You are on page 1of 2

PROJECT APPRAISAL - A METHODOLOGY

Appraisal involves a careful checking of the basic data, assumptions and methodology used in project
preparation, an in-depth review of the work plan, cost estimates and proposed financing, an
assessment of the project's organizational and management aspects, and finally the viability of
project .
It is mandatory for the Project Authorities to undertake project appraisal or atleast give details of
financial, economic and social benefits and suitably incorporate it in the PC-I. These projects are
examined in the Planning and Development Division from the technical,
institutional/organizational/managerial, financial and economic point of view depending on nature of
the project. On the basis of such an assessment, a judgement is reached as to whether the project is
technically sound, financially justified and viable from the point of view of the economy as a whole.
In the Planning and Development Division, there is a division of labour in the appraisal of projects
prepared by the concerned Executing Agencies. The concerned Technical Section in consultation with
other technical sections i.e; Physical Planning & Housing, Manpower, Governance and Environment
sections undertake the technical appraisal, wherever necessary. This covers engineering, commercial,
organizational and managerial aspects, while the Economic Appraisal Section carries out the pre-
sanction appraisal of the development projects from the financial and economic points of view.
Economic appraisal of a project is concerned with the desirability of carrying out the project from the
standpoint of its contribution to the development of the national economy. Whereas financial analysis
deals with only costs and returns to project participants, economic analysis deals with costs and
returns to society as a whole. The rationale behind the project appraisal is to provide the decision-
makers with financial and economic yardsticks for the selection/rejection of projects from among
competing alternative proposals for investment.

The techniques of project appraisal can be divided under two heads viz (i) undiscounted and (ii)
discounted. Undiscounted techniques include (a) Pay back period, and (b) Profit & Loss account.
Discounted techniques take into account the time value of money and include (a) Net Present Value
(NPV), (b) Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR), (c) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) (d) Sensitivity Analysis
(treatment of uncertainty) (e) and Domestic Resource Cost (Modified Bruno Ratio). Different
investment appraisal criteria are given at Appendix-I.
Economic viability of the project is invariably judged at 12 percent discount rate/opportunity cost of
capital. However, in case of financial analysis, the actual rate of interest i.e. the rate at which capital is
obtained is used. For the government-funded projects, the discount rate is fixed by the Budget Wing of
the Finance Division for development loans and advances on yearly basis. The provisional rate of
mark-up fixed by the Finance Division for the current year (2005-06) is 8.22%. In case the project is
funded by more than one source, the financial analysis is carried out on the weighted average cost of
capital (WACC) for each project. If the project is financed through foreign grants, the financial analysis
is undertaken at zero discount rate. However, the economic analysis is undertaken at 12% discount
rate.

Many investment projects are addition to existing facilities/activities and thus benefits and costs
relevant to the new project are those that are incremental to what would have occurred if the new
project had not been added. During the operating life of a project, it is very important to measure all
costs and benefits as the difference between what these variables would be if no project (without
project) were undertaken and what they will be should the project be implemented (with project). It is
very common error to assume that all costs and benefits are incremental to the new project when, in
fact, they are not. Hence, considerable care must be taken in defining a “ base case” which realistically
sets out the profile of costs and benefits expected if no additional investment is undertaken.