Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
R.W. Sourer
The Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46206, U.S.A.
Summary
Separations of twelve different racemic amines were
studied by high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPL C) in several column-solvent combinations.
Relative retentions, which show some dependence
upon the substitution at the asymmetric centers, are
reported for the amines which were examined as the
(+)- 10-camphorsulfonamides.
Sample Preparation
All amines (except for 1-methyl-2-phenoxyethylamine,
which was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co.,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin) were obtained in-house and were
used without further purification. Some amines were
obtained as salts which were treated with excess sodium
hydroxide, extracted with ethyl ether, and dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate. No evidence of decomposition
was noted for any of the samples, even after 2 weeks
storage at room temperature. The (+)-10-camphorsulfonyl
chloride was prepared on a 0.06 mole scale using the
procedure of Bartlett and Knox [10]. The crude product
demonstrated the correct NMR spectrum and was dried
in vacuo over P2 os until use. (+)-10-Camphorsulfonamides of the amines were prepared by the procedure of
Furukawa [5] using 0.001 moles of amine and 0.001
moles of crude (+)-10-camphorsulfonyl chloride in
diethyl ether (10 cm 3). The aqueous-ether mixtures were
stirred vigorously at room temperature for one hour,
were then acidified with 1 mole dm -a HCI, and were
finally extracted with ether and dried over anhydrous
sodium sulfate. The crude camphorsulfonamides were
used "as is" after evaporation under dry nitrogen to
volumes of 5 cm 3 .
Analytical Procedure
A Varian 8520 liquid chromatograph with a Variscan
variable wavelength detector operating at 254 nm was
used for all measurements. The column was a Varian
Micropak-NH2-10/~ (25 cm X 0.2 cm id). Solvent
systems, which are described with the data, were
prepared from distilled-inglass or spectroscopically pure
solvents. The flow rates and approximate operating
pressures are described with the experimental results.
Tile size of injections was 5 m m 3 .
Results
Data for amide separations are reported in Table I. The
degree of separation is reported in each case as a (uncorrected). For the ~t-methylbenzylamine, a sample
enriched in one isomer was used for all experiments to
facilitate peak identification. All separations were
achieved in 10 minutes or less. A typical chromatogram
is shown in Fig. 1.
Short Communications
635
I
5
MINUTES
o'
10
Fig. 1
9 HPLCseparation of (+-)-m-methoxy-~-methylbenzylamineas
a-methylbenzyl
p-methoxy-a-methylbenzyl
m-methoxy-c~-methylbenzyl
o-methoxy-c~-methylbenzyl
a-methylphenethyl
o-methyl-~-methylphenethyl
p-methoxy-~-methylphenethyl
p-chloro-c~-methylphenethyl
3,4-methylenedioxy-~-methylphenethyl
~ethylphenethyl
1-methyl-3-phenylpropyl
1-methyl-2-phenoxyethyl
(a)
1.60
1.54
1.00
1.31
1.24
1.19
1.22
1.25
1.24
1.12
1.13
(b)
1.56
1.56
1.71
1.28
1.04
1.00
1.00
1.08
1.07
1.00
1.08
No separations
(c)
1.59
1.00
1.73
1.13
1.10
1.05
1.03
1.15
1.12
1.00
1.05
Discussion
Structures of the amines examined as (+)-lO-camphorsulfonomides by HPLC are shown in Fig. 2. Group A
includes the ~-methylbenzylamines, Group B the
amphetamines, and Group C some substituted related
anaines.
Three different solvent systems were evaluated with the
Micropak-NH2 column, and in all cases the largest a
values were obtained with the a-methylbenzylamine
compounds. Excellent separations of a-methylbenzylamine enantiomers have been observed by gas chromato-
ICH3
CH3
H
net~ylbenzylaratne
H
tx methvlphenelh~lamme
.iCH2CH3
H
a elhyIphenelhylamme
,c.~
~,.3
H
p methoxy c( methylbonzylamlne
CH3
H
o melhyI r rnethylphenethylarnme
.c.,
I melhu 3 phenylp~0pylamme
CH30--<~CH~--'Cm--N H2
/ H
OCH~
m melh~xy c( melhyIbenlylamm~
H
H
p melho~V a methylphenethyl3mlne t.melhyI 2 phenoxyelhylamlne
~
H 2 C--NH~
H
p chloto a rnethvlphenethylamme
CI-~C
0CFI~
0 melhoxvot n~elhylbenzylarmne
0~ . D - ~
CHe--'~IE--N
H
H3 H2
GROUP B
GROUPC
Fig. 2
Chromatographia,
Vol. 9, No. 12, December 1976
Acknowledgement
[4]
[51
[61
Literature
171
[11
[8]
191
[10]
{ 111
Short Communications
637