Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
April 2007
Gross Weight in
Tons
3.5 tons
12 tons
18 tons
24 tons
30 tons
42 tons
58 tons
% of Total commercial
Vehicles in ADT
33%
22%
16%
14%
9%
4%
2%
Page 1 of 8
Single Axle
Tandem Axle
Axle Load
(kN)
8.9
44.5
62.3
80.0
89.0
133.4
8.9
44.5
62.3
80.0
89.0
133.4
151.2
177.9
222.4
(lbs)
2,000
10,000
14,000
18,000
20,000
30,000
2,000
10,000
14,000
18,000
20,000
30,000
34,000
40,000
50,000
Load Equivalency
Factor (LEF)
0.0002
0.088
0.360
1.00
1.51
7.0
0.000
0.007
0.027
0.077
0.121
0.658
1.09
2.08
4.86
In order to compute the exact values of the load equivalency factors, one should have
the axle loads together with the axle configurations for the predicted traffic composition
of the project being studied. By considering the maximum loads for different vehicle
types and their computed equivalency factors were applied as follows:
Table A2.2 : Vehicle Type and Load Equivalency Factors
Vehicle Type
Mini Bus
Bus
2-Axle Truck
3-Axle Truck
4-Axle Truck
5-Axle Truck
6-Axle Truck
Gross Weight
3.5 tons
12 tons
18 tons
24 tons
30 tons
42 tons
58 tons
Axle Configuration
2.45 ton SXL + 1.05 ton SXL
8.40 ton SXL + 3.60 ton SXL
11 ton SXL + 7 ton SXL
18 ton TXL + 6 ton SXL
18 ton TXL + (2x6) ton SXL
18 ton TXL + 16 ton TXL + 8 ton SXL
30 ton TrXL + 18 ton TXL + 10 ton SXL
LEF
0.0073
1.240
3.855
2.103
2.126
4.455
8.090
SXL: Single Axle Load, TXL: Tandem Axle Load, TrXL: Tridem Axle Load
The above values of LEFs were used to compute the cumulative 18-kip ESAL values
over the design period of 20 years. The computed 18-kip ESAL values were then used
in the structural design of pavement layers.
April 2007
Page 2 of 8
A3: DESIGN SUBGRADE CBR, MR, R-VALUE WHICH ONE USED IN DESIGN
ai
MR (psi)
0.42
EAC =400,000
0.35
EDBM =300,000
0.14
EBS =32,000
0.12
EBS =15,000
April 2007
Page 3 of 8
pavement performance;
traffic;
sub-grade soil strength;
materials of construction;
environment;
drainage; and,
reliability.
The AASHTO (1993) relationship used for the design of flexible pavement is as
under:
PSI
log10
.
4.2 15
log10 W18 ZR So 9.36 log10 SN 1 0.20
2.32 log10 MR 8.07
1094
0.40
SN 15.19
Where,
W18
ZR
So
PSI
is difference between the initial design serviceability index, po, and the design terminal
serviceability index, pt.
MR
is resilient modulus.
SN
where,
Drainage Quality
April 2007
1-5%
5-25%
> 25%
Excellent
1.40-1.25
1.35-1.30
1.30-1.20
1.20
Good
1.35-1.25
1.25-1.15
1.15-1.10
1.00
Page 4 of 8
Fair
1.25-1.15
1.15-1.05
1.00-0.80
0.80
Poor
1.15-1.05
1.05-0.80
0.80-0.60
0.60
Very Poor
1.05-0.95
0.95-0.75
0.75-0.40
0.40
For the present design, the value of mi has been taken as 1.0 corresponding to
drainage quality as Good with the pavement structure exposed to >25% of time
exposed to moisture approaching saturation.
The MR values of unbound granular materials have been estimated using the
following relationship (AASHTO, 1993):
MR = k1 k2
where,
k1, k2
is the stress state. The values of within the base courses vary depending on the resilient
modulus of soil and the asphalt layer thickness. The values used in the design are
(AASHTO, 1993):
are
AC Thickness
Roadbed Soil
(inch)
7500
15000
<2
20
25
30
24
10
15
20
46
10
15
>6
regression coefficients which are dependent of the material type used in the
pavement courses. The suggested values of k1 and k2 are given below:
Moisture Condition
k1 (Note 1)
k2 (Note 1)
Base
Dry
6000 - 10000
0.5 - 0.7
Damp
4000 - 6000
0.5 - 0.7
Wet
2000 - 4000
0.5 - 0.7
Sub-Base
Dry
6000 - 8000
0.4 - 0.6
Damp
4000 - 6000
0.4 - 0.6
Wet
1500 - 4000
0.4 - 0.6
April 2007
Page 5 of 8
Based on the above considerations and also keeping in mind the ISOHDM
(1995) recommendations, the following values of layer coefficient for the different
pavement materials have been adopted for pavement design: Pavement
structural strength and layer strength coefficient derived from various agencies is
presented in Table 3.6.
