Sie sind auf Seite 1von 76



 





!
!


!
!
!

| 

"

#$|
#"
%


$
"

&' (
' )*+
+


,
-!
! ./0
! /0
! +/$10
!
2/
0





  

 
  


  

|3 

$


#


+

2

3.


(





3&

-4

-4

-4


53#

)


"


*


,
1



63# ,


-




'
#

)

)/20

;

,

)

7

)

)







)
8
,

9
,
:


-2



4 -#





 

#
)



,


 !

,
+.2

<

-2

-
,





7

+

7
)


,
,
+

|3
3
3
53
63
m3
3
=3







)
./0
&2
-4


/
0
|3
3
3
53
63
m3


'"
'

2

&

3 +2
=3 *
>3 +
|?3
"
||3
@@

| 3 .
=

_
 !





! +
$

2$
"

>

_
 !

4

where 
how @



! 
! )
! *

)$$
$"$

3This is because Corporate HQ, in the related diversified
firm, has the ability to transfer core competencies from one
business unit to another3
|?

_
 !

4

&



)

*

-








&

2

+"

9$- 

,$

+

,

||

_
 !
*4
7
|0 0
&"7*
'7
 +,

&
882

2  7*
  7*


_
 !
7! 7
 
D

(
D

D
A B
 


 


AC2B
 

A
B


A.B

(

(
D

(



|

_
 !
7! + 
&,"
)7 
D

#



(

9
nvest
Strongly

9
nvest
Selectively

9
nvest
Selectively


Earn/
Protect

,

(
Harvest/
Divest

Earn/
Protect

: 2
Dominate/
Delay/Divest
(
Harvest/
Divest
(
Harvest/
Divest

 92
7

|5

_
 ! 

1!
! 9:
! D7*":
! 97*%:

, 

!
#<

|6

_
 ! #
!
,6
Threat of

+


Bargaining
Power

ntensity of
#




Bargaining
power

Threat
From

|m

_
 ! #
!
,6

! 6
2@6

! .6


! *


_
 !
! ,

&6

"
)!


8

|=

_
 !
! ,




  
  

44
.


.


(


244
&4

#


#

 
 
|>

_
 !
!
<

<

#
") 

&<
22


3
?

_
 !
!
<
,
.



2
 

8
(

 E4 -$D)$#&

_
 !
!
<

-$21!
|3
$/0:
3
/0
:
3

/0:
53 |$ :

7$
$7*44
3



  





#
24

#$ 
1!

924
:
:



  
  
 

# -') (-
&')

+"

#



92! 2
'

#
,


-') (
' &)'( ; &+



)! ,$ $ 
5

4
-




'
#

)

)/20

;

,

)

7

)

)







)
8
,

9
,
:


-2



 

  
!
"#
$  
  

+'






2





,|




,


,


)


)7


)

 

  
!
#
 

  

+'




7*F


7*;



,



7*G



2


,




2


,


2


 

  
!
#
%
  

+"'



-


-7


-



,F


,;


,G


  
  
&
  


 


.
7*4
3D
3
&



>

-






.
,
,

/0


.




)






$

.



3
&

|



&7*
! 



7* 7* 

7*
7*

!

$7* 4 77*
! 7

)
4 7

)
/)
0


3
)


)
"


)
!


)
3*
$/0
/0

#

'
92

)
AB





5

)
! 



)

#
3-
"$


1

)
! 
! ++




+ 
)

+doing things right)


+
)
%doing right things)
& %"@)


,

/0
/0

)
4 &
'



#
/0

'
92
/0

+"! -


v
 vvv
vv v
v v

E4 |3#
3'
3'


)
4 &
'


#

'
92

/0

/0

+"! ).-


v "'
vv v
v v

)
4 &
#


#
/

0

'
92
/0

+"! 2-


vv _v
v v

>

)
4 &
#


#

'
92

/0

/0

+"! 7*


$
v v

5?

)
4 &
,


#
/0

'




/0

+"! 7*


 vv 
v v

5|

)! 
"
,

++

.+

+



.



#84 8

'


'








7

7
2

7


7

.

/
0
7AB

.

