Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Department of Chemical and Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi s/n, 17071 Girona, Spain
Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering, University of Lleida, Avda. Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
c
Northwest Research-Extension Center, Kansas State University, 105 Experiment Farm Road, Colby, KS 67701, USA
b
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 9 October 2009
Received in revised form 12 January 2010
Accepted 13 January 2010
Available online 6 February 2010
Keywords:
Flushing
Wastewater
Surface drip irrigation
Subsurface drip irrigation
Plugging
1. Introduction
The use of efuents in agriculture is a viable alternative in areas
where water is scarce or when there is intense competition for its
use. The best way to apply efuents from the public health and
environmental points of view is by means of microirrigation (Bucks
et al., 1979). Surface drip irrigation (DI) and subsurface drip
irrigation (SDI) are two types of microirrigation systems. Surface
drip irrigation uses emitters and lateral lines laid on the soil surface
or attached above-ground on a trellis or tree while subsurface drip
irrigation emitters are buried below the soil surface. The main
advantages of these drip irrigation systems are that they increase
water use efciency, minimize salinity hazard to plants, improve
chemical application, decrease energy requirements and improve
cultural practices (Ayars et al., 2007). Additionally, SDI systems
diminish human exposure to efuents and also vandalism
potential, but have a higher initial investment cost and need
careful and consistent operation, maintenance and management
(Lamm and Camp, 2007).
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 972 41 84 59; fax: +34 972 41 83 99.
E-mail address: jaume.puig@udg.edu (J. Puig-Bargues).
0378-3774/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.019
884
Fig. 1. Hydraulic diagram of the microirrigation system and location of monitoring and control equipment.
Emitter 1
Emitter 2
2.3
50400
400
17.0
1.00
0.05
Yes
<3
1.15
0.95
1.09
22.0
8.0
2.0
100
350
16.1
1.00
0.46
No
<3
0.76
1.08
0.82
75.0
70.0
Filter inlet
Temperature (8C)
pH
DO (mg/l)
Turbidity (FTU)
Filter outlet
DO (mg/l)
Turbidity (FTU)
Irrigation period
1
21.25 3.52
7.33 0.09
3.96 0.80
10.33 10.50
19.64 1.94
7.97 0.26
3.54 0.92
9.08 9.88
27.20 1.20
7.46 0.16
2.50 0.41
8.06 8.51
3.57 0.98
2.87 3.66
3.13 0.48
2.02 1.92
4.16 0.83
3.40 2.83
885
Table 3
Dates and accumulated irrigation time for when ushing events were carried out.
Irrigation
period
Treatment
Date
Irrigation
time (h)
First
Monthly ushing
Monthly ushing
Monthly ushing/one
ushing
October 5, 2007
November 2, 2007
December 7, 2007
Second
Monthly ushing
Monthly ushing
Monthly ushing/one
ushing
753
995
1080
Third
Monthly ushing
Monthly ushing/one
ushing
August 4, 2008
September 8, 2008
1339
1620
107
307
540
886
p25
p
x
and location along the lateral and the double interactions between
them, and the replications as error term. For studying the number
of totally clogged emitters, the model included as xed effects the
irrigation system, emitter, ushing frequency treatment and the
double interactions between them, and replications as the error
term. Tukeys pairwise comparison was used to identify means
that were different at probabilities of 0.05 or less.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Sand media lter performance
The sand lter achieved a turbidity removal efciency for the
efuent between 61% (irrigation periods 1 and 2) and 71% (period
3). These turbidity removal efciencies lowered the physical
clogging risks and were similar to those observed with a sand
media lter with effective sizes of 0.40 mm and 0.27 mm working
with similar efuents (Duran-Ros et al., 2009). The increase in
dissolved oxygen at the lter outlet [6.23% (season 1), 0.47%
(season 2) and 26.56% (season 3)] indicates that some reduction of
organic contaminants was achieved through ltration. The
presence of less organic material after the sand media lters
was also observed by Tajrishy et al. (1994) and could explain the
lower fouling of emitters protected by this type of lter (Duran-Ros
et al., 2009). The greater reduction in turbidity and increased
dissolved oxygen achieved in the third irrigation period could be
related to the smaller effective sand media size used in the third
season (Ives, 1980).
The number of sand lter backwashings was 117 during the
rst irrigation period and 306 during the second one. This increase
was primarily due to the sand media clogging by trapped particles
that were observed at the end of the second irrigation period. The
manufacturer indicated that the sand media should be replaced
after 1000 h of operation. In the third irrigation period, the number
of backwashings increased to 503 due to, rst, the smaller effective
sand media size and, second to some treatment plant discharge
events having greater solids load in the efuent.
