Exodus from Hell

Romans 13-

3 For Magistrates are not to be feared for good works, but for evil.Wilt thou then be
without fear of the power? do well: so shalt thou have praise of the same.

4 For he is the minister of God for thy wealth: but if thou do evil, fear: for he beareth
not the sword for nought: for he is the minister of God to take vengeance on him that
doeth evil.

Not sure how I got on this line of thought, but it occurred, so here goes:
Recorder
Etymology- recorder (n.)
"chief legal officer of a city," early 15c., from Anglo-French recordour (early 14c.),
Old French recordeor "witness; storyteller; minstrel," from Medieval Latin
recordator, from Latin recordari "remember" (see record (v.)).

late Middle English (denoting a kind of judge): from Anglo-Norman French

recordour, from Old French recorderbring to remembrance;

Every city has one. Re-Member? Restore one's membership to the Body of
Christ/true Church?
Biblical usage-

In historic times, the recorder was the chancellor or vizier of the kingdom. He brought
all weighty matters under the notice of the king, such as complaints, petitions, and
wishes of subjects or foreigners.(some researchers believe Chancery is also an
Embassy)He also drew up papers for the king's guidance, and prepared drafts of the
royal will for the scribes. All treaties came under his oversight; and he had the care of
the national archives or records, to which, as royal historiographer, he added the current
annals of the kingdom.[6]

chancellor (n.)
early 12c., from Old French chancelier (12c.), from Late Latin cancellarius
"keeper of the barrier, secretary, usher of a law court," so called because he
worked behind a lattice (Latin cancellus) at a basilica or law court (see chancel).
In the Roman Empire, a sort of court usher; the post gradually gained importance
in the Western kingdoms. A variant form, canceler, existed in Old English, from
Old North French, but was replaced by this central French form.
late Old English, from Old French cancelier, from late Latin cancellariusporter,
secretary (originally a court official stationed at the grating separating
public from judges), from cancellicrossbars.
cancel (v.)
late 14c., "cross out with lines," from Anglo-French canceler, from Latin
cancellare "to make resemble a lattice," which in Late Latin took on a sense
"cross out something written" by marking it with crossed lines, from cancelli,
plural of cancellus "lattice, grating," diminutive of cancer "crossed bars, lattice," a
variant of carcer "prison" (see incarceration). Figurative use, "to nullify an
obligation" is from mid-15c. Related: Canceled (also cancelled); cancelling.

Chancellor (Latin: cancellarius) is a title of various official positions in the

governments of many nations. The original chancellors were the cancellarii of Roman

courts of justiceushers, who sat at the cancelli or lattice work screens of a basilica or
law court, which separated the judge and counsel from the audience. A chancellor's
office is called a chancellery or chancery. The word is now used in the titles of
many various officers in all kinds of settings (government, education, religion
etc.). Nowadays the term is most often used to describe:

The head of the government

A person in charge of foreign affairs

A person with duties related to justice

A person in charge of financial and economic issues

The head of a university

Hell (Blacks)- The name formerly given to a place

Chancellors were ministers for the Exchequer aka Treasury.(

under the exchequer chamber, where the king's debtors were confined. Clerk of the
Treasury was also known as the Clerk of Hell. "exchequer" has come to mean the
Treasury and, colloquially, pecuniary possessions in general; as in "the company's
exchequer is low".

