Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
What would you do if you saw a co-worker stealing supplies from the office, or discovered that
another employee was using company time to run a side business? People encounter ethical dilemmas
like these in their workplaces all the time, and while it's usually clear when an employee is doing
something wrong, it's not always clear how to handle the situation.
Dilemmas are complex situations, where there are not clear cut guidelines either in law or religion.
Dough Wallace explains, An ethical dilemma exists when one is faced with having to make choice
among following alternatives:
1. Real alternatives that are equally justiciable
2. Significant consequences on stakeholders in the situation
Pastin defined four major ethics personality types, and noted that each one handles workplace ethics
differently:
1. The Conformist This employee follows rules, rather than questioning authority figures,
and tends to do things "by the book." One might think this ethical type could be counted on to
always do the right thing, but the Conformist might look the other way if higher-up staff
member were acting unethical, since a manager is someone he or she is supposed to obey. The
Conformist will run into work-related ethical conflicts unless his or her organization has a set
of rigid rules and well-defined consequences for not following them.
2. The Navigator When confronted with a situation in which people are behaving
unethically, Navigators rely on their innate ethics sense to guide their actions, even if these
decisions aren't easy. This ethical type has a generally sound moral compass, which gives the
Navigator the flexibility to make choices even unpopular ones. Navigators' ethical sense
imbues them with qualities of leadership, and others learn to respect and count on them. They
will succeed in most organizations but will leave a company that is unethical.
3. The Negotiator Negotiators try to make up the rules as they go along. When faced with a
sketchy situation, such as a co-worker drinking on his or her lunch hour, the Negotiator might
take a wait-and-see attitude to see if the incident affects his or her job in any way, to see if the
drinking gets any worse or to see if anyone else notices. Navigators will encounter ethicsrelated trouble if their jobs require them to exercise judgment without guidelines, because
they change the rules according to what seems easiest at the time.
4. The Wiggler The Wiggler doesn't give a lot of thought to what is right, but instead takes
the route that's most advantageous to him or her. For example, Wigglers may lie to appease a
supervisor but refuse to lie again if they sense that others are beginning to suspect the
supervisor. Wigglers are mostly motivated by self-interest getting on a manager's good
side, scoring a better deal for themselves or avoiding conflict. They will run into trouble when
others sense that they dodge ethical issues to protect their own interests.
The BELIEVE IT Strategy
The BELIEVE IT strategy for resolving ethical problems is a step by step process so that others will
be able to BELIEVE and understand your decision. It is based on assessing the principles and values
relevant to a particular problem and results in a decision which is believable and defendable. The
BELIEVE IT strategy is not dependent on whether you have a utilitarian, Universalist or religious
approach; it concentrates on the situation at hand and is aimed at reaching an outcome.
BELIEVE IT model
Using the BELIEVE IT model, an organisation can train staff to incorporate a set of key values into
their decision making. That is, when assessing the values involved in the dilemma, staff can make
reference to what the organisation has stated that it wishes to be the most important values. In this
way, the approach to resolving ethical dilemmas in an organisation becomes less reliant on individual
value judgements and more reliant on stated organisational values. Additionally, it gives staff a step
by step approach which enables them to resolve ethical dilemmas quickly and in a way that is entirely
justifiable.
Steps in resolving Ethical Dilemmas
Rushworth Kidder has suggested steps for dealing with ethical dilemma:
1. Define the problem/moral issue correctly
2. Determine the people who will be affected by the decision. Also determine your role.
3. Analyze how the events have happened.
4. Test for right vs. wrong issues? Is it illegal? How would you resolve the things if you stood on
the other side.
5. Apply three approaches to resolve the dilemma.
Rule-based thinking
Care-based