Sie sind auf Seite 1von 21

Strategic Cost Management

Introduction
Strategic management involves the formulation and implementation of the major goals and
initiatives taken by a company's top management on behalf of owners, based on consideration
of resources and an assessment of the internal and external environments in which the
organization competes.
Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise and involves specifying the
organization's objectives, developing policies and plans designed to achieve these objectives, and
then allocating resources to implement the plans. Academics and practicing managers have
developed numerous models and frameworks to assist in strategic decision making in the context
of complex environments and competitive dynamics. [2] Strategic management is not static in
nature; the models often include a feedback loop to monitor execution and inform the next round
of planning.
Harvard Professor Michael Porter identifies three principles underlying strategy: creating a
"unique and valuable [market] position", making trade-offs by choosing "what not to do", and
creating "fit" by aligning company activities with one another to support the chosen
strategy Dr. Vladimir Kvint defines strategy as "a system of finding, formulating, and developing
a doctrine that will ensure long-term success if followed faithfully.
Corporate strategy involves answering a key question from a portfolio perspective: "What
business should we be in?" Business strategy involves answering the question: "How shall we
compete in this business?" In management theory and practice, a further distinction is often made
between strategic management and operational management. Operational management is
concerned primarily with improving efficiency and controlling costs within the boundaries set by
the organization's strategy.
Strategic Cost Management (SCM) is understood in different ways in literature as a matter of
fact that there is no universally agreed definition. In fact, different costs are for different
purposes. However, SCM can be defined as the use of cost information to do the following: help
formulate and communicate strategies, carry out tactics that implement those strategies
1

Strategic Cost Management


objectives. [Govindarajan and Shank]. In other words this means that SCM is not only cost
management but also a tool use to increase revenues, improve productivity and customer
satisfaction, and at the same time improve the strategic position of the company. The key is that
costs must be viewed by looking simultaneously at the value they provide to achieve company's
strategic/long-term objectives.
Three types of cost management are:
1. Those that strengthen the organizations competitive position.
An example of a cost management technique that strengthens an organizations position is
illustrated as follows. A hospital redesigns its patient admission procedure so it becomes more
efficient and easier for patients. The hospital will become known for its easy admission
procedure so more people will come to that hospital if the patient has a choice. The strategic
position of the hospital has just been increased over its competitors.
2. Those that that have no impact on the organizations position.
An example of a cost management technique that has no impact on the organizations
competitive position is illustrated as follows. An insurance company decides to reevaluate its
accounts payable system to make it more efficient. The evaluation has no positive benefits to the
insurance company in the external market. The objective of the change is to make the
organization more profitable.
3. Those that weaken the organizations position.
An example of a cost management technique that will weaken the organizations competitive
position is illustrated as follows. A large airline company only has two desks for administering
and selling tickets. This set-up induces long lines for the airline customer who can ultimately
result in high dissatisfaction and a bad reputation for the airline. This may reduce the amount of
ticket sales when compared with the airlines competitors. Even though having only two desks
available for customers may initially be cost effective, in the long run, it harms the company.

Strategic Cost Management

As a general rule, an organization should never undertake any practices that are predicted
to weaken the position of the organization.

Cost estimating can be done in a variety of ways. Accurate cost estimating is one of the main
elements involved in cost management. The following is a list of estimating techniques that may
be used for an organization:

Analogous Estimating (Top-Down Estimating) - Using the cost of a previous, similar


project as a reference for predicting the cost of the current project. This is a form of
expert judgment and is used when there is a limited amount of information about the
project.

Parametric Modeling - Using mathematical parameters to predict project costs. Models


can be simple or complex. They are most reliable when

(1) the historical information is correct,

(2) the parameters are quantifiable, and

(3) The model can be applied to both large and small scale projects.

Bottom-Up Estimating - This involves estimating the cost of work items and them
summing the estimates to get a project total. Smaller work items increase the cost and
accuracy.

Computerized Tools - Project management software and spreadsheets aid in project


estimation.