Court of Chancery was a court of Equity. Jurisdiction- 1)Trusts and administration of estates 2)Insanity and Guardianship (was kings
prerogative to look after them through doctrine of Parens Patriae) 3)Charities

*Remedies-

The Court of Chancery could

grant three possible remedies specific performance, injunctions and damages. The
remedy of specific performance is, in contractual matters, an order by the court which
requires the party in breach of contract to perform his obligations. [92] The validity of the
contract as a whole was not normally considered, only whether there was adequate
consideration and if expecting the party that breached the contract to carry out his
obligations was viable.[93] Injunctions, on the other hand, are remedies which prevent a
party from doing something (unlike specific performance, which requires them to do
something).[94] Until the Common Law Procedure Act 1854, the Court of Chancery was
the only body qualified to grant injunctions and specific performance. [95]

Damages is money claimed in compensation for some failure by the other party to a
case.[96] It is commonly believed that the Court of Chancery could not grant damages
until the Chancery Amendment Act 1858, which gave it that right, but in some special
cases it had been able to provide damages for over 600 years. The idea of damages
was first conceived in English law during the 13th century, when the Statutes of Merton
and Gloucester provided for damages in certain circumstances. Despite what is
normally assumed by academics, it was not just the common law courts that could grant
damages under these statutes; the Exchequer of Pleas and Court of Chancery both had
the right to do so. In Cardinal Beaufort's case in 1453, for example, it is stated that "I
shall have a subpoena against my feoffee and recover damages for the value of
the land".[97] A statute passed during the reign of Richard II specifically gave the
Chancery the right to award damages, stating: For as much as People be compelled to
come before the King's Council, or in the Chancery by Writs grounded upon untrue
Suggestions; that the Chancellor for the Time being, presently after that such
Suggestions be duly found and proved untrue, shall have Power to ordain and award
Damages according to his Discretion, to him which is so troubled unduly, as afore is
said.[98]
This did not extend to every case, but merely to those which had been dismissed
because one party's "suggestions [are] proved untrue", and was normally awarded to
pay for the innocent party's costs in responding to the party that had lied. Lord
Hardwicke, however, claimed that the Chancery's jurisdiction to award damages was
not derived "from any authority, but from conscience", and rather than being
statutory was instead due to the Lord Chancellor's inherent authority. As a result,
General Orders were regularly issued awarding the innocent party additional costs, such
as the cost of a solicitor on top of the costs of responding to the other party's false
statements.[98]

The Court became more cautious about awarding damages during the 16th and 17th
centuries; Lord Chancellors and legal writers considered it a common law remedy, and
judges would normally only award damages where no other remedy was appropriate.
Damages were sometimes given as an ancillary remedy, such as in Browne v Dom

Bridges in 1588, where the defendant had disposed of waste inside the plaintiffs woods.
As well as an injunction to prevent the defendant dumping waste in the woods, damages
were also awarded to pay for the harm to the woods." [99] This convention (that damages
could only be awarded as an ancillary remedy, or where no others were available)
remained the cause until the 18th and early 19th centuries, when the attitude of the
Court towards awarding damages became more liberal; in Lannoy v Werry, for example,
it was held that where there was sufficient evidence of harm, the Court could award
damages in addition to specific performance and other remedies. [100] This changed with
Todd v Gee in 1810, where Lord Eldon held that "except in very special cases, it was not
the course of proceeding in Equity to file a Bill for specific performance of an agreement;
praying in the alternative, if it cannot be performed, an issue, or an inquiry before the
Master, with a view to damages. The plaintiff must take that remedy, if he chooses it, at
Law." This was followed by Hatch v Cobb, in which Chancellor Kent held that "though
equity, in very special cases, may possibly sustain a bill for damages, on a breach of
contract, it is clearly not the ordinary jurisdiction of the court". [101]
The Court's right to give damages was reiterated in Phelps v Prothero in 1855, where
the Court of Appeal in Chancery held that if a plaintiff starts an action in a court of equity
for specific performance and damages are also appropriate, the court of equity may
choose to award damages.[102] This authorisation was limited to certain circumstances,
and was again not regularly used. Eventually, the Chancery Amendment Act 1858 gave
the Court full jurisdiction to award damages; the situation before that was so limited that
lawyers at the time commented as if the Court had not previously been able to do so. [103]

Found this when researching Hell:

