Corbett, Jung 1

Basic Jung
Lecture notes of Dr. Lionel Corbett: Private Distribution Only (4th revision)

The ego
To Jung, the ego means human consciousness, or strictly speaking the center of the field of
consciousness, the subject of personal acts of consciousness, ones sense of identity, the collection
of memories and feelings that feel like me. The ego is also the psychological expression of the
combination of all our body sensations. Jung believes that the ego arises out of the Self, or the
unconscious, during development, like the moon separating from the earth as the solar system
formed. The ground plan for the ego lies within the unconscious. An ego evolves in childhood in
response to the demands of the environmentfrom the collision of the inner and outer worlds. In
development, the ego gradually becomes more and more autonomous.
As it develops, the ego may be more oriented to the inner or the outer worlds; typological
preference decides which of these is more important; the superior functions are connected to the
ego. Jung's ego is not the same as Freud's ego; in Jung the ego is not a signaling device, and does
not have unconscious parts, as it does for Freud; for Jung, the ego is one among many complexes,
or subdivisions of the personality. The ego is that complex that is conscious; Jung usually uses the
metaphor of illumination or brightness to indicate what he means by this; the ego is the organ of
differentiation, reflection, and discrimination of pairs of opposites--subject from object, positive
from negative, etc.
If we have a healthy ego, we have a sense of identity, we can tolerate a degree of stress without
collapsing, we can tolerate painful affect, we know what is inside and what is outside, and we
experience ourselves as having continuity in time and space. We feel that we are the same person
we always have been, and we are relatively autonomous.
The process of becoming conscious and developing an ego is the subject of hero myths (eg
Ulysses) that describe the hero's fight against the powers of darkness that try to annihilate him--this
means taking on the journey into the unconscious; the hero has to liberate himself from ties to the

Corbett, Jung 1

parents and attempt psychological rebirth by means of a dangerous adventure, so as to attain the
secret of new life (vol. 5.) The hero is a common motif in many mythologies. In The Hero With a
Thousand Faces (1949) Campbell shows the common structure. We all have to leave home; we are
called to a task, cross a threshold, face danger, trials and ordeals, slay the monster, and we are
rewarded with the treasure hard to attain, the kingdom or the marriage etc. This is an archetypal
journey--Jung and Campbell describe it from a masculine point of view; see also Maureen Murdock
on the woman's journey; think of Psyche's journey.
The monster might be the need to free oneself from mother; if the hero is caught by the monster
and cannot free himself, the anima is never freed from identification with mother, and the man is
trapped in the unconscious, or in a merger with mother (see 12, 437,8). It has been pointed out that
this need to kill the mother-dragon represents a male journey, and may not be the same for women;
Kim Chernin (Reinventing Eve). Jung thought that this pattern applied to development in the first
part of life, during which one emancipates from parents, establishes a career and a social position
and develops the ego. This always leads to a one -sided development, and we rely heavily on the
superior function; the scholar has no time for feeling, the business man does not cultivate the inner
life. Later in life one can let go of being in charge and acknowledge our dependence on the Self,
and develop the inferior function. Today the hero is the astronaut who conquers outer space etc; we
have to explore, and this is an archetypal journey.
The ego became very important in Jung's thinking. It seemed to Jung as if the divine uses human
consciousness to become conscious of itself; this also became important for Jung as an explanation
for creation and incarnation. He thought that the divine becomes conscious in the act of human
reflection, as if the divine could not otherwise be conscious of itself. For this reason, Jung thought
that the ego was important; he did not like the eastern idea of dissolution of the self or the ego as a
goal of spiritual development, since he believed that there could be no consciousness without
someone there to be conscious 9,i, 506. (In eastern thought, there can be consciousness without a
subject). Jung has been criticized for insisting on this western egocentric prejudice, but he is
committed to western individualism, and he was too fragile to tolerate the idea of loss of ego.

Corbett, Jung 1

Jung believed that the ego gradually becomes relativized, meaning we realize it is not really the
center of the personality (9, ii, 11)--it exists in relation to the Self.
The objective psyche and the archetypes (See Blake, Visions of the Daughters of Albion, p.
191).
Personal consciousness rests on a level of the psyche that is objective, or autonomous from the
point of view of consciousness. This level is not synonymous with Freud's personal unconscious,
which contains parts of the ego and superego; Jung felt that Freud dealt with this level (7, 441), but
the deeper level has its own laws and patterns. The objective psyche contains archetypal processes
that manifest themselves in image and symbol, in dreams, mythology and fairy tales, fantasy
products, religions, and other symbolic systems such as alchemy. Just as the material world is
ordered, in ways that we call the laws of physics, so the psyche has its own natural law that Junga
calls archetypes.
In MDR ( p. 158-61), Jung reports a 1909 dream of a house with many levels, which began his
thinking about this deeper level of the psyche. He also reports the experience of a patient who
could see the phallus of the sun that was the origin of the wind--(8, 317-8). This was initially
unintelligible until Jung discovered a Mithraic manuscript that described a similar image. He
studied the dreams of black people in the Southern USA, and found motifs from Greek mythology
in them, such as a man crucified on a wheel, which suggested to Jung the ancient sun-wheel
sacrifice to propitiate the sun god. The image of the sun-wheel is traceable back to the Paleolithic
age, before the wheel itself had been invented; this repeats the mythologem of Ixion, who offended
men and gods by killing his father in law to avoid paying the bride-price at his wedding. Zeus took
him to Olympus to purify him, but Ixion tried to seduce Hera. As a punishment, Hermes chained
him by his hands and feet to a wheel that constantly revolves in the sky (CW18, 81) Jung suggests
that that these motifs are common to all people and not to particular races. They express universal
modes of experience. In other words, we are not born with the psyche as a tabula rasa, but with an
enormous potential for different kinds of human experiences. Archetypes are deep structures of the
psyche; they are analogous to the laws of physics. They describe the deep structures of the psyche.

Corbett, Jung 1

Like any natural law, they are not in any particular place, any more than the law of gravity is in one
place.
The idea that we are bound together by a common level of the psyche helped to give rise to the idea
that Jung was a mystic; after all, Locke, in the 17th century, had said that we have no innate ideas-we are born as a tabula rasa, and the only knowledge that we have comes from the senses. In this
theory, human qualities are entirely learned, based purely on culture. But Jung's position is that
because we have innate structures in the psyche (8, 230), the child meets the world with specific
aptitudes or preformed patterns of expectation; the archetypes are the potential for typical human
behavior.
In animals, archetypes are the same as innate release mechanisms (Lorenz, Tinbergen); the animal
has a repertoire of behavior that certain situations evoke; the animal responds with a particular
pattern of behavior. Baby chicks are terrified when even a model of a hawk is drawn overhead, but
not when images of other birds are used, or if the model is drawn backwards over them. Turtles lay
eggs on the beach above the tide level, and when they hatch they head for the sea as fast as
possible, so as not to be eaten by the gulls overhead; this is spontaneous; they know what they must
do. What we call instincts are in the body, but are also expressed psychologically as images,
symbols and fantasies. Are the pyramids in Egypt and in Mexico expressions of the same mental
pattern, or are similar artifacts in different cultures the result of diffusion? Or are they simply due to
the fact that the human brain is similar and we face similar life circumstances?
Jung has been criticized for ignoring the biological and instinctual level of the person, especially
sexuality, and of propounding a purely spiritual psychology. But archetypal theory includes the
biological with the spectrum concept of the archetype. At the same time as the body reacts, so an
image forms in the psyche, because body and psyche are two aspects of a unitary process; the
archetype is a psychosomatic unity. As the bird builds the nest, or as the baby feeds, presumably
images go on in the mind that correspond to the bodily experience. When an instinct is represented
in the mind, it appears as an archetypal image or symbol that expresses the nature of the instinct
imaginally. Psyche is a part of nature; body and mind are a whole; we cannot separate psyche and
biology 8, 232. Early in his writing, Jung does tend to write about body and spirit as polar

Corbett, Jung 1

opposites, but in the 1940's he introduced the idea of the psychoid realm, suggesting that archetypes
are actually continuous with inorganic matter; at bottom, psyche is simply world 9, i, 291. The
concept of the psychoid transcends the opposition of psyche or spirit and matter; it is a unitary
worldview.
The archetypes themselves are unknowable; they are known through their effects, such as their
production of symbols/images, or their role in the center of complexes. (Unlike Freud or Lacan,
Jung stresses image over language when discussing the unconscious.; in fact, initially he used the
term primordial image, borrowed from the 19th century historian Jacob Burckhardt. See Lewis,
The Historical Development of the Concept of the Archetype, Quadrant, 22, 47, 1989. ) The image
or representation is the way the archetype appears in the mind; the image is not identical with the
archetype. The archetype itself allows many empirical expressions (letters, 2, p. 461). The
archetype itself is unknowable--the ding an sich; in the Kantian sense it is the irrepresentable
numenon; its existence is inferred from its effects (letters 2, p. 23). Jung uses the analogy of the
invisible axial system of the crystal, that preforms the shape of the crystal in the mother liquid,
although it has no material existence of its own; we can represent the crystal (image) but not the
underlying pattern former. The pattern-forming mechanism is an a priori possibility of
representation; each person and each culture gives particular contents to different archetype; these
are the images. (Four Archetypes, p. 13). When we fall in love, the anima or the animus has been
constellated; we fall in love without being conscious of why we do so; the archetype is
unconscious, so falling in love seems spontaneous. This effect is what matters; Jung insists
frequently that he is trying to describe archetypes phenomenologically without taking a
philosophical or metaphysical position about their nature or origins; we have certain experiences
that he calls archetypal.
There are as many archetypes as there are typical human situations and beliefs; belief in a divine
being, the Oedipus complex, Great Mother, Sky Father, anima, animus, hero, magus, paradise, the
night sea journey, the helpful animal, the dying and resurrected god. Archetypes prepare us to
behave in particular situations. We are born predisposed to experience mother; the actual mother
fills in this archetypal potential. Sexual attraction is not only a function of social construction--it
does not only function as culture lays down; we respond spontaneously to the opposite sex because

Corbett, Jung 1

the anima or animus is constellated by the other person" in spite of ourselves." The question over
which Jung got into trouble was whether everyone's archetypal inheritance is the same, or whether
different archetypes move through different races. In the 1930's, Jung made some stupid remarks
about Aryan and Jewish psychology, and about European and Asian psychological differences.
This raised the possibility of psychological differences based on race, and the possibility of
justifying racial discrimination. (See Lingering Shadows, and Samuel's essay in the paperback
edition of Jung's Essays on Contemporary Events, 1988.)
Usually, Jung refers to the archetypes as the common inheritance of all humanity; they are
generally human, everyone is contained within the same psyche, and the same archetypes are found
in different races. (See the Zarathustra Seminars, p. 648). This phenomenon could be explained
by the migration of peoples, but he also saw archetypal ideas in the dreams and psychotic material
of people with no contact with these ideas, such as the sun phallus. He felt he had ruled out
cryptomnesia; are the links fortuitous, or does the mind have its own history as does the body?
The other issue is whether he is a Lamarckian; sometimes he says that archetypes are inherited.
Lamarck suggested that characteristics acquired during a lifetime could be passed on to offsprings;
the modern theory of evolution suggest that only genetic mutations can be inherited. In his early
writing, Jung initially sounded Lamarkian in 7, 109 (1917, revised up to 1942) when he says that
archetypes are the deposits of constantly repeated experiences of humanity, pathways traced out by
the cumulative experience of our ancestors 8, 99. They are images of of typical human events that
have crystallized out over time (7, 151) because of the similarity of human experience over the
ages, because of endless repetition (9, i, 99) as forms without contents. Here he says that the
archetypes are the repository of human existence and experience. When he says the archetypes are
inherited with the body, he is still in a biological mode in his attempt to reconcile biology with the
life of the spirit (1942; Essays on a Science of Mythology, p. 74). Later he realized that the
question of the origin of the archetypes is an unanswerable question; in Man and His symbols,
1961, p. 58 he says they are of unknown origin. In his later work, Jung actually rejected the idea
that contents could be inherited (18, 524, 1127, 1228; 8, 718); only the disposition or possibility of
having certain experiences are inherited; the archetype is empty and formal only (9,i, 155, 152)--we
do not inherit ideas, only the possibility of having them. The archetype is not determined as to its
content; it is not an unconscious idea--9, i, 79. We are disposed to live in a certain type of world;

