Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
!
!
!
!
!
|
"
#$|
#"
%
$
"
&'
(
' )*+
+
,
-!
! ./0
!
/0
! +/$10
!
2/
0
|3
$
#
+
2
3.
(
3&
-4
-4
-4
53#
)
"
*
,
1
63# ,
-
'
#
)
)/20
;
,
)
7
)
)
)
8
,
9
,
:
-2
4 -#
#
)
,
!
,
+.2
<
-2
-
,
7
+
7
)
,
,
+
|3
3
3
53
63
m3
3
=3
)
./0
&2
-4
/
0
|3
3
3
53
63
m3
'"
'
2
&
3 +2
=3 *
>3 +
|?3
"
||3
@@
| 3 .
=
_
!
! +
$
2$
"
>
_
!
4
where
how @
!
! )
! *
)$$
$"$
3This is because Corporate HQ, in the related diversified
firm, has the ability to transfer core competencies from one
business unit to another3
|?
_
!
4
&
)
*
-
&
2
+"
9$-
,$
+
,
||
_
!
*4
7
|0 0
&"7*
'7
+,
&
882
2 7*
7*
_
!
7! 7
D
(
D
D
AB
AC2B
A
B
A.B
(
(
D
(
|
_
!
7! +
&,"
)7
D
#
(
9
nvest
Strongly
9
nvest
Selectively
9
nvest
Selectively
Earn/
Protect
,
(
Harvest/
Divest
Earn/
Protect
: 2
Dominate/
Delay/Divest
(
Harvest/
Divest
(
Harvest/
Divest
92
7
|5
_
!
1!
! 9:
! D7*":
! 97*%:
,
!
#<
|6
_
! #
!
,6
Threat of
+
Bargaining
Power
ntensity of
#
Bargaining
power
Threat
From
|m
_
! #
!
,6
! 6
2@6
! .6
! *
_
!
! ,
&6
"
)!
8
|=
_
!
! ,
44
.
.
(
244
&4
#
#
|>
_
!
!
<
<
#
")
&<
22
3
?
_
!
!
<
,
.
2
8
(
_
!
!
<
-$21!
|3
$/0:
3
/0
:
3
/0:
53 |$ :
7$
$7*44
3
#
24
#$
1!
924
:
:
# -')
(-
&')
+"
#
92! 2
'
#
,
-')
(
' &)'(;&+
)! ,$ $
5
4
-
'
#
)
)/20
;
,
)
7
)
)
)
8
,
9
,
:
-2
!
"#
$
+'
2
,|
,
,
)
)7
)
!
#
+'
7*F
7*;
,
7*G
2
,
2
,
2
!
#
%
+"'
-
-7
-
,F
,;
,G
&
.
7*4
3D
3
&
>
-
.
,
,
/0
.
)
$
.
3
&
|
&7*
!
7* 7*
7*
7*
!
$7* 4 77*
! 7
)
4 7
)
/)
0
3
)
)
"
)
!
)
3*
$/0
/0
#
'
92
)
AB
5
)
!
)
#
3-
"$
1
)
!
! ++
+
)
)
4 &
'
#
/0
'
92
/0
+"! -
v
vvv
vv v
v v
E4 |3#
3'
3'
)
4 &
'
#
'
92
/0
/0
+"! ).-
v "'
vv v
v v
)
4 &
#
#
/
0
'
92
/0
+"! 2-
vv _v
v v
>
)
4 &
#
#
'
92
/0
/0
+"! 7*
$
v v
5?
)
4 &
,
#
/0
'
/0
+"! 7*
vv
v v
5|
)!
"
,
++
.+
+
.
#84 8
'
'
7
7
2
7
7
.
/
0
7AB
.
/
0
.2
/%
@0
-
.
"
)!
,
,
,
)
"3
"3
#84 8
'
/0
/"0
'
/0
/"0
7
2
"
"
"
)
!
.+
%
7! 2
&2 !
7'1
#7
G77
!
&-!
! .2
55
)
!
!
.
(2
7
AB
.
H
56
)
!
).!$
.
(2
7
').
7! ! ! !
).
I).
-$4
-$
,
81"
! )."$
)
+/
0
5m
)
!
2
!
(
&)
"
"
2!
$
AB
2"I
2"
A'4B
5
)
!
,
2
4
5=
)
!
,
#1
C2
DC442
+
&
+
#
&
5>
)
!
,
.
(
)1
#DC
#4
4
&4
6?
)
!
,
!
!
.
,7&
,
&
6|
)
!
#
.
4 actual cash held at HQ much less than that would have been required as
an independent company
)! whether to include at SP or COGS?
#! how to deal with creditors?
92
! treatment of current liabilities 2 extreme treatments
-"
! which value to consider? Problems with depreciation
(! preference for leased assets over owned assets so as to reduce
capital charge
#! exclusion from computation of assets employed
#! Capitalization of items like R & D and its repercussion on EVA
if capitalized, very less incentive to cut such expenditure as it would only reduce
a part of if by way of capital charge
)! ,
#! )'#8+<
,
)#
+<
)#
3
+<
2
3
)#3
3
+<
3#
,&"3
+<
)#
+<
)#
,
<-
|???$)#
+<
<-
|???$)#
+<
)#
+<
6
)!
,#! )#
)#
! #!
)#3
! $
! #
65
)!
,#! +<
)#
5
! +<
$2)#2
)#/ ?I0)#/?I0
/|?I03Ro creates a bias towards little or no
expansion in high-profit business units while at the same time low-profit units are making
investments at rates of returns well below those rejected by high-profit units
! *)#3&
+<
3
! .3-2$
39)#3
! +<
)#
%23&7*
$+<
3
66
,,
|3 )
3 .
3 -
53
63
m3 -
6m
7!
7
'
7.
7
#
#
)
7
,
,
7!
&
! &
-""
-
#G7
$1$2
#
! #
! #
! #3<
23
! #44
2
6=
7!
G
#$G77
/de novo0
1
&G77
122! should the activity
under review be performed at all? What should the quality
level be?
#
3D3
6>
&,4
#
$2
3
&
3
'&,!
&7*
&
&7*%
#
m?
&,4
-&,
23
!
2
&4
#"
&,$
&4!
&,4
"3
&2
42
m|
&,4
!
,! !
|3 ,2
3
7*
,
23
2
&,4
Comparative usage of the TP methods by fortune 1000
Companies as per survey by Vijay Govindarajan
:
&,4
!
.,/ 0
7
.DC
&
2
m5
, !
7
.J
,2!
J)
%
-
&
#
#
-
-
m6
-
4
&
"
&
"
+"
)#$+<
$,
$
+
.
&1
#1
1
.
1$
1
$
3
D
7
3
mm
7
/
7
04
$7
7
42
8
3&3-
"$
!
&1'D
3
7
3
#
7
E4
!
!
!
!
!
-4
,
2
,"
+44
7
/
7
04
,
&
J
$
$
7'D
D$(
D
7
(
)
)
(
@'D
@'D
m=
.1
(
4
! &
m>
!
,
,
'
2
,
,
&,
,
?
!
-
&
)2
&
!
D
'
.
"
&4
,
#1
71$
D112
-
"
!
'
-
,
'
2$
8
2
&2$
$$3,
3
23
2
2
3-
3
! .
,
-
#
,
&
&2
&2
2
&
2
C
C#
9
7
7
77
.
7
3
2
3
'
3
'
3
*3
'3
+
,8
$
$
+
+
6
$$
3
&
2$
2$
3
4
2"3
D213
#
2
3