Doctrine of Election > electing citizenship (being a debtor)
When we choose to be a citizen, we are choosing to be debtors. All the concepts (the
naming of things), come with rights, duties, obligations, debts, benefits, and
liability. Under the Doctrine of Election, you get a right, or a benefit, NEVER BOTH.
See "election", Black's Law
From Black's Law Dictionary 8th. ed:

ELECTION n.
1. The exercise of a choice; esp., the act of choosing from several possible rights
or remedies in a way that precludes the use of other rights or remedies. See ELECTION
OF REMEDIES.
2. The doctrine by which a person is compelled to choose between accepting a benefit
under a legal instrument and retaining some property right to which the person is
already entitled; an obligation imposed on a party to choose between alternative rights
or claims, so that the party is entitled to enjoy only one <
BENEFICIUM (ben-e-fish-ee-um), n. [Latin benefit] 1.Roman law. A privilege, remedy,
or benefit granted by law, such as the beneficium abstinendi (privilege of abstaining),
by which an heir could refuse to accept an inheritance (and thereby avoid
the accompanying debt).
BENEFICIUM ABSTINENDI (ben-e-fish-ee-um ab-sti-nen-dI). [Latin privilege of
abstaining] Roman law. The right of an heir to refuse an inheritance and thus avoid
liability for the testator's debts. These heirs came also to be protected by the praetor,
viz. by the jus or beneficium abstinendi. Provided they took care not to act as heir in any
kind of way, then, whether they formally demanded the privilege or not, their own
property could not be made liable for their ancestor's debts.
Using the patented last name
The attorneys have named you as a thing (res), and patented the last name so that
when you use it (buy things, apply for licenses, vote, accept mail!), they "own" you and
can administer you as beneficiary.
As long as you do not act like the heir of your estate, then the trustee (the state), will
stick it to you and administer you. You are a state of being, the heir of your own estate,
but not if you act as a beneficiary instead of Executor, which they have tricked us all into
doing. You are screaming for your "rights", your "Constitutions" and thus evidencing
yourself as beneficiary, giving them the go-ahead to "take care of you" (administer you)
as THEY SEE FIT.
Maxim of law: He who accepts [enjoys] the benefit must bear the burden.

If you are Your Own House, you are the heir, as you are not electing anyone to
RE>present you (beneficium abstinendi).
Using the last name for personal gain is a felony (this includes accepting mail in the full
name using their patented last name), see 18 USC 1342:
Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the
Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other
unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious,
false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or
takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter,
postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or
assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
The last name: cognomen
co = with
gn = knowledge
nom = law/name
en = to give
cognomen = with knowledge, {I } give {you} a name, aka a description > letters patent
COGNOMEN. In Roman law. A man's family name. The first name (prae-nomen) was
the proper name of the individual; the second (nomen) indicated the gens or tribe to
which he belonged; while the third (cognomen) denoted his family
family = genus....species
So the Family of Smith, was a black's smith, silver smith, Champagne, a place in
France, Erick's son, Lar's son, etc. etc. those are all de scriptions. They are not you,
always something, or someone else...and attorneys came along and named you
Etymology of: gender
Etymology of: Adam
Etymology of: WashingtonWashington U.S. capital, founded 1791, named for President
George Washington (1732-1799); the family name is from a town in northeastern
England, from Old English, literally "estate of a man named Wassa."
VASSAL (n.)early 14c. (c.1200 as a surname) "tenant who pledges fealty to a lord," from