Corbett, Jung 1

eg, we experience the feminine in a way that is not simply dependent on the women we actually
meet--we are attuned to women from the start (7, 300).
The archetype can be thought of as an open system that lays down an outline within which a wide
range of behavior is possible, such as sexual behavior. Open systems can be contrasted with closed
patterns like the bee's honey dance, which are fixed in every detail. Many people think that this
whole biological argument is irrelevant, since Jung's main approach is hermeneutical, and we do
not need to intrude the language of biology into this domain.
Actually Freud was Lamarckian; in Moses and Monotheism he postulates the inheritance of
feelings about the father that go back to the primal horde. Jung thought that Freud had identified
the first archetype--the incest taboo--and its mythic component, the Oedipus complex.
Archetypal images appear in dreams, visions, fantasies, religions and mythologies. There are an
infinite number of possible representations of the archetype, which are personified as the gods and
goddesses of mythology. (For example, Christ himself is not the archetype; he personifies an
underlying archetype of the redeemer, or the the Anthropos, or the Self, also seen as Buddha,
Osiris, Dionysius, etc. (Jung borrows the word Anthropos from Ezekiel and Daniel to describe this
archetype. ) To show how archetypal images overlap, note that Jesus also embodies the archetype
of the savior and the healer. Mythology contains a collection of archetypal images in the form of
stories. Mythology is therefore a mirror of the objective psyche, as these images have been
understood and elaborated in particular cultures. The reason that various cultures have similar
mythic themes is because the objective psyche is common to all of humanity; there is a common
underlying organization. Any mythologem can pop up in any person for this reason; we are not
totally products of our culture.
In a very late letter (vol. 2, 1960, p. 563) Jung says that the archetypes are autonomous, with a sort
of consciousness or psychological life of their own; he calls them animalia, or animated beings, and
says that they are autonomous, and this autonomy does not disappear when the particular image in
which they are manifest disappears. (This personification of the archetypes as animated beings
with their own consciousness. gets him in trouble in respectable scientific circles, but not among

Corbett, Jung 1

the neo-romantics at Pacifica.) The tendency to personify is characteristic of Jung; rather than his
rational side, this is his poetic streak, which prefers drama and mythopoetic ways of thinking.
Jung believed (in the same letter to Serrano) that we are affected by these forces in a way that is
deeper than our own will; we are not entirely in control of our destiny, and we need to honor the
gods that affect us. We are not master in our own house, and we should study what affects us so
deeply (letters vol. 2, 594). For example, Wotan is an old Germanic storm god, and god of battle;
his name is said to mean "one who makes mad" since he made people furious. The Germanic
people used to sacrifice their captives in war to him, by burning, stabbing and strangling them.
Wotan was also the god of the dead (he has later connections to Mercury); this is the manifest
image that is elaborated in that mythology as a character in the stories. Underneath the image is the
basic form determinant that causes the Wotan phenomenon, which Jung saw at work behind the
Nazi phenomenon, when this archetypal force possessed Germany. This phenomenon fits with his
idea that archetypal forces can remain dormant until cultural conditions allow them to surface.
Archetypes are like dry river-beds that can dry up and refill when the water starts to flow again (10,
395). Certain cultures allow the expression of particular archetypes more so than others--eg, the
archetype of initiation is found in many tribal cultures but not so much in ours.
There is an ideological problem with the concept of the archetype, which is that people resist
theories of an innate human nature that is common to all people, since this seems to detract from
human freedom and justifies repressive political systems. If we are by nature territorial or
hierarchical, we cannot abolish private property or social ranks; they are embedded in human
nature. This may be another reason that Jung was ostracized by academia (Stevens). But Jung
thought that the environment was important in filling in the content of the archetype (8, 324), and
the content is culturally determined (17, 160), which is why these are not stereotypes--a common
criticism of the idea. Jung rejects the existentialist position that we are totally free to decide who
we are, but he does not believe that we are totally bound by instincts; we have relative freedom, and
the archetypes set some limits on it (8, 398). He distinguished between "mass man" who was
engulfed by the environment, and the person who is rooted in the inner world (10, 462), who is
more autonomous and authentic; this is the basis of the idea of individuation.

Corbett, Jung 1

Another criticism is that the idea of the collective unconscious is racist. Jung wrote that there are
psychological differences between races and cultures, and this led to the charge of anti-semitism,
but he defended himself by saying that to say that races have their own differences and
psychopathology does not imply depreciation (10, 466, 10, 1014). Actually the idea of the
objective psyche can be seen to affirm the basic unity of humanity, since the archetypes belong to
humanity in general (18, 79). "Somewhere you are the same as a man of another race" since we
have the same unconscious structures, just as we all have the same heart (18, 93). The
psychological differences between races are the result of culture, not the archetypes.
The idea of deep structures in the psyche is consonant with similar ideas in other fields. In LeviStrauss' structural anthropology, it is noted that societies with no contact with each other have
similar organizational forms. Piaget talks about preformed categories in the mind. Chomsky noted
an innate predisposition for language; children aged 5-6 seem to use a larger number of phrases
than they have heard. Contemporary neuroscience agrees that our brain structures process
perceptions in ways that predisposes us to behave in particular ways. Perhaps an Aristotelian
would say that the archetypes derive from experience of the actual mother and father; the Platonist
would say that there are primordial ideas or images that exist a priori. Plato believed that learning
represented a kind of recollection of Forms or ideas that are stimulated by experience. The idea of
the archetype is also seen as an extension of Kant's idea that the mind has a priori structures that
shape knowledge of the world. An anthropologist called Levy-Bruhl called them "representations
collectives," and in comparative religion they are called "categories of the imagination." Adolf
Bastian used the term "elementary" or "primordial" thoughts (9,i, 89).
I do not think there is much point in asking where the archetypes come from or whether they
evolve. One can do a great deal of physics without knowing where the laws of physics came from
or why natural constants have the actual values that they have! There existence is a just-so story;
this is how things are.
The words "archetype" and "spirit" refer to the same principle. When an archetype is experienced
relatively directly, it produces what Otto called a numinous experience; when Moses (Exodus 3: 2)
stood before the burning bush that was not consumed by the fire, he knew, as anyone would

Corbett, Jung 1

without being told, that this was not an ordinary phenomenon. Such an uncanny phenomenon
transcends his ordinary human experience. What traditional religions call an experience of spirit,
the psychologist calls a numinous experience of the archetype. But archetypal manifestations are
not "spiritual" in the sense of something non-material; we do not need to split matter and spirit.
Matter has its own numinosity, and it can manifest the sacred--think of the power of the nuclear
bomb as an example of the power of matter.
Fire is one of the commonest archetypal manifestations of the numinosum in all cultures and
religions, as it is throughout the Bible. In antiquity, when God accepted a sacrifice, he consumed it
with his fire. Wherever we look, fire represents the presence of spiritual energy, the energy of life
and desire, light in the darkness, and purification. Therefore, the psychologist regards fire as an
archetypal symbol of the power of the divine. Given the situation that Moses was called upon to
deal with, fire also suggests the archetypal or spiritual capacity for destruction, re-generation and
transformation. Perhaps the fire in the bush is a link to his subsequent experience on the volcano of
Mt. Sinai, which was covered in smoke and fire when Moses spoke to God, and is also a link to the
pillar of fire that led the Hebrews by night. The New Testament account of the descent of tongues
of flame at Pentecost, or Jesus appearing from heaven "in flaming fire," (2 Thess: 1,7) are similar
instances of the mythical depiction of spirit or archetype in the form of fire and light. Fire is the
symbolic way in which a particular archetypal quality expresses itself in a specific situation, to
create a specific meaning.
Ideally we try to relate to the numinous experience of the archetype, meaning that the ego is not
overwhelmed by it, leading to a state of possession, which leads to inflation, such as becoming
Jesus or Mary, or imagining that we are more than human. Nor does the ego try to ignore it by
projecting it onto others, which identifies with it too little, such as projecting the savior or the
anima or animus onto others.
In the Judeo-Christian tradition, "spirit" is the traditional name for the divine when it is
experienced in a somewhat impersonal manner. In the Gospels, the Holy Spirit is spoken of as a
kind of alter ego of Christ, in the sense that after his departure he promised to send the spirit in his
stead. The word spirit suggests a manifestation of the power and will of God, so that it has long

10

Corbett, Jung 1

been believed that when the spirit takes over a person he or she becomes an instrument of the
divine. Traditionally, in such states of possession, prophecy or oracles are uttered. Translated into
psychological language, this means that the personality is overwhelmed by an archetypal process
from the objective psyche. In the Bible, Sampson is unusually strong because of the spirit of God,
which also makes King Saul insane. The Gospels speak of the spirit as responsible for revelation,
and indeed any numinous experience does act as a personal revelation. However, although a
numinous experience reveals the presence of the archetype, it is never the archetype itself, which
can only be known by means of the particular symbolic shape it takes as it enters the human level
of the psyche. Thus, when Moses saw the burning bush, he knew that the fire itself was not God,
only God's manifestation.
The archetypes of the objective psyche manifest themselves in as many ways as there are numinous
experiences. Here I would like to focus on two broad categories, namely the archetypes
experienced as the powers of nature, and as patterns of human behavior. In antiquity, natural forces
were personified as gods or goddesses because of their numinosity. Early peoples attributed the
mystery of the growth of crops, on which their lives depended, to an earth Mother goddess. Most
religions and mythologies have some kind of divine Mother who is responsible for nourishing and
replenishing the earth, and for personal comfort, soothing and intercession. Psychologically, this
archetypal principle is known as the Mother archetype, which is always given a local name by
particular religions. In Christianity, she is called the Virgin Mary; other religions have other names
for the same archetype. There is a Queen of Heaven in many traditions, who is that aspect of
divinity that has to do with mothering. Her mythic names are Demeter, Cybele, Mary, Hathor or
Isis, which are different formulations of the same deep structure in the autonomous psyche. Only
the dress changes according to local customs and doctrines. In her positive aspect, this archetypal
force is nurturing and protective, while in her negative aspect she is rejecting, devouring, and
death-dealing. (Note that the archetype is not a unitary entity; it consists of a set of
processesthe archetype is actually a verb.)
Even though the names of the gods and goddesses differ in different religious systems and
mythologies, the attributes of a god or goddess always describe archetypal or spiritual forces such
as birth and death, law and order, art, healing, fertility, and the movement of the heavens. Human

