Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ear to be consistent with the Aegean Late Bronze Age, the time of the floruit of
Troy, but not the time of the Greek alphabet. The term Homer can be used to mean
traditional elements of verse known to the rhapsodes from which they composed or
al poetry, which transmitted information concerning the culture of Mycenaean Gre
ece. This information is often called the world of Homer (or of Odysseus, or the I
liad). The Homeric period would in that case cover a number of historical period
s, especially the Mycenaean Age, prior to the first delivery of a work called th
e Iliad.
Concurrent with the questions of whether there was a biographical person named H
omer, and what role he may have played in the development of the currently known
texts, is the question of whether there ever was a uniform text of the Iliad or
Odyssey. Considered word-for-word, the printed texts as we know them are the pr
oduct of the scholars of the last three centuries. Each edition of the Iliad or
Odyssey is a little different, as the editors rely on different manuscripts and
fragments, and make different choices as to the most accurate text to use. The t
erm accuracy reveals a fundamental belief in an original uniform text. The manuscr
ipts of the whole work currently available date to no earlier than the 10th cent
ury. These are at the end of a missing thousand-year chain of copies made as eac
h generation of manuscripts disintegrated or were lost or destroyed. These numer
ous manuscripts are so similar that a single original can be postulated.[7]
The time gap in the chain is bridged by the scholia, or notes, on the existing m
anuscripts, which indicate that the original had been published by Aristarchus o
f Samothrace in the 2nd century BCE. Librarian of the Library of Alexandria, he
had noticed a wide divergence in the works attributed to Homer, and was trying t
o restore a more authentic copy. He had collected several manuscripts, which he
named: the Sinopic, the Massiliotic, etc. The one he selected for correction was
the koine, which Murray translates as the Vulgate. Aristarchus was known for his
conservative selection of material. He marked lines that he thought were spuriou
s, not of Homer. The entire last book of the Odyssey was marked.
The koine in turn had come from the first librarian at Alexandria, Zenodotus, wh
o flourished at the beginning of the 3rd century BCE. He also was attempting to
restore authenticity to manuscripts he found in a state of chaos. He set the pre
cedent by marking passages he considered spurious, and by filling in material th
at seemed to be missing himself. Neither Zenodotus nor Aristarchus mentioned any
authentic master copy from which to make corrections. Their method was intuitiv
e. The current division into 24 books each for the Iliad and Odyssey came from Z
enodotus.
Murray rejects the concept that an authoritative text for the Vulgate existed at
the time of Zenodotus. He resorts to the fragments, the quotations of Homer in
other works. About 200 existed at the time Murray wrote. Some of these match the
current texts, some seem to paraphrase them, and some are not represented at al
l. Murray cites the Shield of Achilles, which also appears as the Shield of Hera
cles in Hesiod. Murray concludes that the epic poems were still in "a fluid stat
e". He presents 150 BCE as the date after which the text solidifies around the V
ulgate. Of the 5th century BCE, Murray said "'Homer' meant to them 'the author o
f the Iliad and the Odyssey', but we cannot be sure that either
was exactly what
we mean by those words."[8]
The earliest mention of a work of Homer was by Callinus, a poet who flourished a
bout 750 BCE. He attributed the Thebais, an epic about the attack on Boeotian Th
ebes by the epigonoi, to Homer. The Thebais was written about the time of the ap
pearance of the Greek alphabet, but it could have been originally oral. The Ilia
d is mentioned by name in Herodotus with regard to the early 6th century, but th
ere is no telling what Iliad that is. Almost all the ancient sources from the ve
ry earliest appear determined that a Homer, author of the Iliad and Odyssey, exi
sted. The author of the Hymn to Apollo identifies himself in the last verse of t
he poem as a blind man from Chios.
Nevertheless it is possible to make a case that Homer was only a mythological ch
aracter, the supposed founder of the Homeridae. Martin West has asserted that "H
omer" is "not the name of a historical poet, but a fictitious or constructed nam
e."[9] Oliver Taplin, in the Oxford History of the Classical World s article on Ho
ng divided into 3a and 3b. In addition he adds Vita 11 from the Chrestomathia of
Proclus, pp 99 102.[21] The varying and contradictory biographical information in
these sources is termed humorously by Nagy "Variations on a Theme of Homer" aft
er the model of the names of certain musical compositions.[22]
For more details on this topic, see Ancient accounts of Homer, Life of Homer (Ps
eudo-Herodotus).
Etymological theories[edit]
can compose an epic. Albert B. Lord's "The Singer of Tales", on the topic of epi
cs sung by modern rhapsodes, shows that epics of that size have been in fact bei
ng composed spontaneously from memorized elements in modern times. The problem o
f visual cues can be solved if Homer can be presumed not to have been blind from
birth, but to have become blind, which is the point of view of Pseudo-Herodotus
.
In the latter source, Homer, after losing his sight to disease, embarks on a car
eer as a wandering rhapsode, or impromptu composer of poems at public gatherings
. Either at the beginning of his career or early in it, he assumes a stage name,
reputedly "the blind man", which declares himself to be in the category of blin
d prophets, who see with inspired inner vision, but not with outer, bringing a s
ort of divine glamor to the performance. Not all the vitae agree on the meaning
of the name. There is nothing biological about the Greek roots. The word is segm
ented Hom-eros, where Hom is from Greek homou, "together",[33] and the second -a
r- in arariskein, "join together",[34] the eta in -eros being East Greek. The "b
lind" meaning joins together the blind man and his guide. Other unions are certa
inly possible, provided they are attested. Gregory Nagy uses a phrase, phone hom
ereusai, "fitting [the song] together with the voice" found in Hesiod, a contemp
orary of Homer, to interpret Homeros as "he who fits (the Song) together".[35]
Consideration of the name as a type leaves open the possibility that any rhapsod
e could conform to it; that is, there was no biographic original named Homer. We
st says "The probability is that 'Homer' was not the name of a historical Greek
poet but is the imaginary ancestor of the Homeridai; such guild-names in -idai a
nd -adai are not normally based on the name of an historical person".[23] They w
ere upholding their function as rhapsodes or "lay-stitchers" specialising in the
recitation of Homeric poetry.
Cultural background[edit]
Ancient Greek coast of Anatolia
William Ihne examining the sources counted as many 19 locations in classical tim
es that claimed Homer as a citizen, including Athens, which accepted Smyrna as H
omer s native city, but insisted the city was its colony. The cause of these multi
ple claims was civic competition for the honor.[36] Ihne chose Smyrna because so
me of the Vitae identify the word Homer as Aeolic, and Smyrna had an Aeolic back
ground. These circumstances give precedence to the longest, most detailed vita,
that of Pseudo-Herodotus, which is one of the sources that identify Smyrna as or
iginally Aeolian.
The Aeolians were one of the three major ethnic groups of ancient Greece, the ot
her two being Ionians and Dorians. Aeolians came mainly from Thessaly, occupying
also Boeotia at an early date, after the Trojan War, in parallel to the occupat
ion of Peloponnesus by the Dorians. They had their own dialect of East Greek. He
siod as a Boeotian was a member of the group, which is substantiated by the Aeol
ic phrases related to the name of Homer found in his works. The Aeolians coloniz
ed the northwest coast of Asia Minor, calling their region Aeolis, and Lesbos.[3
7] The villages to which they immigrated were already populated by the descendan
ts of the Trojan War population. They were keeping the lore alive, according to
Pseudo-Herodotus. Aeolis extended from the coast opposite Lesbos to Smyrna on th
e edge of Ionia. The Aeolian League contained 12 cities, including Smyrna. To th
e south were the 12 cities, or dodacapolis, of the Ionian League. At about 688 B
CE Smyrna was taken by Colophonians who had ostensibly come to a festival there
and passed into Ionian hands.[38]
The political relevance of the two leagues came to a practical end in the latter
half of the 5th century BCE when most of the cities around the Aegean joined, o
r were forced to join, the Delian League, a koine implementing the hegemony of A
thens. Each city must contribute men and ships or money to a common defense forc
e. The treasury was kept at Athens. The details and conjoined events are the top
ic of Thucydides History of the Peloponnesian War. Inscriptions from those times
offer a basis for the study of Aeolic. Buck distinguished three dialects, Thessa
lian, Boeotian, and Lesbian.[39]
The Ionian cities in Asia Minor spoke a dialect of Ionic. In the border region b
etween Ionia and Aeolis it was modified to include features taken from Aeolic, c
reating an Ionic-Aeolic mixture similar to that of the Homeric poems.[40] For ex
ample, Chios had always been a member of the Ionian League,[41] and yet Chian con
tains a few special characteristics, which are of Aeolic origin. [42] The same sor
t of admixture did not occur at the Ionic-Dorian border in southwestern Anatolia
.
