Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
00394109/00 $8.00
+ .OO
AMPULLA OF VATER
Anatomic, Embryologic, and Surgical Aspects
Claude Avisse, MD, Jean-Bernard Flament, MD,
and Jean-Franqois Delattre, MD
The ampulla of Vater (i.e., the hepatopancreatic ampulla) corresponds anatomically with the dilated junction of the common bile duct and the main
pancreatic duct of Wirsung before their opening into the duodenum. This ampullary appearance is inconstant, and its existence is disputed by some investigators.
Considered more widely and realistically from the surgical viewpoint, the
ampulla of Vater constitutes the junction of the biliary, pancreatic, and digestive
tracts (Fig. 1).It corresponds to an anatomic and functional region that comprises
(1)the junction of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct; (2) surrounded by
the sphincteric system of Oddi; (3) traversing a dehiscence of the duodenal wall
(fenestra choledochae); and (4) terminating at the greater duodenal papilla (or
great caruncle), covered by the duodenal mucosa. The ampulla of Vater is the
site of tumors, often with a threatening prognosis and the surgical treatment of
which may be consequently difficult. It is also commonly the site of disorders
specific to or caused by the neighboring organs that affect biliopancreatic emptying. The understanding of these disorders has benefited from peroperative
manometric studies and from endoscopy. Numerous anatomic, embryologic,
pathophysiologic, and pathologic studies of the ampulla of Vater have been
performed. This article reviews only important and practical points of these studies.
CHOLEDOCHOPANCREATIC JUNCTION
The junction of the main pancreatic duct and the common bile duct and
their opening at the greater duodenal papilla (Fig. 2) occurs in three ways6: (1)
201
202
AVISSE et a1
Figure 1. Junction of the biliaty, pancreatic, and digestive tracts (peroperative cholangiogram).
a common duct, 1 mm to 8 mm in length, in 60% of cases; (2) a doublebarreled opening at the apex of the papilla in 38% of cases; and (3) separate
duodenal openings for the two canals in 2% of cases. In 1720, Vater6 noted this
junctional arrangement of the bile and pancreatic ducts; after having ligated the
papillary orifice and injecting water into the common bile duct, he noted a reflux
of fluid into the duct of Wirsung, which became expanded at the duodenal wall
as a tubercle, which he called the diverticulum of the bile. The studies of Soemmering6in 1801 and of Bernard6in 1856 established this concept of a common duct
dilated into an ampulla, the so-called ampulla of Vater. Of 50 anatomic specimens
studied, Papalmitiades and Rettori7found such a common duct in only 31 cases
(62%), and observed a dilatation of this common duct, justifying the term ampulla
in only 2 cases (4%), so the existence of this structure is disputed, and many
investigators consider it as merely an artifact of anatomic dissection.
The site of duodenal implantation of this ductal junction and the association
of the main pancreatic duct of Wirsung with the common bile duct are important
to consider. In 75% of cases, the greater duodenal papilla, with the two ducts, is
implanted in the descending portion of the duodenum (see Fig. 2) at the junction
of its posterior and medial aspects, high up but usually at its midportion. The
terminal pancreatic duct is always inferior and anterior to the common bile duct
(Fig. 3A). In 25% of cases, the implantation of the greater duodenal papilla is
low, especially at the horizontal portion of the duodenum (Fig. 3B), to the right
of the superior mesenteric vascular axis; the pancreatic duct is verticalized
parallel to the left border of the common bile duct (Fig. 4).
For surgeons, the high position of the papilla can be appreciated on intraop-
AMPULLA OF VATER
203
204
AVISSE et a1
TOP
LEFT
Figure 3. Implantation of the ductal junction and relation of the main pancreatic duct (P) to
the common bile duct (C) through the papilla in the descending portion (A) and in the
horizontal portion of the duodenum (B). Incision for sphincterotomy (arrow).
erative cholangiography. With the duodenum closed, the precise location of the
position of the papilla calls for the insertion of a probe into the common bile
duct, palpated through the duodenal wall. Duodenopancreatic stripping (i.e.,
the Kocher maneuver) makes the biliary-digestive confluence, normally situated
deeply in the subhepatic region, superficial and easily palpable.
Figure 4. Greater duodenal papilla in the horizontal portion of the duodenum. The pancreatic duct is verticalized, parallel to the left border of the common bile duct.
AMPULLA OF VATER
205
The existence of a sphincter at the termination of the common bile duct was
demonstrated by Oddi in 1887 as a smooth muscle sphincter, causing the passage
of the bile to be intermittent. The anatomic and embryologic research of
Schwegler and Boyden12 and Rettori9 indicated the independent origin of the
sphincter in association with the duodenal musculature. Schwegler and BoydenI2
showed that this muscular system differentiates separately from the duodenal
muscle in the mesenchyme that surrounds the ducts and that it becomes integrated with the duodenal wall only secondarily.
According to Papalmitiades and R e t t ~ r i the
, ~ three elements constituting
this sphincteric system are (Fig. 5A):
A common sphincter-6 mm in length, composed of thick, circular, semicircular, and longitudinal fibers and interspersed with numerous glands
that are the origin of potentially malignant vaterian tumors
A specific common bile duct sphincter-10 mm in length, one third of
which is outside of the duodenal wall, intraluminal
A specific sphincter of the pancreatic duct-6 mm in length, of which
only one fourth is extramural
According to Barraya et a1,2 these sphincters can be divided into three zones
(Fig. 5B): (1) a superior occlusive sphincter; ( 2 ) a middle sphincter defining an
infundibulum, which can be easily dilated; and (3) an inferior sphincter, which
participates in the formation of the papilla. This sphincteric complex is situated
in a dehiscence of the duodenal wall, the duodenal window.