Although the regulated inlet pressures were similar between
irrigation periods there was a steady increase in the seasonal water
applications, 6005 m3, 6087 m3, and 6407 m3 over seasons 13,
respectively, which is a 7% increment over the entire course of the
experiment.
3.2. Emitter performance
100
(3)
where p25 is the average pressure of 25% of the emitters with the
lowest pressure (kPa), p is the average pressure of all the tested
emitters (kPa) and x is the emitter ow exponent.
Additionally, at every evaluation of emitter discharge, the
number of totally clogged emitters of each dripline was also
determined.
2.4. Observation of the clogging of the emitters
After all the experimental measurements were completed,
some lateral sections and emitters were analyzed for visual
evidence of clogging. Clogged emitters were inspected externally
and then cut open for internal inspection.
2.5. Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were carried out using the GLM procedure
of the SAS statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The
model used for analyzing emitter performance included as xed
effects the irrigation system, emitter, ushing frequency treatment
887
Table 4
Pressure uniformity (Uplq) and distribution uniformity (DUlq) for each emitter type in the surface and subsurface irrigation units at the end of the irrigation periods. In
subsurface drip irrigation, Uplq and DUlq were only determined at the end of the experiment.
Emitter type
Flushing frequency
Surface
Subsurface
0h
540 h
1080 h
1620 h
1620 h
Uplq
DUlq
Uplq
DUlq
Uplq
DUlq
Uplq
DUlq
Uplq
DUlq
No ushing
Seasonal ushinga
Monthly ushing
99.8
99.8
99.8
95.1
94.3
94.3
99.9
99.9
99.9
94.2
93.0
96.0
99.8
99.8
99.8
83.2
91.7
94.0
99.8
99.6
99.8
76.0
95.1
84.5
99.7
99.7
99.7
54.0
80.1
87.7
No ushing
Seasonal ushinga
Monthly ushing
98.5
98.0
98.3
96.5
97.0
95.1
98.8
98.8
98.6
96.3
96.3
95.5
98.1
97.9
98.1
86.2
96.5
89.9
97.9
97.9
98.0
67.8
87.1
93.9
97.3
97.6
97.5
24.3
47.0
69.4
A single ushing event was conducted at the end of each irrigation period.
Fig. 3. Average emitter 2 lateral ow rate for every 10 h of experiment. Dotted lines show a period where the system was operating but the data was missed as the
instrumentation was not working properly.
888
Table 5
Signicance level (P-value) of the statistical model and of each factor and
interaction for explaining the relative emitter discharge (qr) variability at the end of
the experiment (1620 h of irrigation).
P-value
Model
Irrigation system
Emitter type
Flushing frequency
Emitter location
Irrigation system emitter type
Irrigation system ushing frequency
Irrigation system emitter location
Emitter type ushing frequency
Emitter type emitter location
Flushing frequency emitter location
***
*
***
**
*
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
*
*
Fig. 4. Average relative emitter discharge and standard error after 1620 h for emitter 1 (pressure compensating) and emitter 2 (nonpressure compensating) for the different
locations. For each emitter, different lowercase letters mean signicant differences (P < 0.05) among sampling locations. For each emitter location, different uppercase letters
mean signicant differences (P < 0.05) among emitters.
889
Fig. 5. Average relative emitter discharge and standard error after 1620 h for the three ushing frequency treatments for the different locations. For each ushing frequency
treatment, different lowercase letters mean signicant differences (P < 0.05) among sampling locations. For each emitter location, different uppercase letters mean
signicant differences (P < 0.05) among treatments.
Table 6
Average and standard deviation of the percentage of completely clogged emitters
by emitter, irrigation system and ushing frequency at the end of the experiment.
Table 7
Signicance level (P-value) of the statistical model and of each factor and
interaction for explaining completely clogged emitter variability at the end of the
experiment (1620 h of irrigation).
Emitter
type
Flushing frequency
Surface drip
irrigation
1
P-value
No ushing
One ushing
Monthly ushing
0.3 0.5
0.8 1.0
0.0 0.0
1.4 1.7
0.3 0.5
0.3 0.5
No ushing
One ushing
Monthly ushing
1.3 1.0
0.8 1.0
0.5 0.6
4.5 1.6
3.7 3.1
4.5 1.0
Model
Irrigation system
Emitter type
Flushing treatment
Irrigation system emitter type
Irrigation system ushing treatment
Emitter type ushing treatment
n.s., not signicant; P > 0.05.
