Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Timber Structure
by
S. S. Nabaei, Y. Weinand
Reprinted from
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
SPACE STRUCTURES
Volume 26 Number 4 2011
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. IBOIS, the re-interpretation of timber
construction
In recent years, the necessity of using renewable and
sustainable resources in the building sector has
become obvious, and interest in timber as a building
material has revived [13]. Novel timber-derived
products, such as massif block panels, have emerged
and the use of such products is spreading [4, 5].
321
322
(a)
3.4 m
2. PRESENTATION OF STRUCTURE
2.1. The folding concept
The folding concept presented in this paper has been
initially examined, during an architectural workshop,
The Atelier Weinand at IBOIS-EPFL, turning around
the discrete architectural geometry. A V-form basic
module is fabricated through connecting two timber
panels and is then spatially multiplied using consecutive
spatial rotations and translations to form an arch (fig 1).
The structure can be decomposed into four
principal typologies (fig 2) each consisted of two
mirrored timber panels, joined together as a V-form
module, through the bisector plan, by means of two
hard wood dowels (fig 3). They are placed in the
(b)
Typ. 1
Typ. 2
Typ. 3
Typ. 4
Typ. 4
Typ. 3
Typ. 2
Typ. 1
Figure 2. (a) Front and top view of the prototype (b) Principal
typologies of timber panels (unfolded top view).
(a)
7.4 m
4.3 m
(b)
323
S2 (P2)
P1 = R1 (P1)
Q1 = R1 (Q1)
Qe
P1
Q1
Pe
P1
2
Q1
S2
S 1 ( Q 1)
Q2
R1
++
S1
Pe
R1
0
cx = 1 S1 (1)
cv = 1 S2 (1)
S2 (P1)
Q1
P1
Q1
P1
S1 (Q1)
T1
R2
(Q
1)
T1 = (cv)
T1 = (cv) cx
T1 = (cv) R2 (cx)
T2
P1
I1
T3
T3 T1 (cv) R2 (cx)
cv cx
Figure 4. Transformation of basic trapezoidal panel (0) into two V-form modules (M'cv M'cx).
324
(a)
Horizontal
trimming plan
H
Trimmed part on CX element
(b)
w: Translation vector
2w
w
Concave element
(CV)
U-joint
Convex element
(CX)
Convex element
(CX)
Concave element
(CV)
325
3' 3'
3. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Here the objective is to understand the structural
system considering the geometric non-linearity by the
aid of appropriate numerical models and to propose
eventual improvements. The diagnostics about the
structural system is consisted of the linear static
analysis under the self-weight and the modal dynamic
analysis, in order to examine the rigidity. Based on
these observations, improvements are proposed in 4.
2' 2'
3'
2'
1' 1'
1'
11
1
22
33
326
I.5master
CX
I.2slave
I.5slave
I.2master
CV
I.3slave
CX
I.4master
I.3master
I.4slave
CV
II.1
I.3
I.2
I.5
CX
I.1
I.4
II.2
CV
TYPE I
I.1 Axial contact between coincident faces of U-joints
I.2 Contact between top face of CV-U-joint with upper face of CX
I.3 Contact between bottom face of CV-U-joint with lower face of CX
I.4 Contact between bottom face of CX-U-joint with lower face of CV
I.5 Contact between top face of CX-U-joint with upper face of CV
TYPE II
II.1 Joint along two mirrored panels of CX
II.2 Joint along two mirrored panels of CV
327
in mm
U, Magnitude
+4.123e-03
+3.779e-03
+3.435e-03
+3.092e-03
+2.748e-03
+2.405e-03
+2.061e-03
+1.718e-03
+1.374e-03
+1.031e-03
+6.871e-04
+3.435e-04
+0.000e+00
S Mises in Pa
S, Mises
(Avg: 75%)
+1.412e+07
+1.294e+07
+1.177e+07
+1.059e+07
+9.413e+06
+8.237e+06
+7.060e+06
+5.884e+06
+4.707e+06
+3.531e+06
+2.354e+06
+1.178e+06
+1.268e+03
Figure 10. Global deformation field and von Mises stress in single isolated arc model..
(2)
(a)
(a)
(b)
CV 2
CV 1
CV 1
Openned U-joint
CX 1
CX 1
CV 1
CX 0
CX 0
CV 2
CX 1
CX 1
CV 2
(b)
CV 2
CV 1
(IV)
(IV)
(IV)
(III)
CV
(III)
CV
CV
CX
CV
CX
CX
CV
CX
CV
CX
CX
CV
CV
(c)
(III): Internal supplementary U-joint typology
(IV): External supplementary U-joint typology
(c)
Original CV
Interlocked CV
(III)
(II)
(II)
(I)
(I)
(IV)
k 2 m2 f 2
165
=
k0 m0 f0
(3)
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors would like to thank O. Baverel from Navier
laboratory of ENPC, for his contribution to this
study.
[12]
[13]
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
330
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]