Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

anaging Content

Martin Creaner, TeleManagement Forum's president talk to Intercomms about develo


pment at the organisation and the issues to be addressed at Management World Ame
ricas in November
Martin Creaner has been working and advising in the Communications Industry for
18 years and is presently President and Chief Technical Officer of the Telemanag
ement Forum. Prior to joining the TeleManagement Forum, Martin held a number of
executive positions with BT, the major UK based European Communications Service
Provider, and with Motorola, the global Wireless Networks Equipment manufacturer
, where Martin led the 2.5G and 3G OSS solutions development activities. Martin
sits on the board of a number of telecoms companies, and is the Chairman of Sela
tra Ltd., which is a java games applications service provider for the mobile mar
ketplace.
Martin is an accomplished speaker and regularly is asked to chair or give keynot
e talks at leading telecommunication industry events.
Q: You've set out the task for Dallas to address the issue of Managing Content.
How are you doing that?
A: Managing content is the overarching banner for that activity, but really what
we are looking at is the whole content experience and how that fits into the br
oader telecoms value chain. We are really keen on growing the TM Forum and its r
elevance into a wider set of the industry. This is because we feel that these wi
der industries such as cable, device players and content are becoming intimately
linked with the sort of business that we've traditionally been involved in. At
Dallas we will continue the dialogue we have got going in those areas. The purpo
se of that is to increase number of content companies participating in and joini
ng the TM Forum, building up relationships and partnerships with telecoms player
and suppliers.
Q: How do the speakers and tracks at this event reflect that goal?
A: We have number of tracks running with either people from Telcos talking about
the content challenges that they face or we have invited content companies to c
ome along and talk to us about how they see themselves fitting into the overall
Telecoms value chain. In our Catalyst area, we have also established the 'Conten
t Encounter' which akin to a catalyst on steroids, totally focussed on content.
We have picked a number of key scenarios that relate to the sort of content that
is being put out today and the sort of content services people will want tomorr
ow. We will really try to focus on the management challenges of how you get that
content out there and how do you assure its quality end-to-end because one of t
he thing that we have learned as we have been looking at how the value chain han
gs together is that the content players are obsessed with the quality of their c
ontent when it reaches the end user.
Q: Aren't Telecoms providers equally as interested?
A: In all of the previous services that telecoms provides we've always been very
interested in call quality and so on but it has always been to some extent quit
e subjective and to some extent it has always been a given that voice quality wo
uld be good enough. However when you are putting, for example a Disney movie ove
r the telephone lines onto you computer or your television or handset, what Disn
ey is hugely interested in is the end user experience. They quite rightly assume
that if the end user isn't happy with the delivered content, at least part of t
heir dissatisfaction will reflect directly on Disney, even if Disney is nothing
to do with it. Consequently they want to be involved in that value chain. It is
a question of how you get the content players into the value chain. How do you m
easure end-to-end quality? How do you manage the end user devices so that the en
d to end quality is controllable and how do you assure revenue across the value
chain?

