Nancy Duffy McCarron, CBN 164780

Attorney, Pro Tem Judge, Real Estate Broker,

Arbitrator for BBB Southern California
Notary Public, State of California
950 Roble Lane
Santa Barbara, CA 93103
April 10, 2015
Kamala Harris
Attorney General of California
1300 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814-2919
Phone 916-445-9555

Re: Arnold Stubblefield [R] Bribes via PACs

Follow-Up to Your Colonies Corruption Indictments
involving Stubblefield bribes laundered through PACs

Dear Ms. Harris:

I waited 3 years to file this request to investigate more corruption in San Bernardino
County involving Arnold Stubblefield because I wanted to accumulate significant evidence.
I do not make allegations unless I have indisputable evidence to support those allegations.
During my 20 year career as a victim rights attorney I prosecuted 5 civil RICO complaints
against white collar racketeers who defrauded elderly victims regularly in a similar way.
All 5 civil cases I prosecuted resulted in subsequent criminal indictments of perpetrators.
People v. Jacqueline Berkaw, US v. Jacqueline Berkaw, People v. Craig Radden, US v.
Craig Radden, People v. Elke Dreves, People v. Rajan Ayyar, People v. Michael Coombs.
There were many other cases, but these were convictions for racketeering against victims.
I have worked together with agents from FBI, District Attorney, Attorney General, etc.
Many agents have retired but all agreed that when I alleged racketeering I had sufficient
evidence to indict and convict every time. Attached are two volumes of evidence supporting
a pattern of racketeering involving Arnold Stubblefield and his corrupt influence (PC 85).
Included are two volumes (22 exhibits) which seems overwhelming at first glance.
However, it will only take an hour or two to review because you do not need to read it all.
I highlighted key sentences. On included spreadsheets relevant columns are highlighted.
Scanning highlighted columns or words on each page shows a picture by eye scan in seconds.
You need not read the entire spreadsheet, which is evidentiary support for my allegations.
Exhibit 1 is a picture of Arnold Stubblefield wearing his money necklace from facebook.
A picture is worth a thousand words. Stubblefield loves money so much he actually wears it.
The next picture is a lot at the front entrance to Stubblefields 400 space mobile home park,
entitled, Mountain Shadows Mobile Home Community, 4040 E. Peidmont Dr, Highland, CA.
It shows the parks sign mounted on top of a large Neil Derry for County Supervisor.
Following is your indictment affidavit against Neil Derry for laundering Stubbleifields
$5,000 to Neil Derry via Bill Postmus, convicted felon and former SB County Tax Assessor.
Following that is Dale Stubblefields convictions for political crimes in San Jacinto, CA.
Stubblefields have a long history of bribing city and county officials to get what they want.
After the gold divider paper is the San Bernardino DA felony indictment of Bill Postmus, in
the COLONIES corruption case you worked jointly WITH San Bernardino DA Mike Ramos.