11

Corbett, Jung 1

descriptions of gods and goddesses are an attempt to speak about these forces by personifying
them, giving them names, and telling stories about them. The western monotheistic traditions
claim that their descriptions of the divine are more sophisticated than the earlier pagan pantheons of
gods, although the monotheists have simply gathered up all the archetypal functions of the many
earlier gods and attributed these functions to one God who is in charge of everything.
In the psyche the archetypes take the form of potentials for patterns of behavior that lead to
characteristic ways of being human. An archetype is responsible for behavior that does not have to
be learned. For example, because a baby is born with a set of archetypal potentials, it "knows"
how to be a baby, just as a mother knows how to be a mother without being told. Both baby and
mother have a set of built in expectations about what will happen. These expectations belong to the
Mother-Child archetype. This archetype allows the baby to expect that it will be fed, soothed, and
responded to, and allows mothers to meet these needs without training, just as a bird can build a
nest without being taught how to do so. Similarly, there is an innate expectation that someone will
be present who will fill in the child's archetypal potential to experience fathering, and this archetype
is represented in mythology as the Father gods of the traditions such as Zeus or the sky Father of
the Bible.
It would be a mistake to assume that these archetypal expectations are only the result of genetic
inheritance, only the result of the way that the brain works, because if we are not materialists we
cannot reduce the psyche to a manifestation of the brain or the genes. The genes express archetypal
patterns at the level of the body, but the structure of the genes themselves may be the result of
archetypal ordering principles. We cannot tell which came first, or if there is an underlying patternforming principle that affects both body and psyche simultaneously. Archetypal theory suggests
that there is information available to the baby about what to expect from the environment and how
to interact with it. This information is organized as a set of potentials that are present at birth, and
these potentials express themselves both genetically and psychologically at the same time.
To study the "other side" of the psyche, which is the world of the archetypes, mythology is very
valuable. Mythology depicts archetypal situations; Jung calls mythology the "textbook" of the
archetypes; here the unconscious represents itself as a story, not rationally. The representation of

12

Corbett, Jung 1

the unconscious by means of story is more faithful than conceptual modes of thought as a way of
representing the psyche's processes. Myth is the primordial language of the psyche and no
intellectual formulation comes close to it (Psychology and Alchemy, p. 25.) Mythology reveals the
unconscious processes of the psyche. To describe these processes, Jung prefers myth to abstract
language that is not rooted in the experience of the psyche. Symbols allow a re-experiencing of the
process of the psyche that too much clarity actually dispels (Alchemical studies, p. 199). Myths
and dreams arise from a common, myth making level of the psyche, so that the study of mythology
can cast light on the amplification of dreams by placing the dream in a larger context. When trying
to understand the meaning of a mythological motif in a dream, it is important to understand the
personal history and the situation of the dreamer, just as we have to understand the historical and
cultural context of the myth itself. The mythic images always present themselves in terms of the
person's specific life. See the example in the Dream Seminars of October 30, 1929, p. 337--on the
figure of Christ as a hero with a sword, which amplifies the dream of an analysand of his.
An archetype is a mythological figure (The spirit in man, art, literature, p. 81), but one that is
colored by the culture in which it arises. For example, there are many heroes, with the same
underlying archetype since we all have to leave home and go on the journey, but different cultures
color the hero archetype according to their own preferences--the Greek hero Odysseus looks
different than Sir Galahad. Because myths are so culture bound, some people think that fairy tales
are actually closer to the core archetypal dynamics of the unconscious themselves--they are more
similar across cultures.
The fact that myths or fairy tales with the same themes are found across cultures suggests that what
seems to be only "my" experience is also reflected in the larger experience of humanity, and always
has been, because the psyche is structured in particular ways that tend to produce experiences of a
particular quality. For example, hundreds of versions of the story of Cinderella have been found in
different parts of the world. It is a household tale on every continent. The Cinderella story has
eternal relevance; we are gripped by it because the story is a perennial one. Whenever and
wherever we live, this theme resonates with people who were treated like Cinderella in childhood.
Anne Baring (Psyche's Stories, 1991), building on the work of earlier scholars, has extracted the
essence of the story based on its roots in world mythology and folklore. She suggests that when we

13

Corbett, Jung 1

strip away all the local coloring of the story and look for the core theme, Cinderella is actually
about the transfiguration of the soul from a sooty drudge to a radiant bride, and about the soul's
exile because it has forgotten its divine origin. After its descent into the manifest world, the soul
journeys to find herself and regain her relationship to the divine world from which she emanated,
so that she may return with the knowledge of who she really is. The fairy godmother is actually
Sophia, or divine wisdom, who presides over the soul's quest for this discovery. Finally the
masculine and feminine potentials of the soul are united in a sacred marriage. Baring suggests that
Cinderella may also be seen as the archetypal feminine that has been badly damaged by the
patriarchy and relegated to the role of servant. The image of authentic union between the
masculine and feminine has been carried by this story until such time as real union becomes a
conscious possibility in the culture. According to early 20th. century scholar Harold Bayley (The
Lost Language of Symbolism, 1912), the name "Cinderella" has its etymological roots in ancient
words that mean light and fire; cinders are an earthly analog of the stars. Another level of the story
therefore represents the light of the soul whose divinity is never totally extinguished even though
the soul is unrecognized and dishonored on the earth. Bayley (p. 196) therefore suggests that
Cinderella symbolizes the awakening, growth, and elevation of divine Wisdom within the mind.
There are many such stories whose archetypal theme is that of light hidden in the darkness, light
that is given as an act of grace, or light that has to be found and redeemed. These stories are
moving because they strike a powerful latent chord within us.
The word archetype is sometimes applied to a figure, sometimes to a situation such as crossing a
ford or getting through a wall of flame, or it can be used to describe an idea such as the union of
opposites on the cross. It can also be used to describe a process such as the process of initiation.
This is an example of how certain archetypes have hardly any acceptable cultural outlets, even
though they persist in the psyche. The archetype of initiation is neglected in our culture, so that it
has to operate unconsciously, and this often causes trouble. We see the way this archetype works
by studying societies where it is more obvious. In pre-technological tribal cultures, this archetype
comes into operation spontaneously, whenever a transition is needed from one status to another, for
example, in order to make a boy into a man, or a girl into a woman. These societies feel that one
does not simply become a man or woman by default. A ritual is necessary to activate this process,
which aims at the total transformation of the individual by means of the ritual. Rites of passage

14

Corbett, Jung 1

have evolved in response to the pressure of the archetype of initiation. These rites overcome any
inertia or unwillingness within the person to accept the necessity for a change of status, so they
ensure the continuity of the culture. Rites of passage are needed whenever we either have to move
into a new stage of life or regress and remain stuck. By ensuring development, these rituals
produce a sense of rejuvenation and renewal, and they enable the individual to move into a new
status supported and acknowledged by his or her society. The initiate is made radically conscious
of his or her new status and is given a place in an ordered cosmos, together with all the attendant
responsibilities. Because of the numinosity of the archetype of initiation, the ritual has such a
profound emotional effect on the person that the new position is unmistakable, and indeed is felt to
be divinely sanctioned. The person then has a clear position in society, so the individual and the
group are cohesively linked. The rituals also give the initiate access to the sacred symbols of the
culture, because he or she is told the myths, sacred stories and secrets of the tribe, such as the
names of the secret gods. The initiate is then empowered to participate in the life of the sacred as it
is understood by his or her culture.
In our own society, such rites of passage have almost disappeared, except for religious
occasions such as baptism, confirmation or bar mitzvahs, and the marriage ceremony. However
these ceremonies have little of the intensity of the rites of passage of tribal cultures, who better
understand the need for an emotionally powerful experience at these transitional periods. Boys'
initiation rites typically involve seclusion, ordeals such as circumcision, maltreatment such as
beatings, being terrorized by elders dressed as demons, sleeplessness, symbolic death and rebirth,
and dietary restrictions. The boy learns a living mythology by participating in its enactment.
Ideally, a man emerges from the ordeal who knows about courage and self-denial in the face of
danger, but who can also control these strengths and apply them for the greater good of the
community. He knows how to relate to other people, and how to work harmoniously as part of a
group.
Women's rites too can be painful and dangerous. Among the Nootka people of Vancouver Island,
B. C., the rite of passage of girls into womanhood involves their being taken far out into the ocean
and left to swim to shore alone. The event is surrounded by prayer, chanting and much social
support from her elders. This act of courage in the water is said to transform the girl into a woman;

15

Corbett, Jung 1

after successfully completing the test, she is able to marry and have children in the clear knowledge
of who she is (Cameron, 1981). Other girl's initiation rites involve scarification of her body, when
symbols of the tribe's mythology are carved into her flesh (Lincoln, Emerging from the Chrysalis ).
Because the body has been permanently altered, the initiate realizes that she is no longer a child.
In the absence of socially sanctioned forms for its expression, the archetype of initiation does not
go away, but instead produces constant demand for an outlet. This internal pressure may
unconsciously lead to behavior that actually represents the spontaneous emergence of the archetype
in an unconscious form. Puberty, or the time of transition from childhood to young adulthood, is a
good model to illustrate the need for initiation, since it is such a potentially dangerous period of
transition. In a remarkable confirmation of the fact that the psyche has innate archetypal patterns
built into it, regardless of the culture, the behavior of adolescents in western cultures with no formal
rites of passage bears uncanny similarity to the forms of initiation seen in tribal cultures in which
this archetype is consciously enacted. Adolescents in industrialized societies indulge in a variety of
behaviors that may seem inexplicable until one realizes that they are unconsciously acting out a
search for initiation, because without initiation life stagnates. Hence the common cry among this
age group (and among uninitiated people of any age) that life is meaningless, and the frequent
search for a way to make sense of life.
In the absence of formal initiation, archetypal patterns of initiation may emerge spontaneously
without the necessary social containment. The frightening aspect of this process for the
adolescent's family is that some form of symbolic death, or risk of actual death, occurs in many
rites of passage. Among adolescent boys, the search for initiation is seen in the pursuit of activities
that require a frightening ordeal to prove the boy's manhood, in order to gain adult recognition of
his achievements. This often leads to activities that require a combination of bravery, agility and
danger, such as dangerous sports, athletics, body-building or military service. Adolescents
searching for initiation may seek out danger in the form of fast driving or other tests of courage,
and if the process goes awry actual death may occur. It may not be a coincidence that some
adolescents spontaneously seek out body piercing or other bodily mutilations, since these are
traditional forms of initiation into adulthood. Adolescents who do this feel strangely satisfied, but
they cannot give a good explanation for their behavior because they are unconsciously following an

16

Corbett, Jung 1

archetypal prompting. In the grip of this archetype, adolescents feel a need to do something radical
in order to leave behind everything familiar, whereupon it may feel to parents that the child is
ungrateful, or as if the child that they knew has died to them. Many adolescents experience the
religious dimension of the archetype of initiation, which involves a need for intense spirituality,
often found in religious conversion or the search for a spiritual community.
In tribal cultures, ritual elders are able to help the initiate through the process of initiation, because
the elders understand what is needed since they have been through it themselves. In situations
when there are no adequate ritual elders, we find delinquency, gang behavior, alcoholism,
dangerous driving, severe depressions or other crises that force the young person to grow up with
little direction. The archetype can then only manifest itself in a harmful form, in a way that brings
people to their knees in order to force transformation. Conventional psychology and psychiatry
sees these behavior problems from a purely clinical perspective, but they are also the result of an
attempt at auto-initiation. For some fortunate individuals, the autonomous psyche arranges
archetypal experiences that initiate the individual without loss of life or health. Ideally, a
psychological new birth is the successful outcome of this period. The young person learns a new
way of being in the world and lets go of his or her childhood mode of being. Otherwise, the
uninitiated person simply remains an emotional and spiritual child in an adult body.
Because our society suffers from an absence of formal initiation rites, transition into a new status
may happen unconsciously. If a boy has never been initiated, he becomes someone who outwardly
looks like a man but who is really still an adolescent in his relationships and his use of power.
When such "men" reach high political positions, they may do great harm. Uninitiated adolescent
girls may become pregnant unintentionally, because their transition into womanhood is not marked
clearly and powerfully, as it is in tribal cultures. In the absence of initiation it is as if the girl does
not realize that she has become a woman and that her new status has profound implications.
Any numinous experience, any contact with the sacred, is potentially powerful enough to perform
the function of initiating the individual into a new level of consciousness and moving him or her
into a new status. In a sense therefore, all contact with the numinosum is initiatory. In the absence
of outer initiation from the culture, the Self may take the lead by initiating the person from within,

