Securities And Exchange Commission v. Heinen et al Doc.

23
Case 5:07-cv-02214-JF Document 23 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 3

1 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

ONE MARITIME PLAZA, SIXTH FLOOR
2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
TELEPHONE: 415.434.4484
FACSIMILE: 415.434.4507
3
THOMAS F. CARLUCCI, BAR NO. 135767
4 tcarlucci@foley.com
ERIN J. HOLLAND, BAR NO. 233305
eholland@foley.com
5
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
6 555 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 3500
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
7 TELEPHONE: 213.972.4500
FACSIMILE: 213.486.0065
8 PAMELA L. JOHNSTON, BAR NO. 132558
pjohnston@foley.com
9
ATTORNEYS FOR NON-PARTY WENDY HOWELL
10

11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13 SAN JOSE DIVISION
14 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: C-07-2214(JF)
COMMISSION,
15 DECLARATION OF ERIN J. HOLLAND
Plaintiff, IN SUPPORT OF NON-PARTY WENDY
16 HOWELL’S MOTION TO QUASH OR, IN
vs. THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR ISSUANCE OF
17 A PROTECTIVE ORDER
NANCY R. HEINEN,
18 Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Defendant.
19 Date: December 11, 2007
Time: 10:00 a.m.
20 Dept: Courtroom 2, 5th Floor
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DECLARATION OF ERIN J. HOLLAND IN SUPPORT OF

NON-PARTY WENDY HOWELL’S MOTION TO QUASH; CASE NO. C-07-2214(JF)
SFCA_487443.1
Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 5:07-cv-02214-JF Document 23 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 3

1 DECLARATION OF ERIN J. HOLLAND

2 I, Erin J. Holland, hereby declare as follows:
3 1. I am an attorney in good standing with the State Bar of California and am duly
4 licensed to practice law in the State of California. I am an associate at the law firm of Foley &
5 Lardner LLP, attorneys of record for Non-Party Wendy Howell (“Howell”) in the above-
6 captioned matter. I submit this Declaration in support of Non-Party Wendy Howell’s Motion to
7 Quash, or in the Alternative, for Issuance of a Protective Order. Unless otherwise stated, I have
8 personal knowledge of the facts set forth below and, if called as a witness, I could and would
9 competently testify thereto.
10 2. Defendant Nancy Heinen (“Heinen”) hired Ms. Howell as a full-time staff
11 attorney for Apple Computer, Inc. in 1997. Ms. Howell reported directly to Defendant Heinen
12 until Heinen’s departure in the Spring of 2006.
13 3. I spoke with Miles Ehrlich and Felicia Gross, counsel for Defendant Nancy R.
14 Heinen, by telephone on October 11, 17, and 22. Ms. Johnston joined me on these calls. We
15 informed Mr. Ehrlich and Ms. Gross of Ms. Howell’s objection to the subpoenas served on non-
16 parties Bank of Alameda, Washington Mutual, Wells Fargo & Co., Western Sunrise Mortgage,
17 Franklin Templeton Investments, California State University, Stanford University, and the
18 California State Bar on or about September 21, 2007. Throughout the course of these
19 conversations, we were able to narrow and resolve a number of issues raised by the subpoenas as
20 discussed in the brief.
21 4. On October 5, 2007, I sent written objections to the subpoenas to Mr. Ehrlich on
22 behalf of Ms. Howell. These objections indicated that Ms. Howell objected to the subpoenas on
23 the grounds that the subpoenas (1) require disclosure of Ms. Howell’s personal and private
24 records; (2) seek information irrelevant to the dispute; (3) are impermissibly overbroad; and (4)
25 were issued merely to harass and annoy Ms. Howell.
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
2
DECLARATION OF ERIN J. HOLLAND IN SUPPORT OF
SFCA_487443.1 NON-PARTY WENDY HOWELL’S MOTION TO QUASH; CASE NO. C-07-2214(JF)
 Case 5:07-cv-02214-JF Document 23 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 3 of 3

1 5. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed
2 on November 2, 2007, in San Francisco, California.
3 By: s/ Erin J. Holland
ERIN J. HOLLAND
4

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
3
DECLARATION OF ERIN J. HOLLAND IN SUPPORT OF
SFCA_487443.1 NON-PARTY WENDY HOWELL’S MOTION TO QUASH; CASE NO. C-07-2214(JF)