These were included to refresh your recollection about Stubblefield and Colonies case.
Bill Postmus & Neil Derry left offices in disgrace and plead guilty to corruption crimes.
For some unknown reason Arnold Stubblefield was not prosecuted for perpetrating bribes.
Perhaps law enforcement gave him immunity in exchange for his testimony against targets.
It is time now to hold Stubblefield accountable for 40 years of political corruption. (PC 85).
Exhibit 2 shows that as soon as corrupt Bill Postmus departed the Tax Assessors Office
Arnold Stubblefield immediately contributed $2,500 to the new Tax Assessor Bob Dutton.
I noticed there is a James D. Dutton (Supervising Deputy Attorney General) on your staff.
If he is related to Bob Dutton he must disqualify himself from participating in investigation.
Exhibit 2 shows Bob Dutton is the current San Bernardino County Tax Assessor official.
An apple doesnt fall far from the tree. It is no coincidence that Arnold Stubblefield already
bought influence in the Tax Assessors Office. It is a primary part of racketeering enterprise.
Please read my February 4, 2013 letter to San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, in
which I demanded an investigation of the corruption within the Tax Assessors office.
Attached is significant evidence supporting my allegations as to specific corruption there.
The county maintains a database of parcels and corresponding property tax assessments.
Owners pay taxes annually based upon current valuations of the real property being taxed.
These taxes are for the use of local county services such as fire departments, police, etc.
Stubblefield bribes these officials to minimize the purported valuations of his properties on
tax assessor databases to minimize the amount of annual taxes Stubblefield owes on them.
Be mindful there are 400 spaces in the park and about 387 of them are able to be occupied by
Stubblefields tenants. He collects between $1,100 to $1,500 for each home rented therein.
Stubblefield advertises in monthly flyers to residents. see Exhibit 1, at tab RENTALS
His rental income (at $1,300 average per home x 387 homes) exceeds $500,000 per month.
Certainly he can afford to pay his share of taxes for services which all these tenants use.
Only private owners of homes in the park pay annual taxes based on 1% of purchase price.
This is where the two databases included at Exhibit 2 shows the picture by eye scan.
You need only scan down two highlighted columns showing tax roll year and valuations.
The first database is Stubblefield owned homes. The second database is private owners.
Please note roll value columns in Stubblefield homes show no value, 0, unavailable, or
in the few places where dollar amounts appear the values are set at artificially low values.
The column entitled Roll Year shows the last year taxes were paid. Stubblefield homes
show years such as 1998, 1993, etc. which means he has paid ZERO since then on an asset
which produces monthly income of $1,300. Is this fair? If you talk to Bob Dutton he will
say they are coaches and not taxable. NOT TRUE. See tab How mobile homes are taxed.
Since 1980 they are taxed annually at 1% of the amount the buyer paid for the home asset.
See the database for individual owners. It shows roll years at recent years (2012, etc.)
and shows valuations of actual values, such as $79,900 which the owner pays 1% per year.
Secondly, Bob Dutton intentionally and purposefully maintains the database of homes
in Stubblefields park NOT IN NUMERICAL ORDER. This makes it nearly impossible for
anyone to properly audit the records. This is Bob Duttons role in racketeering enterprise.
Keep the records jumbled up making it difficult to audit records, and make sure values
of homes Stubblefield owns are listed in the databases as unavailable, zero, or negligible.
It must be nice to rake in $500,000 per month in rental income and pay no taxes on it for
county services residents use daily. This is why Stubblefield contributed to Bob Dutton.
2

Bob Dutton never responded to my 2/4/13 letter, nor did any Supervisor follow up on it.
Ignoring corruption seems to be the regular course of action in San Bernardino County.
Exhibit 3 is a certified copy of the Tax Assessors print out of owners of homes in the park.
(Dennis Draeger 1/30/15). A 2-minute scan of the report (in which I highlighted in yellow all
of the homes Stubblefield owns out of 387) shows Stubblefield owns about 2/3 of the homes.
When I bought a mobile home in the park in 2005 about 90% were owned by individuals.
Stubblefield hired a new law firm (HART|KING from Orange County) in early 2010 as part
of his racketeering enterprise. The firm specializes in park busting to facilitate the owners
filching of the bulk of homes from their owners to convert the park into a cash cow of rental
units in which residents have no protections under Mobile Home Residency Law (MRL)
because they are not owners of the homes. Only owners are protected under the MRL act.
Since Stubblefield hired the callous firm they have helped him steal 2/3 of them already.
To this end, the HART|KING ruthless lawyer, Robert Williamson (a liar & cheater)
devised a 50-page onerous set of 2010 Community Rules in February of 2010. Stubblefield
held a town hall meeting in the clubhouse for owners to voice their concerns about them.
I stood up at the meeting and pronounced that many of the new rules were unconstitutional.
Stubblefields overall park manager and henchman Tom Parrish told me to sit down and that
he had heard enough from me. I was not allowed to speak any more at that owners meeting.
Stubblefield and Tom Parrish, through his ruthless lawyer, Robert Williamson, decided
they were going to get me after that meeting. They intended to make an example of me, so
that no one would ever challenge their rules which were covertly designed as a pretext to
use against owners, who violate a rule 3 times (the park can now evict to steal their home).
My tenure as an owner of a second home in the park from 2005 to 2010 was uneventful.
After speaking up at that 2010 meeting they have engaged in a witch hunt to evict me.
My housemate (Bonnie Shipley) and I have endured 3 years of living hell since they first
tried to evict Bonnie (to preclude me from getting any help with $1100 in monthly rent).
My primary residence is a Santa Barbara home I share with my husband, Tim McCarron.
Bonnie Shipley and I decided we would fight to protect $675,000 mobile home residents
from arbitrary and whimsical evictions without just cause by fighting the eviction vigorously.
After Stubblefield lost his sham eviction action against Bonnie Shipley directly, and he was
served with my motion for 3 years of vitriolic litigation tactics against us, he became furious.
We believe Stubblefield tried to burn down my mobile home by tampering with the pedestal
which supplies electric to the home. We have no proof but no one else had an arson motive.
Stubblefield bribed the arson investigator and battalion chief to file a false report. (Exh. 13).
Exhibit 4 is the park Directory showing resident telephone numbers with space numbers.
I highlighted in yellow all the spaces with homes now owned by Stubblefield (about 2/3).
It takes about 30 seconds to scan it to get the picture.
Exhibit 5 shows where the Judicial Corruption is shown in my spreadsheet of hearings.
80 hearings, 619 docket entries, 20 volume case file. Why all this scorched earth litigation?
Red shows Bonnie Shipleys motions were nearly always denied while Stubblefields motions
were always granted (in green). We could not figure out why Judge Wilfred Schneider
always ruled against us and ruled in favor of Stubblefield---disregarding codes and the law.
3