17

Corbett, Jung 1

by means of a numinous experience, either positive or negative. For example, a young man, in a
painful quandary about the direction his life should take, had the following dream, which he
described as "unbelievably clear":
I'm sitting on a hillside overlooking the ocean, under a big tree.
It's night; I look up, and the stars move to form a message in a script and a
language I do not understand. As they move, a voice, which seems to come from
every direction, says: "you are blessed to have this choice. You have the
opportunity to be of service to other people." The voice also speaks an unknown
language but the odd thing is that I understand it with no difficulty. The sense is
that the stars and the voice say the same thing, which is that I have the
opportunity to do a great deal of good if I pick a career that allows service to
others.
This dream left the dreamer with a sense of deliverance and clarity about his life. He went into
training in a helping profession, at which he is now very successful. The dream is an example of
initiation from the Self, from the level of the autonomous psyche. Because he was in a state of
transitional turmoil, with no outer direction, this archetype became activated. Again we see the
theme of numinous experience providing specific help with an emotional problem.
The archetype can either be experienced positively or negatively. The Great Mother may appear in
her terrible form, for example as Kali, who creates and destroys life; she represents the inexorable
life-death cycle of destruction and regeneration, a bloody and repetitive cycle. The Witch can be
icy cold; thing of Medusa, who turns people to stone. Or She can appear in benign form as the
BVM, or as Kwan Yin or Demeter.

Jung felt that science had reduced this archetype to "matter"

without giving Mother Earth its due significance (Man and his symbols, p. 84). Similarly, the
father archetype can be expressed as the benign sky god, or Zeus with his thunderbolts, or Saturn or
Chronos. Uranus would not let his children be born, and tried to push them back into their mother
and imprison them in her. Cronos castrated his father Uranus and freed his siblings, but then
proved to be as tyrannical as his father; he swallowed his children as they were born. His son Zeus,
the father god of the Greeks, punished mortals severely if they disobeyed him. He often withheld
the necessities of life, and cruelly punished anyone such as Prometheus who tried to improve things
for humanity. Although he could be protective of his favorites, Zeus also tried to destroy humanity
by causing a great flood because people were impious. Before that, the Babylonian god Enlil

18

Corbett, Jung 1

caused a flood that nearly killed the whole human race, while he was in a bad mood. The biblical
father god is also unpredictable and violent.
Jung thought that the reason parents were perceived as so powerful was that behind the personal
parent is the figure of the divine parent, so that the person herself seems larger than life. The parent
humanizes the archetype. The positive aspects of the mother archetype have to do with nurture,
containment, protection--hence the mother goddesses; the negative side of the Mother are depicted
in terms of overprotection, smothering, etc, and hence mythic images of witches, devouring
dragons, or the grave. Jung says that he has isolated the virtual image, or the psychic potential,
from the content or from individual experiences, by comparing the mythology of different cultures-this comparison gives us an idea of the nature of the underlying archetypal process.
Just as a dream compensates for the one-sidedness of consciousness, so archetypal images as they
are brought out by artists compensate for the one-sidedness of a culture (15, 131). For example,
Jung thinks that James Joyce's Ulysses, which has a lack of feeling, compensates for the
sentimentality of the age that produced it--it was written just after WW1. Joyce is cool and
unsentimental, in contrast to the glorification of war that had happened. Jung feels that this
sentimentality had led to the death of millions of people, and Joyce compensated for this with his
emotional disengagement. (Not all readers agree with Jung's view of Ulysses, and see a lot of
feeling in the novel, but his is a theoretical point.) In the Faust myth according to Goethe, Jung
felt that Faust fell in love with the young girl Gretchen to compensate for the fact that the industrial
civilization around Goethe is only interested in the search for knowledge. Gretchen is an
archetypal image of the eternal feminine. Gretchen compensates for Faust's inhumanity, or for the
masculine quest for knowledge and power. Faust worships success, which stands in the way of
moral reflection--Jung felt this was a caricature of the average German (After the catastrophe,
1945).
Jung used mythology and its archetypal motifs to amplify dreams and fantasies; eg letter of Nov. 2,
1960. Many people find this a too subjective use of mythology; academic studies of mythology try
to deal with it objectively, as "out there," and there is not much connection between "in here" and

19

Corbett, Jung 1

"out there." Also, as Ginette Paris pointed out, the Jungian approach to myth is to use it to illumine
the modern day psyche, not to study ancient cultures.
The Cultural Unconscious is an idea of Joseph Henderson, who believed that much of what Jung
called the personal unconscious. is not really personal but is actually determined by the culture. He
describes the cultural unconscious as an area of historical memory lying between the collective
unconscious. and the manifest pattern of the culture. He says that the forms that the archetypes
take are mutable, varying with culture. (See The origins of a theory of cultural attitudes, In:
Shadow and Self: Selected Papers in Analytical Psychology, Chiron press, 1990, and Quadrant,
1988, 21, p. 7-16). Henderson's theory tries to explain how myths are changed by the culture, so
that they do not express the objective psyche directly. He distinguishes between myths of the
cultural unconscious that are tied to their own particular time and place, and myths of the objective
psyche that are truly universal. As well, cultural attitudes seem to color archetypal images.
The Shadow
The shadow is an archetypal aspect of everyone's psyche. The term is used in various ways. One
meaning is to describe the dark side of the personality, parts of oneself that are dystonic,
unpleasant, shameful, or unacceptable. The shadow appears when we are drunk or possessed by a
complex, or full of self-doubt. It may appear in dreams as a same sex, unknown figure behaving
badly, or in a way that we would not imagine ourselves behaving (letters, 2, p. 160) (16, 470; 11,
131, p. 134). This is roughly the same as Freud's unconscious, consisting of repressed material or
split off feelings. The shadow may also be positive, for example in a person with low self esteem
who is really a good person but cannot feel it. Or the shadow may exist as unconscious talents and
qualities. A habitual criminal does not live out his good side, which remains shadow.
Confrontation with the personal shadow is painful but crucial for self-knowledge; Jung feels this
should be the first part of therapy. It is not difficult to discover one's shadow; make a list of all the
people you do not like, or ask about what one does not like about people of another race or color.
Initially the shadow tends to be projected onto others. Hence the mythologem of the scapegoat;
this projection underlies racial prejudice, pogroms, etc. by turning the enemy into a devil. The

20

Corbett, Jung 1

enemy is always portrayed as depraved, evil and inhuman, given epithets such as the evil empire,
the axis of evil, etc.
In literature, we see the shadow as Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde (although this can also be seen as an
example of an internal complex), where Hyde is a killer, the shadow of the healing doctor. The
idea for this story first came to Stevenson in a nightmare. The shadow is also seen in Scrooge's
dream as the ghost of Marley. Jung sees the shadow and persona as an example of the tension of
opposites within the personality; the persona is compensatory for the shadow--it tends to be the
opposite of the shadow. What is needed is a degree of integration of the shadow, enduring it or
coming to terms with it, or mastery of it, eg converting rage to assertiveness, vulnerability to
empathy for others.
The archetypal or collective shadow is the archetype of collective evil; the mythological Devil.
Persona
The persona was the name given to the mask worn by classical actors, with a hole at the mouth
through which the sound came. It is that part of us that interfaces with society and adapts to it by
fulfilling its role expectations about how to behave. There are social demands about the behavior
required for certain professions and occupations, so there is a cultural dimension to the persona.
Because this is one's idea of how to behave, it conceals the shadow. The persona mediates between
the ego and the outer world, acting as a compromise between the demands of the culture and the
needs of the ego. This process allows adaptation but obscures individuality, since when we identify
too much with the persona it may take on the characteristics of a false self, or a lack of real identity.
The persona is not inherently false--the problem arises if we identify with it too closely, which
happens when the ego is fragile or rigid; if the ego is really undeveloped, the persona has to stand
in for it. The persona is a problem if it cannot be relinquished easily because it is used defensively,
or if we adapt a persona that is not right for us, or if we promise more than is really there. We
cannot behave like the doctor or the marine drill sergeant in every situation. In dreams, clothes
comment on the persona, or it may be expressed as diplomas, qualifications on the wall, or other

21

Corbett, Jung 1

status symbols. Jung notes that we tend to be invested in the persona because it is "rewarded in
cash." (9, i, 221).
Anima and animus
There is a good deal of patriarchal thinking in the classical literature, and this is where we find
some of it. Neumann (Creation of consciousness) says that consciousness is masculine even in
women, and the unconscious is feminine even in men. Obviously there is no need to genderize
consciousness. Two components of the psyche that Jung did genderize are anima and animus,
which Jung suggests act as a bridge to the unconscious. because of their otherness. Anima and
animus are archetypal potentials that are filled in with the current gender stereotypes about how
men and women "should" be.
Anima and animus are images of contrapsychic sexuality, or the masculine and feminine principles
in the psyche. They are archetypal in form, but their content is influenced by cultural stereotypes
and actual people that we come across in development such as mother and father. Jung was correct
in giving equal weight to anima and animus, but, when he tried to describe the content of these
principles, he fell into the mistake of confusing description with prescription; he thought that these
contents were of necessity as the patriarchy had forced them to be. For example, he confused
femininity with feeling and intuition, masculinity with thinking and sensation; this confuses
typology with gender. Jung did not seem to realize that he was describing cultural stereotypes, and
thought he was describing archetypal necessities. Thus, he thought that the eros principle was the
underpinning of female psychology, and the logos the basis of masculinity.
The Eros principle, which Jung saw at the base of women's psychology, contains relatedness,
intimacy, love, harmony, integration, and the valuing of subjectivity rather than collective attitudes.
Eros is earthy, material, passive, receptive, and creative. The Logos principle contains word, deed,
power, meaning, reason, judgment, discrimination, objective interests, structure, abstraction,
clarity, universality, spiritual in the sense of non -material (10, 255). Each principle complements
what the other lacks (10, 275). To achieve wholeness, each sex must develop both principles; to
the extent that they are ignored, they strengthen in the unconscious; the animus possessed woman is