/

0
.2
/%
@0

-

.



"

)! 
,
,

,


)






"3



"3

#84 8

'
/0
/"0

'

/0
/"0



7

2



"
"

"

)
!
.+
%

7! 2

&2 ! 
7'1
#7
G77

! 
&-! 
! .2

55

)
!
 
! 



.
(2

7


AB
.
H

56

)
!
).!$



.

(2

7

').

7! ! ! !


).

I).

-$4

-$

,

81"

! )."$
)


+/
0
5m

)
!
2
! 

( 

&)
"

"

2! 

$
AB
2"I
2"

A'4B

5

)
!
,





2
4


5=

)
!
,










#1
C2
DC442
+
&
+
#
&

5>

)
!
,


.






(
)1
#DC
#4


4 
&4
6?

)
!
,


! 

! 






.


,7&
, &

6|

)
!
#

.







4 actual cash held at HQ much less than that would have been required as
an independent company
)! whether to include at SP or COGS?
#! how to deal with creditors?
92
! treatment of current liabilities 2 extreme treatments
-" ! which value to consider? Problems with depreciation
(! preference for leased assets over owned assets so as to reduce
capital charge
#! exclusion from computation of assets employed
#! Capitalization of items like R & D and its repercussion on EVA
if capitalized, very less incentive to cut such expenditure as it would only reduce
a part of if by way of capital charge

)! ,
#! )'#8+<
,

)#

+<



)#

3

+< 
2
3



)#3 

3

+< 3#

,&"3



+< 
)#

+< 
)#

,


<-
|???$)#
+<


<-
|???$)#
+<



)#


+< 

 6


)!
,#! )#

)#
! #! 
)#3
! $

! #



65

)!
,#! +< )#

5
! +< $2)#2
)#/ ?I0)#/?I0


/|?I03Ro creates a bias towards little or no
expansion in high-profit business units while at the same time low-profit units are making
investments at rates of returns well below those rejected by high-profit units

! *)#3&
+< 3
! .3-2$
39)#3
! +< )#
%23&7*
$+< 3

66

,,
|3 )

3 .
3 -
53 
63 
m3 -

6m

7!
7
'
7.
7


#
#

)
7
,
,

7!
&
! &



-""
-
#G7
$1$2

#
! #

! #

! #3<
23
! #44
2

6=

7!
G
#$G77
/de novo0
1

&G77


122! should the activity
under review be performed at all? What should the quality
level be?
#
3D3

6>

&,4 
# 
$2
3
&
3
'&,!
&7*

&
&7*%
#

m?

&,4 
-&,

23
!



2
&4
#"
&,$

&4! 
&,4
"3
&2
42

m|

&,4 

!



,! !
|3 ,2

3 7*
 ,
23

2


&,4 
Comparative usage of the TP methods by fortune 1000
Companies as per survey by Vijay Govindarajan





   
: 



  
  

&,4 

!

.,/ 0




7
.DC

&

2

m5

, !
7 


.J 
,2!
J) %


-



&


#
#
-

-

m6

, ! 7



! .4
,

-

4



&
"


&

"


+"

)#$+< $,


$
+ 

.


&1


#1
1

.


1$



1
$
3
D
7

3
mm

7
/ 7
04
$7
7
42
8

3&3-
"$
! 
&1'D

3 7

3
# 7
E4
!
!
!
!
!

-4
,
2
,"
+44

7
/ 7
04

,

&


J


$


$

7'D

D$(
D

7






(







)

)



(
@'D



@'D


m=










.1
(
4

! &


  
m>


!
,








,
'

2

,
,
&,



,
?


!
-







&
)2
&







!
D
'







.

"
&4
,
#1



71$


D112

-
"


!
'










- 


,

'



2$
8



2
&2$
$$3,
3
23 2
2
3-
3

! .

,

-



#



,

&



&2




&2
2



&

2






C

C#
9







7

7
 

77
.

7 


3 2
3

'

3
'
3

*3

'3






+
,8
$

 $




+

+
 6


 

 
$$
3
&  2$
2$
3
 4
2"3
D213
#  
2
3

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen