Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
huge capacity of
compromise
between
the
multi-carrier
and
single-carrier
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
With the increase in the use of wireless devices bandwidth demand is
increasing day by day. FiWi network which use both wireless as well as
optical network with huge bandwidth can be considered as a solution to the
increasing bandwidth usage. The advantage of using OFDM transmission
technique for FiWi network is studied in the following section.
2.1 REVIEW ON BACKPAPERS
2.1.1
FIBER-WIRELESS
NETWORKS
AND
SUBSYSTEM
TECHNOLOGIES
Hybrid fiber-wireless networks incorporating WDM technology for
fixed wireless access operating in the sub-millimeter- wave and millimeterwave (mm-wave) frequency regions are being actively pursued to provide
unmetered connectivity for ultrahigh bandwidth communications. The
architecture of such radio networks requires a large number of antenna basestations with high throughput to be deployed to maximize the geographical
coverage with the main switching and routing functionalities located in a
centralized location. The transportation of mm-wave wireless signals within
the hybrid network is subject to several impairments including low optoelectronic conversion efficiency, fiber chromatic dispersion and also
degradation due to nonlinearities along the link. One of the major technical
(mm-wave)
fiber-wireless
systems
have
the
advantage of being able to exploit the large unused bandwidth in the wireless
spectrum as well as the inherent large bandwidth of the optical fiber. This can
provide high data rates with minimum delay. There are three possible
methods to transport the mm wave wireless signal over the optical link RFover-fiber, IF-over-fiber, and Baseband-over-fiber. Comparing the three
transport schemes, ultimately there is a trade-off between the complexity in
the RF electronic and the optoelectronic interfaces within the base-station.
One of the key challenges in implementing mm-wave fiber-wireless access
systems is to efficiently distribute the wireless signals while maintaining a
functionally simple and compact BS design. Amongst the schemes, RF-overfiber transport scheme has the potential to simplify the BS design for mmwave fiber-wireless systems.
It is well-established that the total capacity and throughput of a mmwave fiber-wireless system can be greatly enhanced with efficient optical
fiber architectures using wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) optical
networking technology. With the incorporation of WDM in mm-wave fiberwireless approaches, a fast deployment route for these systems may be
achieved. By leveraging the optical network infrastructure already existing in
the access and metro network domains, unused fibers may be utilized as the
means of communications between the CO and the antenna BSs. It is
therefore equally important that mm-wave fiber-wireless access technology
can coexist with other optical access technologies; being able to
various points in the system are described. It is shown that if a cyclic prefix is
added to each OFDM symbol, any linear distortion introduced by the channel
can be equalized by a single tap equalizer. This process is explained by
considering the effect of a simple two-path channel on the component of the
transmitted signal due to one subcarrier frequency. Throughout the
description particular emphasis is given to those aspects of an OFDM system
that are often misunderstood.
Although the theoretical basis for OFDM was laid several decades
ago, and OFDM became the basis of many communications standards for
wireless and wired applications in the 1990s, it is only very recently that the
application of OFDM
to optical communication has been considered. This is partly because of the
apparent incompatibility between OFDM modulation and conventional
optical systems. A number of forms of OFDM which overcome these
incompatibilities in various ways have been developed for a variety of optical
applications. These are classified into those appropriate for optical wireless
and multimode fiber applications and those for single mode fiber. For the
former, intensity modulation should be used, while for the latter the OFDM
signal should be carried on the field of optical signal. OFDM has a number of
drawbacks including its high peak-to average power ratio and sensitivity to
frequency offset and phase noise. These are described and their likely
implications for optical communications discussed.
In conclusion, OFDM is a very promising technology for optical
communications, but the very different constraints introduced open up many
new interesting avenues for research.
2.1.3 OFDM VERSUS SINGLE CARRIER TRANSMISSION FOR 100
Gbps OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
This paper analyze the orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
(OFDM) technique in long-haul next generation optical communication links
and compare it with the well-established single-carrier (SC) data transmission
using high-level modulation formats and coherent detection. The analysis of
7
the two alternative solutions is carried out in the 100 Gbps scenario, which is
commonly considered to be the next upgrade of existing optical links, with
special emphasis on quaternary phase-shift keying (QPSK) modulations. The
comparison between OFDM and SC takes into account the main linear and
nonlinear impairments of the optical channel, e.g., group velocity dispersion
(GVD), polarization mode dispersion (PMD), self-phase modulation (SPM),
cross-phase modulation (XPM), and four-wave mixing (FWM), as well as the
phase noise due to transmit and receive lasers, their relative
frequency offset, other synchronization aspects, the overall complexity, the
power and spectral efficiency, and the technological constraints.
OFDM is an effective way to decompose a time-dispersive channel
into a set of independent and parallel sub channels .Hence, when OFDM is
employed and the cyclic prefix is long enough to ensure perfect
compensation of the dispersion a trivial SbS detector can be used for data
detection. This is the reason for the recent widespread use of OFDM in
several wireless communication systems, where, as mentioned, SC
transmissions with SbS detection are not able to achieve channel capacity.
The main advantage of OFDM, which made it a winning technology
for a large number of communication standards like DVB, DSL, WiMax, is
the possibility to match the transmitted signal spectrum to the particular
channel characteristics, like non-flat amplitude responses, due to fading, or
multipath, etc. The effective exploitation of the channel is also possible
through several techniques which improve OFDM efficiency, like bit and
power loading, pulse shaping, channel shortening. All these peculiar features
of OFDM have a lower impact in optical communication, as the channel
amplitude response is almost flat (neglecting minor impairments like
polarization dependent losses and imperfections in the frequency responses
of electrical and optical filters), and the high data rates prevent taking
advantage from sophisticated signal processing.
The main reasons that drive the interest in OFDM are the simple
compensation of linear impairments and the implicit parallelization given by
the IFFT/FFT operations, which lowers the processing speed at the receiver.
8
FIBER
NON-LINEARITY
MITIGATION
BY
PAPR
10
11
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
In this section, the system architecture of the FiWi networks is rstly
outlined, and then the proposed MB-OFDM frame structure for FiWi
networks is addressed in detail. Finally, the signal model over the berwireless channels is presented.
3.1 FiWi SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
12
13
d m=[d m ,0 , d m ,1 , , d m , N1 ]
to
N 1
m , n=
d m .k e
~
the
2 nk
N
generated
frequency-domain
, m=0,1, . , S1
data
(1)
N k=0
d=[ d T0 , d T1 , , d TS1 ]T
{d m }S1
m=0
of length SN
d m=[d Tm ,0 , d Tm ,1 , , d Tm ,G 1]T
14
sub- blocks
2)
G1
{d m ,g }g=0
'
15
has its own CP (or ZP in ZP- OFDM systems) as the guard interval, and there
are totally S CPs as shown in Fig. 2 (a). Since the length of guard interval is
usually large enough to combat the composite effects of wireless multipath as
well as optical CD and PMD in FiWi networks the frequently inserted CPs
obviously reduce the spectral efciency. However, the proposed scheme
utilizes only one ZP as the guard interval for all of the S data blocks. The
only one guard interval instead of S guard intervals could also be efciently
used for reliable data demodulation, thus the proposed MB-OFDM scheme
could achieve higher spectral efciency.
The second obvious difference between the proposed MB- OFDM
solution and the conventional one lies in the way to generate the time-domain
payload data. As illustrated in Fig. 2 and further explained in Fig. 3, the g th
sub-block
d m , g=[d m , g ,0 , d m , g ,1 , , dm ,g , N '1 ]
N/G)
to
the
corresponding
frequency-domain
~ ~~ ~T
d m , g=[ d m , g ,0 , d m , g ,1 , , d m , g ,N 1 ] as below :
N1
m , g ,n =
j
dm. g , k e
~
2 nk
N'
, n=0,1, . , N '1
=
data
(2)
N ' k=0
{d m ,g }g=0
1
1
B
f= =
=
T N Ts N '
16
(3)
f'
1
1
B
= ' T = ' =G f
'
T N
N
s
(4)
time domain. It is clear that the subcarrier spacing f ' would be enlarged
when the smaller IFFT size
N ' is used.
