Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Theophilus 2013-2014
Innocent Until Proven Guilty does not apply to natn sect like in courtspg. 1
Publicizing the FBI Watch list would hinder CT efforts.pg. 1
Watch List placement is complex.pg. 2
There are newer procedures that are working effectivelypg. 2
Informationalpg. 3
FBI INFORMANTS.pg. 4
Theophilus 2013-2014
http://people.howstuffworks.com/government-watch-list.htm
Cristen Conger- As a writer and blogger for HowStuffWorks and a contributing writer
for Discovery News, Cristen specializes in technology and the science of everyday living.
Her articles have featured on Huffington Post, ABC Science and MSNBC.com She holds
a degree in Journalism from the University of Georgia.
Argument: If anyone decided to publicize the FBI watch list, the suspects in question
would in turn be able to avoid surveillance better.
Theophilus 2013-2014
The FBI has already made significant improvements when it comes to the watch list
From The FBI Has Built a Better Terrorist Watchlist Written by Charles S. Clark,
Government Executive, published by The Nuclear Threat Initiative, March 25th, 2014
In response to our reports, the FBI revised its watchlist policy, reorganized the
operational unit responsible for processing watchlist nominations, implemented new
automated processes and timeliness standards for the submission and processing of
watchlist actions, and established a team to assess the FBIs performance against the new
criteria." the document reads. "Generally, we found that these improvements have helped
to ensure that the watchlist is more complete, accurate and current."
http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/fbi-has-built-better-terrorist-watchlist/
The FBI has already made plans to be clearer in their documentation
From The FBI Has Built a Better Terrorist Watchlist Written by Charles S. Clark,
Government Executive, published by The Nuclear Threat Initiative, March 25th, 2014
The IG made a dozen recommendations, including requiring the screening center to
"better document its actions during national security events, clarifying FBI information
sharing policies to ensure they are consistent with those of the watchlist community, and
improving the efficiency of the FBIs watchlist nomination process for investigative and
non-investigative subjects." The FBI agreed with all the recommendations and reported
that corrective action has begun.
http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/fbi-has-built-better-terrorist-watchlist/
Informational
The agencies that contribute to the terrorist watch list are as follows:
From The FBI Has Built a Better Terrorist Watchlist Written by Charles S. Clark,
Government Executive, published by The Nuclear Threat Initiative, March 25th, 2014
The agencies contributing to the terrorist watchlist include the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the CIA, the National
Security Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office and the departments of Justice,
Defense, State, Treasury, Homeland Security and Energy.
Charlie Clark joined Government Executive in the fall of 2009. He has been on staff at
The Washington Post, Congressional Quarterly, National Journal, Time-Life Books, Tax
Analysts, the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, and the
National Center on Education and the Economy.
The Nuclear Threat Initiative works to strengthen global security by reducing global
threats from nuclear, biological and chemical weapons
Theophilus 2013-2014
FBI INFORMANTS
Main argument: Informants are not hired by the FBI. They give information to the
FBI, and are sometimes compensated for that information (for example, if you give
info to the FBI regarding a terrorist, you would be compensated 1 million.)
Informant could be later contacted by the FBI for more info.
Every example brought up by the affirmative team about the FBI manipulating
informants was regarding a foreigner/foreign surveillance - not U.S.
citizens/domestic surveillance - so these examples should not influence the judges
decision
Informants are not hired by the FBI
Frequently Asked Questions, Published by the FBI, Copyright 2014
Informants are individuals who supply information to the FBI on a confidential basis.
They are not hired or trained employees of the FBI, although they may receive
compensation in some instances for their information and expenses.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/faqs
The FBI does not manipulate informants.
Better this world, Published by PBS, September 6, 2011
Discussing the role of informants on its website, the FBI writes, "use of informants to
assist in the investigation of criminal activity may involve an element of deception,
intrusion into the privacy of individuals or cooperation with persons whose reliability and
motivation may be open to question. . . . [S]pecial care is taken to carefully evaluate and
closely supervise their use so the rights of individuals under investigation are not
infringed."
Main Argument: Without FBI Informants, we would be unable to predict terrorist
attacks
as quickly.
D1: Removing informants would increase the amount of terrorist attacks in the U.S.
Use of informants is lawful and essential
Frequently Asked Questions, Published by the FBI, Copyright 2014
The courts have recognized that the governments use of informants is lawful and often
essential to the effectiveness of properly authorized law enforcement investigations.
However, use of informants to assist in the investigation of criminal activity may involve
an element of deception, intrusion into the privacy of individuals, or cooperation with
persons whose reliability and motivation may be open to question. Although it is legally
permissible for the FBI to use informants in its investigations, special care is taken to
carefully evaluate and closely supervise their use so the rights of individuals under
investigation are not infringed. The FBI can only use informants consistent with specific
guidelines issued by the attorney general that control the use of informants.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/faqs