Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chapter 1: Introduction
Background
According to the United States Census, in 2006 there were 5.8 million
stay-at-home parents. Of that number, 5.6 million were mothers (PalladinoSchultheiss, 2009, p. 25). As the percentage of women in the workforce
continues to grow, there are still many women who opt out of careers in
order to be full time mothers. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in
2011 70.6 percent of women with children less than eighteen years of age
were in the workforce (Solis & Galvin, 2012, p. 35). This is compared to 93.5
percent of men with children less than eighteen years of age. This gap is
even larger between men and women when children are less than six years
old. These statistics show that there is a large percentage of womennearly
womans experience will be exactly the same as another. Using a case study
approach to looking at identity, I will do greater justice to the women I
interview as I will be better able to describe their experiences and decisionmaking processes, given the identity pieces that make each woman unique.
Significance
This research has particular significance in two ways. First, it suggests
a need for more flexible and inclusive workplace policies. When women are
faced with the choice of whether or not to leave their careers, they begin to
question whether or not their workplace is inclusive of their dual identities as
worker and as mother. If the workplace is not particularly flexible, they are
more likely to make the decision to leave career. The review of the literature
and proposed research look into how women make these decisions, including
how workplace policies may impact their decision. If we had more inclusive
workplace policies that allowed women to work and mother, the need for this
research would be lower.
Secondly, this research has implications for career counselors working
with young women in college or high school settings. Many of the factors
women consider when making the decision to leave work for motherhood,
including information they have gathered about what it stereotypically
appropriate for a woman given her gender. For career counselors it is
important to ensure that ones own biases regarding gender appropriateness
are kept to oneself. This being said, a career counselor should be aware of
the potential struggles women might face and the possible decision-making
process that may ensue if she chooses a career or employer that is not
accepting of this dual identity.
assume that there is a similar, but different process for those women versus
the women from whom data is gathered in the present study.
A third and final limitation to this research is the generalizability of the
study to the greater population of mothers. As stated, this study uses a
multiple case-study approach, which means the data will delve deep into
womens individual experiences. Because of this we cannot be sure that the
data collected and patterns identified can be applied to all women currently
in the workforce who are in the process of making the decision to leave
career for motherhood. Additionally, other identities (e.g. race, sexual
orientation, ability, etc.) aside from female and woman identities were not
controlled for or included intentionally as part of the analysis. In examining
individual data, there may be some small noticeable patterns as a result of
other identities; however, they are not part of the greater analysis. Again,
this is another area for future research.
whether or not to leave career for motherhood, women are choosing one of
these patterns. Multitrack is becoming the most desirable option, but many
women still choose a unitrack or sequential pattern given the pressures on
women to successfully have it all.
Having it All
Todays women hold a split dream, which encompasses a desire for
both career and family. According to Farber (1996), women wanting it all
has puzzled career theorists as it was thought that career and homemaking
were distinct orientations that could not coexist (p. 330). This theoretical
assumption comes out of the fact that maternal and work identities, as
constructed in our culture, are dialectic (Johnston and Swanson, 2007, p.
449). Not only are these patterns separate, they are divided along gendered
lines. According to Palladino-Schultheiss (2009), conventional gendered
definitions of work reflect a split[that renders] invisible alternative
definitions of work (p. 30). The jobs of motherhood and employment are
performed in separate contexts.
United States culture is set up in such a way that keeps these two
realms divided. Despite this, women evaluate the combination of
wife/mother/career as the most attractive role option according to Bridges
(1987) (Hoffnung, 2004, p. 711). Even with the overlap in roles, women
pursuing a career still want the time and flexibility to satisfy family needs
and they want to be the one to pick their child up from school if they are sick
(Crowley & Kolenikov, 2014, p. 186). This is not too much for women to ask
for, but given the gendered nature of work and of mothering, women are
faced with balancing their multiple roles and fulfilling all of them successfully
as specified by the cultural script.
Overall, young women are willing to delay starting a family in order to
pursue a career, however they are still very committed to having one
(Hoffnung, 2004). Balancing these competing desires can be trying.
Hoffnung (2004) identifies four components that affect whether or not one
can be successful in balancing career and family. The first component
centers on the type of career women choose. For example, if a career is
more flexible, balancing career and family may be easier. In fact, Hoffnung
(2004) found that the historically common solution to balancing work and
family was to choose a female-dominated profession that tends to allow
more integration of mothering responsibilities.
