Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract-
propylene
In
the
improved
phase
the quantitative
was
model,
the
effect
of
the
taken
into
account
to
improve
process. The superficial gas velocity and catalyst feed rate have
a strong effect on the hydrodynamics and reaction rate, which
results in a greater variation in the polymer production rate
and reactor temperature. At typical operating conditions the
improved well mixed and well mixed models were in good
agreement. While the COO!ICU bubble size model was found to
over-predict
temperature
and
under
II.
bed
INTRODUCTION
III.
114
2010 2nd International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (ICBEE 2010)
6 = 0.534 1- exp
E =E
e
mf
Eave = (1 - 6)Ee
v
P
Uo - Um
f
0.413
0.05gexp
Eb = 1- 0.146exp
(3)
U -U
0
mf
0.429
U -U
_
mf
4.439
Deb
= Ah(l- Eave)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
[Milt=o = [Milin
d[Mil
(AHEave) -- = UeA([Milin -[Mil)
dt
-RvEave[Mil- (1- Eave)R
+ 0.2
(8)
(9)
V.
(1)
(2)
The correlations required to evaluate the average bed
voidage from dynamic two-phase flow structure model are
as follows [8, 9]:
115
2010 2nd International Conforence on Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (ICBEE 2010)
REFERENCES
[I]
[2]
[3]
[4]
VI. CONCLUSIONS
3237-3259.
[5]
[6]
[7]
837-850.
[8]
[9]
H.P. Cui, N., Mostoufi, J. Chaouki, Gas and solids between dynamic
bubble and emulsion in gas-fluidized beds, Powder Techno!. 120
[10]
143.
(200I) 12-20.
500-513.
Rate constant
Unit
Formation
Kfj)
s-
Initiation
KiO)
KhO)
Khr
KpO)
lmorls-l
22.88
54.93
[6]
lmorls-l
lmorls-l
0.1
20
0.1
20
[5]
[5]
lmorls-l
kealmorl
208.6
7.2
22.8849
7.2
[6]
lmorl
0.0462
0.2535
[6]
Propagation
Activation energy
Transfer
KhO)
Site Type 1
Site Type 2
Reference
[5]
116
2010 2nd International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (ICBEE 2010)
Deactivation
7.54
0.12
[6]
[5]
0.0001
0.0001
[5]
0.00034
2000
0.00034
2000
[6]
[5]
7.54
0.12
[morl
[morl
[morl
1
Kjm(j)
Kjh(j)
Kjr(j)
Kds(j)
Kdi(j)
[mOrlSl
TABLE 2 OPERATING CONDITIONS AND PHYSICAL PARAMETERS CONSIDERED IN THIS WORK FOR
MODELING FLUIDIZED BED POLYPROPYLENE REACTORS
Operating conditions
Physical properties
V (m3)=50
J1
(Pa.s)=1.14xlO-4
Trer(K)=353.15
P (kglm3)=23.45
Tin (K)=317.15
Ps (kglm3)=910
dp (m) =500x10.6
P(bar)=25
Propylene concentration
(molllit)=1
cmj=0.45
Hydrogen concentration
(mo1llit)= 0.015
Catalyst feed rote (gls)= 0.2
32S0
3000
--
27S0
. . . . . .
2S00
.!!!.
-9 22S0
2
2000
c
0
::J
"0
a..
Constant
bubble
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
/'
.,
/'
....
.
.
./
..
... .
.../
-:.
--;.
17S0
1S00
12S0
1000
. .. .
. ../
.
./
.. .
/'
. ...
/.../
/...
...
.
/
.'
7S0
SOO
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.4
O.S
117
2010 2nd International Conference on Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (ICBEE 2010)
360
357
g
Q)
348
Qj
345
c..
E
2
Q)
en
(1)
r.
c..
c
0
iii
"S
E
W
........
. . . ..
351
::;
ro
. .....
...... ....
354
342
339
.'
336
333
330
--
327
324
321
318
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Time
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
(s)
Fig. 2. Effect of step change in the catalyst feed rate from 0.3 gls to 0.2 or 0.4 g/s on
the emulsion phase temperature calculated by the three models at Vo=0.35 mls.
1700
1600
1500
Vi"
:
2
1400
1300
c
0
1200
"0
1100
U
::J
e
D...
--
'\
". '\
"
". ". . .. "". "". "- "".
.......
".
'.
.......
.......
.......
.......
1000
"-
"
"-
900
"
800
"
"
---
700 +-------.---
0.3
0.5
0.4
Uo
0.6
0.7
(m/s)
Fig. 3. Effect of superficial gas velocity on the product rate at Fcat=0.2 g/s.
118