Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CANDIDATES DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the work which is being presented in this seminar entitled
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement
for the award of Degree of Bachelor of Technology in Information Technology, Rajasthan
Technical University, Kota, is an authentic record of my work carried out under the supervision
of Mr. Rakesh Rathi.
I would also like to express my gratitude to Dr. M.M. Sharma, Principal, Govt. Engineering
College, Ajmer and Mr. Atul Choudhary, Assistant Professor, CS/IT for their support without
which the work would have never been realized.
Jaga Ram
(11EEACS027)
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is with profound gratitude that we express my deep indebtedness to my Seminar Guide Mr.
Atul Choudhary without whose support and guidance it would not have been possible for this
Seminar Topic to have materialized and taken a concrete shape. This Seminar Presentation
provides me with the opportunity to put into knowledge of advanced technology. I would also
like to express our gratitude to Mr. Rakesh Rathi (HOD, CS&IT), and other faculty members
of the college for their valuable guidance and help in the development of this Seminar
Presentation.
At last but not the least, I am thankful to all our friends and other people, who helped us in the
development of this Seminar Presentation.
Jaga Ram
11EEACS027
iii
ABSTRACT
The standard literature on this subject generally relies on the thesis of the incentive to create
and/or disclose new ideas, traditionally linked to the solution of the public goods provision
problem. However, although this argument undoubtedly remains valid in the general case, in
several circumstances, it fails to satisfactorily take into account various consequences arising
from the dynamic effect of intellectual property rights on the market structure and from the
emergence of new social behaviors which significantly affect the consumption and the
production paradigm, such as the case of peer-to-peer systems or the Open Source movement.
The main conclusion that seems to emerge from this review is that the economic evaluation of
intellectual property based on a more suitable representation of facts and specific features of
inventive and creative contexts might reveal a totally different overall balance of welfare and
therefore lead to different regulatory and policy indications.
The problem of intellectual property protections has been seriously discussed since the first
launch of intellectual property negotiations within the framework of the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT). These discussions have particularly centered on negotiations with
regard to the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in the
eighth round of the GATT negotiations.
iv
CONTENTS
PAGE
NO.
CERTIFICATE..................................................................................................... i
CANDIDATES DECLARATION...................................................................... ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT................................................................................... iii
ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................... iv
CONTENTS.......................................................................................................... v
LIST OF FIGURES.............................................................................................. viii
Chapter -1
Chapter -2
1.2
1.3
1.4
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY.......................................................5
2.1
2.2
Patent............................................................................... 5
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.6
2.1.7
2.1.8
Trademark......................................................................... 10
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.3
2.4
Chapter -3
Chapter -4
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
Industrial design............................................................... 13
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
Geographical indication.................................................... 14
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.6
Owner of copyright........................................................... 18
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4.2
vi
CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................... 24
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES............................................................ 25
vii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Description
Page
No.
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.2
Figure 2.1
Geographical Indication.........................................................14
Figure 3.1
Copyright............................................................................... 17
viii