The second component is marriagewhether and when women marry
and what division of labor looks like in the household. The third component
is motherhoodhow many children women have. Finally, the fourth
component is attitude, which includes individual opinions about womens role
within the household, work, or marriage. If a woman has more traditional
views that include staying home and caring for children, she is less likely to
be successful in balancing career and family. Balancing work and family
responsibilitiesremains a challenge and still poses a barrier for women
(Landivar, 2014, p. 213), however according to Perrone-McGovern (2012),
the boundary between worker and mother identities is becoming more
permeable and fluid.
Expectations
10
The cultural script in the United States has changed from the selfless
mother of the past, to the superwoman of the present (Farber, 1996, p.
331). This alludes to the number of roles and responsibilities women are
expected to successfully fulfill. Women are expected to by everything to
everyone. At the same time, the older cultural script, as described by
Johnston and Swanson (2007), enforces expectations that make women
responsible for childcare. Not only are they responsible for child care, it is an
expectation that decisions made by a mother should be appropriate and
responsible given the needs of children and family. Johnston and Swanson
(2007) call these intensive mothering expectations and argue that they
position mothers as the sole source of child guidance, nurturance,
education, and physical emotional sustenance (p. 448).
These expectations make it difficult for women to successfully manage
both career and family because they are pulled in opposite directions.
Mothers are also forced to justify their desire to work. Johnston and Swanson
(2007) cite that many women feel the only way they can justify their desire
to work is by describing it as a financial need. Feeling pressure to justify
actions this way continues to belittle a womens right to work and mother
even in a time when women are accepted and successful in the workplace.
Palladino-Schultheiss (2009) describes the history of the gendered nature of
career and family by saying the womens movement gained momentum
through transformations of the feminine into male-dominated hierarchies
rather than through struggles to have womens experiences validated (p.
11
27). This speaks to the fact that women can work in a career and in the
home, so long as they are not letting their womanly responsibilities faulter.
This circles back to the concept of having it all and balancing career
and family. The demands of external reality often cause women to adjust
their career expectations to provide a compatible match with marriage and
family responsibilities (Whitmarsh et al., 2007, p. 231). Adjusting career
expectations can look a multitude of ways, including taking an extended
leave, reducing hours, or switching to a career that can better accommodate
the demands family puts on mothers. Ferber and Green (2003) echo that it
is extremely difficult for women to balance career and family and argue that
there is great concern about the problems women encounter combining
career and family, in part because of the difficulties in doing justice to both,
and in part because of the strains on the individuals who do combine both
(p. 143).
Women know that combining career and motherhood is extremely
difficult, but in many cases they continue to attempt it. Making the decision
to leave career for family could have many career-related risks for women.
When in the decision-making process, women consider a variety of factors,
including career risks. The following addresses those factors and risks.
Factors in the Decision-Making Process
Though researchers do not know much about how mothers navigate
the decision-making process when deciding to leave their career for family,
they do know that women must consider a variety of factors in order to make
a decision. Some of these factors include perceived career harm, societal
12
13
estimated that the wage penalty is approximately seven percent per child
(Crowley and Kolenikov, 2014, p. 170).
If women perceive greater career harm, they are less likely to fully exit
the workforce for motherhood. This is especially true if they have high
career salience. When a career has less personal meaning to a mother, they
are more likely to leave their career in lieu of motherhood (Raskin, 2006).
These potential risks to career can be controlled if there is greater flexibility
in the workplace that allows for work and mothering to coexist.
Value Orientation
Perrone-McGovern (2012) identified four societal value orientations
that impact workplace culture and individual values, which in turn impact
mothers decision-making process. The first of the four orientations is
individualism versus collectivism, which impacts whether or not a workplace
or individual is supportive of community. When it comes to motherhood,
workplaces with a collectivist view are more supportive of a woman and her
multiple roles. If this were the case, she would be less likely to leave her
career.
The second is humane orientation, which is the degree to which a
society values kindness and generosity. In this orientation as it relates to
work and motherhood, an employer that holds a strong humane orientation
would have workplace policies in place that allows women to navigate both
mothering and work roles.
The third orientation is specificity versus diffusion is the degree to
which social constructs are viewed as separate or as one. In a diffuse
society, like the United States, roles are compartmentalized. In this case,
14
mother and worker identities are seen as separate and are difficult to
combine.
The final orientation is gender egalitarianism, which focuses on the
minimization of differences between genders. In the United States, there are
very clear gender roles. This is particularly true when it comes mothering.