From the fact that Lesbian acquired more Ionic features in poetry over the cours
e of time Janko argues for a northward expansion of Ionian population and speech
at the expense of the Aeolians. [43] Aeolic was gradually assimilating to Ionic, b
ut after the 5th century BCE both began to assimilate to the now widespread sist
er dialect of Ionic, Attic, and the koine that developed from it in the Hellenis
tic period. Attic began to appear in the inscriptions of Ionia in the 4th centur
y BCE and had displaced Ionian by about 100 BCE. In 281 BC the new kingdom of Pe
rgamon acquired the Aeolic coast of Anatolia, separating Lesbian, which was gone
from the kingdom by the 3rd century BCE. Lesbian went on until the 1st century
CE and was the last Aeolic dialect to disappear.[44]
G.S. Kirk, who tends to be somewhat skeptical concerning the biographic details
given in the vitae, at least extends a limited credibility to some basic circums
tances as at all plausible. Homer is most frequently said to have been born in the
Ionian region of Asia Minor, at Smyrna, or on the island of Chios, dying on the
Cycladic island of Ios.[17] These areas were either Aeolian or partially so. Sm
yrna had not yet been taken by the Ionians. Chios had been settled by pre-Hellen
ic tribesmen from Thessaly, but the language remains unknown. They may have been
Aeolic-speaking. The association with Chios dates back to at least Semonides of
Amorgos, who cited Iliad 6.146 as by "the man of Chios".[45] An eponymous bardi
c guild, known as the Homeridae (sons of Homer), or Homeristae ('Homerizers')[46
] existed there, tracing descent from an ancestor of that name. On Ios were used
some words known to be Aeolic; for example, Homereon was one of the names for a
month in the calendar of Ios.[47] The Smyrna connection is alluded to in the or
iginal name posited for him by several vitae: Melesigenes, born of Meles", a rive
r which flowed by that city.
The poems give evidence of familiarity with the natural details and place-names
of this area of Asia Minor;[48] for example, Homer refers to meadow birds at the
mouth of the Caystros,[49] a storm in the Icarian sea,[50] and mentions that wo
men in Maeonia and Caria stain ivory with scarlet.[51] However, Homer also had a
geographical knowledge of all Mycenaean Greece that has been verified by discov
ery of most of the sites. Wilhelm Dorpfeld, the classical archaeologist,[52] sug
gests that Homer had visited many of the places and regions which he describes i
n his epics, such as Mycenae, Troy and more. According to Diodorus Siculus, Home
r had even visited Egypt.[53]
Biographical assertions[edit]
Chios
Some vitae depict Homer as a wandering minstrel, like Thamyris[54] or Hesiod, wh
o walked as far as Chalkis to sing at the funeral games of Amphidamas.[55] We ar
e given the image of a "blind, begging singer who hangs around with little peopl
e: shoemakers, fisherman, potters, sailors, elderly men in the gathering places
of harbour towns".[56] The poems, on the other hand, give us evidence of singers
at the courts of the nobility. There is a strong aristocratic bias in the poems
demonstrated by the lack of any major protagonists of non-aristocratic stock, a
nd by episodes such as the beating down of the commoner Thersites by the king Od
ysseus for daring to criticize his superiors. Scholars are divided as to which c
ategory, if any, the court singer or the wandering minstrel, the historic "Homer
" belonged.[57]
Most of the 12 vitae have little concern for historicty. Scorialenses I says we o
nly hear the report, and do not know anything. Most therefore report several orig
in stories. They are typically at least in part mythical. Whether the latter are
given unfeigned credibility is not clear. For instance, Homer was the son of th
e river Meles and a nymph. Pseudo-Plutarch I, relying less on mythology, present
s an alternative genealogy that makes Homer and Hesiod cousins. The only account
n tour to mainland Greece he stopped at Samos for the festivals there. Heading f
or Athens in the spring his ship was blown to Ios. While waiting for favorable w
inds he grew ill and died. The author then goes on to make a case that Homer was
Aeolian, not Ionian. He gives the date of his birth as 622 years before Xerxes,
which if true would make his mention of writing anachronist if the writing was
in the Greek alphabet.
Works attributed to Homer[edit]
The attribution of a work is not the same meaning as a known authorship, the dif
ference being an element of doubt. The Greeks of the sixth and early fifth centu
ries BCE understood by the works of "Homer", generally, "the whole body of heroi
c tradition as embodied in hexameter verse".[58] The entire Epic Cycle was inclu
ded. The genre included further poems on the Trojan War, such as the Little Ilia
d, the Nostoi, the Cypria, and the Epigoni, as well as the Theban poems about Oe
dipus and his sons. Other works, such as the corpus of Homeric Hymns, the comic
mini-epic Batrachomyomachia ("The Frog-Mouse War"), and the Margites, were also
attributed to him. Two other poems, the Capture of Oechalia and the Phocais were
also assigned Homeric authorship.
Epics[edit]
The Iliad and the Odyssey are both mentioned as works of Homer by Herodotus.[59]
He quotes a few lines from them both, which are the same in today s editions. The
passage quoted from the Iliad mentions that Paris stopped at Sidon before bring
ing Helen to Troy. From the fact that the Cypria has Paris going directly to Tro
y from Sparta, Herodotus concludes that it was not written by Homer. The doubtin
g process had begun.
