Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 6 August 2010
Accepted 6 December 2010
Available online 13 December 2010
Keywords:
Sedimentary basins
Brine waters
Salinization processes
Major dissolved constituents
a b s t r a c t
Classical chemical classication plots that use major anions and cations can discern between different water
facies but they do not offer sufcient discriminatory power for salt waters from sedimentary basins, whose
origin is therefore frequently misunderstood.
The Brine Differentiation Plot (BDP) was proposed by Hounslow (1995) in order to investigate the brine
genesis, principally evaporite dissolution, alkali lakes and oileld brines. However, its diagnostic potential has
been undervalued so far.
In this paper, the potential of BDP was tested and compared with the classical LangelierLudwig plot using
concentration of major dissolved constituents of fresh to brine waters from different sedimentary basins
(Northern Apennine Foredeep, Italy; Provence Basin, Western Mediterranean; Caucasus; Trinidad). Mixing
processes between different water types as evaluated by these diagrams would seem to be constrained by the
boronchloride plot.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Chemical classication of subsurface waters from sedimentary
basins aids in interpreting the complex processes involved in
producing their dissolved solids, to better understand their origin
and evolution, and the origin of water that is more likely to be
associated with hydrocarbon accumulation (Collins, 1975). From a
general point of view, hydrocarbon accumulations are primarily
related to Ca-chloride and secondarily to Na-bicarbonate waters
(Sulin, 1946). The relative arrangement of the major constituents on a
square plot was rst proposed by Tolstikhine at the end of 1930, and
was applied to distinguish between hydrocarbon-bearing Ca-chloride
and Na-bicarbonate waters (Chilingar, 1957; Chilingar et al., 2003). A
similar plot but with inversion of the axis was proposed by Langelier
and Ludwig (1942), and is nowadays universally employed in water
classication (hereafter LLP). However, classication plots that use
major dissolved constituents are unsuccessful to distinguish between
salinization mechanisms like seawater evaporation and salt dissolution because waters of different origin fall in the same Na-chloride
eld; therefore other elements like Br and I coupled with Cl in binary
diagrams should be used (e.g. Richter and Kreitler, 1993). Recently, a
Brine Differentiation Plot (hereafter BDP) was proposed as a tool to
discriminate between different brine origins (Hounslow, 1995). The plot
uses molar Ca/(Ca + SO4) and Na/(Na + Cl) on the vertical and
horizontal axes, respectively. On this diagram, eld characteristic of
127
Fig. 1. LangelierLudwig plot, where (Na + K) = (rNa+K/rcations)50 and (HCO3) = rHCO3/ranions)50, where r is the mEq/L concentration of the constituents. The (Ca + Mg) and
(SO4 + Cl) are complementary values. (A) Reading key; dashed lines represent binary mixings. (B) Waters from Northern Apennine Foredeep (NAF); brine, saline and brackish
waters from mud volcanoes: Boschetti et al. (2011); Martinelli and Ferrari (1991). Bold cross: brackish groundwater enriched in Na and depleted in Ca due to overpressure (SALV,
Boschetti et al., 2011); black crosses (Lesignano waters, Boschetti et al., 2011) and grey crosses (Porretta waters; Bencini and Duchi, 1980; Ciancabilla et al., 2007): Ca-chloride and
overpressured waters mixed with Na-bicarbonate waters, respectively. Fresh Na-bicarbonate waters (sp, f10 and f14 are brackish samples mixed with hydrocarbon-bearing waters):
Duchi et al. (2005); Venturelli et al. (2003); our unpublished data. Water of meteoric origin dissolving evaporates: Forti et al., 1988; our unpublished data. Double arrow in the alkalibicarbonate eld represents mixing with or evolution from Ca-bicarbonate fresh waters. (C) Saline to brine interstitial waters from Provence Basin (site 372, Western
Mediterranean; McDuff et al., 1978); mud volcanoes from Caucasus (Lavrushin et al., 2003) and Trinidad (Dia et al., 1999).
2+
aq
albite
and/or zeolitization
seawater and evaporated seawater solutions up to gypsum precipitation have an almost constant Na/(Na + Cl) ratio of about 0.46, that is
similar to the maximum ratio revealed in the NAF Ca-chloride brines
(Fig. 2B).
In order to conrm the potentiality of the BDP to describe the
seawater origin and the diagenetic processes, interstitial waters from
Provence Basin have been added to the plot (grey triangles in Fig. 2C;
site 372, Western Mediterranean; McDuff et al., 1978). Similar to NAF
waters, they were misinterpreted as evaporite-dissolving waters
(McDuff et al., 1978), but most recently their evaporated-seawater
origin has been conrmed by chemical and boron isotope investigations (Vengosh et al., 1994, 2000). In fact these waters, classiable as
Ca-chloride brines [1 b rCa/r(SO4 + HCO3) b 16], are displaced in the
reversed triangle eld of the BDP, and have Na/(Na + Cl) b 0.46 and
0.55 b Ca/(Ca + SO4) b 0.95, that is they evolve from seawater towards
typical oil-eld brines because of sulfate loss (reduction) and Ca
increase (albitization and/or zeolitization) related to an early burial
diagenesis (eogenesis).