Women are responsible for rearing children regardless of whether or not the
work, as described early in this review of the literature.
Relationships
Relationships are the final primary factors women consider when
making the decision to leave career for motherhood. Motulsky (2014)
argued, career decision making has traditionally been viewed as primarily
an individual, objective, and rational process, (p. 1083), but other research
has shown that parents, partners, friends, colleagues, and supervisors
greatly impact the decision-making process. Palladino-Schultheiss (2009)
wrote:
Motherhood may be the most controversial career a woman can have
women who make [the choice to leave career] are often greeted with
surprise, disapproval, and a lack of understandingnot only from
coworkers, colleagues, and supervisors, but also from family and
friends. Discourse on motherhood is wrought with images of women
throwing away their career or wasting their well-deserved and wellearned education (p.29).
As is evident in Motulsky (2014) and Palladino-Schultheiss (2009) research,
relationships impact the decision-making process regardless of the context or
type of the relationship. Jacobsen (1999) argued, disapproval from others as
well as a struggle with ones self, comes from values and worldviews from
15
family of originabout what [is] possible, good, or desired on career and life
choices (Motulsky, 2014, 1091). Regardless of whether or not others
opinions are expressed to mothers, mothers are constantly thinking about
what others will think of their decision to leave career.
Theoretical Orientation
Many theories can be used to analyze the decision-making process
women go through. In reviewing the literature, a relational cultural
perspective is the most used theoretical orientation. This perspective is used
because a relational approach to career developmentdescribes the
interaction between career and other life roles within the larger societal
context (Perrone-McGovern, 2012, p. 21). A relational approach focuses on
a womans interactions with the world because as Blustein (2004) puts it,
women do not make career decisions in a relational vacuum (Motulsky,
2014, p. 1080).
For the purposes of combining the decision-making process, meaningmaking, and identity as they relate to women leaving careers for family,
Baxter-Magoldas Theory of Self Authorship is used to frame the proposed
research. Self-Authorship is defined by Baxter-Magolda (2008) as the
internal capacity to coordinate, integrate, act upon, or invent values,
beliefs, convictions, generalizations, ideals, abstractions, interpersonal
loyalties, and interpersonal states (p. 270). At the most basic level, selfauthorship focuses on learning how to negotiate and act on our own
purposesrather than those we have uncritically assimilated from others
(Baxter-Magolda, 2008, p. 270). This is crucial not only to the decision-
16
17
18
19
20
Chapter 3: Methods
Participants
In the present study, the population studied are mothers who left their
careers when they either 1) found out they were pregnant or 2) planned on
becoming pregnant in the near future. The goal is to have a sample of
approximately fifteen to twenty. The women in this study will be postchildbirth, with children ranging from newborns to eighteen. Women can be
any number of ages, but the preference is for them to be between the ages
of 18 and 50. Women may have returned to their careers by the time they
are interviewed for this study. For this particular study, women should be in
21
22
23
24
researcher will generate questions for the second interview after the first
interview.
The third interview will take place after all first and second interviews
have taken place with all 15-20 participants. The third interview may be
several months after the first interview depending on how quickly
participants are solicited and interviewed. Between the second and third
interviews, data will be analyzed using a constant comparative analysis in
order to determine potential themes and steps to womens decision-making
process.
The third interview is focused on controlling for descriptive and
interpretive validity through participant feedback. During the third interview,
the researcher will inform the participant of their discovered themes and ask
participants to discuss how they think those findings match up with their
lived experiences. This helps ensure validity because the researcher is being
careful not to publish results that are out of line with what is really going on
in womens lives. Once third interviews have taken place, the researcher will
recode the data inclusive of the third interview as well as reevaluate the
themes that may not fit with the participants lived experiences.
Analysis
Demographic information collected from the participants at the
beginning of the study will be collected and represented by a chart in the
results section of the paper for reference by readers of the study. The
researcher will use constant comparative analysis to review the
transcriptions and notes from the interviews. In coding the data, the
researcher will pay the closest amount of attention to: behaviors, definition
25
References
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2008). Three elements of self-authorship. Journal of
College Student Development, 49(4), 269-284.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2009). The activity of meaning making: A holistic
perspective on college student development. Journal of College Student
Development Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 621-639.
Creamer, E. G. & Laughlin, A. (2005). Self-authorship and women's career
decision making. Journal of College Student Development, 46(1), 13-27.
