Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. INTRODUCTION
HE PRODUCED magnetic field is an important environmental constraint on power lines. Traditionally, the magnetic field produced by a power line is calculated as the vectorial sum of the magnetic fields produced by each conductor
current separately [1][3]. Although this method is suitable for
the numerical calculation of the magnetic field with the use of
a computer program, it is not suitable for drawing conclusions
about the magnetic field properties and its dependencies on the
various parameters of the line setting. For example, in [4], the
authors examined the effect of compaction and optimum phase
arrangement on the produced magnetic field. In order to reach
Manuscript received March 10, 2003; revised March 4, 2004. Paper no.
TPWRD-00098-2003.
G. Filippopoulos is with the Greek Atomic Energy Commission, Agia
Paraskevi 15310, Athens, Greece (e-mail: filippop@eeae.gr).
D. Tsanakas is with the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department,
University of Patras, Rion 26500, Greece (e-mail: Tsanakas@ee.upatras.gr).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TPWRD.2004.839184
FILIPPOPOULOS AND TSANAKAS: CALCULATION OF MAGNETIC FIELD PRODUCED BY ELECTRIC POWER LINES
complex numbers and their basic properties, from a mathematical point of view, are briefly discussed in the Appendix. Further
and more comprehensive coverage of the topic of double complex numbers can be found in [8]. It is not the first time that
double complex numbers have been used to represent elliptically polarized vectorssuch are the vectors of the magnetic
field produced by power lines. In [9], these numbers have been
used to represent the elliptically polarized vector of the electric
field of light.
Using the double complex numbers to represent the vector
of the magnetic field produced by single circuit lines in flat arrangement, a surprising result came up. The multipole expansion of the magnetic field was contracted to only two terms
which, when combined, result in a simple formula for the magnetic field. This formula was then used to derive the formula
for the direct calculation of the resultant value of the magnetic
field produced by any flat or vertical power line. Based on this
observation, a general method to extract the magnetic field formulas for lines consisting of conductors arranged on some corners of a regular polygon, exploiting the polygonal symmetry,
was developed. Using this method, similar formulas for the analytical calculation of the magnetic field produced by single circuit lines in delta arrangement as well as by double circuit lines
and six-phase lines in hexagon arrangement were derived.
Since the multipole expansion is valid only for far distances
from the line, a question was whether the derived formulas are
also valid close to the line. This led to the examination of the
general formula for the magnetic field vector produced by an
arbitrary line consisting of conductors, which is valid at any
distance from the line. This is a rational function of distance.
The coefficients of this function are independent of the distance
from the line, and so the formulas for the magnetic field are
the same for any distance from it. So the developed formulas
are accurate at any distance from the line. Moreover, through
the given expressions for these coefficients, the formula for the
magnetic field vector can be reached for any power line.
For denotation, bold letters are used for space vectors, underlined letters are for phasors, and bold underlined letters are for
double complex numbers (elliptically polarized vectors). Also,
small letters indicate instantaneous values and capital letters
represent root mean square (rms) values.
II. MAGNETIC FIELD CALCULATION
Fig. 1 shows the space arrangement of the conductors of a
power line in relation to the
axes system. The line route is
considered straight and parallel to the axis. The line conductors are not straight, but they are sagged by their weight. The
curve that is drawn by each conductor in a span between two
sequential suspension points is known as the catenary one. In
order to simplify the calculations and the analysis of the magnetic field produced by the line, the model of an assembly of
horizontal conductors parallel to the axis is used [1][3]. This
model is precise for the calculation of the magnetic fields if, as
usual, the conductor sag is small in comparison to the span [10].
The calculation of the magnetic field in the vicinity of a power
line consists of two steps: the calculation of the line currents and
the calculation of the produced field. In this paper, the second
1475
(2.1)
where
is the magnetic permeability
of free space, is the unit vector in the direction of the axis,
is the vector distance from the conductor to the point of
interest P, and the symbol denotes the cross product of the
vectors
and
.
In the general case, a line with conductors may be considered. Using the superposition theorem, the magnetic flux density
produced by the line is the sum of the fields produced by each
conductor separately
(2.2)
Relation (2.2) is usually used for the arithmetic calculation
of the magnetic field vector. However, the summing operation
does not allow this formula to be readily applied for the calculation of the magnetic field and makes it unsuitable for reaching
general conclusions for the magnetic field properties and its dependencies on the various parameters of the line setting.
