Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
This paper presents a study into the effect of different activation conditions on the porosity and adsorption characteristics
of carbon adsorbents produced from waste tyre rubber. For the purpose of this work, three carbon series were produced using
different activation temperatures (between 925 and 1100 8C) and oxidising agents (steam or carbon dioxide). Carbons
produced to different degrees of burn off were characterised using gas (nitrogen) and liquid phase (phenol, methylene blue
and Procion Red H-E2B) adsorption. Total micropore volumes and BET surface areas increased almost linearly with the
degree of activation to 0.554 ml / g and 1070 m 2 / g, respectively, while the development of external surface area was
particularly rapid at degrees of activation above 50 wt% burn off. Steam was observed to generate a narrower but more
extensive microporosity than carbon dioxide. However, carbon dioxide produced carbons of slightly larger external surface
areas. Activation at higher temperatures resulted in pores of slightly larger dimensions, although this was only evident in
highly activated samples. Porosity characteristics were reflected in the capacity of the carbons to adsorb species of different
molecular size from solution. In this respect, steam-activated carbons presented greater capacities for the adsorption of
smaller molecular size compounds (phenol), while carbon dioxide-activated carbons adsorbed larger textile dyes more
effectively.
2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A. Activated carbons; B. Activation; C. Adsorption; D. Adsorption properties; Porosity
1. Introduction
Increasing demand for adsorption processes in the water
treatment industry is encouraging research into the production of activated carbon from alternative precursors
including industrial wastes and agricultural by-products
[13]. The production of carbon adsorbents from waste
tyre rubber has been investigated by several authors, with
marked differences in the porosity of the final products
[410]. This variability has been attributed primarily to
differences in the pyrolysis and activation conditions
employed but also to the characteristics of the rubber feed,
including particle size and composition [10].
*Corresponding author. Present address: Royal Holloway
Institute for Environmental Research, Huntersdale, Callow Hill,
Virginia Water, Surrey GU25 4LN, UK. Fax: 144-1784-477-427.
E-mail address: chris.sollars@rhul.ac.uk (C.J. Sollars).
0008-6223 / 03 / $ see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016 / S0008-6223(02)00449-9
1010
2. Experimental
1011
Fig. 2. Nitrogen gas adsorptiondesorption isotherms exhibited by tyre rubber pyrolytic char (Pyro) and carbons activated in steam
(SP 925 400) and carbon dioxide (P 950 400) to a similar degree of burn off.
]
]
]
]
1012
1013
Table 1
Langmuir parameters determined for the adsorption of phenol, methylene blue and Procion Red by tyre rubber-derived carbons produced
under different activation conditions
Carbon
burn off
(wt%)
Phenol
Xm
(mg / g)
Methylene blue
b
Xm
(mg / g)
P 950 80
12.5
53
0.07
0.99
74
0.450
]
]
P 950 240
31.6
89
0.13
0.99
196
0.708
]
]
P 950 400
45.3
97
0.11
0.95
254
0.876
]
]
P 950 480
52.5
99
0.01
0.96
292
0.762
]
]
P 950 640
65.4
94
0.01
0.98
352
1.085
]
]
SP 925 80
12.5
64
0.06
0.99
125
0.06
]
]
SP 925 240
30.1
93
0.09
0.97
236
0.52
]
]
SP 925 400
45.3
92
0.11
0.96
296
0.19
]
]
SP 925 480
49.8
105
0.07
0.98
325
0.37
]
]
SP 925 640
63.2
106
0.06
0.99
360
0.57
]
]
P 1100 60
31.1
85
0.12
0.98
189
0.403
]
]
P 1100 120
46.5
89
0.07
0.98
287
0.513
]
]
P 1100 180
66.2
76
0.07
0.97
327
0.772
]
]
Values determined by application of the Langmuir equation to the adsorption data.
Procion Red
r
0.87
0.95
0.89
0.98
0.87
0.90
0.87
0.94
0.99
0.99
0.88
0.94
0.88
Xm
(mg / g)
r2
67
99
145
237
385
67
104
139
211
333
105
188
n/a
0.489
0.260
1.230
0.279
0.383
0.204
0.138
0.479
0.179
0.345
0.418
0.418
n/a
0.96
0.99
0.91
0.93
0.97
0.98
0.99
0.92
0.98
0.99
0.94
0.94
n/a
1014
Fig. 7. Adsorption isotherms for phenol (left), methylene blue (middle) and Procion Red (right) exhibited by tyre rubber carbons from series
SP 925.
]
4. Conclusions
Activation of pyrolytic chars from waste tyre rubber
resulted in a rapid development of their porosity, surface
area and capacity to adsorb organic species of different
molecular size. Results presented in this paper show that
carbon characteristics are primarily influenced by the
degree of activation of the carbons but also by the nature
of the activation agent (steam or carbon dioxide) and, to a
lesser extent, the process temperature.