Fig 4 : Comparison of frequency-domain signal structure: (a) The conventional OFDM with the N-point IFFT; (b) The proposed MB-OFDM with the
N-point IFFT.
In conventional OFDM-based FiWi networks, the IFFT size is usually
congured large to keep the overhead caused by the frequently inserted CPs
within a certain degree, so the resulting subcarrier spacing is usually much
smaller than the system coherent bandwidth . Therefore, it is possible to
reduce the IFFT size to some extent without sacricing the system
performance. However,
17
N ' according to
spectral efciency since multiple data blocks in MB-OFDM share only one
guard interval. On the contrary, a conventional OFDM system usually adopts
the relatively large IFFT size N because it requires every IFFT block to have
its own guard interval. The direct reason of using the reduced IFFT size to
generate the time-domain sub-blocks in MB-OFDM is to reduce the PAPR
and alleviate the sensitivity to residual CFO of OFDM signals.
3.3 CHANNEL MODEL FOR FIBER-WIRELESS SYSTEMS
After the ber-wireless channel, the received data
r=[r 0 ,r 1 , , r SN1 ]
L 1
(5)
l=0
where dnl is the (nl)th entry of the super-block data d as shown in Fig. 3,
h=[h0 , h1 , , h L1 ]T
of the ber-wireless link, hl denotes the gain of the lth path including the
wireless multi- path effect as well as the optical impairment effects like CD,
PMD, and polarization dependent loss (PDL) , L denotes the channel length,
wn presents the additive white Gussian noise (AWGN) caused by the optical
amplied spontaneous emission (ASE) and electronic noise. Note that the ZP
length M should be larger than the channel length L to avoid the interferences
between adjacent transmission frames.
3.4 RECEIVER DESIGN
18
N
G
point FFTs.
19
actually becomes
the
cyclic
(6)
r =d h+w
where w denotes the AWGN vector. Therefore, ZP in the proposed MBOFDM acts similarly to the CP in conventional OFDM, whereby the cyclicity
reconstruction could be achieved by directly removing the CP. Second, a pair
of SN-point FFT/IFFT is used to recover the time-domain transmitted superblock data d after compensating for the ber-wireless channel impairments in
the frequency domain. The SN-point FFT is applied to the time- domain
signal r ' in (6) to produce the frequency-domain signal r '
~
~r ' =F r ' =F ( d h+ w ) =~
d h+~
w
SN
where
F SN d
{dm }m=0
(7)
SN
distinguishes
F SN w
(8)
20
N
-point FFTs are used to restore
G
CHAPTER 4
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
The performance analysis of the proposed MB-OFDM transmission
scheme in terms of spectral efciency, PAPR reduction, and the
computational complexity is done. The potential extensions of the proposed
scheme are also discussed.
4.1 SPECTRAL EFFICIENCY
Due to the overhead caused by the preamble, especially the guard
intervals, the spectral efciency of the OFDM based FiWi networks
normalized by the ideal case without any overhead can be expressed in the
percentage form as
0=
SN
100 (9)
SN + KM+ N P
NP
is adopted.
256,M = 32are used for both schemes. It is clear that about 10% higher
spectral efciency could be achieved by the proposed scheme due to the
removal of (S 1) guard intervals.
TABLE 1
COMPARISON OF SPECTRAL EFFICIENCY
E {|d m ,n| }
N1
{d m ,k }k=0
(10)
are random, the maximal
PAPR could be as large as PAPR max = 10log10N in the worst case that all the
data
N1
{d m. k }k=0
N 1
{d m , k }k=0
appears in practice, so the widely used metric for evaluating PAPR is the
complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) Fc(), which is
dened as the probability that the PAPR is larger than a given threshold . It
has been proved that
Fc() = Pr(PAPR >)=1Pr(PAPR ) = 1(1e ) N ,
(11)
which indicates that the CCDF is only dependent on the IFFT size N for a
given threshold . Thus, the smaller IFFT size
22
N'
N'
could also be
intuitively explained by the fact that the proposed MB- OFDM is essentially
a compromise between the multi-carrier and signal-carrier transmission
schemes, whereby multi-carrier signal has high PAPR while single-carrier
signal enjoys low PARR.