The magnetic flux density vector occurred in (2.2) with its
classical representation as is described in [1]. That is, a vector
in plane whose components in each axis is sinusoidal varying
and
are the
with time. If
1476
Fig. 3. Traverse section of the power-line model, noting the reference point O.
and
axis, respectively,
(2.3)
and
are the unit vectors on and axis, respecwhere
and
tively, and the vectors
are the real and the imaginary part of , which correand
, respecsponds to the real and the imaginary part
tively, of the currents
. Note that in the following paragraphs, the symbol is used instead of .
The magnitude of the magnetic field is usually characterized
by its resultant rms value , which is equal to
(2.4)
This parameter is generally used to determine the magnitude
of the magnetic field in order to compare it with exposure limits.
III. REPRESENTATION WITH DOUBLE COMPLEX NUMBERS
The relations for the magnetic field vectors are simplified if
plane are represented with comthe vector distances on the
plex numbers. On the other hand, for ac lines, the conductor currents are sinusoidal varying quantities represented by phasors,
which are also complex numbers. It is clear that having only one
set of complex numbers does not allow the simultaneous repreplane and the current phasors.
sentation of the vectors in the
In order to solve this problem, two different copies of the comof the complex numbers
plex numbers set are used: 1) the set
and 2) the set
of the
with the imaginary unit
complex numbers with the imaginary unit
. It is
.
noted that
The set
is used for the representation of the vectors on the
plane. Each vector on the
plane
is
.
represented by the complex number in
in (2.2) is
Using this representation, the factor
, where
is the complex conjugate of
replaced with
(3.2)
,
, and
The complex numbers in
represent the real and the imaginary part of , and
the complex numbers in
,
, and
represent the phasors of the components of the
magnetic field in the and axis.
The resultant rms value of the magnetic field , given by
(2.4), is equal to the modulus
(discussed in the Appendix)
of the double complex number .
IV. MULTIPOLE EXPANSION
Fig. 3 shows again the traverse section of the power-line
model. The place of the conductor is characterized by the
from the reference point O, which is a central
vector distance
point of the line. The point O is close to but not necessarily the
center of the conductor arrangement [5]. Its choice is a matter
of experience and is made in order to simplify the derived mathematical expressions. In all of the examples presented in this
paper, O is selected as the center of the conductor arrangement.
defines the distance of the point of interest P
The vector
in (3.1), it becomes
from the point O. Replacing
FILIPPOPOULOS AND TSANAKAS: CALCULATION OF MAGNETIC FIELD PRODUCED BY ELECTRIC POWER LINES
1477
(4.1)
(4.2)
(4.3)
Fig. 4. Traverse sections of a) a flat power line and b) a vertical power line.
where
(4.4)
(5.6)
(4.5)
Each term
of the multipole expansion is called order
is called the order moment. The first
term. The factor
nonzero term of the magnetic field multipole expansion approximates the power-line magnetic field at far distances from the
line as explained in [5].
The advantage of double complex numbers use for the representation of magnetic flux density vector is demonstrated by the
simplified general relations (4.4) and (4.5) for the order term
and its moment in comparison with (4), (5), (6), and (7) in [5],
which express the first four terms of the magnetic field with the
classical representation of the magnetic flux density vector.
V. FLAT AND VERTICAL POWER LINES
Fig. 4(a) shows a flat power line. This line consists of three
conductors lying on the horizontal plane. Using the center conductor as the reference point O, the distances of the conductors
from it are given in (5.1). The conductor currents are considered
to be as in (5.2)
(5.1)
(5.2)
(5.10)
The moment
is calculated according to (4.5), which for
gives (5.3). It is noted that since the currents are balanced,
(5.3)
The former equation gives two general expressions for the
: one if is an even number and one
terms of the moment
if it is an odd number
Using the above formula, the formula for the resultant value
of the magnetic field is derived
(5.12)
for
for even
odd
(5.4)
(5.5)
1478
Fig. 5. Line with the conductors placed at the corners of a regular polygon.
Fig. 4(b) shows a vertical power line. The formula for the
magnetic field produced by this line can be derived in a similar
way as for the flat power line. However, another way is to conin (5.12) as the angle between the conductor
sider the angle
plane and the vector as shown in Fig. 4(b). In this case, (5.12)
also expresses the magnetic field around the vertical power line.
The formula (5.12) may be readily used for the calculation of
the magnetic field resultant value produced by a single circuit
line in flat or in vertical arrangement.
Fig. 6. Traverse section of a delta power line. The conductors are placed on
the corners of an equilateral triangle.
where
(6.7)
(6.8)
is the angle between the vectors and ,
where the angle
shown in Fig. 5.