22

Corbett, Jung 1

not related but power driven, and the anima possessed man is possessed by moods instead of
consciously in touch with his feeling life. In general Jung was more positive about women's
development than Freud, but some of his comments about women are just rubbish (10, 243).
Today we would say that there is no need to genderize qualities like assertiveness or nurturing.
Jung felt that the contents of the animus were early on determined by experiences with father and
with cultural images of maleness. The animus is initially unconscious, and bridges to the
unconscious, allowing previously inaccessible logos qualities to emerge into consciousness. It is
found in dreams, and in projection onto men; when positive, it gives commitments, beliefs,
inspirations, allows meaning, allows discrimination (16, 505) and the capacity for reflection (9, ii,
33) and creativity, assertion, and initiative. If undeveloped, the animus makes women too clinging,
and allows men to take over; such women tend to be anima women, who will be whatever the man
wants. A well developed animus allows a woman to make up her own mind and decide what she
really thinks about things; Jung felt that the animus is only a problem when a woman does not
allow the natural expression of her feelings. When negative, leading to animus possession, the
animus is power driven, produces irrational opinions that are not really her own (7, 332), makes
women bossy, ruthless, domineering, abrasive, competitive, aggressive, fooled by second rate
thinking, unrelated, and opinionated. The animus-possessed woman feels that she is always right;
animus opinions "irritate a man to death," and a woman's criticism is felt as a form of ruthless
attack (see Harding on the animus hound). Jung tends to dwell on the negative side of the animus-perhaps because of the fear of his mother's animus, what he called her "natural mind." He found
his mother's criticisms crushing. (See Dream Analysis, in notes of the 1928-1930 seminar, 1984, p.
76 and 96, and Von Franz's book on the effect of mother's animus on the boy in Puer Eternus, p.
127-9. He felt that the woman's animus had an undermining effect on a man's confidence in
himself and his work--the discouraging word that provokes moodiness and resentment. He felt that
when a man gets moody and resentful and a woman nags, the real issue is between the animus and
the anima, not a human dialogue.
In her book Anima and Animus, Emma Jung notes four manifestations of the animus that are also
thought to be developmental stages; power, deed, word, meaning. Each has a positive and a
negative aspect to it, and can be personified in dreams. Power is seen in the form of an athlete or

23

Corbett, Jung 1

soldier; when positive it gives achievement, when negative it dominates others. Deed is seen in the
form of people like astronauts; if positive, it is seen as social reform, negatively seen as over
concern for rules and law. Word is seen in the form of an orator, a poet who can deal with words
and abstractions; negatively it appears as rigid opinions and prejudice. Meaning was seen as the
highest level of animus development, seen positively in philosophers and priests, negatively as
religious dogmatism or denial of real experience in favor of abstractions. Jolande Jacobi says that
the animus is often multiple because women are consciously monogamous, so the unconscious
compensates with a muliplicity of figures. Harding says that the undeveloped animus is more
likely to appear as a group.
When experienced in projection, the animus causes romantic attraction; the woman finds a
particular man attractive because he corresponds to the animus. Eventually it is hoped that the
woman will stop projecting the animus and see the man in his own right, distinct from the
projections; the same is true of the anima projected onto a woman. The idea is that one integrates
these figures and stops projecting them or being possessed by them. If you are not devoured by it,
anima or animus becomes a source of creative power. Heathcliff in Bronte's Wuthering Heights is
the demon lover aspect of the animus who if unconsciously projected arouses passion, but is too
undependable in marriage; the heroine Catherine rejects him and marries the safer Edgar Linton,
but regrets it.
Toni Wolff's classic paper is Structural Forms of the Feminine Psyche; this deals with women, not
the anima. She sees women's consciousness taking one or two of four major forms; all of them are
potentials in any woman, but one tends to be dominant.
The mother form nourishes, helps, teaches, gives protection, and tends development; it can be
positive or negative--the recipient may not need mothering. The hetaira (from the Gk. paramour-illicit lover, mistress) is interested in relationships primarily; she focuses on a man's subjective
interest rather than what the world demands of him; she is interested in the dynamics of
relationship. Negatively she may undervalue his adaptation to social responsibilities. The Amazon
is independent of men; may have friendships or sex with them, but men are not the focus of her life;
she is interested in her own achievements. She is independent, contributes to the world scene,

24

Corbett, Jung 1

enjoys work and competition. She make few personal demands on men. Negatively she recognizes
no authority, wants to fight, is a Fury; she competes too much and is animus possessed. The medial
woman is a medium between the seen and the unseen worlds, between conscious and unconscious.
She can express what is in the air in the culture; she is sensitive to currents of feelings in the culture
that may not yet be very conscious. Witches, astrologers, spiritualists, clairvoyants, psychics,
psychotherapists express this dominant. Positively the medial woman verbalizes the unconscious
need for the non-rational and for spiritual concerns; negatively she gets so wrapped up in this area
that she neglects material reality. The Mother and the Hetaira are most interested in relationships;
the Amazon and the medial woman are mostly interested in objective cultural values and ideas.
(Guggenbuhl -Craig, in Marriage Dead or Alive, has his own list of 9 archetypal feminine forms,
and differentiates Wolff's list in more detail. Robert Moore has a similar structural division of the
masculine psyche--King, Lover, Magus, Warrior. (I suppose we could all make our favorite list; it
would probably reflect the psychology of the list maker as well as the psyche.)
The contents of the anima are partly determined by experience with mother, sisters, etc. and partly
by the cultural expectations of women. Jung experienced his own anima during his descent to the
unconscious after the break with Freud (MDR p. 181). He saw an old man with a white beard-Elijah-- and a beautiful young girl, Salome, who was blind. He systematically wrote and painted
these fantasies, to try to understand them; while he was doing so, an inner voice told him he was
doing art. He recognized this as the voice of a woman pt of his; he argued with the voice, insisting
that it was not art. These were conversations with the anima, which he differentiates from the ego
by personifying her and then speaking to her as if she were objectively real, which this is what he
recommends until she is integrated.
When positive, the anima makes a man related to others, compassionate, and gentle; it also
provokes moods, reactions and impulses from the unconscious, so when a man is possessed by the
anima it causes him to be moody and sentimental rather than in touch with his true feelings. He
becomes resentful, testy, touchy, uncontained emotionally, seduced by the wrong type of woman,
and gets into meaningless relationships, --all this is said to be due to undeveloped femininity.
Such a man falls prey to the temptress or deceiver; the woman in myth who casts a spell on the
hero, such as Circe, a dangerous femme fatale, or the sirens of Ulysses. As a man becomes more

25

Corbett, Jung 1

mature, so does his image of the anima. The anima can be helpful; Ariadne leading one out of the
labyrinth, Beatrice for Dante, leading him through the underworld. Here the feminine appears as
the inspiration for the spiritual quest, the companion on the journey. Another example is Lara in
Dr. Zhivago. Projected, the anima causes passionate attraction, and if a man is unconscious of her
he can be a total fool in relationships with women. The idea is that when a man is overly logos
oriented, his anima is out of control in the unconscious.
Jung describes four major images that men project onto women (16, 369); Eve, or the earth mother
appears in dreams as a cook, harvesting grain, caring for children, sustaining life. Helen of Troy
appears as a sex object; examples are Marylyn Monroe or the Greta Garbo type of movie stars and
pin ups. In mature form, she appears as the Blessed Virgin Mary, the spiritual mother, or Sophia,
the wisdom figure, the wise old woman.
Demaris Wehr (Jung and Feminism) talks about the irony of the fact that Jung describes the anima
as so powerful in men, yet he describes women's psychology in terms of passivity and lack of
creativity, and many of his best students were women and very creative. Wehr says that female
Jungians go along with Jung's depreciation of women because their internalized social oppression is
in tune with his opinions. Jung's thinking about women simply never rose above the cultural
misogyny of his time. She points out that he reveres the power of the feminine in the psyche but is
insensitive to womens' cultural difficulties and lack of power.
Anima and animus compensate; the anima compensates for conscious masculinity, and visa versa.
These are personified in dreams as opposite sex figures that compensate for the one-sidedness of
consciousness. Jung thought that we must face these personifications so that they cease to be
autonomous personalities within us, often acting in opposition to the conscious will.
We choose a partner according to their capacity to represent certain aspects of ones own soul. The
anima/us are experienced initially in projection, which is the cause of mutual fascination (or of
aversion), so that others may not understand a woman's attraction to a particular man who looks
awful to everyone else; they then say "what does she see in him?" What she sees is a projection of
the animus. Or a man who is very intellectual may fall hopelessly in love with a woman who is

26

Corbett, Jung 1

very emotionally undifferentiated, because his own emotionality is that way. The anima of a
scholar has a primitive romanticism; the anima of the sensitive artist is an earthbound and realistic
type of woman. Effeminate men have an amazon anima. We tend to choose partners who embody
the unknown aspects of our psyche; hence the term soul image, which is personified in dreams..
Today, we can think of the soul image as a dream figure that leads one deeply into the unconscious.
It can be personified as a figure of either sex in both men and women; it is really any unknown
figure, although classically the same sex figure in a dream is a representation of the shadow. We
can no longer say what the content of these figures "should" be, but we do have these contrasexual
figures in our psyche, which tell us what is represented as masculine or feminine in our own
psyche. This is usually learned; the content is not innate.
The anima/animus form a syzygy--a pair of connected opposites.
Another important archetype is the puer/puella, which is connected to the Divine Child. The Child
represents youthful enthusiasm and new beginnings--mythic images are the baby Jesus or Buddha.
The puer is an eternal child, a Peter Pan. He cannot settle down, and is reluctant to make
commitments, personally or occupationally. He lives a provisional life, always starting again,
always innocent, idealistic, given to flights of the imagination (Icarus--flew too close to the sun and
his wax wings melted; Phaethon tricked his father, Apollo the sun god, into letting him drive the
chariot of the sun. He could not control the horses and he fell.) The puer has no concern for the
future, and is untouched by aging. He needs excitement, and so is fascinated by dangerous sports
such as stunt flying and mountaineering; he is a daredevil, often charming and charismatic. He
may live like a perpetual adolescent, with an adolescent psychology that persists into later life. He
may only work occasionally, getting money wherever he can, often from women or by means of
illegal activity. The puer is often said to dream of flying, because he is not grounded. He is full of
enthusiasm and often spiritually oriented. The puer is thought to have relatively close contact with
the unconscious, which is true of the child in general.
Jung thought that in Nazi Germany the puer archetype was active without the balance of the wise
old man, so the people could be led around by authority figures without thinking for themselves
(Zarathustra seminars.) The cure for the puer is work; traditionally they were sent to medical

27

Corbett, Jung 1

school, because it was felt that they must face routine and get grounded. The development of the
puer is said to be due to excessive attachment to mother, accoring to von Franz, who analyzes this
archetype in terms of The Little Prince. Hillman thought that von Franz had overemphasized the
neurotic features of the archetype, and talks about the puer-senex as a polarity that are two poles of
the same archetype, of which the senex is actually the problem. The puer is in touch with spirit, but
the senex is rigid and authoritarian, while the puer's impulses are playful, elusive, and irreverent--it
is not a coincidence that Hillman thinks this. Most contemporary Jungians see the puer as a
cultural problem. Ancient Greece had a youth-oriented culture, and so do we; they had Hermes
and young athletes, and so do we; love of sports is also found in both. Presidents like Bush and
Clinton are like puers, compared to the senex Reagan. The patriarchy is based on puer psychology;
mature, initiated masculinity does not abuse people and is socially responsible and concerned about
social justice.
We have to keep the Puer/puella alive in us, to remain creative and interested in life, but it must be
balanced by the Senex as wisdom and stability. Too much Senex and you are dull and rigid; too
much Puer and you are unreliable and too flighty. So the dreams and enthusiasms of the puer must
be balanced by some senex energy to implement them carefully. The senex in its wisdom aspect is
the figure who gives good counsel, preserves values, good judgment, brings experience to the
situation; negatively it is rigid, bound to rules, and cannot change established patterns.
The trickster is a mixed archetype--mythic shape shifters, like Loki in Norse mythology, Coyote in
American Indian stories, or Hermes, who could lead you astray, play tricks on the other gods.
Court jesters used wit to get away with telling the truth.
The wise old man appears as a magician, prophet, etc. The wise old man appeared in the vision of
Elijah and then Philemon during Jung's descent into the underworld. In his younger years, Jung did
not see wise old women; he associated wisdom with masculinity, but later (Answer to Job) he
stresses Sophia. Jung thought that wisdom is often personified in women's dreams by images of
the archetypal earth mother (Zarathustra Seminars).

28

Corbett, Jung 1

One of the dangers in life is to identify with the archetype, which leads to inflation. Jung thought
that Nietzsche had identified with the wise old man archetype and had become a bit megalomanic
because of this--it makes one an overconfident intellectual. We must relate to these figures, not
identify with them.
The Self
A subject in its own right.
Complexes
Complexes are central to Jung's theory; they were discovered as he did the association experiments
between 1904-1911, when he found that spontaneous responses to stimulus words were interfered
with by something of which the person was unaware. He realized that this finding empirically
confirmed Freud's idea of the repressed unconscious., because complexes are emotionally toned,
and as they are activated the emotion interferes with the free flow of associations. The complex
consists of two parts; an archetypal core, such as the Mother or Father archetype, surrounded by a
cluster or shell of images, memories, and feelings that are the result of childhood experiences with
human beings. It is as if the archetypal core acts like a magnet, around which events cluster that
belong to that archetype. This core adds energy to the complex.
The complex can be more or less conscious and healthy or problematic; the ego itself is a conscious
complex. Complexes may be harmoniously in agreement with the larger personality, or they may
be incompatible with the conscious attitude, in which case if the tension between them is tolerable
it stimulates growth. The Self tends to balance the system towards the unity and wholeness of the
personality, but the psyche can splinter because of the impossibility of sustaining the tension
between the fragments, when their demands are too different from each other. In this case, splitting
occurs, and the complex may become autonomous, acting like a splinter psyche that is alien to the
ego. The complex may then possess the personality, living a life of its own within the person, like
an independent being inside us.

29

Corbett, Jung 1

Jung contrasts this idea with the idea of the monotheism of consciousness that denies internal
autonomous systems 13, 51; there are many centers inside the psyche, and Jung thought that the
psyche is inherently dissociable--it splits. MPD is an extreme example of this, with apparently
little connection between the fragments. Very early, Jung had worked with his cousin Helene
Prieswerk, a fiftenn year old girl who was a trance medium; she would talk to spirits as if they were
real to her, and during the trances she behaved very differently than her normal behavior. Jung
wrote that her visionary experiences and personality that she channeled represented contents of her
unconscious that were completely dissociated from her waking consciousness.
When the complex is constellated, or stimulated, it may distort perception, leading to parapraxes (8,
628, 201-2). Complexes are connected to the shadow and to the fourth function. They are
revealed in dreams, perhaps personified as a person or an image, and they appear in the
transference when we project a father or mother complex onto the therapist. They also are
responsible for symptoms such as anxiety and depression etc. Characters in fairy tales personify
complexeseg, Cinderella. When negative, complexes act as areas of vulnerability within the
personality. They can be projected onto people, and not just in therapy; we can also project the
mother complex onto any maternal figure, or onto an institution that has a maternal role--the
Church, the Queen, or the college--the phrase alma mater means benign mother. Or we can
identify with the complex, and become just like mother or father. These kind of complexes need to
be made conscious in order to free the ego from their hegemony. Importantly, the ego itself is a
complex; it is that complex that dominates consciousness.
Jung thought that neurosis has a positive aspect; it tries to bring the unlived life to consciousness; it
is an attempt at Self-cure, that forces the person to face the unconscious, and to find meaning. The
neurosis also brings collective problems into the personal sphere, eg eating disorders. The neurotic
personality is still relatively intact, because there is some internal coherence and the unconscious
has not overwhelmed consciousness; there are a small number of nuclear complexes involved, that
can be understood, and the rest of the personality is intact. But the psychotic is flooded by the
unconscious, and there is no sense of an intact ego. The personality is shattered, and there is no
psychological continuity between the fragments--the splitting is unsystematic, and random, with no
continuity of meaning between the fragments. Jung felt that emotional turmoil produced a toxin

30

Corbett, Jung 1

that affects the brain to cause schizophrenia; this toxin stimulates complexes to make it seem as if
the complex had caused the illness. But he believes we can still understand the contents
psychologically, because the delusions and hallucinations have meaning. (See Perry.)
So far I have concentrated on the fact that the archetype produces vivid imagery, and that
complexes are emotionally toned. These ideas fit together when we consider the archetypal nature
of emotion. An important effect of the archetype is an intense emotional reaction, or an affect. The
archetype at the center of the complex not only produces psychological effects, such as thoughts,
fantasies and dreams, it also produces powerful emotions that stir up the body, producing effects
such as sweating, dry mouth, pounding heart, muscle tension, and blushing. All complexes are
emotionally charged, so that when a complex is activated emotion invariably flares up. We feel
emotion in that part of us that we call the body, while imagery, thinking, fantasy, and memory are
experienced as in the mind. These are simply perspectives; the mind-body is an undivided unity,
and the archetype is expressed in both simultaneously. It is misleading to say that mind affects
body or body affects mind, as if they were different entities. We are not dealing with two different
types of reality. Rather, we perceive mind and body as if they were different, so that our language
splits them because we need both terms to describe our experience, just as the physicist must
sometimes describe light as a particle or a wave, depending on how he perceives it. It is arbitrary
to separate mind and body. As the Zen tradition asks, "where would you like to cut the cat?"
meaning that there is no place to divide something that is a whole. If mind and body are not split,
an image in the mind and the emotion that belongs to it are experienced simultaneously.
Because mind and body are a unit, Jung's metaphor for the archetype is that of the light spectrum,
which we can divide into its colors even though light itself is just light. The visible spectrum
extends from blue to red. The blue end is analogous to what we call mind, image, and fantasy. The
red end represents the body. Emotion, or the "red" end of the spectrum, is the effect of the
archetype in the body, while images are the archetype's effect in the mind, at the "blue" end. When
a complex is negative, our imagery and dreams about it are unpleasant, and at the same time its
emotional tone is painful, so that the body feels distress. Since the effect of the archetype in the
body is felt as emotion, Jung suggested that suffering can be thought of as the experience of the
divine (as the archetype) trying to incarnate itself within us--it enters the body as emotion. The

31

Corbett, Jung 1

depth psychological approach to spirituality suggests that, when we are gripped by any intense
emotion, be it negative or positive, the numinosum is present. Therefore, emotions have a
transpersonal or archetypal significance, which William Blake realized when he said that our
emotions are an "infusion of the divine." Work on our painful complexes therefore deepens our
connection to the numinosum at their center. When we pay attention to a complex, or to the
emotions it causes, we are simultaneously attending to an emotional difficulty and a manifestation
of the archetype. The psychological problem is also a spiritual problem.
There are traditional roots for the suggestion that the experience of the numinosum is associated
with powerful feelings. Biblical figures who feel addressed by God are frequently filled with
emotions such as love or fear. The book of Samuel (1 Sam. 18:7) describes how King Saul was
envious of David because of David's success in war. One day, while David was playing his lyre,
"an evil spirit from God rushed upon Saul and he raved within his house." Saul then tried to kill
David with a spear, in an envious rage. The psychologist would say that Saul's emotional
imbalance was due to possession by the emotions produced by a destructive complex that
overwhelmed his normal personality. The "evil spirit" is the numinosum at the center of that
complex. The fact that the Bible portrays God acting out of emotions such as anger, jealousy,
indignation or compassion, points to the projection of human feelings onto a God-image. The
prophets are often possessed by powerful emotions as they express the will of God, and it was a
short step for them to assume that the divine itself has these feelings, without understanding that the
numinosum provokes them in us.
When speaking of the archetype, some psychologists tend to neglect emotion and prefer to focus on
striking dream images, because they assume that images and symbols are more fundamental
products of the psyche than is affect, which is associated with a bodily reaction. This assumption
actually fosters a type of mind-body splitting, perhaps unconsciously perpetuating a preference for
mind over body. In fact, image and affect are equally important effects of the archetype. The
eruption of an intense emotion is as much a manifestation of the archetype as is the production of a
vivid dream image. However, if, in childhood, we were not allowed to have certain feelings such
as anger, they may be split off or disavowed, in which case we may have mental imagery without
the feelings that would have been attached to it. The emotions that are not allowed to be felt live in

32

Corbett, Jung 1

a walled off area of the personality that may be very hard to access. A person who suffers this split
may discuss a very disturbing memory from childhood with hardly any feelings about it. Or, we
may become anxious or depressed but have no idea why we feel so badly, because no imagery or
thoughts come to mind that tell us why.
When a complex is activated, the affect that is associated with that complex is experienced very
intensely, sometimes to the extent that all other feelings are temporarily overwhelmed, and our
behavior is dominated by the demands of that complex. Later, as we look back at how we behaved
when we were gripped by the complex, we say "I don't know what came over me." By means of its
emotional intensity, and the behavior that this brings about, the archetype, or spirit, incarnates into
body and behavior in this world. The emotional intensity of archetypal experience gives it meaning
and makes it relevant to the person by affecting how we behave. But this emphasis on emotion
does not mean that religious experience is irrational. Feeling is just as rational as thinking; feeling
simply evaluates the world according to its own criteria. Or, as Pascal said, "the heart has its
reasons that reason knows not of." Accordingly, we give equal weight to the intellectual and the
emotional aspects of numinous experience.
The emotional power of a complex makes it difficult to resist, and makes the source of much of our
behavior unconscious. One objection to archetypal theory is that it implies that our destiny is
entirely determined at birth by our archetypal endowment, leaving us very little room for personal
choice. However, while we cannot change our archetypal endowment, we are able to change our
attitude to it. We can mature in our relationship to the archetypal dominants in our personality, and
we can express them in different ways. We may not be able to change the hand of cards we have
been dealt, but there may be several ways to play the same hand. For example, if we experienced
an absent or an abusive parent in childhood, as adults we may respond to this by becoming a
negative parent ourselves, or by abusing our children. Or, we may realize what was missing, and
decide to give to others what we would have like to have had ourselves. We may then attend to our
own children consciously and try to help younger people. The same archetypal problem could
thereby produce different outcomes. Our response to it is not fixed, but rather it varies with the
stage of life we are in and our overall emotional health. The effort to free oneself from the

33

Corbett, Jung 1

conditioning produced by our archetypal endowment, by becoming as conscious as possible, is an

important spiritual practice.
The symbol
The word comes from the Gk. symbolon, meaning to throw together. Etymologically, symbolic is
the opposite of diabolic, meaning to separate. Jung's usage of the term is distinct from Freud's
usage, since for Jung the symbol is not a sign, but rather the best possible formulation of the
unknowable or inexpressible--the symbol points beyond itself, whereas the sign is just what it says
it is. Because the symbol is irrational, it cannot be fully put into words, and it always evokes
feelings. Archetypes appear as symbols, eg images of the Mother Goddessess. The symbol
reconciles opposites, offering a third thing--eg, the cross. The symbol arises spontaneously from
the unconscious, a manifestation of the transcendent function that bridges conscious and
unconscious. The symbol is not only a visual image; music may be symbolic, and so is ritual, eg.
baptism as rebirth.
Synchronicity is the word Jung coined for meaningful coincidence. He used this word to describe
what he thought was an acausal connecting principle. Two events occur at the same time, not
because one causes the other but because they are connected by a common meaning. Eg, a dream
occurs that is related to an event that happens at a distance, both at the same time. The I Ching and
astrology are both based on this principle, which links the material world with the psyche, and inner
and outer, under the aegis of the archetype concerned. This illustrates the idea of the unus mundus,
and is found in the concept of the implicate and explicate order. This idea links matter and mind.
Individuation means becoming who we really are, the fulfillment of ones archetypal potentials--the
telos--with which we were born. We are called to obey our own law given to us by our daimon (a
concept originated by Jung, [17, 300] not Hillman). This requires the integration of conscious and
unconscious, so that anima/us, shadow and other non-ego parts of the personality are integrated,
and projections onto others are withdrawn. The process is guided by the Self, and is never
complete. The result is different for everyone.