From these concepts can be derived the existence of an extramural, intraduodenal, or intraluminal zone of the sphincter, which alone should be involved in
a possible sphincterotomy.
206
AVISSE et a1
DUODENAL WINDOW
Classic descriptions of the duodenal window show the presence of an
interruption of the duodenal muscle fibers at the point of penetration of the
common bile duct and the main pancreatic duct into the duodenal wall. The
muscular orifice that Schwegler and BoydenI2called the duodenal window (fenestra
choledochae) was described in detail by Papalmitiades and R e t t ~ r iThe
. ~ duodenal
window is a quadrilateral orifice, typically with sides of 5 mm to 7 mm. Its
anterior and posterior borders correspond with the spindle-shaped separation
of the superficially situated longitudinal muscle fibers of the duodenal wall. Its
superior and inferior borders correspond with a separation of the deeply situated
circular fibers. The window is situated on the posterior slope of the medial
border of the duodenum, and its margins are united with the sphincteric block
by a system of muscle fibers, the nomenclature and description of which vary
among investigators. The duodenal wall surrounding the sphincteric apparatus
must be respected" 6, during sphincterotomies and localized excisions of the
papilla; a procedure that is too extensive risks opening the digestive lumen into
the pericholedochal and retropancreatic cellular spaces and may cause severe
vascular damage, so, except for carcinologic imperatives, the excision of tumors
of the ampulla of Vater often requires a sacrifice: cephalic duodenopancreatectomy.
The association of the ductal termination with the duodenal wall (see Figs.
2 and 4) is important surgically and functionally.10The common bile duct
approaches the duodenal wall, forming an acute angle of approximately 25" to
309 open upward when the papilla is located in the descending duodenum. The
terminal intraparietal part of the duct has a zigzag course between the duodenal
muscle fibers, which prevents reflux of the duodenal contents toward the biliary
tract regardless of the variations of intraduodenal pressure.
The main pancreatic duct, closer to horizontal, forms an angle of 60" with
the duodenal wall in the frontal plane. It receives the common bile duct at its
upper border and right side. In practice, the pancreatic duct is always situated
below and in front of the common bile duct.
Muscle fibers (Fig. 6) coming from the margins of the duodenal window
tether the termination of the biliary and pancreatic ducts to the duodenal wall.
The authors borrow the description and nomenclature of these fibers from
Papalmitiades and Rett~ri.~,Superficially, the C1 fibers originating from the
longitudinal muscle layer at the anterior and posterior borders of the papilla
join the common bile duct and pancreatic duct. The C2 fibers, given off by the
circular muscle layer, arise from the lower border of the duodenal window and
disappear over the pancreatic duct. The C4 fibers, also arising from the circular
muscle layer, arise from the upper border of the window and disappear at the
common bile duct.
Deeply, the C5 fibers, originating from the circular muscle layer at the upper
border of the window, dissipate obliquely at the papilla. The C3 fibers, given off
by the circular muscle layer at the inferior border of the window, have a special
arrangement: The fibers coming from in front disappear over the anterior and
inferior aspects of the papilla, whereas posteriorly they turn downward and are
lost at the lower pole of the papilla. The lesser density of the tethering fibers
behind the papilla gives rise to a weak point where mucosal hernias may
develop: the mucosal diverticula of the duodenal window (Fig. 7). In the authors'
experience? l1 these acquired diverticula are common in elderly patients; they
may lead to dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi and may have a major role
in the development of biliary calculi, cholangitis, or pancreatitis. Lastly, the
AMPULLA OF VATER
Ch
207
Ch \
\
FL
FL
--
c, ,
.w
W'
FC
FC
'
c,
Figure 6. A-D, The tethering fibers (Cl-C5) of the greater duodenal papilla (P) and the
weak point for development of mucosal diverticula. Ch =common bile duct; W = main
pancreatic duct; FC = circular fibers; FL = longitudinal fibers.
The duodenal mucosa and the greater duodenal papilla (see Fig. 3; Fig. 8),
with the orifices of the common bile duct and the main pancreatic duct, can be
examined by endoscopy or surgically after duodenotomy. The papilla presents
as a polypoid prominence 5 mm to 10 mm in length and 5 mm in width, hidden
by transverse, circular, duodenal folds. The smoothing out of these folds allows
for the identification of the papilla, which is surmounted by a transverse fold,
208
AVISSE et a1
AMPULLA OF VATER
209
Figure 8. The greater duodenal papilla. Papilla (1). Transverse fold (2).Longitudinal fold
(3). Orifice of mucosal diverticulum (4).
organ, preferably horizontal for vascular reasons; and smoothing out of the
transverse folds. The only anatomic anomaly or variation of any importance is
the presence of a lesser duodenal papilla (i.e., a small caruncle), which is always
situated several centimeters above the greater papilla and drains only pancreatic
secretions. The patent accessory pancreatic duct of Santorini sometimes drains
the entire dorsal pancreas in cases of a pancreas divisum, in which the dorsal
and ventral pancreatic channels have failed to fuse., l o
VASCULARIZATION
210
AVISSE et a1
5
J
Figure 9. Arterial vascularization of the papilla. Posterior and superior pancreaticoduodenal
arch (1). Ventral cornmissural arch (2). Anterior and inferior pancreaticoduodenal arch (3).
Gastroduodenal artery (4). Superior mesenteric artery (5).
AMPULLA OF VATER
211
Figure 10. Posterior and superior (A) and anterior and inferior (B) pancreaticoduodenal
arches.
even the left lumbar trunk or thoracic duct; the rapid invasion of remote
nodal regions justifies the consideration of cephalic duodenopancreatectomy as the procedure of choice for malignant tumors of the vaterian region
SUMMARY
212
AVISSE et a1