Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Arshad
Reference:
Waheed
PLD
vs.
[2010]
Punjmin
Lah
etc.
510
question. The Supreme Court was ably assisted by the team of the
office of the Advocate General Punjab in the matter of the
18th Amendment.
Amir Khan & Co vs. Government of the Punjab
Reference: PLD [2010] Lah 443
In this case auction of collection rights in favour of a private contractor
was sought. The Lahore High Court was ably assisted by Syed Nayyar
Abbas Rizvi, Additional Advocate General, Punjab who argued
successfully before the court in terms of Rule 3 that no award could be
made in favour of a private contractor. The judgment was approvingly
upheld
by
the
Supreme
Court
of
Pakistan.
Syed Muhammad Murtaza Zaidi vs. Motor Registration
Authority and others
Reference: CLC [2010] 494
The imposition of luxury tax on Motor Vehicle with capacity of 2000 CC
and above was challenged as being unconstitutional. The Government
of Punjab convinced the Lahore High Court that the levy in-question
was imposed on the use of motor vehicles and not on the vehicle itself
and therefore there was no question of double taxation or
unconstitutionality of the legislation whereby the tax had been
imposed. This judgment was upheld by Supreme Court of Pakistan in
[2010] SCMR 983.