Exhibit 6 shows the docket entries for the first sham complaint in which Shipley prevailed.
(428 docket entries for the first sham case; 182 docket entries for the second sham case).
Exhibit 7 shows the Minute Orders (60 hearings in first case; 23 hearings for second case)
Exhibit 8 shows I complained to Presiding Judge, Marsha Slough, about Schneiders bias.
Responses from Ms. Slough and Donna Garza (then presiding judge of the Civil Division)
provided mere lip service, such as my remedy is to appeal and they dont get involved.
An example of the bizarre bias: I set a motion for transfer to unlimited jurisdiction 10/4/12.
On Friday (5 days before the hearing) Williamson noticed a deposition for my handyman at
his office in Orange County the same morning at the same time. He knew I could not be in
two places at once. I called to reschedule. Williamson refused. I had to appear for the
motion I set on calendar in San Bernardino. Williamson appeared by telephone that day.
Williamson had a court reporter sitting there waiting to report we did not show up.
Williamson then moved for $9,000 in sanctions against Bonnie Shipley, Steve Allen & me.
Judge Schneider actually awarded $9,000 in sanctions against us. We could not believe it!
We could not understand how and why he could be so unfair and biased against us, praying
to God to help us understand this depravity. God answered our prayers by allowing us to
discover a key fact by accident. Williamson asked to continue a 12/17/12 trial date due to
the death of Tom Parrishs son. We ordered a copy of death certificate. (see pink sheet)
TOM PARRISHS SONS SURVIVING WIFES NAME WAS KIM SCHNEIDER!
This explained why Judge Wilfred Schneider was so biased against us in their favor.
Immediately upon this discovery I wrote to Marsha Slough demanding that she ask Judge
Wilfred Schneider if Kim Schneider was his family member. She never answered my letter.
I followed up with a second letter demanding again that she ask him about Kim Schneider.
She never answered my letter. In fact, she never answered another letter to this date.
When we tried to meet with her at her office, Marsha Slough refused to meet with us.
Since she had answered 2 letters, and Donna Garza had written 2 letters, the fact that she
stopped all responses to my letters creates a strong inference that Kim Scheider was related
to Judge Wilfred Schneider. It she found out they were not related she would have been
happy to quickly answer my letter to notify me that she found out they were not related.
Judge Schneider then revoked his sanction order sua sponte and recused himself.
The case was assigned to Judge Alvarez. He ruled mostly in favor of Stubblefield but knew
where to draw the line. He treated me respectfully & was not condescending like Schneider.
After he denied our motion for summary judgment I filed a writ petition to get a reversal.
Judges Joseph Brisco and Gilbert Ochoa reversed Alvarez denial of summary judgment.
Judge Alvarez reversed his denial of summary judgment in a minute order he entered.
At the hearing he ordered prevailing party (Bonnie Shipley) to submit a proposed judgment.
Judge Alvarez never signed the proposed judgment I submitted to him a week after hearing.
After he was reversed, I asked Judge Alvarez to recuse himself which he agreed to willingly.
The case was then assigned to Judge Sachs., who turned out to be completely biased.
Sachs refused to hear my statutory attorney fee motion (originally set for 7/2/13 which
was continued by Judge Alvarez due to Stubblefields appeal of grant of summary judgment.)
Sachs then ordered Stubblefield to prepare final judgment over my vehement objections.
4

Court Rule 3.1312 mandates that the prevailing party prepares the final judgment.
WHO EVER HEARD OF A JUDGE ORDERING THE LOSER TO PREPARE JUDGMENT?
NO UNBIASED JUDGE, WITHOUT A HIDDEN AGENDA, WOULD DO SUCH A THING.
Sachs engaged in 9 serial violations of procedures, court rules & judicial ethics. (Exhibit 10)
The most egregious violation was inserting the words or resident into Civil Code 798.56[d]
This paved the way for Stubblefield to use Civil 798.56[d] to evict residents, as well as
homeowners who purportedly violated a purportedly reasonable park rule. Sachs then did
the most bizarre thing I have ever seen a judge do. He ordered our public file located in the
courts public filing room, to be delivered to his chambers after our March 17, 2014 hearing.
Three days later, Williamson sent a runner to deliver Shipleys final judgment directly to
chambers, without serving it to me before he delivered it on March 20, 2014. Sachs signed
it immediately and entered it on the docket as the final judgment purportedly for Shipley.
In reality, it was against Shipley as it authorized Stubblefield to evict Shipley directly.
Williamson served it by email late at night on March 20, 2014. I composed objections to it
and emailed them to Bonnie Shipley to deliver to court the next day. March 21, 2015.
Public filing clerks said they couldnt file her objections as there was no file there as Judge
Sachs had ordered all volumes to be delivered to his chambers. When Shipley arrived in his
court to file objections the clerk said she was too late as Sachs had already signed order.
This is explained in more detail in the OSC papers Shipley filed against Sachs (Exhibit 11).
See Exhibit 11, pages 23, 24 outlining Sachs 9 serial violations all to help Stubblefield.
Conveniently, the only two Judges who ever applied the LAW and ruled for Shipley were
immediately removed from the Appellate Division Panel who would decide the OSC writ.
The only one they left on the Appellate Panel was Hosking the dissenter against Shipley.
THE PROOF WAS IN THE PUDDING. They replaced Ochoa and Brisco (the two honest
judges who were not bribed by Stubblefield) with two of Sachs lunch buddies from Rancho
Cucamonga (where Stubblefield lives.) I am sure these good ole boys meet at the local
Republican hangout (the Rotary Club) regularly and those judges sit with Stubblefield.
Shipleys OSC was denied forcing her to appeal her own victory, to get or resident
stricken from her final judgment. VOLULME II, Exhibit 12 (appeal brief & decision)
Sachs lunch buddies ordered him to strike the words or resident from the decision but
opined his errors were harmless. They were hardly harmless to us! Delaying fees a year.
Having to spend hundreds of hours researching & writing appellate briefs, replies, etc.
(paying $175 for a transcript)
On May 9, 2014, within 3 days after new Appellate Panel Judge David Cohn denied
Shipleys OSC, Eva Stubblefield Hazard circulated a letter TO ALL RESIDENTS
(RED SHEET marks this important document). Eva Stubblefield warns RESIDENTS
not to go faster than 14 miles per hour in the park. Eva warns that she has engaged a new
Traffic Safety Committee (her group of conspiring spies) who will report the license tag
of anyone speeding over 14 miles per hour. If the resident accumulates three warnings
they will face eviction under Civil Code 798.56[d] per their Memo of Understanding
created by the callous attorney Williamson. THIS NOW PROVIDES ANOTHER WAY
FOR STUBBLEFIELD TO STEAL MORE MOBILE HOMES. (EVICTION REMEDY)
Eva Stubblefield had no problem throwing Sachs under the bus looking like the fool he is.
5