Table 3.6
Pavement Material
ai
MR (psi)
0.42
EAC =400,000
0.35
EDBM =300,000
0.14
EBS =32,000
0.12
EBS =15,000
The pavement is for a heavily trafficked rural highway, which has been designed for Service Level
B. The overall reliability level for the facility has, therefore, been assumed as 90 per cent. For a
two-stage strategy i.e. initial pavement plus one overlay, the design reliability for each stage should
0.50
or 0.95 per cent.
be 0.90
The value of the normal deviate, ZR, corresponding to 95 per cent reliability has been taken as
1.645 (AASHTO, 1993)
The overall standard deviation suitable for the design of flexible pavements range between 0.40 and
0.50. The overall standard deviation, So, has been taken as 0.40 on the assumption that the
projection of the future traffic represents the most likely scenario.
The values of initial serviceability index, pi, and terminal serviceability index, pt,
have been assumed as under:
The pi value of 4.5 has been adopted on the basis of the consideration that the implementation of the
project would be done with strict adherence of quality control norms for materials and works.
For this heavily trafficked important road, the value of the terminal serviceability index, pt, i.e., the
lowest acceptable level of serviceability before the resurfacing would be necessary has been taken
as 2.5.
April 2007
Page 6 of 8
Projected Number of
Standard Axles
(W18)
Allowable
Cumulative Traffic
Main Line
Nasser Road
32.3 x 10^6
5.07
32.73 x 10^6
Jahra Road
29.7 x 10^6
5.02
30.45 x 10^6
Nasser Road
5.2 x 10^6
3.9
5.23 x 10^6
Jahra Road
15.3 x 10^6
4.6
16.26 x 10^6
33.3 x 10^6
5.1
34.18 x 10^6
Al-Jahez Road
21.0 x 10^6
4.8
22.02 x 10^6
Ghazali Road
9.8 x 10^6
4.3
10.15 x 10^6
Airport Road
18.8 x 10^6
4.7
18.94 x 10^6
17.1 x 10^6
4.65
17.55 x 10^6
Service Road
3.3.2.4
Page 7 of 8
By taking the base course and sub-base course thicknesses of 250mm and
200mm, respectively, then
SNAL = SN (0.0394 x (0.14 x 250 x 1.0 + 0.12 x 200 x 1.0)
The thickness of the asphalt layer (DAL) = D1 wearing course + D2 asphalt base
A wearing course thickness 50mm and 40mm for ESAL of more than 10msa and
less than 10msa respectively. Based on this assumption, the thickness worked
out for wearing course and asphalt base for all road segments is given in table
B1.2 below:
Table B1.2: Pavement Structure based on AASHTO-1993
Road Section
Nasser Road
(ML)
Jahra Road
(ML)
Nasser Road
(SR)
Jahra Road
(SR)
4th Ring
Road (SR)
Al-Jahez
Road (SR)
Ghazali Road
(SR)
Airport Road
(SR)
2nd Ring
Road (ML)
ESAL
Required
SN
ACBC
CABC
GSBC
Total
5.07
50
150
250
200
650
5.18
29.7 x 10^6
5.02
50
140
250
200
640
5.04
5.2 x 10^6
3.90
40
75
250
200
565
3.98
15.3 x 10^6
4.60
50
110
250
200
610
4.63
33.3 x 10^6
5.10
50
150
250
200
650
5.18
21.0 x 10^6
4.80
50
125
250
200
625
4.84
9.8 x 10^6
4.30
40
100
250
200
590
4.33
18.8 x 10^6
4.70
50
120
250
200
620
4.77
17.10 x 10^6
4.65
50
120
250
200
620
4.77
32.3 x 10^
April 2007
Page 8 of 8
SN