habeas

corpus: a writ requiring a person to be brought before a judge or court,

especially for investigation of a restraint of the person's liberty, used a
s a protection against illegal imprisonment.
1- Mr. Jens Soering was born 1966 and German national
2- He is in prison in England waiting to extradition to the US.
3- He will be facing the charges of murder in the Commonwealth of
Virginia.
4- Homicides were committed in Virginia in March 1985.
5- Elizabeth Haysom was the applicants girlfriend and the victims were
her parents.
6- The victims were: William Reginald Haysom (aged 72), Nancy Astor
Haysom (aged 53), were both Canadian national.
7- The victims took massive stab and slash wounds to the neck, throat
and body.
8- At the time, the applicant and Elizabeth Haysom were aged 18 and
20 respectively and were both students of University of Virginia. They
both disappeared in 1985, after the death of the victims but were
arrested in England in 1986, due to cheque fraud.
9Great Britain seemed assurance with the terms of Extradition Treaty, in
the event of Mr. Soering being convicted the death penalty, if imposed,
will not be carried out.
On December 1986, the applicant was interviewed in prison by a
German prosecutor from Bonn and he confessed committing the
crimes.
On February 1987, local court in Bonn issued a warrant for the Mr.
Soerings arrest.
On March 1987, the Federal Republic of Germany requested his
extradition to the Federal Republic under the Extradition Treaty of 1872
between the Federal Republic and the UK.
In April 1987, the Director of the Office of international Affairs, Criminal
Division, US Department of Justice, the attorney of Bedford County
Virginia (Mr. Updike) stated that on the assumption of Mr. Soering could
not be tried in Germany, there was no reason to compelling witnesses
from the US to appear in court in Germany.

Mr. Updike swore an affidavit a representation will be made in the

name of the kingdom that the death penalty should not be imposed or
carried out.
In December 1986. psychiatric evaluation adduced from a consultant
forensic psychiatrist reported that the applicant was immature and
inexperienced and he had lost his personal identity symbiotic
relationship with his girlfriend who is powerful persuasive and a
disturbed young woman.
After the affidavit, leave to apply for judicial review was refused.
US Court did not decide whether to accept the assurance and also
whether or not to issue a warrant for Soerings surrender. Their main
reason was "the court will never allow itself to be put in the position of
reviewing an administrative decision before the decision has been
made
On June 1988, the House of Lords rejected the applicants petition for
leave.
On August 1988, the Secretary of State signed a warrant ordering the
applicants surrender to the United States
However the applicant has not been transferred to the United States
due to the proceedings firstly by European commission and then by the
European Court.
The European court of human rights reviewed laws relating to murder
in England and Virginia, and then review to the prison conditions in
Virginia. pg 521-522
The applicant was in extreme stress psychological deterioration and
risk of homosexual abuse and physical attack by prisoners on death
row.
The applicant alleged dad if he was surrendered it would give rise to a
breach by the UK of article 3 which provides "no one shall be subject to
torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

Have a very do United Kingdom government content article 3 should

not be interpreted because there is no responsibility on the contracting
state.
Above all, arguments advanced against approach of the commission
interferes with the international treaty rights, it's leads to a conflict
with the norms of international judicial process. pg 523end
FINAL are you are you because we give them food call go that ha ha
my beautiful
The time of the killing stop looking for is only 18 years old and there is
some psychiatric evidence that he was suffering from abnormality of
mind.