The development of total micropore volume (DA) and
effective surface area (BET) followed a linear relationship
with the degree of activation while the formation of
mesopores was particularly extensive at degrees of activation above 50 wt%. Results presented in this paper show
that activated carbons produced in steam exhibited narrower micropores and larger BET surface areas and total
micropore volumes than those produced using carbon
dioxide. Differences in external surface areas were less
significant and usually in favour of the carbon dioxideactivated carbons. Activation at lower temperatures also
generated micropores of slightly narrower dimensions and
larger BET surface areas. However, these differences were
only significant in highly activated carbons.
Porosity characteristics were reflected in the capacity of
the rubber carbons to adsorb organic species of different
molecular sizes from solution. Thus, steam-activated carbons presented greater capacities for the adsorption of
small and medium size species (such as phenol and
methylene blue) while carbon dioxide-activated carbons
adsorbed larger molecular size compounds (textile dye
Procion Red) more effectively.
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
Acknowledgements
One of the authors (Guillermo San Miguel) would like
Universidades e
to thank the Departmento de Educacion,
of the Basque Government (Spain) for
Investigacion
financial support in the form of a studentship.
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
References
[1] Rodriguez-Reinoso F. Activated carbon: structure, characterisation, preparation and applications. In: Marsh H, Heintz
EA, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, editors, Introduction to carbon
technologies, Alicante, Spain: Publicaciones Universidad de
Alicante, 1997, pp. 35102.
[2] Pollard SJ, Fowler GD, Sollars CJ, Perry R. Low-cost
adsorbents for waste and wastewater treatment: a review. Sci
Total Environ 1992;116(1):3152.
[3] Bansal RC, Donnet J-B, Stoeckli F. In: Active carbon, New
York: Marcel Dekker, 1988, pp. 126.
[4] Allen JL, Gatz JL, Eklund PC. Applications for activated
carbons from used tyres; butane working capacity. Carbon
1999;37(9):148591.
[5] Cunliffe AM, Williams PT. Properties of chars and activated
carbons derived from the pyrolysis of used tyres. Environ
Technol 1998;19(12):117790.
[6] Brady TA, Rostam-Abadi M, Rood MJ. Applications for
activated carbons from waste tyres; natural gas storage and
air pollution control. Gas Sep Purif 1996;10(2):97102.
[7] Teng H, Derio MA, Wojtowiz MA, Bassilakis R, Solomon
PR. Reprocessing of used tyres into activated carbon and
other products. Ind Eng Chem Res 1995;34(9):310211.
[8] San Miguel G, Fowler GD, DallOrso M, Sollars CJ.
Porosity and surface area characteristics of activated carbons
produced from waste tyre rubber. J Chem Tech Biotech
2001;77:18.
[9] Streat M, Patrick JW, Camporro-Perez MJ. Sorption of
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
1015
D, Martn-Guillon
I. Porosity development during CO 2 and
steam activation in a fluidized bed reactor. Energy Fuels
2000;14(2):1429.
Molina-Sabio M, Gonzalez MT, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Sepu lveda-Escribano A. Effect of steam and carbon dioxide
activation in the micropore size distribution of activated
carbon. Carbon 1996;34(4):5059.
Tomkov K, Siemieniewska T, Czechowski F, Jankowska A.
Formation of porous structure in activated brown-coal chars
using O 2 , CO 2 and H 2 O as activating agents. Fuel
1977;56(1):1214.
Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in
multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 1938;60(3):30919.
Gregg SJ, Sing KSW. In: Adsorption, surface area and
porosity, London: Academic Press, 1982.
Lippens BC, deBoer JH, Studies on pore systems in catalysts
V. The t-plot method. J Catal 1965;4:31923.
Kaneko K. Determination of pore size and pore size distribution. Adsorbents and catalysts. J Memb Sci 1994;96:59
89.
Dubinin MM. Fundamentals of theory of adsorption in
micropores of carbon adsorbents: characteristics of their
adsorption properties and microporous structures. Carbon
1989;27(3):45767.
Stoeckli F. Characterisation of microporous carbons by
adsorption and immersion techniques. In: Patrick JW, editor,
Porosity in carbons, London: Edward Arnold, 1995, pp.
6792.
Stoeckli F. Recent developments in Dubinins theory. Carbon 1998;36(4):3638.
1016
[30] Faust SD, Aly OM. In: Adsorption processes for water
treatment, London: Butterworths, 1987, pp. 159.
[31] Cazorla-Amoros D, Alcaniz-Monge J, de la Casa-Lillo MA,
Linares-Solano A. CO 2 as an adsorptive to characterise
carbon molecular sieves and activated carbons. Langmuir
1998;14:458996.
[32] Paulsen PD, Moore BC, Cannon FS. Applicability of ad-