Old French vassal "subject, subordinate, servant" (12c.), from Medieval Latin vassallus
"manservant, domestic, retainer," extended from vassus "servant," from Old Celtic
*wasso- "young man, squire"
Patronizing Your own House
If you are calling the House of Representatives (of United States of America corporation
or any "country" commissioned by it) your father, you are a tenant of that house, without
possession of anything...you are renting every thing, according to Malthusian theory
including the real estate, which is the body.
On the other hand, if you res-ide (are a thing) in your own House as a tenant, only the
Executor/Possessor of course, has access, ownership, possessory rights to do anything
to, with, for, upon, or on behalf of the body (YOUR body). Normally, You (The Human
Executor) would not otherwise do anything harmful to you, rent or trick you out to
another, etc which is the safest "place" for you to be then.
A dwelling, refers to where a res lives. It is a tenant of whatever House it is
patronizing. You have to evidence that you in deed, possess you and that you are not
contracting with the lord god. Possession is nine tenths of the law. If you are filled up by
constitutional theory, the lord god possesses you, and it does not matter what you say,
however, if you evidence that you are possessed by you, and that you are a resident of
Your House, then, there is no other owner.
Definitions:
DWELL. To have an abode; to inhabit; to live in a place.
DWELLING-HOUSE. The house in which a man lives with his family; a resi- dence; the
apartment or building, or group of buildings, occupied by a family as a place of
residence. In conveyancing. Includes all buildings attached to or connected with the
house. 2 Hil. Real Prop. 338, and note. In the law of burglary. A house in which the
occupier and his family usually re- side, or, in other words, dwell and lie in. Whart. Crim.
Law, 357.
DWELLING-PLACE. This term is not synonymous with a "place of pauper settle- ment/'
49 N. H. 553. Dwelling-place, or home, means some per- manent abode or residence,

with intention to remain; and is not synonymous with "domi- cile," as used in
international law, but has a more limited and restricted meaning. 19 Me. 293.
DOMESTIC, n. Domestics, or, in full, domestic servants, are servants who reside in the
same house with the master they serve. The term does not extend to workmen or
laborers employed out of doors. 5 Bin. 167. The Louisiana Civil Code enumerates
as domestics those who receive wages and stay in the house of the person paying and
employing them, for his own service or that of his family; such as valets, footmen,
cooks, butlers, and others who reside in the house. Persons employed in public houses
are not included. 6 La. Ann. 276.
DOMESTIC, adj. Pertaining, belonging, or relating to a home, a domicile, or to the
place of birth, origin, creation, or trans- action. See the following titles.
DOMESTIC ADMINISTRATOR. One appointed at the place of the domicile of
the decedent; distinguished from a foreign or an ancillary administrator.
RES. Lat. In the civil law. A thing; an object. As a term of the law, this word has a very
wide and extensive signification, including not only things which are objects of property,
but also such as are not capable of individual ownership. See Inst. 2, 1, pr. And in old
English law it is said to have a general import, comprehending both corporeal and
incorporeal things of whatever kind, nature, or species. 3 Inst. 182. See Bract, fol. 76.
TENANT. In the broadest sense, one who holds or possesses lands or tenements
by any kind of right or title, whether in fee, for hire, for years, at will, or otherwise.
Cowell. In a more restricted sense, one who holds lands of another; one who has the
temporary use and occupation of real property owned by another person, (called the
"landlord,") the duration and terms of his tenancy being usually fixed by an instrument
called a "lease." The word "tenant" conveys a much more comprehensive idea in the
language of the law than it does in its popular sense. In popular language it is used
more particularly as opposed to the word "landlord," and always seems to imply that
the land or property is not the tenant's own, but belongs to some other person, of whom
he immediately holds it. But, in the language of the law, every possessor of landed
property is called a "tenant" with reference to such property, and this, whether such
landed property is absolutely his own, or whether he merely holds it under a lease for a
certain number of years. Brown. In feudal law. One who holds of another (called "lord"
or "superior") by some service; as fealty or rent.