Stubblefield was already using the gratuitous gift Sachs provided in the signed judgment.
(An order signed by a Superior Court Judge authorizing evictions of RESIDENTS under
Civil Code 798.56[d]. We do not believe Sachs acts were harmless or unintended errors.
We believe he conspired with Stubblefield to create an order to be used to evict RESIDENTS.
Sachs refused to hear fee motion as he proclaimed there was no jurisdiction since I appealed.
Tom Parrish became so upset, on information and belief, we allege that he tried to burn
my mobile home down. A mysterious fire ignited in the electric pedestal which supplies
electric to our mobile home. The pedestal is under the exclusive control of park managers.
Alert neighbors ran over and extinguished the fire with water and a fire extinguisher.
The fire department truck took 22 minutes to arrive despite being less than a mile away.
I called the county arson investigator to ask him to investigate the inside of the pedestal
to try to discern if it had been tampered with before the fire. I gave him the cell phone
numbers and space # of the 2 neighbors who saw where the fire started and put it out.
The arson investigator never called the only 2 witnesses with personal knowledge.
Instead he violated the confidentiality of our victim reporting and met with Tom Parrish
and his attorney to conspire to file a false report to infer we were responsible for the fire.
Apparently, Stubblefield had already bribed the arson investigator and battalion chief.
We asked San Bernardino City staff to investigate the fire department. (Exhibit 13)
Exhibit 14 shows papers from the new sham complaint Stubblefield filed against me.
The court intentionally tried to sabotage me by sending me a defendant notice of eviction
without identifying the assigned judge. A party only has 10 days to file a CCP 170.6.
We believe the court intentionally assigned Wilford Schneider so he could get his revenge.
We called to ask who was assigned to the case. The clerk responded, Wilford Schneider.
We filed a CCP 170.6 motion to disqualify him. Supervising Judge Kyle Brodie then
assigned the case to himself. He was even more biased than Schneider and Sachs.
We filed a demurrer which Kyle should have granted as there is no legal basis for eviction.
Kyle denied it ordering us to answer in 5 days. We filed a writ petition but it was denied.
Exhibit 15 shows various minute orders. Kyle Brodie ruled for Stubblefield every time.
Kyle ruled 100% for Stubblefield on every motion never ruling in Shipleys favor.
HART|KING unethical lawyer Ryan Egan noticed a deposition for my husband (who has
nothing to do with this) at a non-existent location and which he never scheduled any date or
time with the owner of the court reporting service. We showed up. They did not show up.
Then, the firm asked for sanctions against my husband who did nothing wrong at all.
See objections to MTC Tim McCarron and sanctions in Exhibit 16. Judge Brodie never
sanctioned the firm for this fraud on the court, court reporter and the McCarrons.
The same unethical lawyer Ryan Egan tried to surreptitiously get a restraining order
against me based on a forged affidavit, without ever serving papers on me before a hearing.
Fortunately Brodie was out that day and Judge Lily Sinfield (appointed by Gov. Brown)
saw right through the fraud and DENIED the motion even though I did not appear (because
I did not know about it) and never filed an opposition (because I did not know about it).
Lily Sinfeld is an honest judge who has the courage to rule against Stubblefiled.
6

The firm then started filing their usual ex parte motions (on 24-hour notice) when there
is no emergency. These motions are prosecuted soley to harass and truncate my response.
Exhibit 17 shows that when I tried for the EIGHTH TIME NOW to get Sachs to hear my
attorney fee motion, he found a way to sabotage me by vacating the motion and ordering
that I have to refile the entire package at significant reproduction costs and labor for me.
Exhibit 18 shows the court has heard my attorney fee motion scheduled EIGHT TIMES
and each time the court devised a way to avoid hearing the motion and awarding fees.
Shipley prevailed in the first SHAM eviction complaint on 5/16/13. TWO YEARS LATER
Shipley has received NO FEE AWARD after 8 unsuccessful attempts to collect her fees.
It also shows Brodie refuses to order Stubblefield to produce any documents or answer any
questions. We have received ZERO documents and plaintiff has answered ZERO questions.
Each discovery request contains only cut & pasted boilerplate specious objections to every
special interrogatory and every document request. We had 3 pending extensive motions set.
Stubblefield had 3 motions set. When Brodie transferred our case to Judge Sachs in S28,
he vacated all of our three pending discovery motions. HE DID NOT VACATE plaintiffs.
Instead Stubblefields 3 pending motions were simply reset in S28 on the same day & time.
Yet ours were not reset in S28. All three were vacated meaning we have to refile them.
This will be an extensive burden on counsel to reprint hundreds of pages to refile & serve.
These burdens are intentionally thrust on counsel to harass and further burden her.
It is almost as though Judges encourage Stubblefields lawyers to harass us, and enjoy
watching the show---like the Romans who enjoyed watching Christians eaten by lions.
Exhibit 19 is a claim submitted to the County regarding Judge Sachs callous acts.
On March 13, 2015 I faxed the court Notice of our CCP 170.6 challenge as to Sachs
(bias is presumed in you get any part of his judgment reversed---the court ordered Sachs to
strike the words or resident from the final judgment). We were entitled to disqualify him.
The notice also contained Notice of Unavailability of Counsel due my younger brothers
untimely death a few days before that, and my diabetic daughters hospitalization in a
diabetic comatose state. I had two family emergencies and needed to grieve my brothers
death. Any unbiased judge would have continued ALL motions, including the CCP 170.6 for
the 3 weeks I needed to grieve my brothers death and tend to my hospitalized daughter.
Instead Sachs callously conducted the hearing on the CCP 170.6 motion without me, and
DENIED the motion. It is clear that Sachs wants to take serious revenge on me.
Although he issued a perfunctory continuance of all 4 of Stubblefields bogus sanctions
motions, his minute order and transcript recited that he DENIES continuing the time to file
oppositions to the motions. No unbiased judge would be so cruel and insensitive under the
circumstances. I had two family emergencies simultaneously. There was no harm to
Stubblefield whatsoever to continue these motions and my time to file oppositions.
In fact, his lawyer did not even offer any hardship imposed by continuing for a few weeks.
He did not need to as Judge Sachs made the orders without any input from Williamson.
His extreme animus toward me is obvious to any reasonable person. He was cruel.
Exhibit 20 is our pending Petition for Review the Supreme Court to reverse the Court of
Appeals refusal to reverse the Appellate Divisions refusal to reclassify our case to
unlimited jurisdiction where the evidence shows Stubblefield seeks damages exceeding
$25,000. I attached the most recent past due rent statement reciting I owe $25,643.00
7