Report Objectives
This report is a summary of a research done on the area of Strategic Cost Management (SCM).
This report includes a detailed discussion and application of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) which a
3

Strategic Cost Management


company can use to achieve its strategic objects in today's dynamic business environment.
Hence, the main focus of this report is on LCC as mentioned.
Since textbooks normally covers the theoretical aspects of these areas in management
accounting, journals are being used as the main source of information to cover the topic in-depth.

Strategic Cost Management


Review of literature
Before striking very straight on the prices such as spot and future prices, it is quite imperative
that there should be a good understanding of the market as a whole. Dodd & Jones (2007) in
their article Analysis of effectiveness of Derivative Market in Brazil: Hedging and Central Bank
Interventions & Regulations pointed that financial institutions in Brazil use modern risk
exposure models to assess and minimize their risk. Even the Central Bank gives a support in this
regard. They found that if derivatives can provide a reliable ways to minimize risk, particularly
interest rate risk, then there will be smooth international capital flows. They emphasized that the
central bank needs to be proactive to avoid creation of greater speculative opportunities. Li
Xidan and Zhang Bing (2008) in their research article Price linkages between Chinese and
World Copper Future Market emphasized that there existed a time varying relationships
between the Chinese Copper market & its London counterparts. There is a long run relationship
between Shanghai Future Market (SHFE) and London Metals exchanges (LME) copper futures
prices. The influence of LME on SHFE is greater than that of SHFE on LME. Coming further to
another research report extracted from the web site of CFTC (2008) by none other than the
Division of Market Oversight of Central Future Trading Commission of US (CFTC), which
reports on Large Trader Activity in the Silver Future Market because of allegations by the
commentators and analysts that the price of silver future on NYMEX has been manipulated
downward on the short side of the market. The report of the Division of Market Oversight comes
out with the finding that there is no evidence of manipulation in the silver future market. Silver
cash and future prices have been risen dramatically between 2005 and 2007, with silver
outperforming gold, platinum suggesting that silver prices are not depressed relative to other
metal prices. Long Ruyin and Wang Lei (2008) have talked about dynamic relationship among
Chinas metal futures, spot price and Londons future prices. Their study shows that the aforesaid
three have the long equilibrium relationship, the copper future price of Shanghai have
internalities to the futures of London, the aluminum future price have externalities, the three have
different price discovery functions.

Strategic Cost Management


Gravelle John, Global Mining Leader, PwC, in its report titled Metal mired in global uncertainty
(Gold, Silver and Copper Price Report 2014) said that few commodities in the mining sector
have escaped the downturn caused by global economic uncertainty and volatile markets. Gold,
silver and copper are among the closely watched metals. They have also been some of the
hardest hit in 2013.
In India, there has been very few studies on the similar front such as Bose Sushmita (2008) in her
study of trends in commodity prices of commodity market in India, found that multi-commodity
indices having higher exposure to metals and energy products and with efficient and clear price
dissemination in national and international markets behave like the equity indices in terms of
efficiency and flow of information. She found that future markets can provide information for
current spot prices and can help to reduce volatility in spot prices of relevant commodities and
can also provide for effective hedging of price risk. Agricultural indices on the other hand do not
reflect such features properly. Her study has suggested that relationship between spot and future
markets in price discovery has been an important area of research. While most studies talk about
that there is information flow between spot and futures markets, the degree of flow and direction
vary significantly depending on the commodity selected, market infrastructure and operation of
arbitrageurs in the future market. Kumar Brajesh and Pandey Ajay (2008) investigated the cross
market linkages of Indian commodity futures with futures markets outside India. They found that
world markets have bigger (unidirectional) impact on Indian markets. However, effect of
Londoan Metal Exchange (LME) on Indias Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) is stronger than
the effect of MCX on LME. Results of return and volatility spillovers indicate that the Indian
commodity futures markets function as a satellite market and assimilate information from the
world market. Further after going through one working paper of Ghosh (2009), on Issues &
concerns of commodity derivative market in India: An agenda for research available in the
website of Takshashila Academia of Economic Research (TAER) Limited (earlier known