34

Corbett, Jung 1

Jung felt that development had two stages; in the first half of life we develop ego and adapt to outer
reality, work, relationships. In the second half, which may begin with a mid-life crisis, we ask
spiritual questions about values, meaning, and we prepare for death, which is the goal of life.
(Modern thinking suggests that individuation begins immediately.) The other stimulus to
individuation is any crisis or illness that stimulates the need for consciousness. In myth,
individuation is imaged as the night sea journey, death/rebirth themes, crucifixion, being swallowed
by the whale. Psychotherapy speeds or facilitates the process, but it happens naturally.
Individuation allows life to become meaningful.
Mythology
Jung found analogies between individual experiences in dream and fantasy and the mythologies of
various cultures. It is assumed that the two worlds are connected; the objective psyche is
responsible for both. Jung cites the example of the schizophrenic pt who saw the sun phallus, that
corresponds to the solar tube in Mithraic mythology. To use a mythic image as a way of helping to
understand a personal dream is called amplification. This allows some objectification of the image,
and externalizes it, enabling one to see what has gripped the person. This only works when the
person is emotionally moved by the myth; Jung always emphasized this subjective factor, which
discourages researchers who are looking for objective studies. Jung also felt that myth can act as a
compensatory factor in a culture, just as a dream can compensate for an individual one-sidedness.
This is found in a 1922 essay (15, p. 82) on the relationship of analytical psychology to poetry; he
says that art educates the spirit of the age by bringing up forms that the culture needs. The artist
brings up archetypal forms that compensate the one-sidedness of culture. As we see from the
misuse of the Wotan myth by the Nazis, a myth can be used well or badly; one still needs an ethical
attitude to it.
In our culture, the UFO situation (and today we would say the crop circles) illustrates the
importance of mythic compensation for a culture. Jung felt that the UFO sightings were Self
images, projections of our need for wholeness, faced with the cold war's divisiveness and the
terrifying threat of nuclear war. The mandala shape of the saucer is an image of the constellation of
the Self. Since we have lost the mythic ideas of gods, we need something to carry this archetypal

35

Corbett, Jung 1

idea of totality. Here we are in the mythologem of the epiphany, or the mythologem of celestial
beings visiting the earth. The idea of the Self is to reconcile opposites and splits. (see Letters, 2,
p. 477 & MDR p. 323).
In 1936, Jung wrote the Wotan essay. Wotan was the Germanic god of storm, frenzy and battle.
Jung thought that Nazism was a manifestation of possession by this archetype; history is moved by
these kind of forces in the collective. The archetype was constellated but not made conscious, and
when that happens we are possessed by it. He does not really say what constellates Wotan. But
these kind of gods are still present in the unconscious, and social conditions can bring them back.
When a new form of cultural adaptation is needed, if the new orientation that is needed is not
understood, the archetype that best expresses the situation steps in and causes a reaction.
Unfortunately in the 1936 article he somewhat takes the Nazis off the hook, by saying how terrible
it is to fall into the hands of the archetype; because the Germans were victims of Wotan, they were
not fully responsible agents. He felt that the Germanic soul had had Christianity grafted onto it.
The primitive Germanic religion was one of polydemonism and polytheism, and the natural
development of Germanic culture from barbarism to civilization was interrupted by the grafting on
of Christianity, so that a veneer of civilization conceals the primitive, uncivilized areas. This
primitive area should have been allowed to develop.
The need to come to terms with the constellated archetype is a task for the individual, not for the
undifferentiated masses. It is not clear whether he thought the Wotan phenomenon was a good
thing or a bad one--on the positive side, all cultures need an archetypal image of the spirit. Wotan
is a destructive storm god, but also a god of intuitive wisdom, with ecstatic and mantic qualities.
At the time, Jung did not know which way National Socialism would go, and he seemed to think
that the positive side of Wotan would prevail; Germany needed a myth, and he thought that Wotan
was a true expression and personification of the quality of the Germans. He was obviously
politically naive; he thought that National Socialism would turn out to be harmless or helpful.
Later, in a 1945 essay called "After the Catastrophe" he drops the bipolar idea of Wotan and only
talks about the storm god aspect, and sees the Germans' unconscious connection to Wotan as a
Faustian pact with the devil. He had then realized that Wotan was a malignant manifestation of the

36

Corbett, Jung 1

archetype of spirit; the positive dimension could not be integrated because of the low level of
development of the psychological and spiritual culture. He wrote that Wotan was the demonic
embodiment of evil, and it was a spiritual catastrophe for Germany that it could not be dealt with in
its positive aspect. The idea that Germany was in the grip of a myth was an interesting idea that
opens up the possibility that we can analyze political movements mythologically as well as
psychologically.
Another major Jungian work on myth is the book on the Grail legend by Emma Jung and von
Franz. They see the story as a further amplification of the image of Christ, following symbols such
as the fish, the lamb, and the cross, which are also Self symbols. They feel that the spirituality of
Christianity and that of medieval knighthood are at odds with each other, at least latently. This
conflict threatened the integrity of the medieval Christian world view. Christianity had to be
brought into harmony with the thought of the times, so new myths appeared that had to do with the
knightly quest. The resulting story was the quest for the holy grail, whose nature was never
explained fully; it suggested the chalice of the mass, and the blood of Christ, caught in a cup by
Joseph of Arimathea. The grail was a Christian symbol that suggested the knight's quest for the
sacred. But the grail is also a container that suggests the mother, and as a stone it suggested the
Self. As well, the lance, the sword, the search for initiation and the Fisher King have roots in
earlier, Celtic and Germanic pagan mythology, so that the Grail legend helped to graft Christianity
onto the partly pagan mind of Northern Europe, which had not been Christianized for long. This
helped foster a deeper emotional appreciation of the Christian story. These authors say that the
Grail legend compensates for what Christianity rejects, namely evil and matter. Matter is found in
the image of the sacred object, instead of the very spiritual image of Christ, and evil is found in the
image of the wounding of the king by an enemy.
Use of Jungian approaches to myth: One of the main ways myth can be used is to understand the
archetypal basis of everyday life, in books like Bolen's and Moore's. These are psychologized
approaches to myth; the idea is that one can use mythological figures to increase psychological
development; this has been called the new polytheism. Jung did a lot of this kind of work. In a
letter of Oct. 14, 1954, (letters, 2, p. 188) he replies to a young Greek girl who told him of a dream
in which 2 female figures in long Greek robes appeared, one of which was Demeter. He advised

37

Corbett, Jung 1

her to study and meditate on the mythology of Demeter and Persephone in order to find out what
was being said to her. The point is that the old gods and goddesses are not dead, but live on in the
psyche. The Judeo-Christian myth has permeated the culture to the extent that we do not pay
attention to other aspects of the psyche, so that the Greek myths can be used to expand
consciousness. Because they are unfamiliar, they are useful for pointing out unfamiliar areas of
the psyche and so in stimulating growth. (However, one's personal mythology may not be Greek!)
With regard to the connection between religion and myth: Jung could not live within the Christian
myth, or of any other traditional mythology. He distrusted theological formulations, preferred to
understand numinous experience directly, and preferred experience over belief.

Jung was

distressed by the failure of the religious community to understand him. He said that myth gives the
ultimately unimaginable religious experience an image in which to express itself (letters, 2, p.
486), so he disliked the Bultmann attempt to separate religion from its mythic components. He felt
that demythologizing religion would mean that belief would become more important than
experience, and myth is a way that we can communicate religious experience. Instead of getting rid
of myths, or understanding them literally, he preferred to try to re-interpret them psychologically or
symbolically. These symbolic understandings are not to be considered metaphysically valid or
absolutely true; the way we understand the myth may change over time. The symbolic view of
myth is catching on in religious circles.
For Jung himself, the myth of consciousness was crucial; he felt that humanity is necessary for the
completion of creation, because we are a second creator of the world, in the sense that we give the
world its objective existence (MDR, p. 256). Human consciousness allows God to become
conscious of himself; this is his explanatory myth for the development of consciousness and the
meaning of human existence.
Psychic energy
Jungs concept of libido was different than that of Freud. Jung did not want to confine psychic
energy to any specific area, such as sexuality; for Jung, libido is simply the energy of the lifeprocess. Whereas Freud thought libido is causal, determined by the past, Jung said it is purposive,

38

Corbett, Jung 1

teleological. We perceive it subjectively as conation (volition) and desire (4, 282). We cannot
define energy by reference to any one of its forms. Jung thought that psychic energy was a matter
of the gradient between different polarities; tensions arise between various aspects of the
personality that contradict each other. These differences produce differences of potential, like a
battery with two terminals. Jung is clear that we do not know what underlies libido (5, 195).
Personally, I do not find the concept of psychic energy much use, since we dont know what it is; it
is an abstraction that expresses the dynamisms of the personality. Usually psychic energy refers to
affective states, sexuality, aggression, spirituality, motivation, creativity, or emotional investment
in something, so we may as well just call it affect, or interest, or whatever is actually going on.
When we talk about an image having energy, we usually mean it is emotionally powerful. Other
than affect, we do not know if there is a specific form of energy that is psychic. Nevertheless,
many Jungians speak as if energy could collect in the unconscious, making us depressed. A
complex is said to trap energy that can be liberated if it is made conscious. However this seems to
me to translate from physics to psyche, which may not be a legitimate metaphor. To say we are
depressed because energy is trapped in the unconscious is another way of saying we are depressed.
Typology
Jung is said to have developed his typology in an attempt to understand how Freud and Adler could
arrive at such theoretical differences, yet each theory could sometimes be useful. He believed that
their break up in 1911 was related to their inability to see that their mental makeup was different
and this produced different theories. Typology is useful in understanding relationships, including
marriage, and sometimes in psychotherapy. Sometimes psychopathology can be understood in
terms of typologythe childs natural type may not be allowed to flower, or the parent and child
may have very different typologies so they have trouble understanding each other. The danger of
any typology is to pigeon hole people too simplistically. But understanding typology can lead to
tolerance of others, and helps us to understand individual differences.
There are two attitudes of consciousness; the extraverted attitude goes out to the world, it is
interested in outer events, people, things out there. The extravert adjusts well to the environment
and does what the environment expects of him or her; he or she uses the outer world well.

39

Corbett, Jung 1

Extraverts tend to neglect their subjective needs in favor of what is needed out there; decisions and
actions are determined by the outer world, less so by subjective factors. The inner life gives way to
external necessity; the determinants are out there. He listens to the latest music, follows the latest
fashion. Morality coincides with expectations of others.
The introverted attitude means that energy or interest flows inwards, concentrating on subjective
factors, inner responses. Rather than pay attention to the object, we attend to the subjective effects
of the object. What seems to be objective, external information is used for its subjective effects. In
its extreme form the introvert can be totally alienated from the worlda schizoid personality. The
objects elicits archetypal predispositions in the subject, and the subjective effect may be stronger
than the object itself. The introvert prefers his own thoughts to conversation with others; she
enjoys being alone. Often he is socially clumsy, either too outspoken or too polite or critical. The
introvert tends to disregard the opinions of others, distrusting them, and becomes entrenched
internally, opposing the world if necessary. They may then appear defensive, and are often seen as
eccentric or opinionated and disconnected from the real world. He may not be able to explain
himself well, since he really may not know where his opinions come from.
One of these attitudes tends to dominate our mental life or the structures of our consciousness, such
as thinking and feeling. These attitudes are not simply about behavior; one can be an extraverted
monk or an introverted businessman.
The unconscious of the extravert is primitively introverted, and hence egocentric and biased. It
consists of subjective material that is repressed by consciousness, so it feels infantile. The
unconscious of the introvert can be seized by the object that consciousness is ignoring, which then
controls consciousnessso there is a fear of public opinion, a craving for love, or financial
dependence. This happens because the subjective level is overvalued, so he relates to the object in
a primitive way and feels it to be magical. The introvert finds the extravert too superficial, even as
he admires the Es social ability. The E finds the I odd and eccentric, unaccountable in his
behavior which seems to come from nowhere. The I tries to talk about things that are subjectively
very important but of no interest to the other person. But the E does admire the independence of
the I.

40

Corbett, Jung 1

Jung felt that Freud was extravertedhis sexual theory meant that he was oriented outwards, to the
object, or a strong relationship between subject and object. Jung thought that Adler was
introverted; the power of the subject allows him to be isolated. Adler wants to protect the ego from
the spell of the object, while Freud wants the instinct to flow to towards the other. Today many
people think that Freud was actually an IF type.
In Psychological Types, Jung traces these differences through religious and intellectual history. Eg,
in the 9th century, Radbertus proposed the doctrine of transubstantiation, in which the bread and
wine of communion become the body and blood of Christ. This doctrine emphasizes the concrete
and external; it is therefore an E view. Erigena took the I view, saying that communion was simply
a remembrance of the last supper (6, 36).
The functional types.
We have two ways of obtaining data about the world; sensation (S) gives concrete information
through the sensessomething exists that I can see or heara fact. Intuition (N) is perception by
means of the unconscious. N produces a content that emerges full blown into consciousness for no
obvious reason. N sees possibilities rather than facts and details; N sees the future use of the data
that may not be physically present at the moment.
We then sort the data according to either thinking (T) or feeling (F). T aims at definition,
objectivity and a systematic approach. T gives meaning to what S has perceived; T tells you what
the object is, names it and links it to other things categorically. T classifies logically, step by step.
T is interested in cause and effect relationships. F tells you whether you like the object or not,
whether it is desirable; F is a value judgment, often an immediate reaction that gives value to
people, relationships, states of mind, leading to either acceptance or rejection. F is not therefore
synonymous with emotion; it means the ability to sort emotions and relate to emotions consciously,
or to discriminate affective states. Jung made the mistake of saying that F was feminine and T
masculine; this merely reflected the cultural bias of the time.

41

Corbett, Jung 1

Traditionally, colors are associated with the functions: blue with T, yellow with N, red with F,
green or brown with S.
T and F use their own standards; they organize the data differently but rationally. Rational here
does not mean logicalit means an ordered world based on a system. The non-rational, perceptual
types, S and N, live in a much more random world. T and F place what happens into a hierarchy of
principles and values; for T this is usefulness, for F it is values. For S and N, whatever happens is
just so, fortuitous, but T and F find the world ordered according to a system of values and order.
Non-rational types do not understand how the rational or judging T or F types can attribute more
significance to ideas and principles than to reality.
Jung believed that the four functions are pairs of opposites. One of each pair is well
developedthe superior function--while the opposite is undeveloped, unconscious, infantile. The
inferior function may erupt into consciousness, and is often attached to complexes or the anima or
animus. That is why this is not an ego psychologyit is a psychology of individuation, because
one ideally develops the unconscious, inferior function.
ES is about impressions of the external world and outer facts. It is reality oriented, show me. ES
types value what can be sensed outside. They have great discrimination, aesthetic sense, and
reactivity to the surroundings. They are interested in collective behavior, customs, traditions.
Think of British royalty. They like money, opulence, aggressive sexuality, and concrete
enjoyment. They are collectors of objects. They like what is in. They tend to accept things as
they are and may be content not to develop new ideas unless they are original, in which case they
rearrange the facts in new ways. They tend to reject internal ideas as morbid. Their thoughts and
feelings are the result of external influences. Their ideals are rooted more in the outer world than in
ideas and fantasies. Think of a huge French meal with many dishes.
The unconscious repressed N of the S type shows up as projections, jealous fantasies, anxiety about
possible catastrophes (hence the need for star wars and hyped fears of terrorism), phobias, dark
hunches about what may happen, compulsions, magical superstitions, fault finding.

42

Corbett, Jung 1

IS are minute observers of ordinary facts; they want order, things to be where they belong. They
sort, find the archetypally correct place for things. They use money and energy carefully. They are
good at the inside of the body, or close to the bodyendodontists, eye surgeons. Sexuality is
private and intense. They are subjective artiststhey do not paint the object as much as the effect
of the object. The IS adds her own color to the outer stimulusthe result is not an objective
perception, hence impressionism with strangely colored trees and grass. What matters is what is
aroused by the object, not the intensity of the object itself. The IS gives S a subjective
meaningshe does not stop at the S itself. This gives what looks like an arbitrary or unpredictable
quality to her reaction, or a stubborn insistence for no visible reason. He is more ruled by internal
facts than by outer facts. They tend to love nature and animals. They have a passive resistance to
the new. They may seem very passive and unrelated or aloof, unable to express themselves
because their impressions are too deep to speak. They may be poorly adjusted to outer reality
because their subjectivity is so idiosyncratic. Outer objects can take on a mythic, not fully real,
quality. Their archaic EN seeks out the dangerous, the ambiguous, the sordid possibilities.
IT works on the private meaning of ideas, or ideas that arise subjectively. A fact is taken in,
checked against an internal gold standard, an a priori sense of what is true. The outer is matched to
an inner standard, so he moves away from the object to an inner sense of the facts, or to the facts of
his own nature. He may try to find principles that explain his own behavior. He tends to want the
facts to fit his own theory, and may overvalue the validity of his own experience and ignore
othersdangerous for powerful politicians. He may be too sterile and theoretical, and can appear
cold and ruthless because he does not relate to the object at all. He may not care about getting his
ideas out into the world, may not try to impress others, and may make one feel like a nuisance if
engaged in conversation (Mr. Tuvak). He is stubborn in the pursuit of his ideas, but may not
realize their value in the world. His T tries to be scrupulously accurate. Relationally, he is taciturn,
and privately thinks people are stupid. He may have such weak feeling that he is domineering and
arrogant to others, prickly and unapproachable. Tends to be a poor teacher because he cannot
empathize with the students thinking. He is only interested in the content of the idea, not how to
make it accessible. If he is very identified with his ideas, he can be easily hurt if criticized, and
tends to withdraw. He may become very abstract in the search for principles (Kant?).

43

Corbett, Jung 1

ET orders the external world; he is oriented by factual, external data and ideas rather than
subjective ideas (Darwin). The T is directed outwards to external facts, with no need for
abstraction. He is interested in results, not the idea behind the results. This is the practical thinking
of the politician or business man who just wants to get things done. His action is directed by
generally accepted ideas; he may try to force people into a mold. He likes general principles and
formulas, clear ideas of right and wrong, truth and justice, rules and regulationsthe public
prosecutor. His IF is so weak that he hardly knows how he feels. His relationships suffer for the
sake of the ideal idea, which is impersonal. He may become fanatical.
EN sees possibilities in the outer world, and follows them enthusiastically but may quickly loose
interest and move on before he has reaped the benefit of his ideas. He may be a dilettante,, not
developing a project deeply, better at starting projects than finishing them. His N emerges as a
spontaneous insight or new gestalt, emerging unbidden from the unconscious without any facts to
back him up (Capt. Kirk). He cannot explain where the idea came from. He has an empathic grasp
of the unconscious of other people. He feels certain of his N in the absence of facts. He does not
rely on preparation or tradition or common sense; every situation is a new one, and he can change
his mind in a flash. He approaches reality by means of the imagination. He sees things suddenly
without knowing how he got there. Circumstances are a prison; only possibilities are fascinating,
the future. His interests may change quickly. He is not always reliable because he does not like
rules and regulations. He can be a visionary, idealistic, charismatic, inspiring. He may be an
unscrupulous adventurer, a con artist or sociopath, or a successful entrepreneur or stock broker. He
would like to ignore details and focus on the big picture.
His unconscious S leads to preoccupation with quasi-realityhypochondriasis, overeating, being
out of touch with the body. He cannot regulate energy well and becomes exhausted easily. He has
a poor sense of time and space, and has trouble with the here and now; he wants to pull the future
into the present; the excitement is tomorrow.
IN is interested in the unconscious or things that are not out there, the nature of the archetype or a
priori levels of the unconscious. He is not concerned with the outer world, only with what it has
stimulated in him, the images and fantasies that result. He is interested in the background processes

44

Corbett, Jung 1

of consciousness. He perceives meaning in the inner world spontaneously, he grasps the inner life,
the inner nature of things, the meaning of things, their essence. His convictions are sacred. He has
great determination but difficulty expressing what he wants. He needs a medium of expression; see
Rembrandt, Beethoven. He solves problems from within first, turns away from outer objects. His
sense of hope comes from inside. Spirituality is most important; he is at home in the spiritual
realm. Because of inferior S, he is unconscious of the body, clumsy physically, overwhelmed by
outer demands, not aware of the effects he is having on others. He is independent, imaginative,
deep, a dreamer, a wizard, but useless or a poor fit in the larger culture, lonely and isolated.
Whereas the EN wants to do something out there, the IN is happy just to understand without doing
anything.
EF wants harmony between people; he is aware of the interpersonal atmosphere, and is concerned
with how people feel. He can reach for affect in others and detect it. He can heal friction between
people and is warm and enthusiastic socially. He may not feel his own F and he may ignore them,
because out there is more important. His feeling tends to be subordinate to tradition and social
values, so it fits well socially. He likes fashion, philanthropy, whatever values are generally
accepted as good and conventional. The danger is that he may seem shallow. He may need
validation of his feeling from the outside, unlike the IF. His F will override T, no matter the logic
of the situation. His unconscious T is infantile, negative, primitive, monomodal, inflexible, and
may lead to or irrational, obsessive ideas. Because of his unconscious T, his opinions are
groundless and tactlesshis T is not well related to the object or fully under his control.
IF is F that is determined subjectively; it may be very strong but not obvious, so the person may
look cold even if his feelings are powerful. His inner life is hidden but coherent: he can say I love
you, but it is none of your business. Love is too private to share. But when the feelings do come
out, they are disconcertingly intense, totally personal and unconventional. One cannot detect his
motivation; it is too private; a still waters run deep type. He may not be able to verbalize his
feelings at all, but has no interest in impressing others, or even to affect them. He may not respond
to the feelings of others, or he may rebuff them if their feelings seem off. It is as if for any situation
there is an inner correct feeling that has to be matched and realized, and he will ignore feelings that
do not fit properly. This may give him an air of superiority. He is often compassionate and

45

Corbett, Jung 1

benevolent. He is difficult to get to know, and tends to withdraw easily. He wants inner harmony
rather than outer harmony like the EF. He has deep convictions, private loyalties (Cordelia) that
no one knows about. Has a strong reaction to betrayal. Holds in anger. Tends to induce feelings
into others as a way of communicating. IF is mostly concerned with justice, while ET is concerned
with fairness. Beebe says the Russians are IF, the Americans ET. The unconscious primitive ET is
usually negative, defensive, leading to plots, intrigues, rivalries, power struggles.
The shadow is connected with the inferior function. The inferior function is always
undifferentiated, capable of unexpected eruptions. Eg, if a F types ideas (T) is questioned, the
effect can be intense. It is not under conscious control. The inferior function can take over for a
while, but is a source of creativity; it is a door through which the unconscious becomes
consciousness.

46