Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A unique textbook, comprehensive and up-to-date, with a practical, clinical emphasis and a structure
that is ideally suited for teaching behavioral sciences in the medical school classroom.
ISBN 978-0-88937-375-4
&
BEHAVIOR& MEDICINE
DANNY WEDDING
MARGARET L. STUBER
DANNY WEDDING
MARGARET L. STUBER
BEHAVIOR
MEDICINE
5th EDITION
22.04.2010 18:31:14
Dedicated to
my sons Joshua and Jeremiah,
who have given direction,
meaning and purpose to my life.
DW
To my father, Roscoe V. Stuber, MD,
who taught me what it means to be a physician.
MS
Cover art:
Death and Life by Gustav Klimt (1910/15)
Oil on canvas, 180.5 200.5 cm. Leopold Museum, Vienna, Austria. Used by permission.
Gustav Klimt was one of the most remarkable artists of the 20th century. This particular fin de sicle painting, one of
the editors favorites, was awarded first prize in a world exhibition held in Rome in 1911. It is allegorical and depicts
the human condition in a direct and dramatic way. One sees all the major facets of life clustered on the right side of
the canvas most notably birth, love, sex, sorrow, and suffering and Klimt uses the left side of the canvas to remind
us that death is always waiting at the end of the ride. The viewer is reminded of William James poignant comment,
Life is a banquet, but there is always a skeleton staring in at the window. Most physicians will deal with many of the
themes represented in Klimts painting during their personal and professional lives.
Editors
DANNY WEDDING, PhD, MPH
Associate Dean and Professor of Psychology
California School of Professional Psychology
Alliant International University
San Francisco, CA
MARGARET L. STUBER, MD
Jane and Marc Nathanson Professor of Psychiatry
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior
David Geffen School of Medicine
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA
155.916
C2010-901964-4
Foreword
In medical education we spend a disproportionate amount
of time teaching the biomedical model at the expense of
other important areas areas that contribute to both the
art and science of medicine. There is no specialty in medicine that is untouched by the behavioral and social sciences, dimensions that regularly challenge our way of thinking
about medicine and disease. While it is attractive, and in
some ways comforting, to many students to be able to reduce disease to a series of biomedical events, this is not
currently possible and it may never be possible. In fact,
health care without the richness of the behavioral perspective is not medicine at all.
Once a cancer, a mental illness, or even diabetes has been
diagnosed, the power of our treatments to alter the outcome
is influenced by a mlange of behavioral and social factors.
A disease, or more accurately an illness, in one culture, place,
and time may be perceived as completely normal in a different setting. People suffer illnessesthat are life events, while
doctors diagnose and treat diseases that are pathological
events. Illnesses are experiences filtered through a myriad of
social, economic, cultural, and educational lenses that each
impact normal function. Diseases are pathological abnormalities of the normal function and structure of organs and
cells. Biomedical science places a large emphasis on disease,
while medicine is the blending of treating both illness and
disease requiring mastery of both art and science.
The practice of medicine involves far more than an understanding of scientific information and facts. It is also
about culture not only the culture of our patients but the
culture of our profession: the culture of medicine. Medicine is certainly its own culture with a requisite body of
knowledge shared by a large group, a common set of beliefs
and values that are accepted with great thought and passed
along from generation to generation: special symbols, rituals, meanings, hierarchies, roles, special possessions,
unique aspects of language, and behaviors derived from
social learning. The culture of modern medicine influences
how we think about essential human experiences including
race, gender identity, conception, human development,
sickness and disease, social responsibility, aging, dying, and
spirituality. At times our medical thinking does not mesh
with that of our patients. Conditions like menopause, Aspergers syndrome, AIDS, and suicide can have profoundly
different cultural meanings. Medicine is reductionistic. To
many these diseases are understood as disorders of hormones, neurochemicals, and viral agents, while others understand them as disorders of spiritual influences, behaviors, and complex interplays between biology, environment, and culture.
VI
chance to understand a more complete picture of the art
and science of medicine and to develop a more inclusive
belief system that will lead to a more meaningful practice
of medicine and permit better patient care.
Students will likely be frustrated that in much of clinical
care there is no easy answer. When a person presents with
a complex illness linked to a dysfunctional family, deeprooted cultural beliefs, destructive behaviors, and limited
access to health care, there are often no MRI scans or lab
tests that offer a quick diagnosis. Diagnosis requires a good
fund of knowledge, careful listening (both for what is spoken and also for what is not spoken), and a health-care
Foreword
Behavior, a living organisms actions in response to stimuli,
is the cause, the goal, and the reason for everything. Our
DNA, RNA, proteins, cells, organs, systems, memories, and
experiences, in the context of our surroundings, cause our
actions that sustain and reproduce ourselves, help sustain
our fellow humans andif we humans behave especially
wellother species. When our brains (the organs of our
behaviors) die, we are said to die, even while our hearts beat
and machines breathe for us.
Our behaviors determine whether we are good doctors.
Our professional behaviors are responses to the behaviors of
our patients, fellow professionals, and others with whom we
work. Our behaviors extend and shorten our livessometimes dramatically. Our symptoms and often our signs of
illness are expressed by behaviors. Our personalities and our
individuality are reflected as behaviors. The objectives and
competencies of our medical educations are themselves behaviors. In its 2004 report, Improving Medical Education: Enhancing the Behavioral and Social Science Content of Medical
School Curricula, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences states unequivocally that approximately half of all causes of morbidity and mortality in
the United States are linked to behavioral and social factors.
So behavior is pretty important. And everyone who
practices medicine must know a ton about it; be competent in it; and even be sort of expert in it. Personally,
behavior is the only thing that interests me, and every
doctor, medical student, and smart person I have ever met
is interested in it.
So it is always a joy when a splendid book on behavior
is published, in this instance the fifth edition of Danny
Wedding and Margi Stubers Behavior and Medicine. The
chapters in the book are a response to the IOM and the
Preface
Preface
We were pleased and gratified with the enthusiastic reception of the last edition of Behavior and Medicine. The book
has now been read by tens of thousands of medical students, and most of these former students are now practicing medicine. One likes to think that the clinical practice
of these students will be influenced by the book, and that
patient care will be a little more humane, a little more gentle, and perhaps a little more effective because some of the
ideas in Behavior and Medicine took root.
The two editors share a passion for convincing medical
students that understanding human behavior is absolutely
critical to their future practice, and we have been happy
and congenial collaborators.
Hogrefe publishes both in the U.S. and internationally,
and they are able to market Behavior and Medicine to relevant groups of students around the world. Many medical
schools in non-English speaking countries use English language texts, and all physicians need to be conversant with
the basic principles of behavioral science covered in Behavior and Medicine. Were proud that Behavior and Medicine
has been used to educate medical students in Canada, Great
Britain, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Thailand,
Scandinavia, and dozens of other countries as well as the
original target groupmedical students preparing to take
the United States Medical Licensing Examination.
We have been pleased with the warm reception Behavior
and Medicine has received in a number of health professions
outside of medicine. Although the book clearly targets medical students and has the avowed aim of helping these students pass the behavioral science portion of the USMLE,
professors in training programs in nursing, dentistry, public
health, social work, and psychology have adopted the book
and found its content germane to their students. In addition,
a number of physician assistant training programs have used
Behavior and Medicine as a core text.
All of the sample questions at the end of the book, designed to help students prepare for the Behavioral Science
questions on the National Boards, have been updated and
revised to reflect the current USMLE format. Dr. Stuber has
spent hundreds of hours preparing these questions, and we
believe they offer a useful preview of the kind of behavioral
science questions that will be encountered on the USMLE.
The student who reads the book and reviews the sample
questions should have little trouble with the Behavioral Science section of the USMLE examination; in fact, one of our
most gratifying personal rewards as editors and medical
educators has been the numerous students who have reported that they aced the Behavioral Science section of
the USMLE after studying Behavior and Medicine.
Preface
Margaret L. Stuber
Los Angeles, CA
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
One of the pleasures in editing a book is the brief opportunity to thank the many people who contribute to it.
We especially appreciate the chapter authors who were
patient with our frequent queries and multiple revisions of
their work. Every contributor is a seasoned medical educator, and all are prominent authorities in their respective
fields.
The book continues to reflect the values and priorities
set by the books original advisory board. The members of
the advisory board and their original university affiliations
were John E. Carr, PhD (University of Washington), Ivan
N. Mensh, PhD (University of California at Los Angeles),
Sidney A. Orgel, PhD (SUNY, Health Sciences Center at
Syracuse), Edward P. Sheridan, PhD (Northwestern University), James M. Turnbull, MD (East Tennessee University), and Stuart C. Yudofsky, MD (University of Chicago).
We benefited tremendously from comments made by our
colleagues in the Association of Directors of Medical School
Education in Psychiatry (ADMSEP), the Association of Psychologists in Academic Health Centers (APAHC), and the
Association for the Behavioral Sciences and Medical Education (ABSAME). Many of these individuals use Behavior and
Medicine as a text, and a significant number are chapter authors in the current edition. These colleagues made dozens
of helpful suggestions that have been incorporated in this
new edition.
Rob Dimbleby, our editor at Hogrefe Publishing, has become a wonderful friend and valued collaborator. We truly
appreciate his support, good judgment, clear thinking, and
consistent good humor.
Vicki Eichhorn did more than anyone else to help with
the fifth edition. She is an extraordinary assistant, and Danny Wedding would not be half as productive without her.
We especially appreciate the extra efforts she took to ensure
that we met the production deadlines set by Hogrefe. Vicki
lead a small army of support staff at the Missouri Institute
of Mental Health (MIMH) who cheerfully pitched in with
the numerous administrative tasks associated with publication of the new edition. We also gratefully acknowledge
the cheerful and meticulous contributions of Marleen Castaneda and Debra Seacord in the preparation of the final
version of this edition, without whom Margaret Stuber
would be hopelessly disorganized.
Danny Wedding
dwedding@alliant.edu
Margaret Stuber
mstuber@mednet.ucla.edu
Contributors
Contributors
XII
Contributors
Mary L. Hardy, MD
Medical Director
Simms/Mann-UCLA Center for Integrative Oncology
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, CA
Francis G. Lu, MD
Luke & Grace Kim Endowed Professor in Cultural
Psychiatry
Director of Cultural Psychiatry
Associate Director of Residency Training
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
UC Davis Health System
Sacramento, CA
Donald M. Hilty, MD
Director, Rural Program in Medical Education
Professor and Vice-Chair of Faculty Development
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
University of California, Davis
Sacramento, CA
Ka-Kit Hui, MD, FACP
Professor and Director
UCLA Center for East-West Medicine
Department of Medicine
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, CA
Peter Kunstadter, PhD
Senior Research Associate
Program for HIV Prevention and Treatment (PHPT)
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Joseph D. LaBarbera, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Psychiatry
Vanderbilt University
School of Medicine
Nashville, TN
Russell F. Lim, MD
Clinical Professor
Director of Diversity Education and Training
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
University of California, Davis
School of Medicine
Davis, CA
John C. Linton, PhD, ABPP
Professor and Vice-Chair
Department of Behavioral Medicine
West Virginia University School of Medicine
Charleston, WV
XIII
Contributors
Steven C. Schlozman, MD
Co-Director, Medical Student Education in Psychiatry,
Harvard Medical School
Associate Director, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Residency, MGH/McLean Program in Child Psychiatry
Staff Child Psychiatrist, Massachusetts General Hospital
Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
Lecturer in Education, Harvard Graduate School of
Education
Cambridge, MA
Adit V. Shah
Research Assistant
Mindsight Institute
Los Angeles, CA
Daniel J. Siegel, MD
Clinical Professor
UCLA School of Medicine
Co-Director, Mindful Awareness Research Center
Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior
Los Angeles, CA
Madeleine W. Siegel
Research Assistant
Mindsight Institute
Los Angeles, CA
Peter B. Zeldow
Private practice
Chicago, IL
Contents
Contents
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
V
. VII
. IX
.