Strategic Cost Management


Life Cycle Costing - As a SCM Tool

Implementation
The second major process of strategic management is implementation, which involves decisions
regarding how the organization's resources (i.e., people, process and IT systems) will be aligned
and mobilized towards the objectives. Implementation results in how the organization's resources
are structured (such as by product or service or geography), leadership arrangements,
communication, incentives, and monitoring mechanisms to track progress towards objectives,
among others.
Running the day-to-day operations of the business is often referred to as "operations
management" or specific terms for key departments or functions, such as "logistics management"
or "marketing management," which take over once strategic management decisions are
implemented.
The LCC concept was developed by United States' (US) Department of Defense in the early
1960s to increase the effectiveness of government procurement (Shields and Young 1991). After
that, the concept came into the business, and is used there in product development studies and
project evaluation. Then the concept was taken by the management accounting. However, the
application of LCC is limited until 1980s when there were criticisms of the traditional
management accounting practices, which is focused primarily on the manufacturing stage of a
Product's Life Cycle (PLC).
PLC progresses through a sequence of stages from introduction to growth, maturity, and decline.
Thus, accountants might not be able to analyze cost behavior and computation of all associate
costs would be challenging. The planning and design stage incur the most cost so cost
management has to be done in this stage.
LCC refer to the process of estimating and accumulating the total costs that the producer or
manufacturer will incur over the product's entire life; from the beginning to diminish the
particular product. In other words, "cradle-to-grave costing". The main focus of LCC is not only
to reduce the costs that the producer will incur over the PLC including design, manufacturing,
marketing, logistics, and service, but also the costs that customer will incur such as the costs of
7

Strategic Cost Management


acquisition, operation, maintenance, shutdowns, and disposal. This means that, LCC explicitly
takes the longitudinal cost structure of the product's quality and time-related features into the
account in two different angles. Therefore, a LCC perspective is useful not only when costs are
considered from the customer's view but also considering the producer's view throughout PLC
(Artto 1994).Hence, user of the product plays a major role as the cost driver in LCC.
Although, the traditional cost management approach primary focus on the manufacturing stage
of the product the PLC costs do not end when the product has been manufactured. As many
authors commonly cited, 80-90 percentage of the costs are committed or locked-in by the
decisions made in the early stage of PLC. As mentioned, cost management should be done at this
stage. Thus, the key to managing or reducing cost is to focus attention and effort on those
decisions (Shields and Young 1991). But it is important to note that there are some arguments
against committed or locked-in costs. For example, in there study, Cooper and Slagmulder
(2004) "...our research suggest otherwise. Specifically we found that Olympus Optical (product
they studied) is able to manage costs throughout its life..."
In the management accounting perspective, the main purpose of LCC is to adopt a SCM
technique which will maximize the return over the cost objects total life by focusing on the
operational and terminal cash flows. LCC builds a conceptual framework that facilities
management's ability to exploit internal and external linkages of the product. Thus, it helps the
management accountants to understand the cost consequences of developing and making a
product and to identify areas in which cost reduction efforts are likely to be most effective in a
way that promotes the strategic competitive advantage of the company.
Nevertheless, many authors argued that there are four broad purposes for LCC in SCM context.
Below mentioned are: [consider refernce]
1. to assess whether the operating profits earned during the manufacturing, phase will cover
the costs incurred in the planning and decline phases;
2. to identify associated costs during the planning period with a given product design and to
take necessary actions;