In Works and Days, Hesiod says that he crossed to Euboea to contend in the games
held by the sons of Amphidamas at Chalcis.[60] There he won with a hymnos and t
ook away the prize of a tripod, which he dedicated to the Muses of Mount Helicon
, where he first began with aoide, song. One of the vitae, the Certamen , picks up th
is theme. Homer and Hesiod were contemporaries, it says. They both attended the
funeral games of Amphidamas, conducted by his son, Ganyctor, and both contended
in the contest of sophia, wit. In it, one was required to ask a question of the ot
her, who must reply in verse.
Unable to decide, the judge had them each recite from their poems. Hesiod quoted
Works and Days; Homer, Iliad , both as they are now, but neither poem can have bee
n the modern. Hesiod cannot have described beforehand the very event in which he
was participating. The Iliad is supposed to have been written already. It is no
t called that, however. The victory was given to Hesiod because his poem was abo
ut peace, but Homer s, about war.
After the contest, Homer continued his wandering, composing and reciting epic po
etry. The Certamen mentions the Thebais, quoting the first line, which differs but
little from the first line of the Iliad as it is now. It had 7000 lines, as did
the subsequent Epigoni, with a similar first line. The Certamen qualifies the att
ribution to Homer with some say . Subsequently he wrote the epitaph for Midas tomb,
for which he got a silver bowl, and then the Odyssey in 12,000 lines (today s is 1
2110). He had already written the Iliad in 15,500 lines (today s is 15693). Just t
hese three epics alone are 34,500 lines, word-for-word, we are asked to believe,
without reference to the rest of the prodigious Epic Cycle. Then he went to Ath
ens, and to Argos, where he delivered lines 559-568 of Book 2 of the Iliad with
the addition of two more not in the current version. Subsequently he went to Del
os, where he delivered the Hymn to Apollo, and was made a citizen of all the Ion
ian states. Going finally to Ios he slipped on some clay and suffered a fatal fa
ll.
The term Epic Cycle (Epikos Kuklos) refers to a series of ten epic poems written b
y different authors purporting to tell an interconnected sequence of stories cov
ering all Greek mythology. Themes were selected from them for Greek drama as wel
l. The name appears in the Chrestomathia of Eutychius Proclus, a synopsis of Gre
ek literature, known only through further abridged fragments written by Photios
I of Constantinople. No etymology was given. Evelyn-White hypothesizes that they
were written round the Iliad and Odyssey and had a clearly imitative structure.[61]
In this view Homer need have written no more than the Iliad, or the Iliad and O
dyssey, with the Homeridae responsible for all the rest. The unity of theme and
structure came from the close association of the authors in the guild or school.
Proclus does not subscribe to the authorships of the Certamen . He provides the nam
es of other authors where they were available in his sources. These 10 epics, of
which only Photius abridgements of Proclus synopses survive, and scattered fragme
nts of other authors in other times, are as follows. First and oldest, the War of
the Titans (Titanomachia), eight fragments, is said to have been written by eith
er Eumelus of Corinth, floruit 760-740 BCE, or Arctinus of Miletus, floruit in t
he First Olympiad, starting 776 BCE.[62]
The Theban Cycle consists of three epics:[63] Story of Oedipus (Oidipodeia), 6600
lines by Cinaethon of Sparta, floruit 764 BCE;[64] Thebaid (Thebais), attributed t
o Homer;[65] and Epigoni (Epigonoi), attributed to Homer.[66] The Trojan Cycle co
nsists of six epics and the Iliad and Odyssey, eight in all:[61] Cyprian Lays (kup
ria) in 11 books, attributed to either Homer, Stasinus, a younger contemporary o
f Homer, or one Hegesias;[67] Aethiopis (Aithiopis) in five books, sequent of the
Iliad, which is a sequent of Cypria, by Arctinus;[68] Little Iliad (Ilias Mikra) i
n four books by Lesches of Mitylene, floruit 660 BCE;[69] Sack of Ilium (Iliou Per
sis) by Arctinus;[70] Returns (Nostoi) by Agias of Troezen,[71] floruit 740 BCE; a
nd Telegony (Telegonia), by Eugammon of Cyrene, floruit 567 BCE.[72]
Identity and authorship[edit]
Statue of Homer outside the Bavarian State Library in Munich
For more details on this topic, see Homeric Question.
The idea that Homer was responsible for just the two outstanding epics, the Ilia
d and the Odyssey, did not win consensus until 350 BCE.[73] While many, such as
Gregory Nagy, find it unlikely that both epics were composed by the same person,
[74] others, such as W. B. Stanford,[75] argue that the stylistic similarities a
re too consistent to support the theory of multiple authorship. One view which a
ttempts to bridge the differences holds that the Iliad was composed by "Homer" i
n his maturity, while the Odyssey was a work of his old age. The Batrachomyomach
ia, Homeric Hymns and cyclic epics are generally agreed to be later than the Ili
ad and the Odyssey.[citation needed]
Most scholars agree that the Iliad and Odyssey underwent a process of standardis
ation and refinement out of older material beginning in the 8th century BCE. An
important role in this standardisation appears to have been played by the Atheni
an tyrant Hipparchus, who reformed the recitation of Homeric poetry at the Panat
henaic festival. Many classicists hold that this reform must have involved the p
roduction of a canonical written text.