It is not necessary to have conductors located at every corner
of the polygon to use the above formulas; some fictitious conductors with zero currents may be considered to fill the gaps. In
any case, the most difficult part of the application of the method
.
is the calculation of the module
(6.2)
the multipole expansion moments are related through the recursive relation (6.3), derived from (4.5) and (6.2)
(6.4)
(7.1)
(6.3)
This equation means that the multipole expansion of the magnetic field may be separated to sums
(6.5)
(7.2)
(7.3)
The magnetic field expression nominator is calculated after
as in (7.5)
(6.7), as in (7.4) and its modulus
Replacing (5.9) and (4.4) in (6.5), it results in the general formula for the magnetic field vector as a double complex number
(7.4)
(6.6)
(7.5)
FILIPPOPOULOS AND TSANAKAS: CALCULATION OF MAGNETIC FIELD PRODUCED BY ELECTRIC POWER LINES
Fig. 7. Traverse section of a super bundle double circuit line. The conductors
are placed on the corners of a regular hexagon.
1479
Fig. 9. Traverse section of a six-phase line. The conductors are placed on the
corners of a regular hexagon.
Using (7.4) and (7.5), the magnetic flux density vector and
its resultant value are given, after (6.6) and (6.8), by (7.6) and
(7.7), respectively
(7.6)
(7.7)
where the angle
shown in Fig. 6.
and ,
(8.5)
B. Double Circuit Line in Low Reactance Phasing
In Fig. 8, the hexagon arrangement is considered as a low
reactance double circuit line with balanced and equal currents
on the two circuits. The values of and N are calculated for the
currents indicated in Fig. 8 as
(8.6)
(8.7)
C. Six-Phase Line
In Fig. 9, the hexagon arrangement is considered as a sixand N are
phase line with balanced currents. The values of
calculated, for the currents indicated in Fig. 9 as
(8.8)
(8.2)
(8.9)
1480
presented method for the calculation of the magnetic field formula for lines with polygonal symmetry is just one way to find
the above coefficients. There are also other possible ways to derive the same formulas. For example, for the single circuit lines
, (9.6), (9.7), and (9.8)
that consist of three conductors
result in
(9.9)
(9.10)
(9.11)
(9.12)
(9.13)
(9.14)
(9.1)
(9.2)
(9.3)
degree polynomial of with double
is a
In general,
complex numbers (elliptically polarized vectors) as coefficients
[ in (9.4)] and is a degree polynomial of with complex
numbers (space vectors) as coefficients [ in (9.5)]
(9.4)
(9.5)
(9.15)
and
in the polynomials of (9.4) and
The coefficients
(9.5) are calculated in (9.6) and (9.8) with the symmetrical polynomials of the distances . These polynomials occur from (9.2)
and (9.3) in a similar way as the well known Vitas Formulae
occur from the roots of a polynomial [13]. The numerator codepend on the line currents and the geometrical
efficients
arrangement of the conductors whereas the denominator coefdepend only on the geometrical arrangement of the
ficients
conductors. That means that a change in line currents will only
affect the numerator coefficients
(9.6)
where
(9.7)
(9.8)
The variables
,
, ...
appearing in the summing operation of (9.8) take successively all the possible values between
1 and that conform with the indicated inequalities, so that
the terms of the sum are all the possible products with dif. Similarly,
ferent factors between the distances
the terms of the sum in (9.7) are all the possible products with
1 different factors between the distances
excluding . It is noted that
and
.
and
in the above general expressions
The coefficients
are independent of the distance from the line . So their value
can be found for any distance from the line (for example, far
from it) and remain valid at any other distance (close to it). The
FILIPPOPOULOS AND TSANAKAS: CALCULATION OF MAGNETIC FIELD PRODUCED BY ELECTRIC POWER LINES
Fig. 10. Comparison between the resultant value B of the magnetic field
produced by a typical 150-kV flat line with balanced currents as is calculated
with the analytical formula (5.12) and the resultant value of the second-order
[given in (10.1)] of the magnetic field multipole expansion, which
term B
may be used for the calculation of B at far distances from the line [5].
the line. For example, the maximum value of the magnetic field
and the distance from the line axis it occurs on can be found
for various distances between the conductors or for various distances of the calculation plane from the line plane.
The formulas of this paper give identical results with the
numerical calculations of any computer software that takes
into account the general assumptions mentioned in Section II.
However, computer simulations can also be performed in cases
where the arrangement is three dimensional (3-D) or in cases
where there is no magnetic linearity. For example, in [14], the
magnetic field emanated from the 3-D network of the energized
conductors of a residence electrical circuits is calculated and
in [15], the effect of a nonlinear ferromagnetic pipeline on the
magnetic field produced by power lines is examined.
The use of analytical formulas is not competitive to the use
of computer programs but they can combine. For example, special computer software may be developed to calculate the values
and
in the formula for the magnetic
of the coefficients
field vector. These coefficients are constants for given line arrangements and currents and carry significant information about
the behavior of the magnetic field. For example, examining the
values of these coefficients, useful conclusions can be reached
about the effectiveness of active or passive shielding at various
distances from the line. The coefficients of the higher powers of
distance determine the magnetic field far from the line and the
coefficients of lower powers of distance determine the magnetic
field close to the line.
XI. CONCLUSION
A method to derive the analytical formula of the magnetic
field produced by any power line has been presented. The development of the presented method was made possible through the
representation of the magnetic field vectors with double complex numbers. Double complex numbers proved to be very efficacious at this task. Indeed, their use simplified the expressions
for the magnetic field vector produced by power lines, gave
elegant expressions for the multipole expansion of it, and re-
1481
vealed the hidden symmetry of its terms for the lines exhibiting
polygonal symmetry.
The infinite terms of the multipole expansion of the magnetic
field vector produced by any power line with its conductors arranged on the corners of a regular polygon can be contracted
to a sum of few terms. These terms can be combined, resulting
in relative simple formulas for the magnetic field vector and its
resultant value. Using this technique, the formulas for the magnetic field for any single circuit line in flat, vertical, or delta
arrangement as well as for lines whose conductors are arranged
on the corners of a regular hexagon, considered as double circuit
lines in super bundle or in low reactance phasing or as six-phase
lines are derived. These formulas can be readily used for the analytical calculation of the produced magnetic field at any point
in the vicinity of the power lines.
The general formula for the magnetic field vector produced
by any arbitrary line is a rational function of the distance from
it. The coefficients of its numerator depend on the line currents
and the geometrical arrangement of the conductors and the coefficients of its denominator depend only on the geometrical arrangement of the conductors. Through the given expressions for
these coefficients, the formulas for the magnetic field vector of
any power line can be derived.
The derived formulas are accurate at any distance with practical importance, close to or far from the line, whereas the existing formulas in the technical literature were only accurate
at far distances from the line. Also, the calculations based on
the derived formulas are identical with those of any computer
program that takes into account the same assumptions. However, the derived formulas are more suitable for the analysis of
the magnetic field behavior underneath power lines, using the
well-known calculus of functions (integration, derivation, etc.)
to examine the dependence of the magnetic field on the various
parameters of the line setting.
Given the formula for the magnetic field vector, the formula
for the resultant value of the magnetic field can be derived. This
can be easily done for lines consisting of a few conductors, such
as single circuit lines. However, for lines consisting of many
conductors, such as double circuit lines, it is difficult to reach
a formula for the resultant value, unless there is some kind of
symmetry that simplifies the expressions. For example, the conductors of the considered double circuit lines were considered
on the corners of a regular hexagon with equal and balanced currents on the two circuits, though true double circuit lines may
decline significantly from this case.
APPENDIX
DOUBLE COMPLEX NUMBERS
The double complex numbers may be used when there is a
need to use simultaneously two different sets of complex numbers. Two copies of the complex numbers set are used: the set
with the imaginary unit , and the set
with the imagiand
. The set of double
nary unit
cross
complex numbers is the Cartesian product of the set
. So a double complex number
the
may be written in the form
(A.1)
1482
where
and
are complex numbers in
, and
and
are complex
the set
and a, b, c, and d are real numbers (in the
numbers in the set
set ).
Assuming that the usual operations of real numbers apply,
and
, where they appear, the
and replacing
product of the double complex number with another double
occurs as the
complex number
double complex number
(A.2)
Equation (A.2) allows the axiomatic definition of double
complex numbers as a commutative ring with unity. That means
that the basic operation rules for double complex numbers addition and multiplication are the same as the known ones for real
numbers. So there is no need to memorize special operation
rules. Also, there is no need to remember the multiplication
,
where
rule (A.2); it is enough to replace
they appear.