**
P < 0.01.
***
P < 0.001.
***
**
***
n.s.
**
n.s.
n.s.
890
Fig. 6. Average percentage of totally clogged emitters and standard error at the end of the experiment. For each emitter, different lowercase letters mean signicant
differences (P < 0.05) among irrigation system. For each irrigation system, different uppercase letters mean signicant differences (P < 0.05) among emitters.
caused soil ingestion through the emitter when the system was
shutdown (Lamm and Camp, 2007). Mucous microbial substances
have been found to be the main factor of emitter clogging when
working with reclaimed efuents (Adin and Sacks, 1991; Ravina
et al., 1997). Biolm removal by ushing is made difcult by its low
specic gravity and high adhesive characteristics. Installation of
air/vacuum relief valves at the high elevation points can help
prevent soil ingestion in SDI (Lamm and Camp, 2007). These
devices were not installed in the irrigation system because we did
not anticipate soil ingestion would be a problem for our shallow
depth and for the topography of the eld site. The presence of roots
was observed only in two tested emitters. However, root intrusion
from some weeds that grew in the last phase of the third irrigation
period did not cause complete clogging, neither blocking the
emitter outlet nor the emitter labyrinth. Efuent chlorination has
been found to be effective in reducing clogging caused by biolm
growth (Ravina et al., 1997; Tajrishy et al., 1994). Other chemical
treatments such as acidication can be also used for increasing
chlorination effectiveness (Nakayama et al., 2007) and for reducing
root intrusion (Choi and Suarez-Rey, 2004) when it is needed.
4. Conclusions
The clogging of two different emitters, one pressure compensating and the other not, working during three irrigation periods of
540 h each with a wastewater treatment plant efuent that
presented a minor physical clogging hazard, but moderate
chemical and biological clogging hazards, was affected by the
interactions between emitter type and emitter location, and
ushing frequency treatment and emitter location.
Distribution uniformity at the end of the experiment was less
without ushing and subsurface drip irrigation, being 54% and 24%
for the pressure and nonpressure compensating emitters, respectively. Average distribution uniformity for ushed laterals was 90%
and 84% with pressure compensating emitter in surface and
subsurface drip irrigation, respectively, and 91% and 58% with
nonpressure compensating emitter in surface and subsurface
irrigation units.
Dripline ow of the pressure compensating emitter increased
8% over time in surface and subsurface drip irrigation, but in the
nonpressure compensating emitter, dripline ow increased 25% in
References
Adin, A., Sacks, M., 1991. Dripper-clogging factors in wastewater irrigation. J. Irrig.
Drain. Eng. 117 (6), 813827.
ASAE, 2003. ASAE engineering practice EP405.1, February 03. In: Design and
Installation of Microirrigation Systems, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, pp. 901905.
AWWA, 2001. ANSI/AWWA B100-01 AWWA standard for granular lter material,
AWWA, Denver, CO.
Ayars, J.E., Bucks, D.A., Lamm, F.R., Nakayama, F.S., 2007. Introduction. In: Lamm,
F.R., Ayars, J.E., Nakayama, F.S. (Eds.), Microirrigation for Crop Production.
Design, Operation, and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 126.
Bliesner, R.D., 1976. Field evaluation of trickle irrigation efciency. In: Proceedings of
Water Management for Irrigation and Drainage, ASCE, Reston, VA, pp. 382393.
Bucks, D.A., Nakayama, F.S., Gilbert, R.G., 1979. Trickle irrigation water quality and
preventive maintenance. Agric. Water Manage. 2, 149162.
Camp, C.R., Sadler, E.J., Busscher, W.J., 1997. A comparison of uniformity measures
for drip irrigation systems. Trans. ASAE 40 (4), 10131020.
Capra, A., Scicolone, B., 2007. Recycling of poor quality urban wastewater by drip
irrigation systems. J. Clean. Prod. 15 (16), 15291534.
Cararo, D.C., Botrel, T.A., Hills, D.J., Leverenz, H.L., 2006. Analysis of clogging in drip
emitters during wastewater irrigation. Appl. Eng. Agric. 22 (2), 251257.
Choi, C.Y., Suarez-Rey, E.M., 2004. Subsurface drip irrigation for bermudagrass with
reclaimed water. Trans. ASAE 47 (6), 19431951.