Other scholars[who?] still support the idea that Homer was a real person. Since
nothing is known about the life of this Homer, the common joke also recycled with
regard to Shakespeare has it that the poems "were not written by Homer, but by ano
ther man of the same name."[76][77] Samuel Butler argues, based on literary obse
rvations, that a young Sicilian woman wrote the Odyssey (but not the Iliad),[78]
an idea further pursued by Robert Graves in his novel Homer's Daughter and Andr
ew Dalby in Rediscovering Homer.[79]
Independent of the question of single authorship is the near-universal agreement
, after the work of Milman Parry,[80] that the Homeric poems are dependent on an
oral tradition, a generations-old technique that was the collective inheritance
of many singer-poets (aoidoi). An analysis of the structure and vocabulary of t
he Iliad and Odyssey shows that the poems contain many formulaic phrases typical
of extempore epic traditions; even entire verses are at times repeated. Parry a
nd his student Albert Lord pointed out that such elaborate oral tradition, forei
gn to today's literate cultures, is typical of epic poetry in a predominantly or
al cultural milieu, the key words being "oral" and "traditional". Parry started
with "traditional": the repetitive chunks of language, he said, were inherited b
y the singer-poet from his predecessors, and were useful to him in composition.
Parry called these repetitive chunks "formulas".
Exactly when these poems would have taken on a fixed written form is subject to
debate. The traditional solution is the "transcription hypothesis", wherein a no
n-literate "Homer" dictates his poem to a literate scribe between the 8th and 6t
h centuries BCE. The Greek alphabet was introduced in the early 8th century BCE,
so it is possible that Homer himself was of the first generation of authors who
were also literate. The classicist Barry B. Powell suggests that the Greek alph
abet was invented c. 800 BCE by one man, whom he calls the "adapter," in order t
o write down oral epic poetry.[81] More radical Homerists like Gregory Nagy cont
end that a canonical text of the Homeric poems as "scripture" did not exist unti
l the Hellenistic period (3rd to 1st century BCE).
New methods also try to elucidate the question. Combining information technologi
es and statistics stylometry analyzes various linguistic units: words, parts of
speech, and sounds. Based on the frequencies of Greek letters, a first study of
Dietmar Najock[82] particularly shows the internal cohesion of the Iliad and the
Odyssey. Taking into account the repartition of the letters, a recent study of
Stephan Vonfelt[83] highlights the unity of the works of Homer compared to Hesio
d. The thesis of modern analysts being questioned, the debate remains open.
Homeric studies[edit]
Main article: Homeric scholarship
The study of Homer is one of the oldest topics in scholarship, dating back to an
tiquity. The aims and achievements of Homeric studies have changed over the cour
se of the millennia. In the last few centuries, they have revolved around the pr
ocess by which the Homeric poems came into existence and were transmitted over t
ime to us, first orally and later in writing.
Some of the main trends in modern Homeric scholarship have been, in the 19th and
early 20th centuries, Analysis and Unitarianism (see Homeric Question), schools
of thought which emphasized on the one hand the inconsistencies in, and on the
other the artistic unity of, Homer; and in the 20th century and later Oral Theor
y, the study of the mechanisms and effects of oral transmission, and Neoanalysis
, the study of the relationship between Homer and other early epic material.
Homeric dialect[edit]
Main article: Homeric Greek
The language used by Homer is an archaic version of Ionic Greek, with admixtures
from certain other dialects, such as Aeolic Greek. It later served as the basis
of Epic Greek, the language of epic poetry, typically in dactylic hexameter.
Homeric style[edit]
Unbalanced scales.svg
The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on
the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.
(October 2013)
Homer in the company of Calliope, the Muse of epic poetry (replica of Roman Impe
rial mosaic, c. 240 CE, from Vichten)
Aristotle remarks in his Poetics that Homer was unique among the poets of his ti
me, focusing on a single unified theme or action in the epic cycle.[84]
The cardinal qualities of the style of Homer are well articulated by Matthew Arn
old:
[T]he translator of Homer should above all be penetrated by a sense of four qual
ities of his author: that he is eminently rapid; that he is eminently plain and di
rect, both in the evolution of his thought and in the expression of it, that is,
both in his syntax and in his words; that he is eminently plain and direct in t
he substance of his thought, that is, in his matter and ideas; and finally, that
he is eminently noble.[85]
The peculiar rapidity of Homer is due in great measure to his use of hexameter v
erse. It is characteristic of early literature that the evolution of the thought
, or the grammatical form of the sentence, is guided by the structure of the ver
se; and the correspondence which consequently obtains between the rhythm and the
syntax the thought being given out in lengths, as it were, and these again divide
d by tolerably uniform pauses produces a swift flowing movement such as is rarely
found when periods are constructed without direct reference to the metre. That H
omer possesses this rapidity without falling into the corresponding faults, that
is, without becoming either fluctuant or monotonous, is perhaps the best proof
of his unequalled poetic skill. The plainness and directness of both thought and
expression which characterise him were doubtless qualities of his age, but the
author of the Iliad (similar to Voltaire, to whom Arnold happily compares him) m
ust have possessed this gift in a surpassing degree. The Odyssey is in this resp
ect perceptibly below the level of the Iliad.