4.3 COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY
At the transmitter side, Fig. 3 indicates that the proposed scheme
utilizes SG N/G point IFFTs instead of SN-point IFFTs to generate the time
domain data. Considering the complexity of a N-point IFFT in terms of the
number of multiplications is
has the complexity of SG
N
log2N, the proposed MB-OFDM scheme
2
N
N
SN
log2(
)=
G
G
2
log2(
N
), instead of
G
SN
log2N for the conventional OFDM scheme. Clearly, a computation
2
reduction of
SN
log2G could be achieved.
2
N
point FFTs for
G
23
SN
G
more times of
CHAPTER 5
SIMULATION RESULTS
This section provides simulation results to evaluate the performance of
the proposed MB-OFDM transmission scheme for future high-speed FiWi
networks. In the simulation, we choose the LDPC code due to its low
complexity and very low error oor resulted from the absence of 4-cycles in
its graph. A 2.5 Gbps random data stream is coded by LDPC, and then 16
QAM modulation is adopted for constellation mapping. The constellation
24
N ' as
25
Fig 6 : CCDF of the PAPR when different IFFT sizes are used.
shown in Figs. 2 and 3. The theoretical CCDF (11) is also included in Fig. 7
as the benchmark for comparison. It is clear that the reduced IFFT size
N'
could lead to the PAPR reduction, e.g., for the clipping ratio of 0.01, the
PAPR is reduced by 1.2 dB and 1.9 dB when
N ' = 32and
N ' = 16
respectively. We could also observe that the simulated CCDF coincides with
the theoretical result (11).
26
CONCLUSION
In this paper, the multi-block OFDM (MB-OFDM) transmission
scheme is proposed for high-speed FiWi networks to simultaneously achieve
improved spectral efciency, reduced PAPR and mitigated sensitivity to CFO.
One key idea is that the slow time-varying property of the ber-wireless
channel can be utilized to improve the spectral efciency, which is achieved
by sharing one guard interval among multiple data blocks.. The above merits,
which have been demonstrated by the simulation results, are achieved at the
cost of increased yet affordable receiver complexity. The proposed scheme
could also be easily extended to other ber/wireless/FiWi networks. The
future work is to incorporate the proposed scheme with wireless multipleinput multiple-output (MIMO) and optical polarization division multiplexing
(PDM) techniques to further improve the system capacity and reliability.
FUTURE WORKS
The proposed MB-OFDM scheme, or at least some key components of
this scheme, can be directly used or easily extended to other OFDM-based
wireless and optical communication systems.
27
N'
interval for multiple data blocks can be also used by single-carrier systems to
achieve higher spectral efciency.
Third, for some applications, especially for wireless communication
systems, the channel may change very fast, then it is preferred to reduce the
number of data blocks within a super-block to combat the fast channel
variation. In the extreme case, S =1could be congured without improving
the spectral efciency. However, the smaller IFFT size used in the proposed
MB-OFDM scheme could still be used to reduce the PAPR and mitigate the
sensitivity to the residual CFO.
REFERENCES
[1] C. Lim, A. Nirmalathas, M. Bakaul, P. Gamage, K. Lee, Y. Yang, D.
Novak, and R. Waterhouse, Fiber-wireless networks and subsystem
technologies, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 390405, Feb. 2010.
[2] Z. Jia, J. Yu, G. Ellinas, and G. Chang, Key enabling technologies for
optical-wireless networks: Optical millimeter-wave generation, wave- length
reuse, and architecture, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 3452
3471, June 2007.
28
29
spectral
efciency and
reliable
performance
in
high
speed
environments, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 695 707,
May 2012.
[25] C. Youn, X. Liu, S. Chandrasekhar, Y. Kwon, J. Kim, J. Choe, D. Kim,
K. Choi, and E. Nam, Channel estimation and synchro- nization for
30
31