Crowley, J. E. & Kolenikov, S. (2014). Flexible work options and mothers'
perceptions of career harm. The Sociological Quarterly, 55(1), 168-195.
26
Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., Guido, F., Patton, L., & Renn, K. (2010). Student
development in college: Theory, research, and practice (2nd Edition). San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Farber, R. S. (1996). An integrated perspective on women's career
development within a family. American Journal of Family Therapy, 24(4),
329-42.
Ferber, M. A. & Green, C. A. (2003). Career or family: What choices do college
women have? Journal of Labor Research, 24(1), 144-151.
Hoffnung, M. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during
college-education women's 20s. Sex Roles, 50(9/10)
Johnston, D. & Swanson, D. (2007). Cognitive acrobatics in the construction
of worker-mother identity. Sex Roles, 57(5-6), 5-6.
Kahn, J. R., Garcia-Manglano, J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2014). The motherhood
penalty at midlife: Long-term effects of children on women's careers.
Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 56-72.
Landivar, L. C. (2014). Opting out, scaling back, or business-as-usual: An
occupational assessment of women's employment. Sociological Forum,
29(1), 189-214.
Motulsky, S. L. (2010). Relational processes in career transition: Extending
theory, research, and practice. Counseling Psychologist, 38(8), 10781114.
Palladino-Schultheiss, D. E. (2009). To mother or matter: Can women do
both? Journal of Career Development, 36(1), 25-48.
Perrone-McGovern, K. M., Wright, S. L., Howell, D. S., & Barnum, E. L. (2014).
Contextual influences on work and family roles: Gender, culture, and
socioeconomic factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(1), 21-28.
Raskin, P. (2006). Women, work, and family. American Behavioral Scientist,
49(10), 1354-1381.
27
Appendix A
Protocol Questions and Rationale for Interview One:
Questions Aligned with Research Q1:
Question
When did you begin to think about
and start planning how your career
and motherhood would combine?
Rationale
The goal of this question is to get a
sense of how long the decisionmaking process takes and to discover
whether or not there are patterns
that emerge among the women being
interviewed. Follow up questions
might be related to: What was going
on for you at that time? (eg. Were
you in school at the time?), What was
the catalyst that began the decisionmaking process?
The goal of this question to learn
more about the key figures in female
lives in addition to how social media,
historical trends, and stereotypes
impact how women perceive
themselves and motherhood. The
hope is to identify trends that emerge
28
among the women as I interview.
This question builds on the former.
The goal of this question is to gain a
deeper understanding of the
messages women are receiving,
understand how they interpret them,
and finally how that shapes their
opinions on career and motherhood.
Follow up questions may include: Do
you think you consciously absorbed
that information? Did you agree with
the messages you were receiving at
the time?
This question strives to fill in any
gaps that are left after the last two
questions are asked. The goal of this
question is to understand the
conscious factors and options women
weigh as they make the decision to
leave career for motherhood. Follow
up questions may include: Were there
certain factors that weighed more
than others? How did you know
these were the important factors to
weigh?
The goal of this question is to identify
the key element that triggered a
decision to be made. This question
relates to the crisis stage in many
identity development models that
suggests there is some sort of event
that causes an immediate change in
thought or action. An important
follow up question could be: When
did this pivotal moment occur? (eg.
Before pregnancy, during pregnancy,
after birth)
The goal of this question is to get a
sense of how decisions change across
time. This is especially important if
29
the woman started thinking about
career and family at a young age.
This will also speak to how others
influenced the decision-making
process. This will give insight into a
key element of decision-making. I
would also be curious how her
identity shifted if she changed her
mind over the course of the lifetime.
Follow up questions would include:
How do you feel about having to
change your decision?
Question
1.) How did your career identity
impact your decision to leave
work to pursue motherhood?
Rationale
The goal of this question is to
examine how a womans career
identity and self-perception changes
over time as her social identity shifts
from career to family. This question
advances the conversation into
identity and how one tells their story.
It will be important to observe
reactions (positive, negative, or
neutral) related to how they feel
about their shift in identity. Follow up
questions may include: What
identities were salient to you before
you had a child? During? After?
The goal of this question is to elicit
reflection from the participant. At
this point, the individual has gone
through the decision-making process
and can reflect on how their feelings
about career and motherhood have
shifted over the course of their life. I
would also ask the question: Do you
think you made the right decision in
30
leaving your career to raise a family?
Do you wish you made a different
decision? Finally I would want to
know how these feelings impact how
they identify as women now that they
are mothers.