Supplier Name:

Supplier ESD Number:

Evaluator Name:
Business:
Date:

SRS Suppliers Performance Rating - Subcriteria Level

Color Rating Chart

Unsatisfactory
0

Rating Input Range

Criteria/Subcriteria
Quality

Weight
30%

Product Quality

40%

Corrective Action Management

35%

Quality Management Policies / Practices / Processes

Document Management Quality

Delivery/Schedule
SPI
Schedule/Delivery Subcontract SDRLs and Product
Schedule/Delivery Services
Schedule/Delivery Improvement Efforts

Technical
Technical Compliance
Product Development Participation
Technical Process and Systems
Technical Project Management

Price/Cost
CPI
Cost Reduction Efforts
Accurate & Timely
Payment Term Flexibility

Management

15%
10%
Weight
30%
25%
25%
25%
25%
Weight
20%
50%
20%
15%
15%
Weight
10%
30%
30%
25%
15%
Weight
5%

Management Compliance

40%

Communication

20%

Representation

20%
20%
Weight
5%

Sub-Tier Supplier Management

Responsiveness
Timeliness

35%

Customer Focus

35%
30%

Effective Communication

Marginal
1

Satisfactory
2

Very Good
3

Note: The %'s are defaults and can be altered

Exceptional
4

Key Performance
Area
Price / Cost

(Optional)
Performance
Criteria
Considerations

Unsatisfactory

Marginal

Satisfactory

Very Good

Exceptional

Cost
Performance
Index
(CPI)

CPI < 0.90

CPI 0.90 < 0.95
CPI 0.95 < 1.02
CPI 1.02 < 1.05
CPI 1.05
Significant Cost
Cost Overrun: Actual On Budget: Actual Cost Cost Underrun: Actual
Significant Cost
Overrun: Actual Cost of
Cost of Work
of Work Performed is
Cost of Work
Underrun: Actual Cost
Work Performed is
Performed is More than
Within Acceptable
Performed is Less than of Work Performed is
Significantly More than
Cost Budgeted
Bounds of the Cost
the Cost Budgeted
Significantly Less than
Cost Budgeted
Budgeted
the Cost Budgeted

Cost Reduction
Efforts

Does not participate in

Provides some cost
Cooperates in cost
Active in cost
Proactive in cost
cost reduction nor in
reduction. (Does not improvement activities. improvement activities. improvement activities.
R6S with Suppliers
participate in R6S with
(Participates in R6S (Willing to participate in (Willing to participate in
when requested
Suppliers when
with Suppliers when
R6S with Suppliers)
R6S with Suppliers)
requested)
requested)

Accurate &
Timely
Cost or Pricing
Data

Provides
Provides marginally
unsatisfactorily clear & clear & accurate cost,
accurate cost, pricing
pricing and variance
and variance data
data and/or sometimes
and/or consistently late
late

Payment Term
Flexibility

Rigid payment terms

less favorable than
desired

Offers few favorable

payment terms:
<30 days with no
discount

Provides clear &

Provides very clear & Provides outstandingly
accurate cost, pricing accurate cost, pricing clear & accurate cost,
and variance data
and variance data
pricing and variance
and/or on time
and/or usually ahead of data and/or ahead of
time
time
Payment terms are
mostly favorable:
>30 days or >1%
discount

Payment terms are

very favorable:
>40 days or >1.5%
discount

Payment terms are all

favorable:
>45 days or > 2%
discount

Key Performance Area

Technical
SOW - Statement of Work
Specs - Specifications
Drwg - Drawings
SDRLs - Subcontract
Deliverable Requirements
List

(Optional)
Performance
Criteria
Considerations

Unsatisfactory

Marginal

Satisfactory

Very Good

Technical
Compliance

Supplier fails to comply Supplier occasionally Supplier complies with

Supplier complies
with Technical
fails to comply with
Technical
effectively with
Requirements (e.g.,
Technical
Requirements, e.g.,
Technical
SOW, Specs, Drwg,
Requirements, e.g.,
SOW, Specs, SDRLs,
Requirements, e.g.,
SDRLs, etc.)
SOW, Specs, SDRLs,
etc.
SOW, Specs, SDRLs,
etc.
etc.