Strategic Cost Management


3. to support cost comparisons among different product designs to make more informed
decisions among alternatives; and
4. to identify the nature and timing of costs to plan and manage effectively.
LCC-The Perspectives
Producer's Perspective
This perspective of LCC is based on the identifying, analyzing, and managing of each individual
product's costs throughout its life cycle to take competitive advantage. According to Artto (1994)
this refers to the costs that are included in product conception, design, product and process
development, production, logistics, marketing, services and guarantees. Perhaps, this suggests
that most of the costs are committed or incurred in the earlier stage especially in planning and
designing stage of the product or service in the producer's perspective. Therefore, producers are
able to analyze and manage costs before any final manufacturing and investment decisions are
made.
Customer's Perspective
From the customer's perspective the focus is on costs incurred through purchase, operation,
maintenance, support and disposal of product. Artto (1994) argued that a company's long-term
success with customers requires products to have a lower expected associated costs when
compare with substitute products.
Also, Artto (1994) mentioned that organizations must do analysis to learn the market and
customers on a three dimensional way; product quality, time-related factors and purchase price.
In fact, to be competitive in the market, these factors are vital. So, product design and
development criteria should derive from the customer's product selection criteria. This analysis
should be done based on market and customers in the initial stage of product design and
planning. Thus, with help of LCC analysis, management is able to make strategic cost decisions
based on the mentioned two perspectives.

Success - LCC in Action

Strategic Cost Management


LCC is particularly important in environments in which there is large planning and development
cost for example, the NASA's Advanced Air Transportation Technology (AATT) project have
achieved there strategic goals and have been able to manage there cost through LCC on NASA's
Decisions Support Tools (DST) (Wang and Datta).
Integrated Business Machines (IBM) applies LCC and estimates and accumulates costs against
profit over a PLC to determine profits which could generate. Plus, world's leading electronic and
electric giants such as Sony (Japan) and Philips (Holland) have proven successful by applying
the concepts of LCC.
Also, many of the US construction firms have adopted LCC in order to reduce costs as projects
that undergo; LCC analysis gives the total cost of the Net Present Value (NPV), therefore
alternatives could be considered.
BMW has proven so successful in using LCC analysis that helps the management for comparing
costs of different designs in order to make decisions on most appropriate product mix (recyclable
plastic parts). Also the Japan's car manufacturing giant Toyota uses LCC to make decisions on its
Packing Design decisions in sales units. These, cases clearly show that LCC is a reasonably
widespread SCM technique use globally.
Advantages
As mentioned earlier, LCC is a SCM tool that manages costs form "cradle-to-grave", therefore
with LCC, management is able to analyze the behaviour of all costs including indirect cost to
estimates and monitor during PLC, perhaps starting from the initial stage. LCC reporting
involves tracing costs and revenues on a product by product basis (all possible data) throughout
their entire life. Hence, a company can take actions that lower costs in the subsequent stages of
the PLC as well as lower consumer's costs such as operating and maintenance costs. LCC
integrates all viewpoints (the customer and producer) and thus it leads to avoid partial
optimization of the PLC costs and exploits both internal and external linkage (Lindholm and
Suomala 2005a). Moreover, a successful implementation of LCC provides competitive
advantage for the company (shields and Young 1991)

10

Strategic Cost Management


Change in focus from production to marketing
The direction of strategic research also paralleled a major paradigm shift in how companies
competed, specifically a shift from the production focus to market focus. The prevailing concept
in strategy up to the 1950s was to create a product of high technical quality. If you created a
product that worked well and was durable, it was assumed you would have no difficulty
profiting. This was called the production orientation. Henry Ford famously said of the Model T
car: "Any customer can have a car painted any color that he wants, so long as it is black."
Management theorist Peter F Drucker wrote in 1954 that it was the customer who defined what
business the organization was in. In 1960 Theodore Levitt argued that instead of producing
products then trying to sell them to the customer, businesses should start with the customer, find
out what they wanted, and then produce it for them. The fallacy of the production orientation was
also referred to as marketing myopia in an article of the same name by Levitt.
Over time, the customer became the driving force behind all strategic business decisions.
This marketing concept, in the decades since its introduction, has been reformulated and
repackaged under names including market orientation, customer orientation, customer intimacy,
customer focus, customer-driven and market focus.
It's more important than ever to define yourself in terms of what you stand for rather than what
you make, because what you make is going to become outmoded faster than it has at any time in
the past.
Jim Collins wrote in 1997 that the strategic frame of reference is expanded by focusing on why a
company exists rather than what it makes. In 2001, he recommended that organizations define
themselves based on three key questions:

What are we passionate about?