X
. XI
. XIV
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
XVI
Contents
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
PART 6: APPENDICES
USMLE Review Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
USMLE Review Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
Part 1: Mind-Body
Chapter
Interactions
1: Brain,inMind,
Healthand
andBehavior
Disease
Part 1
Mind-Body Interactions
in Health and Disease
Head Stripped From Top to Show Ventricles and Cranial Nerves J. Dryander (1537). Courtesy of the National Library of Medicine. Brain size and
cranial capacity have not been demonstrated to be meaningfully related
to intelligence in humans.
6
given time, the connections among those simultaneously
active neurons are strengthened. This is why if youve had
an experience (remember, neural firing patterns activated) say, of hearing a certain song when youve felt very
happy, in the future you are likely to have the same feeling
(neural firing of joy) when you hear that same song (neural
firing in response to the sounds of the music). This is how
learning and memory work. Neurons that fire together at
one time are more likely to fire together in the future because the synaptic connections that link them together
have become strengthened due to the experience.
In fact, it is these synaptic connections that shape the
architecture of the brain, making each of us unique. Even
identical twins will have subtle differences between their
brains that are created by the unique experiences that shape
the synaptic connections that directly influence how the
mind emerges from the activity of the brain. Our inner
mental lifea life of thoughts, feelings, and memoriesis
directly shaped by how our neurons connect with one anotherwhich in turn has been directly shaped by our own
experiences. In addition, our external behavior is directly
shaped by the synaptic connections within our skulls. In
short, the brain shapes both our minds and our behavior.
Relationships
Mind
Brain
FIGURE 1.1 A triangle of well-being that reveals how energy and information flow is shared in empathic relationships, regulated by a coherent
mind, and flows through the neural connections of an integrated brain
and its extensive interconnections throughout the embodied nervous
system.
Chronic Pain
Beverly J. Field, Robert A. Swarm, & Kenneth E. Freedland
WHAT IS PAIN?
Pain is a basic biological warning mechanism that signals
physiological harm, increases awareness, and often calls for
an action or response such as withdrawing a hand from a
flame. Acute pain is of brief duration, generally has a known
etiology, and in most cases is associated with tissue damage.
When healing is complete, acute pain resolves, and the impact it has on an individuals life is usually minimal. Fear and
anxiety are often the initial emotional responses to acute
pain and serve to motivate careseeking and limitation of
movement. Examples of acute pain include bone fractures,
sprains, puncture wounds, childbirth, various acute disease
states, and postsurgical pain. Chronic noncancer pain is defined as pain lasting 6 months or longer, or pain that persists
beyond the expected time of healing. Chronic pain is persistent, resistant to treatment, and in many cases lasts for the
rest of ones lifetime. Because the underlying pathophysiological process is either unknown or not amenable to a cure,
the goal of treatment is not to fix the pain, but rather to
reduce pain severity and improve function. Chronic pain is
associated with changes in the central nervous system (CNS)
and often has a significant impact on physical and emotional
well-being. Examples of chronic noncancer pain include
chronic low back pain, postherpetic neuralgia after shingles,
osteoarthritic pain, and fibromyalgia.
While acute pain generally signals tissue damage and
physiological harm, chronic pain often does not. Bedrest,
cessation of usual activities, careseeking, and the use of analgesics are appropriate adaptive responses to acute pain.
In contrast, similar avoidance of exercise and daily activities over long periods often leads to deconditioning and
exacerbation of chronic pain. Behaviors that are adaptive
for acute pain become maladaptive when the pain becomes
chronic. Acute pain behaviors such as avoidance of activities and careseeking are maintained by nociceptive factors.
As pain transitions from acute to chronic, psychological,
social, and environmental factors come to play a more
prominent role in the maintenance of pain behaviors. Feelings of apathy, despair, and hopelessness emerge as prospects of a cure diminish. Increased familial attention to the
patients limitations can positively reinforce illness behaviors and avoidance of responsibilities. Eventually, the sick
role comes to dominate the lifeand often the self-imageof the person struggling with chronic pain.
The International Association for the Study of Pain Subcommittee on Taxonomy defined pain as follows:
An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage.
This definition recognizes several of the complexities of
chronic pain, the first of which is its subjective nature. Be-
92
93
of which may be mechanical, thermal, or chemical. It occurs when pain-specific neurons (nociceptors) are activated in response to noxious stimulation. Nociceptors are
specifically sensitive to pain-enhancing substances associated with inflammation. Depending on its etiology, nociceptive pain may be described as dull and aching, sharp
and burning, or cramping and pulling. Examples of nociceptive pain include burns, cuts and bruises, bone fractures, appendicitis, and pancreatitis.
Neuropathic pain results from damage to a peripheral
nerve or to from a dysfunction in the CNS, and it often
occurs in the absence of tissue damage. It can result from
direct damage to nerves (cutting, stretching, or crushing
injuries), from inflammation, from pressure, such as may
result from tumor infiltration, or from compression or
entrapment by damaged spinal disks, joint disorders, or
scar tissue. Neuropathic pain is usually described as sharp,
shooting, burning, or lancinating, and it is often associated with abnormal sensations such as electrical shocks
or pins and needles. The presence of chronic hyperalgesia and/or allodynia in the absence of tissue injury or
inflammation should raise the suspicion that nerve injury
or disease (i.e., neuropathy) is the cause of the pain.
MODELS OF PAIN
Gate Control Model
In 1965, Ronald Wall and Patrick Melzack questioned the
model of pain transmission that had prevailed for the previous two centuries, by which pain had a direct one-to-one
relationship with the degree of injury. They proposed that
pain intensity is determined by both physiological and psychological variables. Their gate-control model suggested
that the transmission of pain-related nerve impulses is
modulated by a gating mechanism in the dorsal horn of the
spinal cord. They proposed that both central and peripheral factors could open and close this gate, i.e., facilitate or
inhibit the transmission of pain-related nerve impulses.
Large diameter nerve fibers inhibit transmission and small
diameter fibers facilitate transmission. Central factors such
as attention, mood, attributions, and expectations were
proposed as modulators of pain perception. For example,
attention directed toward pain was thought to open the
gate, whereas attention directed away from pain was believed to close it.
The greatest challenge of pain continues to be the patient who has
received every known treatment yet continues to suffer.
RONALD MELZACK and PATRICK D. WALL
Biopsychosocial Model
The psychiatrist George L. Engel proposed the biopsychosocial model in the 1970s and further developed it in the
1990s. It emphasizes dynamic interactions between biological, psychological, and social variables in chronic pain
which are continuous and reciprocal. Biological components include ascending and descending neural pathways
and biochemical processes; psychological components include attention, thoughts, emotions, expectations, beliefs,
and attributions. The social aspects range from sociocultural expectations to interpersonal interactions that shape
learned responses to pain.
94
forced by interpersonal and environmental factors. Over
time, with continued reinforcement, patients develop pain
(or illness) behaviors. Fordyce proposed a behavioral treatment paradigm based on extinguishing specific pain behaviors (e.g., excessive rest or requests for medication) and
positively reinforcing adaptive behaviors (e.g., resumption
of normal daily activities.)
Cognitive-Behavioral Model
The cognitive-behavioral model extended the operant
model. It integrated principles of operant behavior modification (e.g., changing contingencies of reinforcement,
building skills, and including families), with cognitive theory and therapy. A basic premise of cognitive theory is that
perceptions of the world are filtered through personal history, beliefs, expectations, and attributions. Cognitions influence our perception, emotions, and behavioral responses, including those involved in the experience of pain. Cognitive therapy challenges distorted or dysfunctional
cognitions and restructures them to improve patients selfimage and to create a more adaptive view of their problems
and circumstances. Negative cognitions that contribute to
feelings of depression, helplessness, and lack of control are
identified, challenged, and restructured; misperceptions,
maladaptive beliefs, unrealistic expectations, fears, and
negative assumptions are addressed. Treatment includes
developing techniques for redirecting attention away from
pain, helping patients learn coping skills for managing
pain, integrating coping skills into everyday life, and formulating plans for relapses.
Depression
Depression is a common comorbidity in patients with
chronic painas with patients who have other chronic
medical conditions. Patients with chronic pain suffer not
only from pain, but also from physical limitations and multiple losses. They may be unable to maintain employment,
95
Substance Abuse
Individuals with a history of substance abuse often become
patients in pain-management centers. They are at risk for
developing chronic pain because of injuries and accidents
associated with substance abuse, e.g., driving while intoxicated, and other high-risk behaviors. Active substance
abuse can undermine attempts to treat pain. Furthermore,
substance abuse is potentially life-threatening if alcohol
and/or illicit drugs are taken in combination with pain
medications. If substance abuse is present, the patient
should be referred to a rehabilitation program and subsequently to a recovery program such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) or Narcotics Anonymous (NA). It is possible to
manage chronic pain for a patient with a history of substance abuse if expectations regarding proper use of medications are clearly established, analgesic use is closely
monitored, and random drug screens are taken in the context of a trusting doctor-patient relationship.
Addiction to opioids among patients prescribed opioid
analgesics for pain is uncommon. The exact prevalence of
addiction to opioids among chronic pain patients is not
known, although a 1992 study by Fishbain, Rosomoff and
Rosomoff suggested a prevalence range from 3% to 19%.
Even defining what behaviors constitute addiction to opioids among patients prescribed opioids for pain is controversial. Drug-seeking behaviors such as taking pain medications faster than prescribed, requesting an increase in
dosage, or obtaining pain medication from more than one
doctor may reflect nothing more than poorly controlled
pain. This drug-seeking behavior is known as pseudoaddiction and commonly resolves when pain is adequately
managed.
Although patients being considered for pain treatment
with opioid analgesics should be assessed for the risk of
abuse or addiction to opioids, no strong predictors of
misuse and addiction have been identified. One investigator found that patient and family histories of substance
abuse and histories of legal problems predicted behaviors
such as claims of lost or stolen pain medications and
urine toxicology screens positive for illicit substances. Because abuse of, and addiction to, opioids is potentially life
threatening, a careful assessment should be made of a patients substance use history. Although there are no established predictors of who might abuse pain medications,
the presence of multiple risk factors suggests the need for
careful monitoring.
96
the same level of pain relief, something that occurs with
most patients over time. Withdrawal symptoms occur in
patients who are physically dependent on opioids, if opioids are suddenly decreased or discontinued. Because tolerance and physical dependence are not uncommon with
chronic use of opioids, patients prescribed opioids for pain
readily meet two of three criteria for the diagnosis of Substance Dependence. The third criterion often met entails
unsuccessful efforts to cut down on the use of opioids either because of withdrawal symptoms and/or increased
pain.
In order to address the problem of unwarranted diagnoses of opioid addiction, the Liaison Committee on Pain
and Addiction met in 2001 to develop definitions that
would more accurately reflect tolerance, dependence, and
addiction in patients prescribed opioids for pain. The committee included members of the American Academy of
Pain Medicine, the American Pain Society, and the American Society of Addiction Medicine.
PAIN TREATMENT
Pain is one of the most frequent reasons why patients seek
medical care. Over the past 20 years, there have been remarkable advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of pain and tremendous growth in access to pain
therapies. Despite these promising developments, pain is
still undertreated, and pain treatments are often inadequate. Although many disease-related, individual, societal,
and environmental factors influence pain and its management, a few realities broadly limit the provision of effective
treatment for pain. These include the neurobiology of pain,
Let us emancipate the student, and give him time and opportunity
for the cultivation of his mind, so that in his pupilage he shall not
be a puppet in the hands of others, but rather a self-relying and
reflecting being.
SIR WILLIAM OSLER
If you listen carefully to what patients say, they will often tell you
not only what is wrong with them but also what is wrong with you.
WALKER PERCY
Entrance into medical school is for many students the fulfillment of a long-held dream. The path to medical school
always involves a great deal of effort. Often it also requires
competition, and a drive to be the best. Once in medical
school, however, students are expected to work and learn
in teams and small groups. Personal best, rather than
competition with peers, is encouragedat least officially.
The amount of information that must be mastered is
overwhelming, as is the responsibility of making life or
death decisions. It is often difficult for medical students,
driven to care and to know, to cope with the significant
pressures they encounter during medical school. Unfortunately, the result, too often, is depression or even suicide. The chances of dying by suicide are higher for physicians than nonphysicians, particularly in women. Male
physicians have a rate of suicide 1.41 times that of male
nonphysicians. Female physicians have a suicide rate 2.27
times that of female nonphysicians.
These increases in suicide are partly a result of the fact
that doctors are more likely to actually die when making
a suicide attempt; ironically, this results in part from their
enhanced understanding of physiology and drugs. Few of
the physicians who died by suicide were receiving psychiatric treatment just before their death. These numbers also
reflect a greater prevalence of depression in physicians. A re-
Nothing will sustain you more potently than the power to recognize in your humdrum routine . . . the true poetry of lifethe poetry
of the commonplace, of the ordinary man, of the toil worn woman,
with their joys, their sorrows, and their griefs.
SIR WILLIAM OSLERS advice to medical students (circa 1905)
168
formal courses in which they are taught how to interview patients. Surely you know how to talk to people, be
friendly, communicate information, and ask questions?
Quickly however, it becomes apparent that you are now
expected to ask total strangers about intimate and often unpleasant topics in a way that would be considered totally inappropriate in any other context. Conversations between
doctor and patient commonly focus on topics such as diarrhea, vomit, blood, itching, bloating, and discharge
from a variety of orifices. In many clinical situations, the
physician must engage in a matter-of-fact conversation
about whether someone has sexual interactions with men,
women, or both, and about the details of those interactions. Obvious adviceoften unwanted and unappreciatedhas to be offered about the need to stop smoking,
lose weight, or improve personal hygiene. These are precisely the things you have been taught not to talk about in
polite society since early childhood, and so these interactions are naturally uncomfortable and often awkward.
Similarly, you are asked to notice and report details
about people that genteel people would overlook. You
need to consider not only the smell of alcohol on someones breath, but also the earthy odor of upper GI bleeding or Candida, and the sweet smell of ketosis. A persons
gait, posture, and facial expression are all potentially important data, to be noted, evaluated, and used. Slips of the
tongue, restlessness, or confusion cannot be politely ignored, as one might socially. For many of you, this is a
new, uncomfortable, and intrusive way of relating to others.
169
Sir William Osler Lecturing to Medical Students at Johns Hopkins Courtesy of the
National Library of Medicine. Master teachers have always been appreciated by medical students. Note that almost all of the students appear to be male.
A unique textbook, comprehensive and up-to-date, with a practical, clinical emphasis and a structure
that is ideally suited for teaching behavioral sciences in the medical school classroom.
ISBN 978-0-88937-375-4
&
BEHAVIOR& MEDICINE
DANNY WEDDING
MARGARET L. STUBER
DANNY WEDDING
MARGARET L. STUBER
BEHAVIOR
MEDICINE
5th EDITION
22.04.2010 18:31:14