed of the terrorist elements after military operation, their further
development could be possible alongside the rest of the country. This
would be even essential from defense and administrative point of view
to check future influx of foreign elements from creating the same
situation which had brought the country to this pass. Without these
measures the entire crusade against terrorism would come to naught.