Rapidity or ease of movement, plainness of expression, and plainness of thought
are not distinguishing qualities of the great epic poets Virgil, Dante,[86] and
Milton. On the contrary, they belong rather to the humbler epico-lyrical school
for which Homer has been so often claimed. The proof that Homer does not belong
to that school and that his poetry is not in any true sense ballad poetry is furnish
ed by the higher artistic structure of his poems and, as regards style, by the f
ourth of the qualities distinguished by Arnold: the quality of nobleness. It is
his noble and powerful style, sustained through every change of idea and subject
, that finally separates Homer from all forms of ballad poetry and popular epic.
Like the French epics, such as the Chanson de Roland, Homeric poetry is indigeno
us and, by the ease of movement and its resultant simplicity, distinguishable fr
om the works of Dante, Milton and Virgil. It is also distinguished from the work
s of these artists by the comparative absence of underlying motives or sentiment
. In Virgil's poetry, a sense of the greatness of Rome and Italy is the leading
motive of a passionate rhetoric, partly veiled by the considered delicacy of his
language. Dante and Milton are still more faithful exponents of the religion an
d politics of their time. Even the French epics display sentiments of fear and h
atred of the Saracens; but, in Homer's works, the interest is purely dramatic. T
here is no strong antipathy of race or religion; the war turns on no political e
vents; the capture of Troy lies outside the range of the Iliad; and even the pro
tagonists are not comparable to the chief national heroes of Greece. So far as c
an be seen, the chief interest in Homer's works is that of human feeling and emo
tion, and of drama; indeed, his works are often referred to as "dramas".
History and the Iliad[edit]
Main article: Historicity of the Iliad
Greece according to the Iliad
The excavations of Heinrich Schliemann at Hisarlik in the late 19th century prov
ided initial evidence to scholars that there was an historical basis for the Tro
jan War. Research into oral epics in Serbo-Croatian and Turkic languages, pionee
red by the aforementioned Parry and Lord, began convincing scholars that long po
ems could be preserved with consistency by oral cultures until they are written
down.[80] The decipherment of Linear B in the 1950s by Michael Ventris (and othe
rs) convinced many of a linguistic continuity between 13th century BCE Mycenaean
writings and the poems attributed to Homer.
It is probable, therefore, that the story of the Trojan War as reflected in the
Homeric poems derives from a tradition of epic poetry founded on a war which act
ually took place. It is crucial, however, not to underestimate the creative and
transforming power of subsequent tradition: for instance, Achilles, the most imp
ortant character of the Iliad, is strongly associated with southern Thessaly, bu
t his legendary figure is interwoven into a tale of war whose kings were from th
e Peloponnese.[citation needed] Tribal wanderings were frequent, and far-flung,
ranging over much of Greece and the Eastern Mediterranean.[87] The epic weaves b
rilliantly the disiecta membra (scattered remains) of these distinct tribal narr
atives, exchanged among clan bards, into a monumental tale in which Greeks join
collectively to do battle on the distant plains of Troy.
