Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Byy
R. K. Verma & G. R. Reddy
[M
]&x& g {1 }
[M ]{&x& } + [K ]{x } =
L t
Let
{x }= { }sin(
i ( t)
we have
and
d so
Fig. 1: 2DOF
System
{&x& } = - 2 { }sin(
i ( t)
- 2 [ M ]{ }+ [K ]{ } = 0
K = M
-1
[K ] and
[A ]{ }= { }
= 2
Examples
Vibration of Structures
Natural frequencies and corresponding mode shapes
Heat Transfer Analysis
Linearized Buckling Analysis
Solution of eq.4
eq 4 yields n Eigenvalues and corresponding
Eigenvectors. Each Eigen pairs ( i , i ) satisfies eq.4; i.e.; we have
K i = M i
i = 1,......., n
orthonormality
i T M j = ij
orthonormality
i T K j = i ij
a.
a
b.
c.
d.
e.
Simplified Technique
Inverse Iteration Technique
Simultaneous Iteration Technique
q
Subspace Iteration Technique
Lanczos Iteration Technique
Simplified Technique
Stiffness Matrix of Each Element
m1
1 1
[K ]e = C
1
1
m2
m3
12 EI
where C = 3
l
M = [1 2 3 ]
T
m1
m2
m3
m2
m3
1
2
3
2060
1.00
0.67
T M = [1.00 0.67 0.33]
2560
2060 0.33
1000Kg
2
500Kg
3
Added
mass
m1
m2
m3
10
1.0
0.67
033
0.33
Modeshapevector
n = T
= 0.0114
M
0.0056
{}
2 = { }n T [K ]{ }n = 1265 .9
2
2
m1=2Kg
k=5N/m
m2=2Kg
/
k=10N/m
Fig. 5: 2DOF
System
[K ]{X } = [M ]{X }
The above system has two eigenvalues and two eigenvectors
and can be obtained using inverse iteration technique as follows.
9
2 1 2
2 1 = 2
5 X 1 2
5 15 X = 2
2
X 1 0.8
=
X 2 0.4
Step 4 Normalizing
o a
g the
t e mode
ode shapes
s apes
=
{X }
{X }T [M ]{X }
0.6325
0
.
3162
= 1.5
= 1.22
Consider {X} = {} and repeat the steps 1-4 till required convergence
is reached.
10
Evaluation of eigenvalues
g
and eigenvectors
g
of second mode
Gram-Schmidt deflation technique is used to make mode shapes
independent to avoid duplication of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
which is explained as below.
below
1
0.6325
Step 1- New Trial vector {X1} = {X}- {} {X 1} =
1
0
.
3162
where = { } [M ]{X }
T
2 1
= [0.6325 0.3162]
1 = 1.8974
2
N
C
id i g {X} ={X
{X1} follow
f ll
t
1 4 off above
b
d evaluate
l t
Now
Considering
steps
1-4
and
eigenvalues and eigenvectors
0.2999
After first iteration { } =
0
.