What can we be best in the world at?

What drives our economic engine?


11

Strategic Cost Management

12

Strategic Cost Management


Nature of strategy
In 1985, Professor Ellen Earle-Chaffee summarized what she thought were the main elements of
strategic management theory where consensus generally existed as of the 1970s, writing that
strategic management:

Involves adapting the organization to its business environment;

Is fluid and complex. Change creates novel combinations of circumstances requiring


unstructured non-repetitive responses;

Affects the entire organization by providing direction;

Involves both strategy formulation processes and also implementation of the content of
the strategy;

May be planned (intended) and unplanned (emergent);

Is done at several levels: overall corporate strategy, and individual business strategies;
and

Involves both conceptual and analytical thought processes.

Chaffee further wrote that research up to that point covered three models of strategy, which were
not mutually exclusive:
1. Linear strategy: A planned determination of goals, initiatives, and allocation of resources,
along the lines of the Chandler definition above. This is most consistent withstrategic
planning approaches and may have a long planning horizon. The strategist "deals with"
the environment but it is not the central concern.
2. Adaptive strategy: In this model, the organization's goals and activities are primarily
concerned with adaptation to the environment, analogous to a biological organism. The
need for continuous adaption reduces or eliminates the planning window. There is more
13

Strategic Cost Management


focus on means (resource mobilization to address the environment) rather than ends
(goals). Strategy is less centralized than in the linear model.
3. Interpretive strategy: A more recent and less developed model than the linear and
adaptive models, interpretive strategy is concerned with "orienting metaphors
constructed for the purpose of conceptualizing and guiding individual attitudes or
organizational participants.

SWOT Analysis
By the 1960s, the capstone business policy course at the Harvard Business School included the
concept of matching the distinctive competence of a company (its strengths and weaknesses)
with its environment (opportunities and threats) in the context of its objectives. This framework
came to be known by the acronym SWOT and was "a major step forward in bringing explicitly
competitive thinking to bear on questions of strategy." Kenneth R. Andrews helped popularize
the framework via a 1963 conference and it remains commonly used in practice.
A SWOT analysis is an organized design method used to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats complex within the person or the group or the organization where the
functional process takes place.
SWOT analysis involves both internal and external factors in an organization. such that the first
two elements indicate internal capability and limitations while the last two factors indicate
chances in business and limitations.(SW =strength and weakness are internal factors while OT=
Opportunities and threats are external issues to a business).

14

Strategic Cost Management


Limitations
LCC estimates too early in the life of a project when the degree of accuracy is questionable and
assuming that the alternative has a finite life cycle. The cost of performing a LCC analysis may
not be appropriate for all projects and a high sensitivity to changing the requirements. The LLC
is influenced by many factors of which some simply cannot control as they arise without
warning. Like the entry of new competitor. Beside, the managers and employees might find LCC
as a not sound SCM technique and it is difficult to compute costs in the customer's perspective.
Also, the disputes in evaluating future cost and dealing with uncertainties regarding factors
affecting LCC may have restricted its use (Lindholm and Suomala 2005a). The application of
LCC relies on the availability of cost information, thus the normal product costing practices
affect companies' abilities to utilize the approach. If company fails to sufficiently track product
costs, it is unlikely that the true total cost of the product can be measured consistently and
accurately. Also the long PLC could make LCC difficult. Moreover, there is evidence from
practice that the failure to recognize the uneven cash flows during the product life cycle can
motivate undesired and inappropriate decision making (Lindholm and Suomala 2005a)

15

Strategic Cost Management


Data Analysis and Interpretation
1) Type of organization
a) Public
b) Private

30%
Public
Private
70%

2) Do you adopt Strategic Cost system


a) Yes
b) No

20%

Yes
No

80%

3) How would you characterize the management style of your organization?