There is a huge amount of content that exists and if you are aggregating content
how do you manage it in a sensible fashion so that you can rapidly assess what
to do with it and how to deliver it. There is a complete management challenge of
just how you manage and handle content purely within the content provider envir
onment but within the broader-based TM Forum, our main focus is how do you manag
e content quality end to end.
Q: Who does your Prosspero initiative help in all this?
A: Prosspero is our mechanism for taking solid standards. Prosspero doesn't try
to create the standards it helps existing ones. Take JSR 190, recently approved
through the JCP process. What we will do is take that standard and put it though
the Prosspero process to ensure that not only is there a good valid working spe
cification but whether there are reference specification, testimonials from serv
ice providers and companies who have already implemented it, are there implement
ation guides, are there training and education, is there an ecosystems of develo
pers are tools that support that implementation? That is the Prosspero process;
to take good solid technical standards an make it easily implementable.
Q: How is it going?
A: Prospero is doing exactly what we wanted it to do. What we have done is put a
number of mature standards through the Prosspero process and at www.prosspero.o
rg we have a portal where people can not only download specifications but all of
the reference implementations that are associated with that approved specificat
ion. What we have also done is build a big pipeline of stuff that is going throu
gh the Prosspero approval process. We have about twenty or so different interfac
es now going through the Prosspero process that are all mapped to the Telcommuni
cations Application Map (TAM) which defines all of the systems within a service
provider environment and we have mapped many of the critical interfaces against
that TAM and we are putting those through the Prosspero process. There are a lot
of interfaces out there and really what Prosspero is all about is getting the i
ndustry to focus on one and use it for particular purpose.
Q: What about development of the TAM?
A: Its growing very rapidly too. We wrote version one about 18 months ago and pe
ople were biting our hand off for it although it was very much was a high level
view. We released the more detailed version two about six months ago. The TAM is
stable and is being fleshed out in the areas that are hot at the moment such as
resources and services and there is going to be another version released in the
next six months that will flesh out some of the remaining areas. One of our key
efforts with the TAM is linking it in to the TM Forum's efforts on Service Deli
very Frameworks. There is a huge amount of hype around IMS STP and what the TMF
has done over the last nine months is to try and make sense of this hype to form
a single architecture agreed between all the major players in the industry all
the other industry bodies such as ETSI and the ITU. We have a High Level Archite
cture agreed which is known as the Service Delivery Framework (SDF). What we are
doing and focussed on expanding out the TM Forum key artefacts like the TAM ETO
M and SID to embrace the wider STF.
Q: What role will Super Catalysts play in the future?
A: We want to do something spectacular on the catalyst front. Not so much specta
cular in terms of all the marketing hype, but to address the whole end to end ch
allenge that the industry is facing. The first will be at Dallas, then Nice and
then Orlando next year and growing all the time. It will help attendees to under
stand and appreciate why end to end management of content service is a huge prob
lem that has to be addressed by the industry.
What this catalyst is trying to do is first shine a spot light on the big end to
end content service management challenge and second secondly identify usable wo
rk that we can adopt and use and those areas that we need to invest a lot of tim
e and money in. For example, take IPTV, one of the big problems we mentioned ear

ly on is that there is no way of knowing what quality you end up getting on you
IPTV delivered service. I can measure the transmission characteristics of the IP
pipe running to your computer and look at the jitter and delay but looking at t
he jitter and delay doesn't necessarily tell you what the quality is going to be
like for video. The Mean Opinion Score (MOS) has been used for voice for the pa
st 50 years to come up with some form of subjective assessment for the voice qua
lity. There are however no companies out there who are developing automatic algo
rithms, to calculate the MOS for video coming in. That is important because if t
here is some way to manage and monitor whether the video being delivered to an i
ndividual customer is sufficiently good then if you ring in and complain about t
he quality we can objectively assess whether than is true. The consumer might no
t be happy with it but we can at least prove you are getting it. When a major Eu
ropean mobile operator began offering steaming video services it became known th
at if you rang up and told them that you were getting poor quality, they had to
refund you but they had no way of knowing if quality was good or bad and it came
close to withdrawing those services.
The same thing could happen with IPTV. That is just one example of why the manag
eability has to stretch a lot further than it has even stretched before. Now the
y don't just have to worry about getting the signal all the way to the device bu
t also whether the device works and if the end user quality is of sufficiently g
ood. Not only will the end users complain. The content provider will only allow
you to deliver movies is you can guarantee that your delivered quality will reac
h certain criteria.
For more information visit:
TMF website at www.tmforum.org or email us on mcreaner@tmforum.org
Upcoming Events
Click for information
Click for information
Click
for information
Click for information
Click for in
formation
Click for information
Click for informat
ionClick for information
Click for information
Cli
ck for information
Click for information
Click for
information
Click for information
Click for infor
mation
Contributors
Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen