Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
Equations of state are used to predict or to match
equilibrium fluid phase behavior for systems as diverse
as distillation columns and miscible gas floods of oil
reservoirs. The success of such simulations depends on
correct predictions of the number and the compositions
of phases present at a given temperature, pressure, and
overall fluid composition. For example, recent research
has shown that three or more phases may exist in
equilibrium in CO 2 floods.
This paper shows why an equation of state can predict
the incorrect number of phases or incorrect phase compositions. The incorrect phase descriptions still satisfy
the usual restrictions on equality of chemical potentials
of components in each phase and conservation of moles
in the system. A new method and its mathematical proof
are presented for determining when a phase equilibrium
solution is incorrect.
Examples of instances where incorrect predictions
may be made are described. These include a binary
system in which a two-phase solution may be predicted
for a single-phase fluid and a multi component
CO 2 /reservoir oil system in which three or more phases
may coexist.
Introduction
Advances in reservoir oil recovery methods have
necessitated advances in methods for prediction of phase
equilibria associated with those methods. It was long
considered sufficient to approximate the reservoir
behavior of oil and gas systems with models in which
compositions of the phases in equilibrium were unimportant. In such a model, the amounts and properties of the
phases are dependent on pressure and temperature only.
Later, experience in production from condensate and
volatile oil reservoirs showed that models incorporating
compositional effects were required to simulate the
phase equilibria adequately. This led to the use of con0197-7520/82/0010-9806$00.25
Copyright 1982 Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME
OCTOBER 1982
PB
91
P2
4
a..
9z
P 3fl
""
PI
PA
0
XB--
Discussion
Equations of state often are used to predict phase
equilibrium solutions. Gibbs energy analysis is the use of
an equation of state to calculate a Gibbs energy surface
and to determine whether a predicted equilibrium state
has the lowest possible Gibbs energy. We first illustrate
the use of a Gibbs energy surface to determine phase
equilibria and show how false solutions can be obtained.
732
I
12
1---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o XLl
FHO
XB--
Xv
t
""
91
~-
93
-J.--I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 Xu
FEED
XL2
Xv
~.-----.------.-----.------r-----.
6000
L
""
is:! 4000
::>
Vl
Vl
.....
Q::
0..
2000
OL-____
____
____
______L -____
direction of curvature of the g surface. For a stable solution, the g surface must be concave upward at the points
of tangency. Downward curvature indicates definite instability. The solution (tangent) labeled as 2" is unstable
by this criterion because the g surface at the point of
tangency near Xv is concave downward. The g surface is
concave upward for both tangency points of Solution 2',
however, and this solution would be considered stable by
the second-derivative criterion.
At pressure P3 shown in Fig. I, the lobe of the g surface corresponding to the V phase will have vanished.
The Gibbs energy curve will resemble that of Fig. 2,
with L I and L2 phases forming from a feed.
We have shown schematically, and for very simple
systems, that false solutions (not corresponding to the
minimum Gibbs energy) to phase equilibrium problems
can be generated for compositions in and around
multi phase regions. The nature of the g surface and
An2
V -nB
P=-----
Fluid Properties
Pc
(K)
(kPa)
(0C)
na
nb
CO 2
304.16
7398.1
toluene
n-decane
iodobenzene
591.77
617.55
721.11
4067.9
2096.0
4529.9
-25.0
35.0
38.1
38.1
-25.0
35.0
0.42564
0.43776
0.43776
0.44485
0.46432
0.41931
0.08003
0.08886
0.08886
0.07986
0.07042
0.08213
Component
I
A=
L; L;
1= 1
j= 1
B=
L;
i= 1
X,XJCl'.;j'
x/3;.
Tc
Interaction Parameters, C Ii
C0 2 /toluene
C0 2 /n-decane
CO 2liodobenzene
734
0.080
0.095
0.1365
2000 , - - - - - , - - - - - - - , - - - - y - - - , - - - - - - - ,
1750 r------r---..,.,.-----,-----r---,
1500
1700
:::; 1000
~ 1650
"0
E
>-<.:>
a:::
... -----
UJ
UJ
500
I
1
1 FALSE
1- L1 +L2 ------..,~;
Vl
<0
<0
<.:>
o
--
--
---
--I
I
1
-----+1- L1 +V-------t---
L+V
-500L-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
O. 2
O. 4
O. 6
O. 8
o
MOLE FRACTI ON CO
2
~
1550
V/
D. 6
D. 7
D. 8
D. 9
MOLE FRACTION CO
G=pV+
I
J(lO (nRT)
p - - - dV-RT ~
+ ~
n;(U;'-TSn.
1=1
(V)
n;ln - . -
nlRT
. .................. (1)
;=1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
MOU FRACTIOO CO
2
- JIm !:--:'-=---::'-:_-:!-:_::'-::-----:
o 0.2 0.4
0.6
0.8
MOU FRACTIOO CO
energy curve, where there are multiple real compressibility solutions of the equation of state, only the
solution giving the lowest Gibbs energy should be considered, and that is the one shown in Fig. 7. We emphasize again that the solid Gibbs energy curves plotted
in the two-phase region (12 to 99% CO 2 ) do not represent the equilibrium Gibbs energy of the system; the
dashed line tangent to the Gibbs energy surface
represents the true equilibrium Gibbs energy in the twophase region. The solid curves are the Gibbs energies
calculated as if the system were a single homogeneous
phase at the pressure, temperature, and composition
specified.
10000
9500
900l L1
T,p.n2
(:~~)
~-
L1 + L2
8500
CRITICAL POINT-
L1+~+V,\
6500
6000
iii
~L1+V
5500
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
MOLE FRACTION CO
0.9
0.8
2
FALSE CRITICAL
o __f!'..L..S._~~~!!~~~_~'?'!l!_!~~!-- ___P_~I~~_-
-~~~~~~~--~~
0.2
0.4
0.6
MOLE FRACTION CO
0.8
26000
24500
21000
;;:, 17500
l5!' 14000
L1
:::>
T.p.n2
'"
~
10500
UPPER
c..
4
"'"
(::~)
BO~D
OF L + V SOLUTIONS
J
LJ + ~ + V
LOWER BO~D OF L
J
3500
SOLUTIONS
O~~L-~L-~__~__~
0.2
0.4
0.6
MOLE FRACTION CO
O. 8
2
737
Conclusions
For fluid systems that exhibit multiple phases, an equation of state may predict false phase equilibrium
solutions.
This paper presents a self-consistent method for determining whether a predicted equilibrium state is false.
The method makes use of the equation of state to
calculate the Gibbs energy surface and the tangent plane
corresponding to the predicted equilibrium solution. If
738
Nomenclature
A = temperature-, pressure,- and compositiondependent phase parameter (Table I)
B = temperature-, pressure-, and compositiondependent phase parameter (Table I)
C ij = interaction parameter for component i with
component j (Table I)
D = G- L, the difference between the Gibbs
energy surface and a tangent plane
(function of composition)
F = function defined in Lemma 2 (Appendix)
G = Gibbs energy surface
g = molar Gibbs energy
I = number of components
J, K = number of phases
Subscripts
c = critical
i = component i
j = component j (Table I); phase j elsewhere
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL
phase k
total
v = component v
cf>
phase
1,2,3
phase identification
References
I. Callen, H.B.: Thermodynamics, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New
York City (1960).
2. Huang, E.T.S. and Tracht, J.H.: "The Displacement of Residual
Oil by Carbon Dioxide," paper SPE 4735 presented at the SPE
Third Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, April 22-24,
1974.
3. Shelton, J.L. and Yarborough, L.: "Multiple Phase Behavior in
Porous Media During CO z or Rich-Gas Flooding," J. Pet. Tech.
(Sept. 1977) 1171-78.
4. Gardner, J.W., Orr, F.M., and Patel, P.D.: "The Effect of Phase
Behavior on CO) Flood Displacement Efficiency," J. Pet. Tech.
(Nov. 1981) 206-7-81.
5. Henry, R.L. and Metcalfe, R.S.: "Multiple Phase Generation
During CO 2 Flooding," paper SPE 8812, presented at the First
Joint SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Tulsa,
April 20-23, 1980.
6. Orr, F.M., Yu, A.D., and Lien, c.L.: "Phase BehaviorofCO z
and Crude Oil in Low Temperature Reservoirs," Soc. Pet. Eng. J.
(Aug. 1981) 480-92.
7. Turek, E.A. et al.: "Phase Equilibria in Carbon Dioxide-Multicomponent Hydrocarbon Systems: Experimental Data and Improved Prediction Technique," paper SPE 9231 presented at the
SPE 1980 Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Sept.
21-24.
8. Heidemann, R.A.: "Three Phase Equilibria Using Equations of
State," AIChE J. (1974) 20,847-55.
9. Evelein, K.A., Moore, R.G., and Heidemann, R.A.: "Correlation of the Phase Behavior in the Systems Hydrogen Sulfide-Water
and Carbon Dioxide-Water," I&EC Proc. Des. Dev. (1976) 15,
423-28.
10. Sorensen, J.M. et al.: "Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium Data: Their
Retrieval, Correlation and Prediction," Fluid Phase Equilibria
(1979) 3, 47-82.
II. Coleman, B.D.: "On the Stability of Equilibrium States of
General Fluids," Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. (1979) 36, 1-32.
12. Dunn, J.E. and Fosdick, R.L.: "Morphology and Stability of
Phases," Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. (1980) 74, 1-99.
13. Gautam, R. and Seider, W.D.: "Computation of Phase and
Chemical Equilibrium: Part II-Phase Splitting," AIChE J.
(1979) 25, 999-1006.
14. Yarborough, L.: "Application of a Generalized Equation of State
to Petroleum Reservoir Fluids," Equations of State in Engineering
and Research, K.C. Chao and R.L. Robinson Jr. (eds.) ACS,
Washington, D.C. (1979) 385-439.
15. Baker, L.E. and Luks, K.D.: "Critical Point and Saturation
Pressure Calculations for Multicomponent Systems," Soc. Pet.
Eng. J. (Feb. 1980) 15-24.