Duran-Ros, M., Puig-Bargues, J., Arbat, G., Barragan, J., Ramrez de Cartagena, F.,
2008. Denition of a SCADA system for a microirrigation network with efuents. Comput. Electron. Agric. 64 (2), 338342.
Duran-Ros, M., Puig-Bargues, J., Arbat, G., Barragan, J., Ramrez de, F., Cartagena,
2009. Effect of lter, emitter and location on clogging when using efuents.
Agric. Water Manage. 96 (1), 6779.
Gil, M., Rodrguez-Sinobas, L., Juana, L., Sanchez, R., Losada, A., 2008. Emitter
discharge variability of subsurface drip irrigation in uniform soils: effect on
water application uniformity. Irrig. Sci. 26 (6), 451458.
Hills, D.J., Brenes, M.J., 2001. Microirrigation of wastewater efuent using drip tape.
Appl. Eng. Agric. 17 (3), 303308.
Hills, D.J., Nawar, F.M., Waller, P.M., 1989. Effects of chemical clogging on drip-tape
irrigation uniformity. Trans. ASAE 32 (4), 12021206.
Hills, D.J., Tajrishy, M.A., Tchobanoglous, G., 2000. The inuence of ltration on
ultraviolet disinfection of secondary efuent for microirrigation. Trans. ASAE 43
(6), 14991505.
891
Ives, K.J., 1980. Deep bed ltration: theory and practice. Filtr. Sep. 17 (2), 157166.
Keller, J., Karmeli, D., 1974. Trickle irrigation design parameters. Trans. ASAE 17 (4),
678684.
Lamm, F.R., Camp, R.C., 2007. Subsurface drip irrigation. In: Lamm, F.R., Ayars,
J.E., Nakayama, F.S. (Eds.), Microirrigation for Crop Production. Design,
Operation, and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 473551.
Lamm, F.R., Trooien, T.P., 2005. Dripline depth effects on corn production when crop
establishment is nonlimiting. Appl. Eng. Agric. 21 (5), 835840.
Liu, H., Huang, G., 2009. Laboratory experiment on drip emitter clogging with
fresh water and treated sewage efuent. Agric. Water Manage. 96 (5), 745
756.
Merriam, J.L., Keller, J., 1978. Farm Irrigation Evaluation: A Guide for Management.
Department of Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering, Utah State University,
Logan, Utah.
Nakayama, F.S., Boman, B.J., Pitts, D.J., 2007. Maintenance. In: Lamm, F.R., Ayars,
J.E., Nakayama, F.S. (Eds.), Microirrigation for Crop Production. Design,
Operation, and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 389430.
Puig-Bargues, J., Lamm, F.R., Trooien, T.P., Clark, G.A., Dripline ushing velocities for
SDI, ASABE paper no. 096457, ASABE, St. Joseph, MI, 2009, p. 17
Ravina, I., Paz, E., Sofer, Z., Marcu, A., Shisha, A., Sagi, G., 1992. Control of emitter
clogging in drip irrigation with reclaimed wastewater. Irrig. Sci. 13 (3), 129
139.
Ravina, I., Paz, E., Sofer, Z., Marcu, A., Shisha, A., Sagi, G., Yechialy, Z., Lev, Y., 1997.
Control of clogging in drip irrigation with stored treated municipal sewage
efuent. Agric. Water Manage. 33 (23), 127137.
Shannon, W.M., James, L.G., Basset, D.L., Mih, W.C., 1982. Sediment transport and
deposition in trickle irrigation laterals. Trans. ASAE 25 (1), 160164.
Tajrishy, M.A., Hills, D.J., Tchobanoglous, G., 1994. Pretreatment of secondary
efuent for drip irrigation. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 120 (4), 716731.
Trooien, T.P., Hills, D.J., 2007. Application of biological efuent. In: Lamm, F.R., Ayars,
J.E., Nakayama, F.S. (Eds.), Microirrigation for Crop Production. Design, Operation,
and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 329356.
Trooien, T.P., Lamm, F.R., Stone, L.R., Alam, M., Rogers, D.H., Clark, G.A., Schlegel, A.J.,
2000. Subsurface drip irrigation using livestock wastewater: dripline ow rates.
Appl. Eng. Agric. 16 (5), 505508.
Vermeiren, L., Jobling, G.A., 1986. Localized Irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage Paper
36. FAO, Rome.
Warrick, A.W., Shani, U., 1996. Soil-limiting ow from subsurface emitters. II. Effect
on uniformity. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 122 (5), 296300.