However, there is a significant difference between the set of
double complex numbers and the sets of complex and real numbers. Double complex numbers is not a division system (i.e.,
there are some double complex numbers without an inverse).
is not valid, unless it is known that is
So, the expression
invertible (for example, if it is a real or a complex number). That
means that the elimination of a double complex factor appearing
in both sides of an equation is forbidden.
of a double complex number expressed in
The modulus
the form of (A.1) is a real number that occurs according to
[2] Electric and Magnetic Fields Produced by Transmission Systems. Description of Phenomena and Practical Guide for Calculation, CIGRE
WG 36.01, CIGRE Tech. Brochure 21, 1980.
[3] R. G. Olsen, D. Deno, and R. S. Baishiki, Magnetic fields from electric
power linestheory and comparison to measurements, IEEE Trans.
Power Del., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 21272136, Oct. 1988.
[4] D. Tsanakas, G. Filippopoulos, J. Voyazakis, and G. Kouvarakis, Compact and optimum phase conductor arrangement for the reduction of
electric and magnetic fields, in Proc. CIGRE Symp.Rep. 36-103, Paris,
France, 2000.
[5] W. T. Kaune and L. E. Zaffanella, Analysis of magnetic fields produced
far from electric power lines, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 7, no. 4, pp.
20822091, Oct. 1992.
[6] P. Pettersson, Principles in transmission line magnetic field reduction,
IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 15871593, Jul. 1996.
[7] I. L. Kantor and A. S. Solodovnikov, Hypercomplex NumbersAn Elementary Introduction to Algebras. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag,
1989.
[8] C. M. Davenport, A commutative hypercomplex algebra with associated function theory, in Clifford Algebras With Numeric and
Symbolic Computations, R. Ablamovicz, P. Lounesto, and J. M. Parra,
Eds. Boston: Birkhuser, 1996, pp. 213227.
[9] J. Bojanowski, Vector description of polarized and unpolarized light
in double-complex calculus, Optics Lasers Eng., vol. 22, pp. 291304,
1995.
[10] A. V. Mamishev, R. D. Nevels, and B. D. Rushell, Effects of conductor
sag on spatial distribution of power line magnetic field, IEEE Trans.
Power Del., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 15711576, Jul. 1996.
[11] R. G. Olsen and T. A. Pankaskie, On the exact, Carson and image theories for wires at or above the earths interface, IEEE Trans. Power App.
Syst., vol. PAS-102, no. 4, pp. 769778, Apr. 1983.
[12] R. G. Olsen and P. S. Wong, Characteristics of low frequency electric
and magnetic fields in the vicinity of electric power lines, IEEE Trans.
Power Del., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 20462055, Oct. 1992.
[13] World of Mathematics, Vitas Formulas, E. Weisstein. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VietasFormulas.html [Online]
[14] F. P. Dawalibi, Computation of electromagnetic fields produced by
electric power lines and residential electrical wiring, IEEE Trans.
Power Del., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 12851294, Jul. 1993.
[15] X. M. Yang and X. B. Xu, Interference of nonlinear ferromagnetic
pipeline on magnetic field produced by power lines, IEEE Trans. Power
Del., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 644649, Apr. 1996.
(A.3)
This relation is consistent with the definition of the modulus
of complex numbers.
A useful relation for the calculation of the modulus of the
and
is the folproduct of two double complex numbers
lowing:
(A.4)
However, this relation is valid only if at least one of and
is a real number or a complex number or a product of a complex
number in
with a complex number in
.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work is the outcome of G. Filippopoulos Ph.D. thesis
at the University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
REFERENCES
[1] D. W. Deno and L. E. Zaffanella, Field effects of overhead transmission
lines and stations, in Transmission Line Reference Book345 kV and
Above, 2nd ed, CA: Elect. Power Res. Inst., 1982, ch. 8.
Dimitris Tsanakas received the electrical engineering degree and the Ph.D.
degree in electrical engineering from the Technical University of Darmstadt,
Darmstadt, Germany, in 1970 and 1976, respectively.
Currently, he is Professor and the Director of the Power Systems Laboratory
at the University of Patras, Patras, Greece. From 1970 to 1973 and from 1977 to
1979, he was with the Public Power Corporation, Athens, Greece. Since 1979, he
was a Professor of the Chair of Electric Energy Systems, Demokritos University,
Thrace, Greece. His research interests include short-circuit currents and their
dynamic effects, analysis of electric and magnetic fields produced by power
systems, and power system planning.
Professor Tsanakas is a member of CIGRE SC 23 Substations, of IEC
TC 73 Short-circuit currents, and of the Greek TC ELOT/TE 75 for CENELEC/TC 111 Human exposure to electromagnetic fields.