3. Na-bicarbonate waters and terrestrial mud volcanoes
Fig. 2. Brine Differentiation Plot (BDP), where Ca/(Ca + SO4) and Na/(Na+ Cl) are molar ratios of the constituents. (A) Reading key (inset redrawn from Hounslow, 1995); G and H are
gypsum and halite precipitation points after seawater evaporation (Pierre, 1982). (B) Waters from Northern Apennine Foredeep (NAF; samples references as in Fig. 1). (C) Saline to brine
interstitial waters from Provence Basin, mud volcanoes from Caucasus and Trinidad (samples references as in Fig. 1 plus other data from Azerbaijan from Mazzini et al., 2009).
129
Fig. 3. Boron versus chlorine, mg/L contents. Symbols as in Figs. 1 and 2. Condensate eld depicts shallow condensation of geothermal uids (e.g. Arnrsson and Andrsdttir, 1995;
Truesdell et al., 1989). Dashed lines represent binary mixings. (A) Reading key. (B) Waters from NAF (see Fig. 1 captions for sample references); the evaporite-dissolving waters from
NAF were not shown because of their quite low B contents (mean 0.05 mg/L). (C) Saline to brine interstitial waters from Provence Basin, mud volcanoes from Caucasus and Trinidad
(sample references as in Fig. 2 plus other data from Azerbaijan from Planke et al., 2003).
5. Conclusions
Seawater evaporation and evaporite mineral dissolution are the
main salinization processes associated with the origin of brine and
saline waters from sedimentary basins. The Brine Differentiation Plot
proposed by Hounslow (1995) may help in the differentiation of these
processes. In that diagram, evaporite dissolving waters are clustered
towards the center of the plot, Ca/(Ca + SO4) = Na/(Na + Cl) 0.5,
whereas seawater-derived Ca-chloride brines have Ca/(Ca + SO4) 1
and Na/(Na + Cl) 0.46. Saline to brine waters from different
sedimentary basins (Northern Apennine Foredeep, Italy; Provence
Basin, Western Mediterranean) cluster between these latter values
and the seawater. This is the result of the diagenetic reaction as
albitization, zeolitization and sulfate reduction that modify the
original seawater signature.
The classic LangelierLudwig diagram allows a clear subdivision and
classication of the three hydrocarbon-bearing water types commonly
found in sedimentary basins (Ca-chloride brines, overpressured/mud
volcanoes and Na-bicarbonate waters) and may help to discern the
possible mixing between them. In particular, terrestrial mud volcanoes
from different countries (Northern Apennine Foredeep, Caucasus,
Trinidad) describe a mixing triangle between these water types.
Mixing trend and relative end-members could be supported by
chlorideboron plots that represent an effective alternative to the
halogenhalogen binary plots.
Obviously, investigations on waters from sedimentary basin
cannot prescind by use of stable isotope and minor and trace element
analysis (e.g. boron and halogens). However, a conscientious use of
these (LLP and BDP) and other diagrams (e.g. Basin Fluid Line plot;
Davisson and Criss, 1996) that use major constituents could clarify
origin and processes behind the chemical composition of waters from
sedimentary basins and rationalize the analysis and use of other
minor-trace elements and isotope ratios.
Acknowledgments
The manuscript beneted from the constructive comments of two
anonymous reviewers and Editor-in-Chief, Prof. B. de Vivo. Special
thanks to Prof. G. Cortecci for his review of an earlier version of this
manuscript.
References
Arnrsson, S., Andrsdttir, A., 1995. Processes controlling the distribution of boron and
chlorine in natural waters in Iceland. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 59,
41254146.
Bencini, A., Duchi, V., 1980. Studio geochimico su alcune acque di Porretta Terme
Bologna (Italia). Atti della Societ Toscana di Scienze Naturali, Memorie, Serie A 87,
365374 (in Italian).
Boschetti, T., Toscani, L., Shouakar-Stash, O., Iacumin, P., Venturelli, G., Mucchino, C.,
Frape, S.K., 2011. Salt waters of the Northern Apennine Foredeep Basin (Italy):
origin and evolution. Aquatic Geochemistry 17, 71108.
Capozzi, R., Picotti, V., 2002. Fluid migration and origin of a mud volcano in the Northern
Apennines (Italy): the role of deeply rooted normal faults. Terra Nova 14, 363370.
Cheng, J.M., McIntosh, J.C., Xie, X.N., Jiao, J.J., 2006. Hydrochemistry of formation water
with implication to diagenetic reactions in Sanzhao depression and QijiaGulong
depression of Songliao Basin, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 88, 8690.
Chilingar, G.V., 1957. Petroleum and Products Analysis. University of Southern
California.
Chilingar, G.V., Buryakovsky, L.A., Eremenko, N.A., Gorfunkel, M.V., 2003. Geology and
geochemistry of oil and gas. Developments in Petroleum Science, Vol. 52. Elsevier,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ciancabilla, N., Ditta, M., Italiano, F., Martinelli, G., 2007. The Porretta thermal springs
(Northern Apennines): seismogenic structures and long-term geochemical
monitoring. Annals of Geophysics 50, 513526.