HABITATIO. In the civil law. The right of dwelling; the right of free residence in another's
house. Inst. 2, 5; Dig. 7, 8.
HABENDUM. In conveyancing. The clause usually following the granting part of the
premises of a deed, which defines the extent of the ownership in the thing granted to be
held and enjoyed by the grantee. 3 Washb. Real Prop. 437.
HABENDUM ET TENENDUM. In old conveyancing. To have and to hold. Formal words
in deeds to land from a very early period. Bract, fol. 176.
HABERE. Lat. In the civil law. To have. Sometimes distinguished from tenere, (to hold,)
and possidere, (to possess;) habere referring to the right, tenere to the fact,
and possidere to both. Calvin.
POSSESSOR. One who possesses; one who has possession.
CORPOREAL. A term descriptive of such things as have an objective,
material existence; perceptible by the senses of sight and touch; possessing a real
body. Opposed to incorporeal and spiritual. There is a distinction between " corporeal"
and "corporal." The former term means "possessing a body," that is, tangible, physical,
material; the latter means "relating to or affecting a body," that is, bodily, external.
Corporeal denotes the nature or physical existence of a body; corporal denotes its
exterior or the co-ordination of it with some other body. Hence we speak of "corporeal
hereditaments, but of "corporal punishment, ""corporal touch," "corporaloath, n eto.
INCORPOREAL. Without body; not of material nature; the opposite of "corporeal," (q.
t>.)
INCORPOREAL CHATTELS. A class of incorporeal rights growing out of or incident to
things personal; such as patent-rights and copyrights. 2 Steph. Comm. 72.
Mathew 19 (first part)
3The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a
man to put away his wife for every cause? 4And he answered and said unto them, Have
ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
5And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his
wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6Wherefore they are no more twain, but one
flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. 7They say unto
him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her

away? 8He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you
to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so. 9And I say unto you,
Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another,
committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
>>> This is what Jesus explained best, when the disciples came to him and asked Him
whether Moses (a judge) was great in granting divorces, and asking him what happens
to females when their "legal" husbands passed away...."are they passed to and fro, what
happens when his brother dies, and then she goes elsewhere?" and of course, Jesus
told them: "You know NOT the scripture of God" as in the Resurrection (when you get
Your House in order), females are not passed around {and there is no such thing as
Moses tricking you out}.
Mathew 22
23 The same day came to him the Sadducees, which say that there is no resurrection,
and asked him, 24 Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his
brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother. 25Now there were with
us seven brethren: and the first, when he had married a wife, deceased, and, having no
issue, left his wife unto his brother: 26Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the
seventh. 27And last of all the woman died also. 28Therefore in the resurrection whose
wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her. 29 Jesus answered and said unto
them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30For in the
resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God
in heaven. 31But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which
was spoken unto you by God, saying, 32I am the God of Abraham, and the God of
Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. 33 And
when the multitude heard this, they were astonished at his doctrine.
>>> God is not the God of the dead, but of the living (why the heck would a female
require a marriage license to protect her from the state? When Your House is in
order, and you realize you are Gods and have repented...there is no predation
from the state....the state is gone, Babyl has fallen).

Their House - The House of Representatives

HELL. The name given to a place under the exchequer chamber, where the
king's debtors were confined. Rich. Diet.
Americanbar.org/groups/leadership/house_of_delegates.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Delegates_(disambiguation)
The lower chambers (hallways, rooms, catacombs) of the House of Representatives, is
the House of Delegates, with full on administrative control over the Bar....under that bar,
is hell, where the King's Debtors are kept.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thoughts- (Exchequer=X CHECKer? Cancels evidence of debt with X? Chancellor=Cancel. One who cancels? Cancels what? If "Hell" is a
debtors prison under the Exchequer's Chambers, then the Exchequer/Chancellor/Cancelor is the one overseeing those who are in hell. When
one repents, one is released from hell, all debts are forgiven, etc. Could it be that since the Cancelor is by definition, the "keeper of the
barrier, secretary and usher", he is the "gatekeeper" and can usher in those who repent?)
Bible has many scriptures that state we must "bear the cross"...

Could it be that the Probate Judge/Chancellor/Exchequer is the one who crosses out the legal title we onced used, thereby declaring it
"dead" and the man who has given his testimony is thereby declared "alive"? Do you see how this fits in with the good book and with the
Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666?