Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
252
Sabri
253
TREATMENT OBJECTIVES
2.
Sabri
254
3.
anterior edge bite and nish in a Class II molar relationship. However, the facial and smile esthetics
would not be optimized.
Nonextraction with rapid maxillary expansion
(RME) and maxillary protraction facemask treatment. The arch-length deciency would be resolved
by transverse and anteroposterior arch expansion.
The combined orthopedic effects of RME and
the facemask would bring the maxilla downward
and forward. This would enhance both the prole
and the smile esthetics by increasing incisor display.
Sabri
255
Sabri
256
Sabri
257
Fig 7. A, Frontal view of patient with facemask; B, occlusal view of intraoral wire splint; C, intraoral
frontal view of soldered elastic hooks.
extracted third molars (Fig 15). The cephalometric radiographs and superimposed tracings at posttreatment (age
16 years 8 months) and 5 years posttreatment (age
21 years 8 months) showed no changes in tooth
positions and soft-tissue prole. There was no facial
growth at 5 years posttreatment except for minor residual growth at the symphysis (Figs 16 and 17).
The nal occlusion may be considered short of ideal
according to the American Board of Orthodontics
norms.5 The maxillary second molars, which were not
banded to prevent bite opening, did not seat spontaneously and remained out of occlusion at 5 years posttreatment. Excursion movements do not reect
balancing interferences, which might lead to potential
myofacial discomfort. The proclination of the maxillary
incisors in compensation for the remaining skeletal
discrepancy also is short of ideal. However, given the
long-standing stability of the completely functional
occlusion, the risks and benets of any future intervention should be properly weighed. Alignment of the
second molars with segmental mechanics to control
the vertical and lingual seating can be achieved. However, it should be combined with selective grinding to
prevent occlusal disturbances and compromising of
an overbite that is already less than the optimal 30%
and that provides minimal anterior protective guidance,
and yet has favorable function and esthetics. If the
anterior occlusion becomes traumatic with fremitus of
the maxillary incisors, interproximal recontouring and
retroclination of the mandibular incisors would probably be the likely approaches to achieve a more
Sabri
258
Maxillary
T1
31.1
21.7
28.7
31.1
T2
24.6
27.5
33.2
36.5
Mandibular
T3
24.4
27.3
32.7
36.6
T1
20.7
23.3
28.6
35.0
T2
20.1
25.9
29.6
34.8
T3
20.1
25.1
29.0
34.6
Sabri
259
Sabri
260
Fig 12. Superimposed pretreatment (solid lines) and posttreatment (dashed lines) cephalometric
tracings.
Fig 13. Five-year posttreatment facial and intraoral photographs (age 21 years 8 months)2 years
without the removable maxillary retainer.
Sabri
261
Sabri
262
The treatment results indicate that a maxillary protraction facemask can still be effective after the patient's
peak of pubertal growth spurt, despite the consensus in
the literature to start before age 8 years for maximum orthopedic effects. This nding suggests that individual
dentofacial characteristics may allow clinicians to push
the envelope of treatment beyond central tendencies
of treatment responses. Research may focus on the identication of such characteristics.
The successful expansion with midpalatal suture
opening enhanced the orthopedic effect of the facemask
Sabri
20. Hnat WP, Braun S, Chinhara A, Legan HL. The relationship of arch
length to alterations in dental arch width. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 2000;118:184-8.
21. McNamara JA Jr. An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class
III malocclusion in young patients. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:
598-608.
22. Woller JL. An assessment of the maxilla after rapid maxillary
expansion using cone beam computed tomography in growing
children [thesis]. St Louis, Mo: Saint Louis University; 2009.
23. Gardner GE, Kronman JH. Cranioskeletal displacements caused by
rapid palatal expansion in the rhesus monkey. Am J Orthod 1971;
59:146-55.
24. Kilic N, Kiki A, Okay M, Erdem A. Effect of rapid maxillary expansion on Holdaway soft tissue measurements. Eur J Orthod 2008;
30:239-43.
25. Velazquez P, Benito E, Bravo LA. Rapid maxillary expansion. A
study of the long-term effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1996;109:361-7.
26. Kim JH, Viana MA, Graber TM, Omerza FF, BeGole EA. The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: a meta-analysis. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:675-85.
27. Delaire J. Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:
289-311.
28. Merwin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing for effective
application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:292-9.
263
29. Sung SJ, Baik HS. Assessment of skeletal and dental changes by
maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;
114:492-502.
30. Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Tollaro l. Skeletal
effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary
expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:333-43.
31. Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction
with expansion in Class III patients in the primary, mixed and
late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:669-80.
32. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Postpubertal assessment of
treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy
followed by xed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2004;118:549-59.
33. Wells A, Sarver D, Proft W. Long-term efcacy of reverse pull
headgear therapy. Angle Orthod 2006;76:915-22.
34. Gautam P, Valiathan A, Adhikari R. Skeletal response to maxillary
protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a nite element
study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:723-8.
35. Sabri R. The 8 components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod
2005;39:155-67.
36. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantication: part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:116-27.
37. Dong JK, Jin TH, Cho HW, Oh SC. The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:9-19.