Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. I NTRODUCTION
Over the last decade, a great research effort has been devoted
towards the development of efficient chaos-based modulation techniques (see [2]-[4]). This motivation originates from theoretical
results about the synchronizing capability of two identical chaotic
systems that start from different initial conditions [1]. Due to
its random-like behavior, chaos not only spreads the spectrum of
the information signal, thus providing robustness against channel
distorsions, but also acts as an encryption key. Hence, covertness of
transmissions can be ensured and due to intricate dynamics of the
signals, it is extremely difficult for the unauthorized user aware of
the transmission to access the information. Other potential benefits
have to be noticed, among others the sharing of channel resources
via Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), resulting from weak
crosscorrelation of chaotic signals, and reduced complexity of
transmission devices.
Use of chaotic signals as spreading codes in a Direct-Sequence
Spread Spectrum system (DS-SS) has been shown to be a promising
way of applying chaos for digital communication purposes [5].
Use of chaos in a DS-SS system consists in replacing the standard
Pseudo-Noise (PN) generator by a chaotic dynamical system. One
motivation for such a chaotic modulation is that a growing number
of communication applications rely on the DS-SS scheme to achieve
CDMA. DS-SS systems also offers a good immunity to channel
impairments through processing gain adjustment.
This paper focuses on receiver design in a Chaotic DirectSequence Spread Spectrum (CD3S) system, the objective being to
bring a complete solution for practical applications, while using
the original chaos synchronization property underscored in [1]. In
particular, we address the problem of carrier phase recovery, which
is usually not considered in the related literature. Leung and Zhu
have recently derived important results about chaos synchronization
through Extended Kalman Filtering (EKF); the authors showed that
the EKF-based technique is a generalization of two conventionnal
schemes (unidirectionnally coupled and drive-response methods). It
is also shown that the EKF-based synchronization approaches the
averaged Cramr-Rao Lower Bound at high Signal-to-Noise-Ratios
Fig. 1.
IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems (IEEE-ISCAS05), Kobe, Japan, May 2005
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems (IEEE-ISCAS05), Kobe, Japan, May 2005
`
where the gaussian noise sequence vkb N 0, Qb , independent
of the past and current state bk , will influence the adaptability of the
symbol filter; a low value Qb will result in slow changes whereas a
larger value will result in rapid variations of the symbol estimates.
It must be emphasized that thanks to the set of noise terms {vkc ,
vkb , nk } and due to use of the Unscented implementation this dual
Kalman receiver can still operate on frequency selective channels
[9], whereas the multipath propagation is not explicitely taken into
account in equations (2) and (3).
B. Dual estimation of the Code, Symbol and Phase
Opposed to the previous receiver structure, relying on a Costas
loop to solve the phase recovery prior to demodulation, we are
now going to develop another solution considering a possible phase
error in the recovered baseband signal. As shown in figure 5, the
frequency transposition is considered with a fixed carrier to get the
in-phase and quadrature signals.
Fig. 5.
(7)
, nk = n1k , n2k , vk = vk1 , vk2
yk = ykRe , ykIm
As considered for the C/S dual estimator, the noises are supposed
zero mean gaussian distributed and independent with the other
parameters that construct the model:
vkc N
(0, Qc ) , vkb N 0, Qb
`
(8)
vk N 0, Q ; Q = diag Q1 , Q2
For the observation noise we have considered nk N (0, R),
2
with the covariance matrix R = 2 I2 .
To illustrate how the phase recovery works we have considered
the case of a demodulation with a carrier frequency offset and
a nonstationary channel which suffers from a periodical phase
alteration. This simulation was made for a Carrier-to-Noise-Ratio
(CNR) of 20dB at the receiver (Fig. 7).
Fig. 6.
(4)
: yk = sgn bk1 ck g k1 + k1 + nk
(
bk+1 = bk + vkb
(5)
yk = bk .f (
ck1 ) .g k1 + k1 + nk
8
k+1
k + k
>
<
=
bk + vk
k+1
(6)
k
>
: yk = sgn bk1 f (
ck1 ) g (k ) + nk
where g (k ) = [cos (k ) , sin (k )]T ;
We recall that only the UKF was used for these simulations.
We add also that for a lower CN R case, with a more difficult
channel, estimated phase jumps of can occur, which for a
normal phase modulation will conduct in errors at the retrieved
informational signal. So differential phase modulation (DPSK) was
employed instead.
The performances of the C/S/P dual receiver, as for the C/S dual
estimation scheme, will now be presented in the next section.
V. N UMERICAL RESULTS
For a numerical communication system the best performance
criteria is given by the BER vs. a parameter of study. In our case,
as we consider a single user transmission, the parameters of interest
will be mean CNR and the considered channel characteristics. Robustness of the proposed receivers against noise and some channel
imperfections have been studied through Monte Carlo simulations,
our objective being to achieve a BER of about 103 .
A zero-mean logistic map (see section III) is used as it generates
sequences with a Dirac like autocorrelation function, and so qualifies
very well as a spreading sequence. Receivers simulated were both
C/S and C/S/P structures for the following channels:
1. stationary AWGN channel (no phase or transfer coefficient shift);
2. nonstationary gaussian channel with variations of phase and
of the channel transfer coefficient; As phase variations we have
considered the equivalent of a sinusoidal instantaneous carrier
frequency shifting with a 20Hz amplitude, and a period of 0.1s.
IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems (IEEE-ISCAS05), Kobe, Japan, May 2005
The results are given with or without any gain control method
each time to increase the pertinence of our numerical simulations.
We showed in a companion paper that the input power fluctuations
yield significant performance degradations for the receivers that
ignore this problem while using chaos synchronization [10]. The
first approach that we proposed (the modified dynamics approach)
is based on a modification of the chaotic dynamics that has been
used by the transmitter; the second approach (denoted control loop)
relies on a feedback control in order to match the second order
statistics of the transmitted chaotic spreading code.
For the nonstationary channel we can observe that the performances of the two systems are coming closer, but the C/S scheme
stands as the best method. In concordance with the results presented
in [10], the statistical gain control loop remains the best automatic
gain control (AGC) solution. Again as the number of joint state
estimation parameters increases (C/S/P case), the performances of
the model dependent AGC decreases.
VI. C ONCLUSIONS
The design of a Chaotic Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum
(CD3S) receiver has been studied in this paper. Thanks to dual
Unscented Kalman Filtering, the chaotic spreading code is synchronized in an efficient way while estimating the symbol at the same
time. Other advantages of the UKF method is its recursivity and its
limited computational cost, which make practical implementation
simpler. The role of carrier phase recovery, usually neglected in
the related literature, have been solved in two ways: the first
approach considers the phase recovery and Code/Symbol estimation
as a separate step and the second method solves this problem in
baseband using three parallel Kalman filters (Code/Symbol/Phase
dual estimation). The gain control is also addressed through either
chaotic dynamics modification at the receiver or statistical matching
between original and synchronized code. The proposed receivers
have been evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations of the BER
over a stationary Gaussian channel and in presence of channel gain
and phase fluctuations. Without any channel fluctuation, the solution
of carrier phase recovery prior to C/S estimation is better than
C/S/P dual estimation in baseband. The full baseband demodulation
becomes an interesting alternative in case of nonstationary channels.
R EFERENCES
Fig. 10. BER performance of the two receivers over a nonstationary channel