Exhibit 2 1 shows our Writ Petition to Appellate Division and 4th. District Court of Appeal
to reverse Sachs' DENIAL of our motion to d i s q u a l i ~him under CCP 5170.6 (2). Although
Brodie transferred our case, his minute order is silent a s to whether our case has been
"reclassified" to unlimited jurisdiction. Accordingly, we did not know which court wss the
appropriate "appellate court" to file our writ. We did not want them to say the writ was
untimely filed a s "filed i n the wrong court7'---so we had to timely file it BOTH COURTS.
Exhibit 22 shows our Motion for Summary Judgment set for Monday April 13, 2015.
Any unbiased judge would grant the motion a s Stubblefield has no legal grounds to evict
us a s a matter of law (Stare Decisis and Statutes). If Sachs remains on the case he will
deny the motion. I n fact, he will not even read our motion. He will deny any of our motions.
He will rule i n Stubblefield's favor regardless of the law. This court refused to even transfer
this case to the right jurisdiction. This is the most basic legal premise a child understands.
Small Claims is up to $10,000. UD Limited is up to $25,000. Unlimited is everything else.
THIS COURT REFUSES TO RECLASSIFY THIS CASE I N THE RIGHT JURISDICTION.
Stubblefield evicts any person who dares to try to rent out her mobilehome. Yet he rents all
the mobilehomes HE OWNS. It is illegal restraint of trade and violates your opinion issued
i n 2013 where you held that if a park owner rents units he cannot prevent home owners
from renting out their homes. (see Exhibit 22 - motion for summary judgment)
WE CAN NOT GET JUSTICE IN .THE "JUSTICE CENTER IN SAN BERNARDINO.
We believe the majority REPUBLICAN "good ole boys" control most of the Judges in San
Bernardino (at least the ones we have encountered except for Ochoa, Briscoe, and the newly
appointed Lily Sinfeld). Brody could have assigned the csse to her but he did not want to
because he knew she would apply THE LAW and not be afraid to rule against Stubblefield.
Finally, they do not file FORM 700's a s mandated under California Law. Brodie has not
filed one i n 3 years. I complained about this to Committee on Judicial Performance.
They elected to do NOTHING about it. I complained about Sachs. They did nothing.
The "good ole boys" on the Appellate Division just rubber stamp e v e 6 bad decision against
the law. The "good ole boy" Republicans in Riverside Court of Appeal , 4th. District, also
just rubber stamp the bad decisions against the law. We do not know where else to turn.
We ask you to investigate this pervasive corruption which has infected San Bernardino
Superior Courts. There is no "justice" i n the San Bernardino "Justice Center."
We hope you will investigate Stubblefield's "contributions" to the Tax Assessor and
Judges in San Bernardino and put a n end to the sewer of corruption in San Bernardino.
EVIL PREVAILS WHEN GOOD WOMEN DO NOTHING.