16. Peng, D.Y. and Robinson, D.B.: "A Rigo~ous Method for
Predicting the Critical Properties of MUlticomponent Systems
from an Equation of State," AIChE 1. (1977) 23, 137-44.
17. Ng, H.-J. and Robinson, D.B.: "Equilibrium Phase Properties of
the Toluene-Carbon Dioxide System," 1. Chern. Eng. Data
(1978) 23, 325-27.
18. Kulkarni, A.A. et al.: "Phase Equilibrium Behavior of System
Carbon Dioxide-n-Decane at Low Temperatures," J. Chern. Eng.
Data (1974) 19, 92-94.
APPENDIX
L:
j=1
Definition 2. Let
be a state of J admissible phases
satisfying conservation of mass and let G be differentiable at each phase in n. Suppose that for every differentiable curve m(7)=[mj(7)], which is defined for 7 in
some open interval containing 0 and which satisfies conservation of mass-i.e.,
J
L: mij(7)=ni,
......................... (A-3)
j=1
d7
. .................... (A-4)
Theorem 2. Let
be a state of J admissible phases
[n)] satisfying conservation of mass. Then G r is stationary at n if and only if G is differentiable at each n)
and the surface G has the same tangent plane at each of
the points [n ) ] .
nj is
Also,
...................... (A-6)
Then
aG
-a (n)ri = ~ fLijri' ....... (A-l3)
i=1
ri
i=1
I
L)(r)=
~
LJ
~ aG[m)(O)] x dmij(O) ,
LJ
......... (A-7)
)=1
i=1
amij
dT
but
aG[m)(O)]
amu
aG(n)
=---=fLij, ................ (A-8)
ami}
.
n,
~ fLijri
i=1
I
fLi} LJ
dT
)=1
i=1
i=1
dmij(O) --0
............... (A-9)
'
)=1
740
never negative.
)=1
J
n.
dmij(O)
dni
dT
dT
----''--- = -
G{(m)-G{(n)=
j=i
nij=
j=i
j=i
...................... (A-23)
Also, J1.ij =J1.iI for 1:5 i :5/, 1 :5}:51. Now,
for each}. Since G is differentiable at nj, the function
G{(n)=
GUi j)
j=i
D(r)/
b b
j=i ;=i
approaches zero as
approaches nj. Let
b
j=i
b
v=i
J1.iI n ij
bJ1.;i m ij
approaches O-i.e., as
;=i
f
r- nj
L(mj),
.................... (A-IS)
F;Cr - n j)=/ID(r)
II b
Irv
v=i
j=i
Then
so
ID(r)l=
Ir
"
- nVj
......................... (A-I9)
D(mj)'
j=i
Irv-nvjl
f
b
v=i
[G(mj)-L(mj)]
j=i
=
Ir;-nijIID(r)11
;=i
Theorem 4. Let n be an equilibrium state with J admissible phases-z at each of which G is differentiable, and
suppose that f is an admissible hypothetical phase.
Then D(f) 2: O.
Proof. Assume D( f) < O. Note that since n is an
equilibrium state, it is also a stationary state.
Choose the set of positive numbers [Ej J so that
j=i
or
G{(m)-G{(n)2:0 ....................... (A-2I)
for 1 :5i:5/, 1 :5}:5J. Also, let these numbers be sufficiently small that, when Lemma 2 is applied to
r= n j -E?
- n)
j ' F(r
j
j satisfies
Fj(-Ejf)<ID(f)11 m;lx (f;) . . . . . . . . . . , .. (A-2S)
I Sisl
Lemma 2. Let
be a stationary state with J nonzero
phases [n jJ. Then, for 1 :5}:5J, there is a functi(),n Fj
which approaches 0 as its argument approaches 0 and
for which
ID(r)1 :5F/Cr-n/) m;lx Ir;-n;jl . ........ (A-22)
.
. ISlsf
.
OCTOBER 1982
and
J
mJ+i =
b EJ ........................ (A-30)
j=i
741
m,
This state,
satisfies conservation of mass with
respect to the feed composition. Furthermore, each mij
is positive and each mj is admissible. It follows that
J+!
j=!
j=!
D(n j -E/)+(
j=!
J
~ ~
Ej)D(f)
j=!
J
[D(n j-E/)[+(
j=!
[D()[Ej+(
j=!
~ D(mj)= ~ D(mj)+D( ~
j=!
< ~
~ Ej)D()
j=!
=( ~ Ej)[[D()[+D()J
j=!
if D()<O. Thus,
Ej)D(l\
j=!
J+!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (A-32)
D(mj)<O .
j=!
Using Lemma 2,
+( ~ Ej)D()]
j=!
E+OO
=oC
=kPa
SPEJ
J
~ F ( - E r)E ( m;lx ei ) + ( ~
LJ }
}
} 1$ [ $ /
LJ!
j=!
742
J=
Original manuscript received in Society of Petroleum Engineers office Dec. 17, 1980.
E )D(
J
Paper accepted for publication May 2, 1982. Revised manuscript received July 6,
1982. Paper (SPE 9806) first presented at the 1981 SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery
Symposium held in Tulsa April 5-8.