Hero cult[edit]
The Apotheosis of Homer, by Archelaus of Priene (marble relief, possibly 3rd cen
tury BCE, now in the British Museum)
In the Hellenistic period, Homer was the subject of a hero cult in several citie
s. A shrine, the Homereion, was devoted to him in Alexandria by Ptolemy IV Philo
pator in the late 3rd century BCE. This shrine is described in Aelian's 3rd cent
ury CE work Varia Historia. He tells how Ptolemy "placed in a circle around the
statue [of Homer] all the cities who laid claim to Homer" and mentions a paintin
g of the poet by the artist Galaton, which apparently depicted Homer in the aspe
book no.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Odyssey
See also[edit]
Portal icon
Poetry portal
Portal icon
Literature portal
Achaeans (Homer)
Achilles
Aeneid
Aoidos
Ancient accounts of Homer
Aristarchus of Samothrace
Bibliomancy
Catalogue of Ships
Cyclic Poets
Dactylic hexameter
Deception of Zeus
Epic Cycle
Epic poetry
Epithets in Homer
Geography of the Odyssey
Greek mythology
Hector
Historicity of the Iliad
Homer's Ithaca
Homeric Greek
Homeric nod
Homeric Question
Homeric scholarship
Ithaca
Life of Homer (Pseudo-Herodotus)
List of characters in the Iliad
Odysseus
Peisistratos (Athens)
Rhapsode
Shield of Achilles
Sortes Homerica
Tabula Iliaca
Telemachy
The Golden Bough (mythology)
Trojan Battle Order
Trojan War
Trojan War in art and literature
Troy
Troy VII
Venetus A Manuscript
Zenodotus of Ephesus
Modern scholars
Richard Bentley
Ioannis Kakridis
Adolf Kirchhoff
Geoffrey Kirk
Karl Lachmann
Walter Leaf
Albert Lord
David Binning Monro
Karl Otfried Muller
Gilbert Murray
Gregory Nagy
Gregor Wilhelm Nitzsch
Milman Parry
Barry B. Powell
Heinrich Schliemann
William Bedell Stanford
Jean-Baptiste Gaspard d'Ansse de Villoison
Alan Wace
Martin Litchfield West
Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff
Friedrich August Wolf
Notes[edit]
Jump up ^ Herodotus 2.53.
Jump up ^ "Vita Herodotea", Chapter 38. An analysis can be found in Graziosi 200
2, pp. 98 101 A summary of the main traditional dates and sources can be found in
Smith, William; Marindin, G.E. (1919). A classical dictionary of Greek and Roman
biography, mythology and geography, by Sir William Smith. Revised throughout an
d in part rewritten by G. E. Marindin. London: J. Murray. pp. 422 425.
Jump up ^ Paragraph 595c lines 1-2, paragraph 600a line 9, paragraph 606e lines
1-2, respectively. The references are collected and interpreted in Too, Yun Lee
(2010). "Chapter 3, Section V". The Idea of the Library in the Ancient World. Ox
ford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Jump up ^ Griffin, Jasper (2004). "The Speeches". In Fowler, Robert. Cambridge C
ompanion to Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 156.
Jump up ^ Nunlist, Rene (2012). "Homer as a Blueprint for Speechwriters: Eustath
ius Commentaries and Rhetoric". Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 52: 493 509.
Jump up ^ Finley 2002, pp. 11 2 Finley's figures are based upon the corpus of lite
rary papyri published before 1963.
Jump up ^ A summary of the sources and an analysis of textual uniformity can be
found in Murray 1960, Chapter 12 The Text of Homer From Known to Unknown.
Jump up ^ Murray 1960, pp. 297 298
Jump up ^ West, Martin (1999). "The Invention of Homer". Classical Quarterly 49
(364).
Jump up ^ Taplin, Oliver (1986). "2 Homer". In Boardman, John; Griffin, Jasper;
Murray, Oswyn. The Oxford History of the Classical World. Oxford; New York: Oxfo
rd University Press. p. 50.
Jump up ^ Kirk, G.S. (1985). The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume I: books 1-4. Cambr
idge: Cambridge University Press. p. 1.
Jump up ^ Nagy, Gregory (2001). "Homeric Poetry and Problems of Multiformity: Th
e "Panathenaic Bottleneck". Classical Philology 96: 109 119. doi:10.1086/449533.
Jump up ^ Watkins, Calvert (1995). How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-Europea
n Poetics. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press; Internet Archive.
Jump up ^ Lucian, Verae Historiae 2.20, cited and tr. in Graziosi 2002, p. 127
Jump up ^ Parke, Herbert W. (1967). Greek Oracles. UK: Hutchinson Educational. p
p. 136 137 citing the Certamen, 12. ISBN 0-09-084111-5.
Jump up ^ Stoessl, F. (1979). "'Homeros'". Der Kleine Pauly: Lexikon der Antike
in funf Banden: Bd. 2. Munchen: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag. p. 1202.
^ Jump up to: a b Kirk, G.S. (1965). Homer and the Epic: A Shortened Version of
the Songs of Homer. London: Cambridge University Press. p. 190. ISBN 0-521-09356
-2.
Jump up ^ Allen, Thomas W., ed. (1912). Homeri Opera (in Latin and Ancient Greek
). Tomus V: Hymnos Cyclum Fragmenta Margiten Batrachomyomachiam Vitas Continens.
Oxonii: Typographeo Clarendoniano.
Jump up ^ The name means any vita located on a manuscript at the Real Biblioteca
del Monasterio de San Lorenzo de El Escorial, "Royal Library of the Monastery o
f Saint Lorenzo of Escorial", Royal because it is in the king's palace, El Escor
ial, near Madrid. The palace was once a monastery.
Jump up ^ So-called because the main manuscript is at the Biblioteca Nazionale C
entrale di Roma, formerly known as the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale Vittorio Em
anuele II.