Product
Development
Participation

The supplier does not Supplier occasionally

provide timely and
fails to participate in
accurate responses to product development
requests for design and (i.e. Integrated Product
technical support.
Team IPT participation)

Technical
Process and
Systems

Supplier fails to employ

Technical Systems,
Processes and
Standards

Supplier occasionally
fails to employ
Technical Systems,
Processes and
Standards

Supplier participates in
product development
(i.e. Integrated Product
Team IPT participation)

Supplier participates
effectively in product
development (i.e.
Integrated Product
Team IPT participation)

Supplier employs
Technical Systems,
Processes and
Standards

Supplier employs
effective Technical
Systems, Processes
and Standards

Technical Project Supplier fails to employ Supplier occasionally

Supplier employs
Management
effective Technical
fails to employ effective
Technical Project
Project Management
Technical Project
Management Practices
Practices
Management Practices

Supplier employs
effective Technical
Project Management
Practices

Exceptional

Supplier exceeds
expectations in
complying with
Technical
Requirements, e.g.,
SOW, Specs, SDRLs,
etc.
Supplier exceeds
expectations in product
development
participation (i.e.
Integrated Product
Team IPT participation)
Supplier exceeds
expectations in
employing Technical
Systems, Processes
and Standards
Supplier exceeds
expectations in
employing effective
Technical Project
Management Practices

Key
Performance
Area

(Optional)
Performance Criteria
Considerations

Responsiveness

Timeliness

Supplier fails to act,

respond and/or
communicate in a
timely manner

Supplier occasionally Supplier acts, responds

Supplier usually
fails to act, respond
and/or communicates exceeds expectations
and/or communicate in
in a timely manner
in acting, responding
a timely manner
and/or communicating
in a timely manner

Supplier consistently
exceeds expectations
in acting, responding
and/or communicating
in a timely manner

Customer Focus

Supplier fails to
demonstrate practices
that promote and
support a "customerfocused" environment

Supplier occasionally Supplier demonstrates

Supplier exceeds
fails to demonstrate
practices that promote
expectations in
practices that promote
and support a
demonstrating
and support a
"customer-focused"
practices that promote
"customer-focused"
environment
and support a
environment
"customer-focused"
environment

Supplier consistently
exceeds expectations
in demonstrating
practices that promote
and support a
"customer-focused"
environment

Effective
Communication

Supplier fails to
effectively
communicate with
Raytheon and/or lower
tier vendors

Supplier occasionally
fails to communicate
with Raytheon and/or
lower tier vendors

Unsatisfactory

Marginal

Satisfactory

Supplier effectively
communicates with
Raytheon and/or lower
tier vendors

Very Good

Exceptional

Supplier usually
Supplier consistently
exceeds expectations exceeds expectations
in effectively
in effectively
communicating with
communicating with
Raytheon and/or lower Raytheon and/or lower
tier vendors
tier vendors

Key Performance
Area
Management

(Optional)
Performance
Criteria
Considerations

Unsatisfactory

Marginal

Satisfactory

Very Good

Exceptional

Management
Compliance
(Non Technical)

Unsatisfactory in
Marginally effective in
Satisfactory in
Very Good in
Outstanding in
complying with
complying with
complying with
complying with
complying with
contractual
contractual
contractual
contractual
contractual
requirements (Including requirements (Including requirements (Including requirements (Including requirements (Including
Staffing)
Staffing)
Staffing)
Staffing)
Staffing)

Communication

Unsatisfactory in
Marginally effective in
Satisfactory in
Very Good in
Outstanding in
communicating
communicating
communicating
communicating
communicating
vertically (through tiers) vertically (through tiers) vertically (through tiers) vertically (through tiers) vertically (through tiers)
and/or horizontally
and/or horizontally
and/or horizontally
and/or horizontally
and/or horizontally
(through organization) (through organization) (through organization) (through organization) (through organization)

Representation

Unsatisfactory in
Marginally effective in
Satisfactory in
Very Good in
Outstanding in
representing Raytheon representing Raytheon representing Raytheon representing Raytheon representing Raytheon
Interests
Interests
Interests
Interests
Interests