6000
and = 7.6498
= 2.766
0
{X } = 1
1
0
0
0 0 2 0
3120
1560
0
1 1 = 1560 1560
1560
0
0
0
1560 2 0 3120
0
X 21
X
31
St 4 Normalizing
Step
N r li i g th
the mode
d shapes
h
=
{X }
[ {X }T [M ]{X } ]
1
2
1
0 X 11
1 X 21
2 X 31
X 12
X 22 =
X 32
1560
3120
X 12
0 .4786
X 22 = 1 .0 e 3 0 .4786
0 .3590
X 32
X 11
X 1 = X 21
X
31
X 12 0 .0158
X 22 = 0 .0158
X 32 0 .0119
3120
1560
0
0 . 9573
0 .7180
0 .3590
0 .0172
0 .0035
0 .0182
12
1 = 2038.5, 2 = 12758
1 = 45.149, 2 = 112.95
X 11
X 21
X
31
X 12
0 .0183
X 22 = 1 .0 e 3 0 .0151
0 .0088
X 32
0 .0150
0 . 0070
0 . 0192
1 = 1661.4, 2 = 13024
1 = 40.76, 2 = 114.122
X 11
X 21
X
31
X 12
0 .0186
X 22 = 1 .0 e 3 0 .0150
0 .0084
X 32
0 .0179
0 .0051
0 .0172
1 = 1655.3, 2 = 12641
1 = 40.685, 2 = 112.43
13
1
0
0
0 0 2 0
3120
1560
0
1 1 = 1560 1560
1560
0
0
0
1560 2 0 3120
0
9 C 1 2 1 X 21
0 1 2 X 31
X 11
X 21
X
31
X 12 0
3120
X 22 = 1560 1560
X 32 3120
0
X 12
0 .4786
X 22 = 1 .0 e 3 0 .4786
0 .3590
X 32
0 .9573
0 .7180
0 .3590
14
Step 4- Reduce the stiffness and mass matrix using above vectors
[M]R = [X]T [M] [X] =0.0009
0 0015
0.0015
[K]R = [X]T [K} [X] =
0.0015
00.0024
0024
1.8666 2.2400
2.2400 4.1066
1 0
0 1
0.0009 0.0015
[M]R {X}k,j =0.0015 0.0024
= [R]k,j
0.1269 0.2961
= 110 0.2961 0.4229
6.9096
16.1224
First
as {X}k,1T [K]R {X}k,1
Fi t eigenvalue
i
l iis given
i
11 = 1666.6
15
[X]k,1T
6.9096
=
16.1224
0.9126 4
10
0.5507
Step
9- Normalizing
St 9
N
li i g second
d vector
t [X]k,2 with
ith [M]R modifies
difi tto
{X}k,2 =
141.2504
85.2352
j =
j ,i +1 j ,i
0.0001
j ,i +1
16
3
[] = [X][X]R= 10 0.4786 0.7179
16.1226 85.235
0.3590
0 3590 00.3590
3590
[] =
0.0187 0.014
0.0149 0.0064
0.0083 0.0201
0.0039
1.3142
0 9999 00.0006
0006
0.9999
T
M =
0.0006 1.0001
T
17
= 68.41
0.0146
{X 1 } = 0.0146
0.0146
[K ]{X i } = [M ]{X i }
{X }
1
0.1049
= 1.0e 4 0.0875
0.0525
18
Step 4-
Step 5-
{X } [M ]{X }
i =
1 = 5.5841e - 004
0.2332
X% 1 = 1.0e-005 0.0583
0.2915
and if i n,
X% i = X i i X i i 1 X i 1
Step 6
6-
i = [ { X% } [ M ]{ X% }
T
Step 7-
X i +1 =
1 = 1.4924e - 004
0.0156
{X 2 } = 0.0039
0.0195
X% i
19
3 = 5.4912e - 018
Tn
= 1
1
2
2
2
n 1
n 1
n 1
5.5841e - 4 1.4924e - 4
1.4804e -5 4.2735e - 5
20
Node1
m1=2Kg
k=5N/m
f1 = 0.193 Hz
H andd f 2 = 0.465Hz
H
0.6325 0.2999
=
0.3162 0.6000
1.8974
{ } [M ]{1} =
0.6002
T
k=10N/m
Fig. 6: 2DOF
System
y
0.5
Acceleration
n (g)
m2=2Kg
Node 2
Response Spectrum
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frequency (Hz)
21
The spectral values corresponding to frequencies 0.193 and 0.465 Hz are 0.49
and 0.98 m/sec2 respectively.
Acceleration response of node 1 in first mode is
0.63251.89740.49=0.588
Acceleration response of node 1 in second mode is
-0.29990.60020.98=-0.176
Acceleration response of node 2 in first mode is
0 31621 89740 49=0 294
0.31621.89740.49=0.294
Acceleration response of node 2 in second mode is
0 6000 0 6002 0 98 0 353
0.60000.60020.98=0.353
References
1. K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures, 3rd Indian
reprint 1996.
reprint,
1996
2. Anil K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, theory and
applications
to
earthquake
engineering,
Second
edition, 2007.
23
24