a) Dictatorial
b) Autocratic
16

Strategic Cost Management


c) Democratic
d) Liaise Fare

17%

17%
Dictatorial
Autocratic
Democratic

25%

Liaise Fare
42%

4) How would you characterize your management commitment to Strategic Cost?


a) Not a priority
b) Low priority
c) Some priority
d) High priority
e) Top priority

30

30

Not a priority
Low priority
Some priority
High priority

20

20

Top priority

10

5) How would you rate your Strategic Cost implementation on communication of the
objectives and rationale for the project?
a) Fair
b) Average
c) Good
d) Excellent

17

Strategic Cost Management

10%

20%

45%

Fair
Good
Average
Excellent

25%

18

Strategic Cost Management


Conclusion
Some authors criticize LCC as it only is applicable for the product which has a certain life period
(e.g not products with short life). However, Cooper and Slagmulder (2004) argued that
companies can achieve significant savings during product life cycle even in an environment of
products with short life cycles and aggressive cost management focused on product design.
According to Takala and Carlson (2001), the most respected criticism of the PLC, was made by
Dhalla & Yuspeh (1976) that is "clearly, the PLC is a dependent variable which is determined by
market actions; it is not an independent variable to which companies should adapt their
marketing programs" and "Forget the product life cycle!" Perhaps, this was more related to the
LCC use in marketing.
In their study Lindholm and (Suomala 2005a) argued that the adoption of LCC depends on the
organisational functions rather than different sectors, as there are some belief that LCC is only
applicable for industries like military and construction sector. Perhaps, this is not the case as
discussed earlier (see Success - LCC in action).
Conclusion
SCM is important to organizations because it is more than focusing on costs but also value and
revenue in both internal and external angles, which is consider as a critical factor for the success
of the companies in the 21st century's competitive business environment. Many studies (Shields
and Young 1991, Arrto 1994 and Lindholm and Suomala 2005a) increasingly stress that rapid
changes in the business environment especially technological changes and shortened life cycles
have made LCC critical to organizations. LCC differs from other costing methods because it
generally includes revenues as well as costs of the PLC (Artto 1994).
Since, LCC is to support during the product planning stage and the analysis of the cost behaviour
of a particular product helps managers and accountants to manage costs more effectively and
minimize wrong decision-making as it focuses cost behavior of each unique phase of the PLC.
Because different types of costs tend to predominate in different phases of the life cycle, by
identifying the timing and nature of significant costs in advance, organizations can develop more
effective means of budgeting and managing these costs. Beside, it is also very useful when
making decisions regarding operation and maintenance (such as warranty) costs incurred during
19

Strategic Cost Management


the life of the product. But the key issue is how far beyond the stage where action is taken should
a company look for positive impacts reduce costs.
Detailed analysis of LCC makes manufactures to arrive at make-or-buy decisions to be more
completive or re-gain its competitiveness in the industry. Because LCC draws general
conclusions in all relevant costs which the producers has to incur in making a product or service
before the productions doesn't take place.
Likewise, by applying LCC as a SCM technique, managements are able to apply may other
techniques in to make economic decision viable such as cost-benefit analysis, discounted cash
flow, sensitivity analysis and NPV analysis. Thus this would give an edge over competitors who
do not use LCC as a SCM tool
Nonetheless, in practice LCC is often represent long-term costing, but the calculations do not
cover the entire life cycle costs in many cases (Lindholm and Suomala 2005a). The reason for
this is that historically colleted data (in early stages) might no longer applicable as some
conditions change. Thus, appropriate use of historically collected data and dealing with the future
uncertainties which affect the effectiveness of life cycle costs (in both perspectives), must be in
the top priority of any organization to be competitive in the market and to achieve its strategic
advantage by implementing LCC as a SCM tool.

20

Strategic Cost Management


Reference
https://www.google.co.in/webhp?
hl=en&tab=iw&gws_rd=ssl#hl=en&q=strategic+cost+management+wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_management
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_management
http://www.fisglobal.com/ucmprdpub/groups/public/documents/document/c007601.p
df
http://www.hrodc.com/COSTS.htm

21

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen