Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Achievements/Failure
During 1965-66 there is increase in the production of tea, salt, cotton cloth and yarn, board, caustic soda,
cement and cycle rubber tires and tubes. The increase in the quantum index of manufacturing industries
from 100 in 1959-60 to 201.7 in 1964-65. Growth in 68-69 was 7.4% that was previously 7.8%. And in
49-50 the share go agriculture was standing 60% which came down to 46% in 68-69.
The strategy paid off very well as the actual growth rate surpassed the projected growth rate. The GNP
registered a growth of 30% over the plan period compared to 24% proposed in the plan and per capita
income grew 15% instead of 12% projected in the plan. The large scale industrial production exhibited
nearly 161% increases in production compared to only 60% increase proposed in the Plan. The share of
the manufacturing industry in GNP as a whole rose from 9.3% in 1960 to 11.5% in 1965.
Third Five Year Plan (1965-1970) Highlights
Targets
The Third Plan was approved by National Economic Council in May 1965 and it was revised in 1966 due
to following two reasons:
Pakistan had to fight battle with India.
The seasonal conditions became worst for agriculture sector which affected production.
An amount of Rs.52000 million was allocated for the plan out of which Rs.30,000 million for the public
sector and Rs.20,000 million for the private sector were allocated. 66 percent of the total plan size was to
invest from the local sources and remaining 32 percent through the external sources.
In this Plan there was a great visible investment shift from consumer goods to capital goods industry
Achievements/Failure
Performance in the industrial sector was also far from satisfactory particularly in the large-scale industrial
sector. The large-scale industrial sector exhibited a growth rate of 10% as against 13% targeted in the
Plan. The industrial sector as a whole expanded at an annual growth rate of 7.8% instead of 10% targeted
in the Plan. The small-scale industry just performed well.
During 1967-68, substantial gains were also recorded by cotton yarn and cloth fertilizes and chemicals,
writing and printing paper etc. The growth rate of large scale industrial decline from 13.9% in 1969-70 to
2.8 in 1970-71 and showed a negative growth rate of 5.6 percent in 1971-72.the negative growth in this
year was due to the war with India and separation from the Bangladesh where exist the big industry of
jute.
Fourth Five year Plan (1970-75) Highlights
Targets
When the government of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto came to power in 1971, planning was virtually bypassed.
The Fourth Five-Year Plan (1970-75) was abandoned as East Pakistan became independent Bangladesh.
Under Bhutto, only annual plans were prepared, and they were largely ignored.
The revised total size of the second Plan was fixed at Rs. 75 billion, an increase in 44% over the Third
Plan size. The increase 6.5% annual growth rate as compared to 5.5% targeted in the Plan.
The share of the industrial sector that had 10% growth rate in the last Plan was drastically slashed from
26% in the Third Plan to 10.2% in the Fourth.
Achievements/Failure
Industrial sector had all along been leading sector in terms of sustain growth. Value added fell by 6.8%
during 1971-72 compared to depress based of 1970-71 when the growth was only 1.2%.Steady growth in
1973-74. Different factor, like war with India and tight credit policies and East Pakistan crisis growth
decline 6.8% in 1971-72. Steady improvement or recovery in 1972-73. Manufacturing sector slow-down
during 1974-75 because low level of investment and shortage of raw material. Textile has heavy weight in
total industrial production. 1974-75 there was also difficult when value added project to grow by 10% in
the LSM sector recorded negative growth of 1.7%. in 1976-77 During this time manufacturing sector
continue to remain under pressure due to various national and international factors.
The volume of national product had been increased and the symptoms of construction were being
reflected from the basic structure of the economy. It was imperative that the development efforts were
concentrated on the higher income group and the majority was deliberately neglected. The social needs
like housing, health, education etc were not paid due attention in planning.
Fifth Five Year Plan (1978-83) Highlights
Targets
The economic growth in Pakistan became stagnate due to the application of Annual Planning in Pakistan
by Peoples Party
Government during the period of 1970-78 therefore, the Marshall Law Government drafted the Fifth Five
Year Plan in 1977 and it was implemented in very difficult and unfavorable condition because:
Commodity Production sector had turned into completely a stagnant sector.
Imports increased fast.
Foreign exchange reserves were decreasing very fast.
The total size of the Plan was targeted at Rs. 210 billion out of which Rs. 148.2 billion were proposed to
be spent in the public sector and Rs. 62 billion were proposed for the private sector.
No major new industrial projects was planned for the public sector however it was emphasized the
completion of the under construction Pakistan steel mills and fertilizers and cement factories.
Private sector was expected to pay a vital role in the development of few industries which is good for the
well-being of the country.
Achievements/Failure
As a whole, the growth rate projected for the industrial sector was almost fulfilled (growth rate was 9.7%
as compared to 10% targeted in the Plan).
In July 1978, the interest rate on loans for fixed investment in industry and agriculture was reduced from
12.5% to 11%. The Zia government accorded more importance to planning. Fifth plan was an attempt to
stabilize the economy and improve the standard of living of the poorest segment of the population.
Nevertheless, some of the plan's goals were attained. Many of the controls on industry were liberalized or
abolished, the balance of payments deficit was kept under control, and Pakistan became self-sufficient in
all basic foodstuffs with the exception of edible oils. Yet the plan failed to stimulate substantial private
industrial investment and to raise significantly the expenditure on rural infrastructure development.