Sub-Tier
Supplier
Management

Unsatisfactory in
Marginally effective in
Satisfactory in
Very Good in managing
Outstanding in
managing performance managing performance managing performance performance of sub-tier managing performance
of sub-tier supplier(s)
of sub-tier supplier(s)
of sub-tier supplier(s)
supplier(s) [quality,
of sub-tier supplier(s)
[quality, cost, delivery, [quality, cost, delivery, [quality, cost, delivery,
cost, delivery, and
[quality, cost, delivery,
and technology]
and technology]
and technology]
technology]
and technology]

Key Performance
Area
Quality
Performance

(Optional)
Performance
Criteria
Considerations
Product Quality

Unsatisfactory

Supplier fails to
demonstrate quality in
the product

Marginal

Satisfactory

Very Good

Exceptional

Supplier demonstrates
Supplier meets the
Supplier demonstrates Supplier demonstrates
marginally acceptable minimum requirements effective quality in the exceptional quality in
quality in the product
for quality in the
product
the product
product

Corrective Action Supplier demonstrates Supplier demonstrates

Supplier meets the
Supplier demonstrates Supplier demonstrates
Management
no active or effective a marginally active and minimum requirements an active and effective
a highly active and
corrective action
effective corrective
for an active and
corrective action
effective corrective
management program
action management
effective corrective
management program
action management
program
action management
program
program
Quality
Management
Policies /
Practices /
Processes

Document
Management
Quality

Supplier demonstrates Supplier demonstrates

no support for and
marginal support for
compliance with Quality and compliance with
Management Policies
Quality Management
and Practices
Policies and Practices

Supplier fails to
demonstrate quality in
document
management

Supplier meets the

Supplier demonstrates Supplier demonstrates
minimum required
support for and
high degree of support
degree of support for compliance with Quality for and compliance
and compliance with
Management Policies
with Quality
Quality Management
and Practices
Management Policies
Policies and Practices
and Practices

Supplier demonstrates
Supplier meets the
Supplier demonstrates Supplier demonstrates
marginally acceptable minimum requirements
effective quality in
exceptional quality in
quality in document
for quality in document
document
document
management
management
management
management

Key Performance
Area
Schedule/ Delivery

SDRL - Subcontract
Deliverable
Requirements List

(Optional)
Performance
Criteria
Considerations

Unsatisfactory

Marginal

Satisfactory

Very Good

SPI < 0.90

Significantly Behind
Schedule: Budgeted
Cost of Work
Performed is
Significantly less than
the Budgeted Cost of
Work Scheduled

SPI 0.90 < 0.95

Behind Schedule:
Budgeted Cost of
Work Performed is
less than Budgeted
Cost of Work
Scheduled

SPI 0.95 < 1.02

On Schedule:
Budgeted Cost of
Work Performed is
Within acceptable
Bounds of the
Budgeted Cost of
Work Scheduled

SPI 1.02 < 1.05

Ahead of Schedule:
Budgeted Cost of
Work Performed is
Greater than the
Budgeted Cost of
Work Scheduled

Schedule/Delivery
Unsatisfactory in
Sometimes fails to
Subcontract
complying with delivery comply with delivery
SDRLs and/or
schedule
schedule
Product

Complies with
delivery schedule

Occasionally
exceeds compliance
with delivery
schedule

Schedule/Delivery
Unsatisfactory in
Sometimes fails to
Services
complying with delivery comply with delivery
schedule
schedule

Complies with
delivery schedule

Occasionally
exceeds compliance
with delivery
schedule

Schedule
Performance Index
(SPI)

Schedule/Delivery
Improvement
Efforts

Unsatisfactory in
schedule recovery
efforts

Marginally
Satisfactorily meets Very good in making
acceptable schedule
requirements for
effective schedule
recovery efforts
schedule recovery
recovery efforts
efforts

Exceptional

SPI 1.05
Significantly Ahead of
Schedule: Budgeted
Cosf of Work
Performed is
Significantly Greater
than the Budget Cost
of work Scheduled
Routinely exceeds
compliance with
delivery schedule

Routinely exceeds
compliance with
delivery schedule
Outstanding in
schedule recovery
efforts