Jump up ^ Nagy 2010, p. 29
Jump up ^ Nagy 2010, p. 133
^ Jump up to: a b West, M.L. (1997). The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elem
ents in Greek Poetry and Myth. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 622.
Jump up ^ Liddell & Scott 1940, ?
Jump up ^ Chantraine, P. (1968). "Homer". Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue
grecque (in French). vol. 2 (3 4). Paris: Klincksieck. p. 797. This long-standing
view is the one adopted by many Greek etymological dictionaries. See also the w
ord history as the name Homer in Liddell & Scott 1940, ?
Jump up ^ Silk 1987, p. 4. Silk generalizes to "Aeolic-speaking districts", but
the only district mentioned in Pseudo-Herodotus is Cyme (Aeolis). Still, he did
perform over the entire area, according to the source, and many cities of the re
gion claimed to be his native city.
Jump up ^ Allen p. 99.
Jump up ^ Homeric Hymns 3:172 3
Jump up ^ Thucidides, The Peloponnesian War 3:104
Jump up ^ Graziosi 2002, p. 133
Jump up ^ Odyssey, 8:64ff.
Commentaries[edit]
Iliad:
P.V. Jones (ed.) 2003, Homer's Iliad. A Commentary on Three Translations, London
. ISBN 1-85399-657-2
G. S. Kirk (gen. ed.) 1985 1993, The Iliad: A Commentary (6 volumes), Cambridge. I
SBN 0-521-28171-7, ISBN 0-521-28172-5, ISBN 0-521-28173-3, ISBN 0-521-28174-1, I
SBN 0-521-31208-6, ISBN 0-521-31209-4
J. Latacz (gen. ed.) 2002 , Homers Ilias. Gesamtkommentar. Auf der Grundlage der A
usgabe von Ameis-Hentze-Cauer (1868 1913) (6 volumes published so far, of an estim
ated 15), Munich/Leipzig. ISBN 3-598-74307-6, ISBN 3-598-74304-1
N. Postlethwaite (ed.) 2000, Homer's Iliad: A Commentary on the Translation of R
ichmond Lattimore, Exeter. ISBN 0-85989-684-6
M.W. Willcock (ed.) 1976, A Companion to the Iliad, Chicago. ISBN 0-226-89855-5
Odyssey:
A. Heubeck (gen. ed.) 1990 1993, A Commentary on Homer's Odyssey (3 volumes; orig.
publ. 1981 1987 in Italian), Oxford. ISBN 0-19-814747-3, ISBN 0-19-872144-7, ISBN
0-19-814953-0
P. Jones (ed.) 1988, Homer's Odyssey: A Commentary based on the English Translat
ion of Richmond Lattimore, Bristol. ISBN 1-85399-038-8
I.J.F. de Jong (ed.) 2001, A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey, Cambridge
. ISBN 0-521-46844-2
Dating the Homeric poems[edit]
Janko, Richard (1982). Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Ep
ic Diction. Cambridge Classical Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN 0-521-23869-2.
Further reading[edit]
Buck, Carl Darling (1928). The Greek Dialects. Chicago: University of Chicago Pr
ess.
Evelyn-White, Hugh Gerard (tr.) (1914). Hesiod, the Homeric hymns and Homerica.
The Loeb Classical Library. London; New York: Heinemann; MacMillen.
Ford, Andrew (1992). Homer : the poetry of the past. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univers
ity Press. ISBN 0-8014-2700-2.
Graziosi, Barbara (2002). Inventing Homer: The Early Perception of Epic. Cambrid
ge Classical Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirk, G.S. (1962). The Songs of Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1940). A Greek-English Lexicon (Revised ed
.). Oxford: Clarendon Press; Perseus Digital Library.
Murray, Gilbert (1960). The Rise of the Greek Epic (Galaxy Books ed.). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Schein, Seth L. (1984). The mortal hero : an introduction to Homer's Iliad. Berk
eley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05128-9.
Silk, Michael (1987). Homer: The Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. I
SBN 0-521-83233-0.
Smith, William, ed. (1876). A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythol
ogy. Vol. I, II & III. London: John Murray.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Homer.
Wikiquote has quotations related to: Homer
Wikisource has original works written by or about:
Homer
Works by Homer at Project Gutenberg
Works by or about Homer at Internet Archive
Works by Homer at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Speaker Icon.svg
Homer; Murray, A.T. The Iliad with an English Translation (in Ancient Greek, Eng
lish). I, Books I-XII. London; New York: William Heinemann Ltd.; G.P. Putnam's S
ons; Internet Archive.
The Chicago Homer
Daitz, Stephen (reader). "Homer, Iliad, Book I, lines 1-52". Society for the Rea
ding of Greek and Latin Literature (SORGLL).
Heath, Malcolm (May 4, 2001). "CLAS3152 Further Greek Literature II: Aristotle's