General Digital Corporation v. LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. et al Doc.

16
Case 3:07-cv-00452-SI Document 16 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987

WILLIAM J. TAYLOR, State Bar No. 72902
2 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
3 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 442-1000
4 Facsimile: (415) 442-1001

5 Attorneys for Defendants

Hitachi America, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic
6 Devices (USA), Inc

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10

11 General Digital Corporation, individually Case No. 07-0452 MJJ

and on behalf of all those similarly
12 situated, NOTICE OF JOINDER IN STIPULATION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
13 Plaintiff, RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ; ORDER

14 v. Honorable Martin J. Jenkins

15 LG.Philips LCD Co. Ltd., et al.,

16 Defendants.

17

18

19

20
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT L AW
NOTICE OF JOINDER IN STIPULATION FOR
SAN FRANCISCO 1-SF/7494301.1 EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
C-07-0452 MJJ

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 3:07-cv-00452-SI Document 16 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants Hitachi America, Ltd. (hereinafter “HAL”) and

2 Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. (hereinafter “HED-US”) have, by written notice to

3 Plaintiff in this action, joined in the Stipulation for Extension of Time between Plaintiff and

4 defendant AU Optronics Corporation America dated and filed in this action on February 6, 2007

5 and currently awaiting approval by the Court (the “Stipulation”).

6 Pursuant to the Stipulation, the deadline for HAL and HED-US to respond to Plaintiff’s

7 Complaint shall be extended until the earlier of the following two dates: (1) forty-five days after

8 the filing of a Consolidated Amended Complaint in the LCD Cases; or (2) forty-five days after

9 Plaintiff provides written notice to Defendants that it does not intend to file a Consolidated

10 Amended Complaint, provided that such notice may be given only after the initial case

11 management conference in the MDL transferee court in this case. The joinder in the Stipulation

12 does not constitute a waiver by HAL and HED-US of any defense, including but not limited to

13 the defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction, insufficiency of process,

14 insufficiency of service of process, or improper venue.

15
Dated: February 7, 2007
16 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
KENT M. ROGER
17 WILLIAM J. TAYLOR
18
By: /s/
19 Kent M. Roger
20 Counsel for Defendants
Hitachi America, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic
21 Devices (USA), Inc
22
IT IS SO ORDERED:
23

24

25 _________________
Martin J. Jenkins
26 U.S. District Court
27

28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
NOTICE OF JOINDER IN STIPULATION FOR
ATTORNEYS AT L AW
SAN FRANCISCO 1-SF/7494301.1 1 EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
C-07-0452 MJJ